Repeated intravitreal high-dosage injections of triamcinolone acetonide for diffuse diabetic macular edema

Clinical and imaging biomarkers of response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in eyes with non-infectious uveitic macular oedema

OBJECTIVE

To investigate clinical and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) biomarkers correlating with pre-injection visual acuity (VA), post-injection VA, and the likelihood of macular oedema (MO) regression following dexamethasone (DEX) implant injection in non-infectious uveitic (NIU) patients.

METHODS

Patient data from Uveitis Services in Milan, Paris, and Berlin were analysed. Eligible participants were NIU patients aged >18 years with MO as the primary indication for DEX treatment. SD-OCT scans and clinical data were collected at the time of DEX injection (pre-injection visit) and after 3 months (post-injection visit). Multivariable regression models, adjusted for pre-injection VA and lens status, were employed to explore associations. MO regression was defined as the absence of intraretinal/subretinal fluid at the post-injection visit.

RESULTS

Our analysis comprised data from 173 DEX treatments, encompassing 103 eyes from 80 patients, with 38 eyes (37%) receiving repeated DEX injections. The absence of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) layer and disorganisation of the inner retinal layers (DRIL) were associated with worse pre- (+0.19 LogMAR, 95% CI 0.01-0.38, p = 0.06, and +0.10 LogMAR, 95% CI 0.02-0.21, p = 0.01) and post-injection VA (+0.33 LogMAR, 95% CI 0.08-0.57, p = 0.01, and +0.17 LogMAR, 95% CI 0.01-0.32, p = 0.04). EZ disruption and DRIL increased significantly (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04), and the chance of gaining ≥5 letters declined in eyes undergoing repeated DEX (p = 0.002). The rate of MO regression after each DEX was 67%. Prolonged MO duration (OR = 0.75/each year, p = 0.02) was associated with reduced likelihood of MO regression. Subretinal fluid was associated with higher rate of MO regression (OR = 6.09, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Integrity of the inner and outer retina is associated with better visual response to DEX. Long-standing or recurrent MO is associated with less chance of both visual and anatomic response. Timely treatment is necessary to maximise the outcomes of MO in NIU patients.

A randomized clinical trial of triamcinolone acetonide injection for suppression of inflammation after blepharoptosis surgery

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of triamcinolone acetonide in suppressing inflammation after blepharoptosis surgery. The study was designed as prospective, randomized, two medical centers' clinical trial. Thirty-two patients with involutional blepharoptosis of the same degree in both eyelids underwent bilateral transcutaneous levator advancement. At the end of the surgery, 4 mg/0.1 ml of triamcinolone acetonide was injected into a randomly selected upper eyelid. The fellow eyelid was not injected and was used as control. Facial photographs were taken on day 1, week 1, month 1, and month 3, and the degree of inflammation, the margin reflex distance 1 (MRD-1), and levator function (LF) between the two eyelids of each patient were compared. The primary outcome was the selection of the less inflamed eyelid decided by the majority of three individuals unrelated to the study. MRD-1 and LF were analyzed for secondary outcomes. As a result, the injected eyelid was judged to be the less inflamed eyelid in all cases. The MRD-1 in the postoperative period less than 1 month was significantly larger in the injected eyelids than the control eyelids (P<0.03). The postsurgical MRD-1 at month 3, the postsurgical LF at all postsurgical examination times were not statistically different. Adverse complications by the injection, including ptosis, levator dysfunction, increase of the intraocular pressure, and visual disturbance were not observed. In conclusion, a triamcinolone acetonide injection after ptosis surgery is both safe and effective in reducing the early postsurgical inflammation and helpful in an earlier return to a daily routine for the patients.

Current concepts of pharmacotherapy of diabetic macular edema

Introduction: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a sight threatening disease and a major cause for blindness for people in working age. The pathogenesis is multifactorial and complex. The pharmacotherapy of DME addresses both the inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by the intravitreal injection of VEGF inhibitors and inflammatory processes by the intravitreal application of steroids. Several trials have been published reporting on the efficacy and safety of these treatments.Areas covered: This review discusses original research articles including basic science and clinical studies as well as review articles focusing on the role of inflammation and VEGF expression in DME. It discusses newly published clinical trials on intravitreal pharmacotherapy for DME. The literature was searched using Medline/PubMed and was selected given its relevance for the topic to be discussed.Expert opinion: Our knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of diabetic macular edema has significantly increased. Some of these insights have been successfully transferred into current treatment strategies already including VEGF suppression or anti-inflammatory treatments using steroids. The identification of additional pathophysiological aspects and their relevance as potential treatment targets will be a future challenge in the treatment of DME. A better knowledge on the complex pathophysiology will also help to establish combination strategies.

Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Practice Guidelines: Customized for Iranian Population

PURPOSE

To customize clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for management of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the Iranian population.

METHODS

Three DR CPGs (The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2013, American Academy of Ophthalmology [Preferred Practice Pattern 2012], and Australian Diabetes Society 2008) were selected from the literature using the AGREE tool. Clinical questions were designed and summarized into four tables by the customization team. The components of the clinical questions along with pertinent recommendations extracted from the above-mentioned CPGs; details of the supporting articles and their levels of evidence; clinical recommendations considering clinical benefits, cost and side effects; and revised recommendations based on customization capability (applicability, acceptability, external validity) were recorded in 4 tables, respectively. Customized recommendations were sent to the faculty members of all universities across the country to score the recommendations from 1 to 9.

RESULTS

Agreed recommendations were accepted as the final recommendations while the non-agreed ones were approved after revision. Eventually, 29 customized recommendations under three major categories consisting of screening, diagnosis and treatment of DR were developed along with their sources and levels of evidence.

CONCLUSION

This customized CPGs for management of DR can be used to standardize the referral pathway, diagnosis and treatment of patients with diabetic retinopathy.

Retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) in its treatment

Purpose

To review published data pertaining to the clinical experience with a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) with a view to establishing a clinically based therapeutic regime.

Methods

A PubMed search using the MeSH terms “retinal vein occlusion” and either “pathophysiology” or “dexamethasone intravitreal implant” was undertaken for manuscripts published until August 2015. The analysis included studies involving minimally 15 patients under a prospective design or 30 under a retrospective design, a minimal follow up of 6 months, and at least 2 intravitreal Ozurdex® injections per eye.

Results

In the vast majority of eyes, satisfactory outcomes were achieved with retreatment intervals of between 3 and 5 months. Initial evidence indicates a similar efficacy compared to anti-VEGF therapies as a first-line treatment. Safety concerns associated with the long-term and repeated use of Ozurdex® are not borne out by clinical findings: its implantation is not associated with a sustained increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) over time or with the number of applications.

Conclusion

Compared with anti-VEGF therapies, the burden of retreatment is reduced. In patients with chronic macular edema not responsive to repetitive anti-VEGF therapies, the outcome after dexamethasone implant treatment is encouraging. However, these results are achieved at the expense of side effects typically associated with steroids: in up to 20 % of the Ozurdex®-treated patients, an elevation in IOP, which could be medically controlled in the majority of cases, and cataract formation or progression was observed.

Efficacy of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide for Diabetic Macular Edema After Vitrectomy

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for diabetic macular edema (DME) in vitrectomized eyes with DME without vitrectomy eyes.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative study evaluated the efficacy of IVTA treatment of DME in 26 consecutive eyes (23 patients). Changes in mean best-corrected visual acuity (VA) and mean central retinal thickness (CRT) were retrospectively evaluated before IVTA and during the 6-month period after IVTA.

RESULTS

Subjects were divided into 2 groups: 13 consecutive eyes (11 patients) with proliferative diabetic retinopathy or DME that underwent vitrectomy (vitrectomized group), and 13 consecutive eyes (12 patients) with DME who received IVTA, but did not undergo vitrectomy (nonvitrectomized group). In the vitrectomized group, there was a significantly decreased CRT for up to 4 months as compared to the thicknesses before IVTA. In the nonvitrectomized group, there was a significantly decreased CRT for up to 5 months after IVTA. In both groups, there was significant improvement in the VA for up to 4 months after IVTA.

CONCLUSION

IVTA may represent a valid treatment option for DME, even in vitrectomized eyes.

Role of implants in the treatment of diabetic macular edema: focus on the dexamethasone intravitreal implant

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the leading cause of sight-threatening complication in diabetic patients, and several treatment modalities have been developed and evaluated to treat this pathology. Intravitreal agents, such as anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) or corticosteroids, have become more popular in recent years and are widely used for treating DME. Sustained release drugs appear to be mentioned more often nowadays for extending the period of intravitreal activity, and corticosteroids play a key role in inhibiting the inflammatory process in DME. A potent corticosteroid, dexamethasone (Ozurdex(®)), in the form of an intravitreal implant, has been approved for various ocular etiologies among which DME is also one. This review evaluates the role of implants in the treatment of DME, mainly focusing on the dexamethasone intravitreal implant.

Behavior of intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide among egyptians

PURPOSE

To evaluate the changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide for the management of diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

The study design is a prospective, interventional, two-arm, dose-response study. Nineteen patients with bilateral DME were included, one eye for every patient underwent intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide (group A, 19 eyes), and the other eye of the same patient underwent intravitreal injection of 8 mg triamcinolone acetonide (group B, 19 eyes); the selection as to which eye was to receive either dose was random. The patients were followed up for 6 months after injection; complete ophthalmological examination and optical coherent topography were done.

RESULTS

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide was effective in reduction of DME in group A in the first 3 months only, while in group B with high dose (8 mg) the improvement continued for 6 months after injection. Significant IOP rise was observed in both groups with an incidence of 68.1% and 73.7% in groups A and B, respectively. IOP-lowering drugs were used to control IOP; however, one patient in each group needed glaucoma filtration surgery in both eyes after intractable glaucoma with failure of medical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Although intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide is very effective in managing DME and with lower cost than other modalities, the rise in IOP and the burden of glaucoma are major concerns. High corticosteroid responder is an individualized reaction irrespective of the intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide dose used.

Treatment options for diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To describe the current management of diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME).

METHODS

Review and discussion of the literature regarding DDME.

RESULTS

Diffuse diabetic macular edema is a condition that can be managed by means of several treatment options, including focal/grid laser photocoagulation, intravitreal or periocular corticosteroids, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though there is no randomized clinical trial specifically designed to assess the best treatment approach for DDME, new therapeutic approaches based on intravitreal injections of corticosteroid and anti-VEGF molecules offer new hope for its management.

Fluocinolone acetonide and its potential in the treatment of chronic diabetic macular edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a potentially sight-threatening disease that predominantly affects patients with type 2 diabetes. The pathogenesis is complex, with many contributing factors involved. In addition to overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor in the diabetic eye, there is an inflammatory pathway that contributes to the breakdown of the blood-retina barrier and nonperfusion. In addition to vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, clinical and experimental investigations underline the great potential of steroids in the treatment of DME. Fluocinolone acetonide is currently the only corticosteroid approved for the treatment of DME in Europe. It is manufactured as an intravitreal insert, releasing fluocinolone acetonide at a rate of 0.2 μg per day. Phase III clinical studies have demonstrated that the beneficial effect of the fluocinolone acetonide insert lasts up to 3 years. Improvement in visual acuity was especially remarkable in patients with a prolonged duration of DME of at least 3 years at the initiation of therapy. Cataract formation occurs in nearly all phakic eyes treated, and needs to be considered when the indication for treatment is made. Given the efficacy versus potential complications of the insert, fluocinolone acetonide represents a promising second-line treatment option in patients with DME. Fluocinolone appears to be especially beneficial for patients whose options for visual recovery have seemed limited up until now.

Intravitreal bevacizumab alone versus combined with macular photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema

Purpose

To compare the efficacy between intravitreal bevacizumab and combination treatment (bevacizumab and macular photocoagulation) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). In addtion, changes of DME type were researched using optical coherence tomography.

Methods

The present study included 90 eyes with bevacizumab injection and 38 eyes with combination treatment. Using chart records, patients were reviewed until 6 months after treatment. The present study compared changes of visual acuity (VA) and macular thickness at each follow up. DME was classified into 4 types and the morphologic pattern was compared.

Results

In patients with the bevacizumab injection only, VA improved from 0.29 ± 0.18 to 0.48 ± 0.26 at 1 month and returned to 0.32 ± 0.20 at 6 months after treatment. In the combination treatment, VA improved from 0.32 ± 0.22 to 0.52 ± 0.26 at 1 month and returned to 0.36 ± 0.18 at 6 months after treatment. There was no significant improvement of VA at the final follow-up with either treatment. There was significant decrease of macular thickness except in the mixed DME type.

Conclusions

The combination treatment did not yield better VA or macular thickness reduction at 6 months than bevacizumab injection alone. By classifying and observing the change of DME type, determining the treatment objectively and predicting the effectiveness of treatment can be helpful.

Intravitreal bevacizumab vs intravitreal triamcinolone combined with macular laser grid for diffuse diabetic macular oedema

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 12-month clinical outcome of patients with persistent non-ischaemic diffuse diabetic macular oedema (DME) treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) or with intravitreal injection of triamcinolone combined with macular laser grid (IVTA-MLG) from September 2005 to February 2008.

METHODS

Retrospective interventional comparative study. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS LogMAR scale) and foveal thickness (FT) at optical coherence tomography (OCT) were obtained at baseline and during 12 months after first treatment. Re-treatment was based on clinical or OCT-based evidence of persistent macular oedema or deterioration in visual acuity.

RESULTS

Forty-three eyes (32 patients) with DME were treated with IVB. Ninety-six eyes (52 patients) with DME were treated with combined laser grid treatment and intravitreal triamcinolone. At baseline, mean BCVA and FT were 0.92+/-0.34 LogMAR and 372+/-22 microm in the IVTA-MLG group, and 1.07+/-0.49 LogMAR and 423+/-33 microm in the IVB group, respectively. At 1- and 3-month visits, BCVA and FT had significantly improved in both groups. After 6 and 12 months, the IVB group experienced a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity (0.83+/-0.21 LogMAR, P<0.001 at 6 months; BCVA 0.86+/-0.24 LogMAR, P<0.001 at 12 months) and FT (248+/-18 microm, P<0.001 at 6 months; 262+/-28 microm, P=0.001 at 12 months) when compared with baseline, whereas the IVTA-MLG group did not show statistically significant improvement in vision and FT. An increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) was present in 10 of 96 (10.4%) eyes treated with IVTA-MLG, and in two cases it was resistant to topical treatment. No significant side effects were reported in the IVB group.

CONCLUSIONS

At 6 and 12 months after first treatment for chronic DME IVB provided significant improvement of BCVA and FT, whereas improvement after IVTA-MLG was not significant. Increased IOP occurred in 10.4% of patients who received IVTA, with two patients requiring trabeculectomy.

[Intravitreous injection: retrospective study on 2028 injections and their side effects]

OBJECTIVE

To observe the tolerance of repeated intravitreous injections over the short and long term and to analyze their complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The clinical records of consecutive patients having one or several intravitreous injections between 2002 and 2007 were evaluated, for all indications except the treatment of endophthalmitis.

RESULTS

2028 intravitreous injections were performed, mainly for age-related macular degeneration (n=1 192) or macular edema secondary to diabetes mellitus or retinal vein occlusion (n=41). The injected drug was triamcinolone acetonide 4 mg (339 injections), pegaptanib sodium 0.3 mg (1179 injections), and ranibizumab 0.3 (497 injections). The patients received 1-27 intravitreous injections per eye. The main complications were endophthalmitis (two after triamcinolone, 0.1% of the total group), pseudoendophthalmitis (two after triamcinolone, 0.1% of the total group), hypertony (7.69% of the total group, 13.78% after triamcinolone, 3.56% after pegaptanib, 1.21% after ranibizumab), including five cases of acute hypertony with transient light perception loss after ranibizumab, cataract (0.44% of total group), and macular hole (one patient after triamcinolone). No case of retinal detachment nor systemic complication was observed.

DISCUSSION

Most of the complications were observed with the use of nonfiltered triamcinolone. The incidence of endophtalmitis was considerably lower with increased experience and the use of a dedicated room for the injections. Repeated injections were locally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

With the strict respect of asepsis rules, intravitreous injection seems well tolerated over the short and long term.

Repeated peribulbar injections of triamcinolone acetonide: a successful and safe treatment for moderate to severe Graves' ophthalmopathy

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of peribulbar triamcinolone injections to treat inflammatory signs of Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) in patients with moderate to severe GO and associated optic neuropathy (ON).

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with active GO [clinical activity score (CAS) > or = 4] and systemic thyroid disease under control were enrolled in this prospective pilot study. Peribulbar triamcinolone acetonide was injected in each orbit (42 eyes), in four doses of 20 mg at 2-week intervals. Ophthalmological examination including CAS evaluation, visual field, computerized tomography (CT) scan and digital photography were performed before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (11 with moderate disease, 10 with ON) were enrolled in this study and followed for at least 14 months. Initial mean CAS was 6.38 +/- 1.49, which dropped to 1.8 +/- 1.12 after 6 months of treatment (P = 0.01; mean difference of 4.57 +/- 1.56; range 1-8 score points). ON was diagnosed in 10 patients. Of these, 66% improved with peribulbar triamcinolone exclusively. A transitory increase in intraocular pressure in two patients was controlled with topic medication.

CONCLUSION

Peribulbar triamcinolone injections reduce the inflammatory signs of moderate GO, as measured by the CAS, and could also be used as an alternative treatment for ON. Randomized clinical trials are needed to compare the results of triamcinolone peribulbar injections to those of other treatment modalities.

Inflammatory cystoid macular edema

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to update our current understanding and management of inflammatory cystoid macular edema.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cystoid macular edema is a common cause of visual loss in uveitis, which occurs predominantly in older patients with chronic uveitis forms and might be heralded by subclinical changes on optic coherence tomography. Cystoid macular edema is emerging as a major cause of visual loss in HIV-infected patients with immune recovery uveitis. Elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines and vascular endothelial growth factor were found in all types of cystoid macular edema. Treatment with anti-inflammatory and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs is widely applied for all forms of cystoid macular edema and usually has a beneficial, but temporary effect. So far, there are no clear guidelines for the treatment of subclinical cystoid macular edema in uveitis. The effect of vitrectomy in inflammatory cystoid macular edema is not yet clear and might become more important in the future. Recent advances in management include intravitreal drug delivery systems of cystoid macular edema-modifying drugs.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes current thoughts on inflammatory cystoid macular edema focusing on the new, clinically relevant findings. Upcoming data on aqueous constituents in cystoid macular edema and imaging with the new generation of optic coherence tomography offer the hope that a better treatment strategy will soon be established.

Changes of intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (avastin)

PURPOSE

To determine changes and need to monitor intraocular pressure (IOP) following intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin).

METHODS

Seventy patients (122 injections) underwent an intravitreal injection of Avastin for exudative age-related macular degeneration treatment. Forty-one eyes (59%) had single injection, 29 eyes (41%) had repeated injections. IOP was measured before and after Avastin injection at 3, 10, and 15 minutes. Twenty-nine eyes were evaluated for baseline IOP changes after multiple injections. Statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Baseline mean IOP was 15.17 +/- 3.42 mm Hg, with range from 08 mm Hg to 23 mm Hg. Postinjection 3 minutes the IOP had risen to a mean of 36.27 +/- 5.1 mm Hg and fell spontaneously to a mean of 24.56 +/- 5.9 mm Hg at 10 minutes. Ten eyes (14%) needed 15 minutes to drop below 30 mm Hg. All eyes were below 30 mm Hg at 15 minutes. No significant change between multiple baseline IOP measurements was detected.

CONCLUSION

Avastin injections caused a predictable probably volume-related rise in IOP which never occluded the central retinal artery and which spontaneously fell to below 30 mm Hg in all eyes within 15 minutes. This strong safety profile provides guidelines on monitoring IOP after Avastin injections. There was no IOP change after multiple injections.

Triple therapy of vitrectomy, intravitreal triamcinolone, and macular laser photocoagulation for intractable diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of a sequentially combined triple therapy on intractable diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

Prospective, interventional case series.

METHODS

Twenty-four eyes from 24 subjects, diagnosed with intractable DME of nontractional origin, were subjected to vitrectomy. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and macular laser photocoagulation were conducted sequentially at one and 14 days after vitrectomy. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded before surgery and at three, six, and 12 months after triple therapy.

RESULTS

The mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVAs before and three, six, and 12 months after the triple therapy were 0.88 +/- 0.37, 0.55 +/- 0.33, 0.56 +/- 0.27, and 0.48 +/- 0.28, respectively. The mean (+/- SD) CMTs before and three, six, and 12 months after the triple therapy were 514 +/- 187 microm, 253 +/- 138 microm, 219 +/- 95 microm, and 197 +/- 91 microm, respectively. The changes in both BCVA and CMT at three, six, and 12 months from baseline were statistically significant (P < .003). The major adverse events after triple therapy were development of nuclear sclerotic cataracts (eight among 12 phakic eyes) and elevation of intraocular pressure (eight among 24 eyes).

CONCLUSIONS

The triple therapy may facilitate early recovery of vision and may improve the long-term outcomes in some patients with DME refractory to conventional monotherapy.

Quantification of sedimented triamcinolone for intravitreal injection

PURPOSE

To develop a practical method to concentrate triamcinolone acetonide for intravitreal injection.

METHODS

A protocol using sedimentation was developed to increase the concentration of triamcinolone acetonide in a 0.1 mL dose. Two variables were investigated: sedimentation time and initial volume of triamcinolone acetonide. Predetermined volumes (0.2 mL to 1 mL) of triamcinolone acetonide were aspirated into tuberculin syringes. Each syringe was placed in a vertical position for a designated time (0 to 120 minutes). The supernatant was then discarded to reduce the volume to 0.1 mL. High-performance liquid chromatography was then used for quantification of the triamcinolone acetonide.

RESULTS

The greatest concentrations of triamcinolone acetonide were seen after 120 minutes of sedimentation. At that time point, the 0.2 mL, 0.3 mL, and 0.5 mL initial volumes resulted in, respectively, 7.4 mg +/- 0.8 mg (mean +/- SE), 9.8 mg +/- 0.2 mg, and 16.4 mg +/- 0.7 mg triamcinolone acetonide in 0.1 mL. The 1.0-mL initial volume resulted in 25.7 mg +/- 0.9 mg triamcinolone acetonide in 0.1 mL; this was the maximum concentration achieved in the experiment.

CONCLUSION

The authors have developed a simple protocol to use sedimentation to greatly increase the concentration of triamcinolone acetonide, starting from commercially available triamcinolone acetonide up to a maximum of 25.7 mg per 0.1 mL (257 +/- 9 mg/mL). This study demonstrates a practical and quantifiable method to increase triamcinolone concentration for intravitreal injections.

Sustained-release ophthalmic drug delivery systems for treatment of macular disorders: present and future applications

Macular disease currently poses the greatest threat to vision in aging populations. Historically, most of this pathology could only be dealt with surgically, and then only after much damage to the macula had already occurred. Current pathophysiological insights into macular diseases have allowed the development of effective new pharmacotherapies. The field of drug delivery systems has advanced over the last several years with emphasis placed on controlled release of drug to specific areas of the eye. Its unique location and tendency toward chronic disease make the macula an important and attractive target for drug delivery systems, especially sustained-release systems. This review evaluates the current literature on the research and development of sustained-release posterior segment drug delivery systems that are primarily intended for macular disease with an emphasis on age-related macular degeneration.Current effective therapies include corticosteroids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor compounds. Recent successes have been reported using anti-angiogenic drugs for therapy of age-related macular degeneration. This review also includes information on implantable devices (biodegradable and non-biodegradable), the use of injected particles (microspheres and liposomes) and future enhanced drug delivery systems, such as ultrasound drug delivery. The devices reviewed show significant drug release over a period of days or weeks. However, macular disorders are chronic diseases requiring years of treatment. Currently, there is no 'gold standard' for therapy and/or drug delivery. Future studies will focus on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of drug delivery to the posterior chamber. If successful, therapeutic modalities will significantly delay loss of vision and improve the quality of life for patients with chronic macular disorders.

Efficacy and safety of multiple intravitreal triamcinolone injections for refractory diabetic macular oedema

AIM

The efficacy and safety of repeated injections of intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) for diabetic macular oedema is unclear, with results of previous reports conflicting.

METHODS

This is a prospective, observational case series of 27 eyes receiving IVTA for diabetic macular oedema. LogMAR visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at baseline and in 3 to 6 monthly intervals for up to 24 months, then correlated with the number of IVTA injections given.

RESULTS

One IVTA injection was required in 6 (18%) eyes, 2 in 8 (24%) eyes, 3 in 13 (39%) eyes and 4-5 in 6 (18%) eyes. VA improved in all patients, but neither the final improvement in VA nor the absolute improvement in CMT from baseline to 24 months correlated with the number of injections received (p = 0.44 and 0.84, respectively). Cataract surgery was more frequent in eyes receiving more injections (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that repeated injections of IVTA continue to be as effective as the first over a 2-year period. The probability of cataract surgery increases with an increasing number of injections.

The management of diabetic eye disease in the setting of cataract surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The increased incidence of diabetes mellitus worldwide is accompanied by an increased risk of co-morbid conditions, including the intersection of diabetes, diabetic retinopathy and cataracts. In an effort to improve the surgical outcomes for this population, it is necessary to understand the historical perspectives that have evolved into current treatment recommendations.

RECENT FINDINGS

While cataract surgery in patients with no or mild retinopathy may result in minimal complications, a substantial minority of patients with diabetes and advanced retinopathy, including macular edema and a history of previous laser treatment, may require additional considerations when planning cataract surgery. Untreated retinopathy, insufficiently treated retinopathy or treatment failures can be challenging. In these instances, a paradigm shift may be indicated, and the occasion of cataract surgery may provide an opportunity to simultaneously treat retinopathy. By utilizing combined vitrectomy/cataract surgical techniques and/or pharmacologic interventions, improved results for a broader diabetic population may be attainable.

SUMMARY

Newer surgical and pharmacologic therapies may now allow for safe and effective surgery in individuals who were previously not candidates for surgery or who had a limited visual prognosis.

Decreasing efficacy of repeated intravitreal triamcinolone injections in diabetic macular oedema

BACKGROUND/AIM

Intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) results in transient improvements in diabetic macular oedema (DMO), necessitating repeated injections. The authors report a case series of 10 eyes of 10 patients with DMO, who received a repeat injection of 4 mg IVTA, at least 26 weeks after the first injection of the same dose.

METHOD

Pre-injection and at 2, 4, 9, and 17 weeks post-injection, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) on optical coherence tomography, after the first and repeat injections, were compared using paired t test. Side effects were monitored.

RESULTS

BCVA, CFT, intraocular pressure (IOP), and cataract scores were not significantly different before initial and repeat injections (given at 32.5 (SD 3.5) weeks after the first injection). Transient improvements of BCVA and CFT were achieved after both injections. However, after the repeat injection, the BCVA was significantly worse at all time points (p<0.05) and so were the best achieved CFT and the CFT at 4 weeks post-injection (p = 0.034 and 0.011 respectively), compared with the initial injection. Post-injection maximum IOPs and increase in cataract scores were not significantly different between the two injections.

CONCLUSION

A repeat injection of 4 mg of IVTA may not be as effective as an initial injection for the treatment of DMO.