Prevalence of acute oral mucosal damage secondary to the use of systemic antineoplastics: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Oral specimens as a tool for accurate metagenomic analysis: A pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Acute oral mucosal damage, as well as other inflammatory processes seem to be related to dysbiosis of the oral microbiome. The need to study changes in the oral microbiome led us to hypothesize what type of sample would provide the most representative picture of the entire human oral microbiome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational, and cross-sectional study was carried out. Six healthy adult participants provided 3 different sample types each, that included saliva, oral rinse and mucosal biopsy tissue. We performed 16S rRNA sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 18 samples using Illumina MiSeq technology.

RESULTS

Participants were 27 ± 6,3 years old. Bacterial alpha diversity was higher in oral rinse samples compared to whole unstimulated saliva and oral mucosa tissue (p = 0,005). However, saliva specimens showed a 56 % relative abundance of identified species followed by a 30 % in oral rinse and only 1 % in tissue samples.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found differences on oral microbiome composition for each type of sample. Oral rinse should be chosen when higher alpha diversity is needed, whereas whole unstimulated saliva should be more appropriate for larger amount of bacterial DNA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results obtained demonstrate the importance of a correct choice of the optimal type of oral sample for microbiome studies due to the differences found in its composition.

Oral Mucositis in Adult Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: Six-Month On-Treatment Follow-Up

Objectives. Oral mucositis (OM) is a common adverse reaction associated with chemotherapy. We conducted a six-month longitudinal study to estimate the cumulative incidence of OM during the first six months of chemotherapy in adult patients with cancer other than head and neck cancer. Secondary objectives were as follows: (a) to scrutinize the oral health status of these patients and its evolution during chemotherapy, as assessed by oral health indices; (b) to estimate adherence to prescribed oral hygiene protocol during chemotherapy; and (c) to analyze ulceration-free survival in these patients. Methods. Sixty-four patients participated. Dental health and oral hygiene were assessed at baseline and at the end. Every month, blood tests were performed and oral lesions were recorded. This study was observational, with the only intervention being instruction in the hygiene protocol. The cumulative incidence of OM was estimated with the patient as the unit of analysis. A repeated measures ANOVA was applied to analyze the monthly blood test results. Ulceration-free survival analysis was conducted with adherence to the oral hygiene protocol as a grouping factor, followed by Cox proportional-hazards regression. Results. The six-month cumulative incidence rate was 43.75%, 95%CI (31.58-56.67%) for OM grade 2 or higher. The hazard ratio of ulceration associated with adherence to the hygiene protocol was 0.154, 95%CI (0.049-0.483), adjusted for age, sex, baseline hygiene index, and class of treatment. Conclusions. Compliance with hygiene recommendations would decrease the OM risk by more than six times, compared to non-compliance.

Cancer-related pain in head and neck cancer survivors: longitudinal findings from the Head and Neck 5000 clinical cohort

PURPOSE

Reports suggest pain is common in head and neck cancer (HNC). However, past studies are limited by small sample sizes and design and measurement heterogeneity. Using data from the Head and Neck 5000 longitudinal cohort, we investigated pain over a year post-diagnosis. We assessed: temporal trends; compared pain across HNC treatments, stages, sites and by HPV status; and identified subgroups of patients at increased risk of pain.

METHODS

Sociodemographic and clinical data and patient-reported pain (measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35) were collected at baseline (pre-treatment), 4- and 12- months. Using mixed effects multivariable regression, we investigated time trends and identified associations between (i) clinically-important general pain and (ii) HN-specific pain and clinical, socio-economic, and demographic variables.

RESULTS

2,870 patients were included. At baseline, 40.9% had clinically-important general pain, rising to 47.6% at 4-months and declining to 35.5% at 12-months. HN-specific pain followed a similar pattern (mean score (sd): baseline 26.4 (25.10); 4-months. 28.9 (26.55); 12-months, 17.2 (19.83)). Across time, general and HN-specific pain levels were increased in: younger patients, smokers, and those with depression and comorbidities at baseline, and more advanced, oral cavity and HPV negative cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

There is high prevalence of general pain in people living with HNC. We identified subgroups more often reporting general and HN-specific pain towards whom interventions could be targeted.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Greater emphasis should be placed on identifying and treating pain in HNC. Systematic pain screening could help identify those who could benefit from an early pain management plan.