Comparing the diagnostic efficacy of intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography volume registration in the detection of mandibular alveolar bone defects

Assessing the Impact of the Metal Artifact Reduction Tool on Detecting Furcation Lesions in Maxillary Molars with Different Intracanal Posts: An Ex Vivo Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study

INTRODUCTION

Considering the potential image compromise and diagnostic challenges posed by metals, this study aimed to assess the efficacy of the metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool in cone-beam computed tomography examinations for detecting furcation lesions in upper molars treated endodontically and restored with different intracanal posts.

METHODS

This ex vivo study used 45 endodontically treated maxillary first molars, categorized into the following3 groups (n = 15): control (without intracanal post), metal post, and fiberglass post. Simulations were conducted in the laboratory to replicate alveolar bone, periodontal ligament, and grade I, II, and III furcation lesions. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were obtained with and without the MAR tool, and the furcation lesions were evaluated considering a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed at 5%.

RESULTS

In the control group, there was no influence of MAR (P > .05); grade II lesions were not diagnosed, and grade III lesions were the most detected (P < .05). In the metal post group with MAR, grade III lesions were diagnosed more frequently than I and II (P < .05) and grade III without MAR (P < .05). In the fiberglass post group, the diagnosis of grade I lesions decreased with MAR (P < .05), and without MAR, grade III was most diagnosed (P < .05); grade III lesions were the most diagnosed (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The MAR tool was only effective for diagnosing grade III furcation lesions, regardless of the intracanal material. Its application for grade I and II lesions did not contribute to improved diagnosis. Furthermore, in the fiberglass post group with grade I lesions, the MAR tool negatively affected the detection of the lesions.

Buccal Bone Thickness in Anterior and Posterior Teeth-A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Immediate dental implant placement has been a subject of great interest over the last decade. Here, information regarding the anatomy and bone thickness of the jaw prior to dental implant placement is crucial to increase the surgery's success and the patient's safety. The clinical premises for this approach have been controversially discussed. One of those heavily discussed premises is a buccal bone thickness of at least 1 mm thickness. This meta-analysis aims to systematically review buccal bone thickness (BBT) in healthy patients. Thus, the feasibility of immediate dental implant placement in daily practice can be assessed. (2) Methods: A search in the electronic databases was performed to identify articles reporting on BBT that was measured by computed tomography in adults. (3) Results: We were able to find 45 studies, including 4324 patients with 25,452 analyzed teeth. The analysis showed a BBT at the alveolar crest of 0.76 ± 0.49 mm in the maxillary frontal and of 1.42 ± 0.74 mm in the maxillary posterior region. In the mandible, the average measured values were similar to those in the maxilla (front: 0.95 ± 0.58 mm; posterior: 1.20 ± 0.96 mm). In the maxillary frontal region 74.4% and in the mandibular frontal region 61.2% of the crestal buccal bones showed widths <1 mm. (4) Conclusions: In more than 60% of the cases, the BBT at the alveolar crest is <1 mm in maxillary and mandibular frontal regions. This anatomic data supports careful pre-surgical assessment, planning of a buccal graft, and critical selection of indication for immediate implant placement, especially in the maxillary and mandibular frontal and premolar region.