Prescribing patterns of opioid analgesics in a dental setting: 2013-2018

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids: United States, 2022: What dentists need to know

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published the Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain-United States, 2022 (CDCCPG) to replace the 2016 guideline. This guideline was designed to serve as a clinical tool to improve communication between clinicians and patients and empower them to make informed, person-centered decisions regarding pain management and the prescribing of opioids. It is intended for primary care and other clinicians, including dentists, who provide pain management for adults with acute, subacute, and chronic pain.

TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED

This article summarizes the CDCCPG, with an emphasis on information of relevance to dentistry.

RESULTS

For dentists, the most important recommendations for pain management are that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications are first-line medications for acute dental pain, interdisciplinary care for chronic orofacial pain is indicated, and opioids should only be prescribed for acute dental pain for a maximum of 3 days after risk assessment.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The CDCCPG contains a great deal of relevant information that can help dentists and dental specialists make safe, effective, and evidence-based decisions in providing pain control for their patients.

De-Implementing Opioids for Dental Extractions (DIODE): a multi-clinic, cluster-randomized trial of clinical decision support strategies in dentistry

BACKGROUND

Opioid pain relievers are commonly prescribed following dental extractions, but evidence shows that non-opioid analgesics often provide adequate pain relief with fewer risks. The current study examined clinical decision support (CDS) as a tool for de-implementing opioid prescribing in dentistry.

METHODS

This prospective, cluster-randomized trial examined CDS for dental pain management at 22 HealthPartners Dental Group clinics in Minnesota. Dental providers (n = 49) were randomized to deliver care using CDS, CDS with patient education materials (CDS-E), or standard practice (SP). Randomization was stratified by provider type (dentist vs. oral surgeon) and baseline opioid prescribing volume. Patient records of dental extractions were examined for January 2019 through May 2021, representing a 12-month baseline and 15-month intervention period (N = 12,924). Opioid prescription at the visit (no vs. yes) was the primary outcome. Data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models, adjusting for patient sex and age, extraction complexity, and baseline prescribing strata (volume and provider type).

RESULTS

Patients were 56.2% female, with a mean age of 46.7 (SD = 20.0) years. Providers were 8% oral surgeons, 57% female, and with a mean age of 43.7 (SD = 11.2) years. There were significant decreases in opioid prescribing during the study (P < 0.001), representing a continuation of pre-existing trends to reduce opioid prescribing in these dental practices. There were no significant differences in opioid prescribing between CDS and SP (OR = 1.29; 97.5% CI = 0.93, 1.79; P = 0.08), or CDS-E and SP arms (OR = 1.27; 97.5% CI = 0.86, 1.79; P = 0.18). The direction of the association favored greater reductions in opioid prescribing in the SP arm. Despite training and implementation support, utilization of the CDS was low, particularly among oral surgeons, who were significantly more likely than other dentists to prescribe opioids. Among non-oral surgeon providers with the opportunity to access it, CDS utilization was not significantly associated with opioid prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS

Equipping dentists with CDS resources, whether alone or accompanied by patient education materials, did not accelerate reductions in opioid prescribing beyond those observed in standard practice. Strategies are needed to enhance CDS utilization for patient care and safety surrounding analgesia following dental extractions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03584789.

Quantifying unused opioids following emergency and ambulatory care: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Objective

To quantify unused opioids among adult and pediatric patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) or ambulatory care settings with a prescription for acute pain.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, and the gray literature from inception to April 29, 2021. We included observational studies in which any patient with an acutely painful condition received a prescription for an opioid on discharge from an outpatient care setting, and unused opioids were quantified. Two reviewers screened records for eligibility, extracted data, and conducted the quality assessment. Where possible, we pooled data and otherwise described the results of studies narratively. Total unused prescriptions were synthesized using a weighted average. Random effects models were used, and heterogeneity was measured by the I² statistic. Our primary outcome was the quantity of unused opioid medication available after receiving a prescription for acute pain. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients with unused opioids following a prescription, the proportion of patients using no opioids, morphine equivalents of unused opioids, and factors associated with leftover opioids.

Results

In this systematic review and meta‐analysis of 9 studies in emergency and ambulatory care settings, 59.6% of prescribed opioids remained unused; pediatric patients had 69.3% of their prescriptions remaining, compared to 54.6% among adult patients. The highest proportion of unused opioids was found following dental extractions (82.6%).

Conclusions and Relevance

More than 50% of opioids remain unused following prescriptions for acute pain. Responsible prescribing must be accompanied by education on safer use, storage, and disposal.

Association of sociodemographic factors with the prescription pattern of opioids for dental patients: a systematic review

Aim To evaluate the association of patients' sociodemographic factors (sex, age, ethnicity, income, educational level, living environment and health insurance) with the prescription pattern of opioids provided by oral health practitioners.Methods Observational studies that evaluated the association of patients' sociodemographic factors and the likelihood of receiving an opioid prescription provided by an oral health practitioner were eligible. Electronic searches were conducted in Medline (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, SciELO, Google Scholar, and OpenGrey up to March 2021. Two authors independently screened the studies, performed data extraction, and assessed the risk-of-bias using the critical appraisal tools developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Certainty of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).Results Eight studies were included in this systematic review. Publication year ranged from 2011 to 2021. Narrative synthesis showed with very low certainty of evidence that younger individuals were more likely to receive a prescription of opioids than older individuals. Regarding the other sociodemographic factors and the prescriptions of opioids in dentistry, the evidence is controversial. Risk of bias was low for most items assessed in the included studies.Conclusion The available evidence suggests that there is an association between patients' sociodemographic factors and the prescription patterns of opioids provided by oral health practitioners.

Comparison of Analgesic Prescriptions for Dental Pain and Patient Pain Outcomes Before vs After an Opioid Reduction Initiative

This cross-sectional study compares prescribing patterns of opioid and nonopioid analgesics and patients’ dental pain outcomes before vs after implementation of an opioid reduction initiative at a single dental clinic.

Factors influencing opioid prescribing after tooth extraction

BACKGROUND

Tooth extractions account for most opioid prescriptions from dentists, but specific characteristics that influence likelihood are less established. Improving understanding can facilitate development of tailored interventions to reduce unnecessary opioid prescribing.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of patients 12 years and older undergoing tooth extraction at the College of Dentistry at the University of Kentucky from 2013 through 2020. The primary end point was issuance of an opioid prescription related to the encounter.

RESULTS

In 44,387 eligible records analyzed, 10,628 (23.9%) patients received an opioid prescription. Results of multivariable logistic regression found that the factors associated with an opioid prescription included receipt of a nonopioid analgesic prescription (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 11.36; 95% CI, 10.37 to 12.44), receipt of an antibiotic prescription (aOR, 8.29; 95% CI, 7.57 to 9.08), procedural sedation (aOR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.93 to 2.31), surgical extraction (aOR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.84 to 2.10), and third molar extractions (1 tooth: aOR, 1.14; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.25; 2 teeth: aOR, 2.09; 95% CI, 2.87 to 2.34; 3 teeth: aOR, 2.73; 95% CI, 2.36 to 3.15; 4 teeth: aOR, 3.45; 95% CI, 3.10 to 3.83). Factors that decreased risk included having an appointment in 2018 or later (aOR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.33), in a student (aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.65) or resident (aOR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.36) clinic, and on any day other than Friday (Monday: aOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.91; Tuesday: aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.99; Wednesday: aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.97; Thursday: aOR, 0.88; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid prescriptions after tooth extraction were common in patients undergoing more extensive procedures. Provider perceptions, habits, and several clinical factors appeared to influence prescribing patterns.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The decision to prescribe an opioid appears to be associated with habits and factors perceived to modulate postoperative pain, which may serve as targets for opioid reduction strategies.

Association of sociodemographic factors with the prescription pattern of opioids for dental patients: A systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Oral health practitioners are responsible for a significant share of opioid prescriptions that seem to be influenced by many aspects, including sociodemographic factors. However, there is no consensus on the factors associated with opioid prescription in Dentistry.

OBJECTIVE

To identify whether patients' sociodemographic factors are associated with the prescription pattern of opioids in Dentistry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review will include observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort). Electronic searches will be conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, Web of science, LILACS, SciELO, and Google Scholar. Grey literature will also be consulted. Two independent reviewers will screen all retrieved articles for eligibility, extract data, and assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The results will be presented as a narrative synthesis and, where possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted. Certainty of the evidence will be assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42020211226.

Variations in Schedule III prescription patterns in a Medicaid population pre- and post-policy

The present study investigated variations in patient movement patterns between prescribers before and after House Bill 1 (HB1) implementation in Kentucky using network abstractions (PPN: prescriber-prescriber networks) from a one-month cross-sectional Schedule III prescription data in a Medicaid population. Network characteristics such as degree centrality distribution of PPN was positively skewed and revealed Dental Practitioners to be the highly connected specialty with opioid analgesic hydrocodone-acetaminophen to be the most commonly prescribed drug. Taxonomy enrichment of the prescriber specialties in PPN using chi-square test revealed a reduction in the enriched taxonomies Post-HB1 compared to Pre-HB1 with Dental practitioners being constitutively enriched (p < 0.05). PPNs were also found to exhibit rich community structure revealing inherent clustering of prescribers as a result of patient movement, and were markedly different from those generated by random graph models. The magnitude of deviation from random graphs decreased Post-HB1 relative to Pre-HB1. The proposed network approach provides system-level insights into prescribers with potential to complement classical reductionist approaches and aggregate statistical measures used in assessing changes in prescription patterns pre- and post- policy implementation. It can provide preliminary cues into drug seeking behavior, and facilitate targeted surveillance of prescriber communities.

Patterns of opioid prescribing in an Appalachian college of dentistry

BACKGROUND

Nonopioids provide sufficient analgesia with less risk after most dental procedures, but opioid prescriptions are still common. This study analyzed opioid prescribing characteristics on the basis of patient demographics and procedure types.

METHODS

The authors conducted a secondary analysis of an existing data set of opioid prescriptions issued from 2013 through 2018 from a college of dentistry in central Appalachia. Opioid prescriptions for young children or liquids were excluded. The authors analyzed prescriptions according to patient age group and sedation level required for surgical procedures.

RESULTS

Of 12,464 opioid prescriptions analyzed, 70% were written after extractions or surgical procedures. More than one-half (57.3%) were written for patients younger than 45 years. Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients received prescriptions of higher quantities (mean [standard deviation], 20.9 [6.4] pills; 95% confidence interval, 20.6 to 21.1) and of longer durations (mean [standard deviation], 3.3 [1.5] days; 95% confidence interval, 3.2 to 3.4) than other groups (P < .001; 1-way analysis of variance).

CONCLUSIONS

AYA patients received more opioids than older patients after dental procedures, which is concerning given the high risk associated with AYA opioid exposure. Faculty in colleges of dentistry should educate students and residents on the risks and benefits of opioid therapy as well as alternative analgesics and via exemplifying appropriate prescribing behavior.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

AYA patients represent a seemingly unidentified high-risk age group for dentists. Dentists who perform invasive procedures must examine carefully opioid prescription necessity and prescribe in a manner consistent with best practices.