Treatment of stage 2 macular hole by intravitreous injection of expansile gas and induction of posterior vitreous detachment

[Vitreomacular traction: diagnostics, natural course, treatment decision and guideline recommendations]

Vitreomacular traction is a tractive foveolar adhesion of the posterior vitreous limiting membrane, resulting in pathological structural alterations of the vitreomacular interface. This must be differentiated from physiological vitreomacular adhesion, which exhibits a completely preserved foveolar depression. Symptoms depend on the severity of the macular changes and typically include reduced visual acuity, reading problems and metamorphopsia. High-resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) imaging enables classification of the sometimes only subtle morphological changes. If pronounced vitreomacular traction is accompanied by epiretinal gliosis and alterations to the outer retina, it is referred to as a vitreomacular traction syndrome. Vitreomacular traction has a high probability of spontaneous resolution within 12 months. Therefore, treatment should only be carried out in cases of undue suffering of the patient and with symptoms during bilateral vision and a lack of spontaneous resolution. In addition to pars plana vitrectomy, alternative treatment options, such as intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin and pneumatic vitreolysis are discussed for vitreomacular traction with an associated macular hole; however, ocriplasmin is no longer available in Germany. The best anatomical results in comparative investigations were achieved by vitrectomy. Pneumatic vitreolysis is controversially discussed due to the increased risk of retinal tears. In one of the current S1 guidelines of the German ophthalmological societies evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostics and treatment of vitreomacular traction are summarized.

Scoping review of nonsurgical treatment options for macular holes

Macular holes (MH) are full-thickness retinal defects affecting central vision. While vitrectomy with inner limiting membrane (ILM) peel is the conventional MH treatment, non-surgical alternatives are gaining interest to mitigate surgical risks. This study conducted a comprehensive literature review and analysis of nonsurgical MH management. A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 1973, to September 13, 2023. Treatments included laser therapy, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), steroids (topical, subtenons, peribulbar, intravitreal), intravitreal gas, anti-vascular endothelial growth factors and ocriplasmin injections. Data extraction covered study details, patient characteristics, MH features, treatment outcomes, and recurrence rates. The initial search yielded 3352 articles, refined to 83 articles that met inclusion criteria following screening. Overall reported anatomical closure rates were 36% with laser photocoagulation, 37% with intravitreal ocriplasmin, 55% with intravitreal gas. Closures were more frequently observed with topical NSAIDs (79%), steroids (84%) and CAIs (73%). Closures were more often observed in patients with smaller MH and in the presence of cystic macular oedema. Although non-surgical MH management approaches show potential for conservative therapy, evidence is limited to support routine use. Stage 1 and traumatic MH may benefit from a short period of observation, but the gold standard approach for full-thickness MH remains to be vitrectomy with ILM peel.

Effect of pneumatic vitreolysis in management of patients with symptomatic focal vitreomacular traction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of single intravitreal injection of an expansile concentration of sulphur hexafluoride gas (SF6) in treating patients with symptomatic focal vitreomacular traction (VMT) documented by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) preoperatively.

METHODS

This is a prospective interventional case series including 30 eyes of 29 patients with symptomatic focal VMT evident on SD-OCT. Pre-operatively, mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/125 (range 20/400-20/40). Mean central foveal thickness (CFT) was 382 μm (range 149-576 μm; SD ± 91.88). All eyes received single intravitreal injection of 0.3 mL of 100% SF6 gas. Postoperatively, we performed SD-OCT at one week, one month, and three months for all eyes. Primary outcome measure was release of VMT. Secondary outcome measures were changes in postoperative BCVA andCFT.

RESULTS

Overall, VMT release occurred in 24 of 30 eyes by the final follow-up visit (80% final release rate); furthermore, 76.9% of eyes with diabetic maculopathy and 25% of eyes with concurrent epiretinal membrane (ERM) had successful VMT release. VMT release was documented on SD-OCT at an average of 3 weeks (range, 1-12 weeks). The rate of release in phakic eyes was 90% (18 of 20 eyes) versus 60% in pseudophakic eyes (6 of 10 eyes). One patient developed a retinal break at upper nasal retina after two weeks of injection.

CONCLUSION

Pneumatic vitreolysis (PVL) with limited face-down position is a viable option for treating focal VMT with few adverse events. Further studies are needed to evaluate its indications, benefits, and risks.

Anatomical and functional outcomes of pneumatic vitreolysis for treatment of vitreomacular traction with and without macular holes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of pneumatic vitreolysis (PVL) for vitreomacular traction (VMT) with or without full thickness macular hole (MH) < 400 µm.

METHODS

Forty-seven eyes of 47 patients were included who had undergone PVL for VMT with or without MH. Main outcome measures were release of VMT, MH closure, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and adverse events.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients had isolated VMT and 14 patients VMT with a MH. Four weeks after PVL, the overall VMT release rate was 35/47 (74.5%): 25/37 (67.6%) in phakic and 10/10 (100%) in pseudophakic eyes (p = 0.03). Four of 14 MH (28.6%) were closed. Twenty-two of 47 (46.8%) eyes required a subsequent PPV: 12/33 (36.4%) in the VMT only group and 10/14 (71.4%) in the VMT with MH group. Mean BCVA improved from 0.48 (± 0.24) to 0.34 (± 0.23) logMAR at 6 months in patients with VMT alone (p < 0.001), and from 0.57 (± 0.27) to 0.41 (± 0.28) logMAR in patients with VMT and MH (p = 0.008). Adverse events included new formation of a large MH in 4/33 (12.1%) eyes, failure of MH closure in 10/14 (71.4%) eyes, progression of mean minimum linear diameter (MLD) MH size from baseline 139 (± 67) to 396 (± 130) µm (p < 0.001) and development of a retinal detachment in 4/47 (8.5%) eyes.

CONCLUSION

While PVL leads to a high VMT release rate particularly in pseudophakic eyes, it is associated with a relatively high incidence of MH formation, MH size progression and retinal detachment.

Vitreomacular disorders: a review of the classification, pathogenesis and treatment paradigms including new surgical techniques

This review explores how optical coherence tomography has guided our assessment of vitreomacular disorders. Vitreomacular disorders (VMD), such as macular holes and epiretinal membranes are common and potentially sight threatening. The introduction and widespread use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging technology has transformed our ability to visualise the vitreoretinal interface. This review discusses the pathogenesis and updated classification scheme for VMD in the OCT era. Imaging biomarkers and the treatment algorithm, including the role of novel therapeutics, for managing patients with VMD are presented.

Immediate Release of Vitreomacular Traction After Pneumatic Vitreolysis Followed by the Drinking Bird Technique

Purpose:

To report a case of release of vitreomacular traction (VMT) in a patient with a full thickness macular hole (FTMH) immediately following pneumatic vitreolysis (PV) combined with head bobbing movements.

Methods:

A 71-year-old female with VMT and an FTMH presented with blurred vision for 2 months to the level of 20/400. At her 1-month follow-up visit, PV was performed using C3F8 gas and she was instructed to perform the drinking bird technique for ten minutes.

Results:

Optical coherence tomography performed ten minutes after PV with head bobbing showed VMT release and a smaller FTMH. Visual acuity improved to 20/150 immediately afterwards and to 20/80 two months later.

Conclusions:

Using the drinking bird technique for a continuous period of time immediately following PV may encourage rapid VMT release. PV may be a feasible option for patients with VMT and FTMH who do not want surgery.

COMPARING INTRAVITREAL AIR AND GAS FOR THE TREATMENT OF VITREOMACULAR TRACTION

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of intravitreal injections of air with gas on vitreomacular traction (VMT) release and attempt to analyze predictive factors for success.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with symptomatic VMT undergoing intravitreal injections (0.3 mL) of either octafluoropropane (C3F8) or air were retrospectively reviewed. The VMT release (primary end point) and the best-corrected visual acuity (secondary end point) were noted 1 month after injection. At baseline and 1 month after the injection, a macular optical coherence tomography was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four eyes of 22 patients were included. Vitreomacular traction was released in 10 cases, 7 among 11 C3F8-injected eyes (63%) and 3 among 13 air-injected eyes (23%) (P = 0.045). In eyes with released VMT, ETDRS improved from 61 ± 35 (0-100) to 65 ± 37 (0-100) 1 month after the injection (P = 0.03). All patients with VMT release had a horizontal vitreomacular adhesion of less than 600 µm. Five eyes (23%) underwent vitrectomy after the injection of gas or air.

CONCLUSION

Posterior vitreous detachment in VMT can be observed with both air and gas injection with a low complication rate. The occurrence of VMT release observed with air seemed to be less frequent than that observed with gas.

Vitreomacular interface alterations following peripheral laser retinopexy: Interface changes after laser

AIM

To demonstrate the morphological outcomes of macular hole following prophylactic peripheral laser retinopexy (PPLR).

METHODS

Our retrospective case-control analysis included 92 eyes, 55 in the laser group and 37 in the non-laser group. Fifty-five patients were subjected to prophylactic peripheral laser retinopexy in preparation for pars plana vitrectomy for macular hole, with and without vitreomacular adhesion (laser group). Before and after prophylactic peripheral laser retinopexy, we evaluated any changes in vitreomacular anatomy by optical coherence tomography. Optical coherence tomography changes were also analyzed in the visits preceding pars plana vitrectomy in 37 macular hole eyes not subjected to prophylactic peripheral laser retinopexy (non-laser group).

RESULTS

In the laser group, 7 out of 55 eyes (12.7%) showed macular hole closure (6 out of 18 macular hole eyes with vitreomacular adhesion (33.3%) and 1 out of 37 eyes without vitreomacular adhesion (2.7%)), while no patients showed macular hole closure in the non-laser group (p < 0.05). The mean width of the seven closed macular hole was 191.4 µm (range: 59-282 µm). In all except one of the six macular hole eyes with vitreomacular adhesion, the macular hole closed without vitreomacular adhesion release. In our analysis of the patient subgroup with vitreomacular adhesion, we observed a release of vitreomacular adhesion in 3 out of 18 eyes (16.6%) in the laser group and in 1 out of 13 eyes (7.6%) in the non-laser group (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These findings support a possible beneficial role for prophylactic peripheral laser retinopexy in selected individuals with macular hole.

Pneumatic Vitreolysis for the Treatment of Vitreomacular Traction Syndrome

Objectives:

To evaluate the posterior vitreous release rates after a single injection of expansile gas in patients with vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome with or without associated full-thickness macular hole (FTMH).

Materials and Methods:

Thirteen eyes of 12 consecutive patients with VMT (11 eyes) or VMT+FTMH (2 eyes) were reviewed retrospectively. Intravitreal injection of 0.3 mL of pure sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) (9 eyes) or perfluoropropane (C3F8) (4 eyes) was performed. Bobbing the head forward and backward similar to ‘drinking bird’ head movements was instructed until VMT release. Full ophthalmic examination and optical coherence tomography was performed at each visit.

Results:

VMT was released in all patients (100%) and mean release time was 5.2 days (1-19 days). Macular hole closure was not achieved in either of the two eyes with FTMH. Mean central subfield thickness decreased significantly from 361 μm to 263 μm (p=0.007). The mean pretreatment visual acuity was 0.44 LogMAR, which significantly improved to 0.25 LogMAR at the last visit (p=0.003). One of 13 eyes had retinal tear after the procedure which was successfully treated with laser retinopexy. Gas migration to the anterior chamber occurred in one patient. No other complications were observed.

Conclusion:

Pneumatic vitreolysis with C3F8 and SF6 gases is a relatively safe, low-cost, and minimally invasive treatment modality for VMT. However, FTMH closure could not be achieved with pneumatic vitreolysis.

Macular Hole Formation After Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence, clinical features, and outcomes of patients with macular hole (MH) formation after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all cases of PPV for diabetic TRD performed by a surgeon (DS) at a large county hospital between November 2013 and August 2016.

RESULTS

Ninety consecutive eyes of 79 patients were included in this case series, of which four eyes developed MH, yielding an incidence of 4.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2%-11.0%). The mean interval between PPV for TRD and MH formation was 7.0 ± 5.5 (mean ± 1 standard deviation) months, and mean follow-up time was 29.6 months ± 6.9 months. Three of the four eyes that developed MH underwent intervention, and of the three that underwent intervention, all had successful hole closure.

CONCLUSION

In this case series, the incidence of MH after PPV for TRD is 4.4% (95% CI, 1.2%-11.0%). The mechanism of MH formation after diabetic TRD repair is not certain but may be related to a taut internal limiting membrane, epiretinal membrane formation, macular edema, or residual vitreous contraction. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:e256-e262.].

Intravitreal gas for symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion: a synthesis of the literature

Symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion (sVMA) is defined as visual loss secondary to foveal damage from vitreomacular traction (VMT) and includes isolated VMT, impending macular hole (MH), and full-thickness MH with persisting vitreous attachment. Management options include pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), intravitreal ocriplasmin, intravitreal gas injection or observation. This synthesis of the literature aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of intravitreal gas for sVMA. Articles describing patients with VMT or MH treated with intravitreal expansile gas were selected by systematic literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to September 2016. The main outcomes at 1 month and final review were logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity (VA), anatomical success (absence of both VMT and MH, without PPV) and adverse events (AEs). The intended comparator was observation. Nine of 106 identified articles were eligible, and none were randomized controlled trials. The mean VA of 91 eyes improved from 0.55 (Snellen equivalent 6/21) to 0.48 (6/18) logMAR at 1 month and to 0.35 (6/13) logMAR at final review. The mean VA at final review, prior to a vitrectomy, was 0.42 (6/16). Anatomic success was 48% at 1 month and 57% at final review. The reported AEs comprised retinal detachment in two highly myopic eyes. Intravitreal gas injection can relieve sVMA. Larger controlled studies are needed to determine safety and efficacy relative to observation, ocriplasmin, or vitrectomy.

Treatment of primary full-thickness macular hole by intravitreal injection of expansile gas

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injection (IVI) of expansile gas to treat primary full-thickness macular hole (FTMH).

METHODS

Prospective interventional case series. Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients in Peking Union Medical College Hospital with primary FTMH underwent IVI of perfluoropropane (C₃F₈) 0.2 ml, followed by 7-14 days' face-down positioning. The macular hole closure rate, post-operative visual acuity, and the incidence of surgical complications were observed. The correlation between the patients' age, macular hole diameter, pre-operative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), status of the vitreous, and the macular hole closure rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 17 cases (65.4%) had hole closure after IVI of C₃F₈ alone. The closure rate of small, medium, and large FTMH was 85.7, 80, and 33.3%, respectively. Pre-operative OCT examination showed that 10 cases (37%) had vitreomacular traction (VMT), and all of them achieved vitreous-macula separation after IVI of the gas. The diameters of the hole (P = 0.024) and the status of the vitreous (P = 0.038) had a significance difference for hole closure. The mean pre-operative and post-operative BCVA was 0.84 ± 0.29 and 0.49 ± 0.36 (logMAR), respectively (P < 0.01). One myope with persistent hole developed rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) 2 months after the surgery. Another myope with hole closure developed RRD 10 months after the surgery. They achieved hole closure and retinal reattachment after vitrectomy and scleral buckling, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal injection of C₃F₈ gas alone was an effective treatment for small-sized and medium-sized primary FTMH, but further large prospective studies are needed.

Intravitreal Injection of Perfluoropropane is More Efficacious than Sulfur Hexafluoride In Releasing Vitreomacular Traction

SUMMARY – The aim was to compare the efficacy of a single intravitreal injection of perfluoropropane (C3F8) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) in releasing vitreomacular traction (VMT). This prospective study included two groups of patients with symptomatic VMT confirmed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Patients from both groups received a single intravitreal injection of expansile gas. One group (29 eyes) received 0.3 mL of 100% C3F8, and the other group (28 eyes) received 0.3 mL of 100% SF6. Eyes without VMT release one month after SF6 injection were secondarily injected with C3F8. The primary outcome was the ratio of eyes in each group with complete VMT release on OCT one month following primary treatment. The secondary outcome was the ratio of reinjected eyes with complete VMT release on OCT one month following second injection. Additional outcome was the ratio of VMT release in eyes with specific clinical characteristics. One month after the application, complete release of VMT on OCT was recorded in 18 out of 29 eyes (62%) in the C3F8 group, in 6 out of 28 eyes (21.4%) in the SF6 group, and in 7 out of 14 (50%) reinjected eyes. There was no statistically significant difference in age, width of vitreomacular attachment (WVMAT), central retinal thickness and presence of additional features between the two groups. In eyes with WVMAT <500 microns, there was no statistically significant difference between the two gases in releasing VMT. In eyes with WVMAT >500 microns, C3F8 was more efficacious (p=0.001). According to the results of our study, intravitreal C3F8 injection seems to be more efficacious in releasing VMT than SF6 in eyes with WVMAT larger than 500 microns.

PNEUMATIC VITREOLYSIS FOR RELIEF OF VITREOMACULAR TRACTION

Pneumatic vitreolysis with C₃F₈ gas is effective in releasing focal vitreomacular traction in a high percentage of eyes with few adverse events, especially with limited vitreomacular traction (within 1 disk area), lack of thick cellophane membranes, no diabetes mellitus, younger age (mean age of 69.1 years vs. 78.1 years), better baseline best spectacle–corrected visual acuity (mean of 20/50 vs. 20/66), small Stage 2 macular hole, and female gender.

Purpose:

To evaluate the outcome of perfluoropropane (C₃F₈) gas injection for symptomatic vitreomacular traction (VMT) with or without Stage 2 macular hole (MH).

Methods:

A retrospective review of eyes with VMT treated with 0.3 mL of C₃F₈ gas was performed. Patients avoided the supine position until gas resolution. Patients with small MH maintained partial face-down positioning.

Results:

Forty-nine consecutive patients (50 eyes) with symptomatic VMT underwent pneumatic vitreolysis between 2010 and 2016. A posterior vitreous detachment developed in 43 eyes (86.0%) after a single gas injection, at a median of 3.0 weeks. Twenty-eight of 35 eyes (80.0%) with VMT only and all 15 eyes (100%) with a small Stage 2 MH developed a posterior vitreous detachment, with MH closure in 10 of 15 eyes (66.7%). Median baseline and last best spectacle–corrected visual acuities were 20/50 and 20/40, respectively (P < 0.001). Mean follow-up time was 11.1 ± 9.9 months. Rate of posterior vitreous detachment was reduced with presence of diabetes mellitus (25%) and with thick cellophane membrane (50%). Univariate analysis showed increased VMT release for eyes with VMT extent within 1 disk area (χ² = 13.1, P = 0.002), eyes with absence of diabetes mellitus (χ² = 8.8, P = 0.007), and eyes with Stage 2 MH (χ² = 5.47, P = 0.019); there was a trend between success and lack of thick cellophane membrane (χ² = 3.32, P = 0.068). Results using logistic regression also showed younger age (P = 0.012), followed by better baseline best spectacle–corrected visual acuity (P = 0.044), lack of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.077), and female gender (P = 0.045) to be predictors of increased VMT release. One VMT-only eye formed a MH and another VMT-only eye developed a retinal detachment. Both eyes responded to vitrectomy.

Conclusion:

Pneumatic vitreolysis with limited face-down position is a viable option for treating VMT with few adverse events. More studies are needed to elucidate its indications, benefits, and risks.

Ocriplasmin for symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion (sVMA) is a recognised cause of visual loss and by tradition has been managed by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). A less invasive alternative to surgery in some people is enzymatic vitreolysis, using an intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of ocriplasmin compared to no treatment, sham or placebo for the treatment of sVMA.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2017, Issue 1), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 24 February 2017), Embase Ovid (1947 to 24 February 2017), PubMed (1946 to 24 February 2017), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch); searched 24 February 2017, ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov); searched 24 February 2017 and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en); searched 24 February 2017. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of people with sVMA. The intervention was intravitreal ocriplasmin 125 μg injection, and this was compared to placebo or sham injection (control). Placebo was defined as a single intravitreal injection of 0.10 mL placebo with identical drug vehicle diluted with saline. A sham injection was defined as the syringe hub or blunt needle touching the conjunctiva to simulate an injection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected relevant trials, assessed methodological quality and extracted data. We graded the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included four RCTs conducted in Europe and the USA with a total of 932 eyes of 932 participants. Participants were 18 to 97 years of age, with evidence of focal vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, with a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/25 or worse in the study eye and 20/400 or better in the fellow eye. The interventions compared were intravitreal ocriplasmin versus sham (two RCTs) or placebo (two RCTs) injection. Both sham and placebo injection were classified as the control group. The main outcome measures were assessed at 28 days and six months. Overall, we judged the studies to have a low or unclear risk of bias. All four RCTs were sponsored by the manufacturers of ocriplasmin.Compared with control, ocriplasmin treatment was more likely to result in VMA release within 28 days (risk ratio (RR) 3.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.00 to 6.00; 859 eyes, 4 RCTs, high-certainty evidence). Approximately 97/1000 eyes will have VMA release within 28 days without treatment. An additional 237 eyes will have VMA release within 28 days for every 1000 eyes treated with ocriplasmin (95% CI 96 more to 482 more).Treatment with ocriplasmin was also more likely to result in macular hole closure (RR 2.87, 95% CI 1.50 to 5.51; 229 eyes, 3 RCTs, high-certainty evidence). Approximately 123/1000 eyes with macular holes will have closure with no treatment. An additional 231 eyes will have macular hole closure for every 1000 eyes treated with ocriplasmin (95% CI 62 more to 556 more).Eyes receiving ocriplasmin were also more likely to have complete posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) within 28 days (RR 2.94, 95% CI 1.39 to 6.24; 689 eyes, 3 RCTs, high-certainty evidence). Approximately 40/1000 eyes will have complete PVD within 28 days without treatment. An additional 78 eyes will have complete PVD within 28 days for every 1000 eyes treated with ocriplasmin (95% CI 16 more to 210 more).Eyes receiving ocriplasmin were more likely to achieve 3-line or greater improvement in BCVA at six months (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.53; 674 eyes, 3 RCTs, moderate-certainty evidence). Approximately 61/1000 eyes will have a 3-line or greater improvement in BCVA at six months without treatment. An additional 58 eyes will have 3-line or greater improvement in BCVA at six months for every 1000 eyes treated with ocriplasmin (95% CI 9 more to 154 more).Receiving ocriplasmin also reduced the requirement for vitrectomy at six months (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.91; 689 eyes, 3 RCTs, moderate-certainty evidence). Approximately 265/1000 eyes will require vitrectomy at six months without treatment and 87 fewer eyes will require vitrectomy for every 1000 eyes treated with ocriplasmin (95% CI 24 fewer to 132 fewer).Treatment with ocriplasmin resulted in a greater improvement in validated Visual Function Questionnaire form score at six months (mean improvement difference 2.7 points, 95% CI 0.8 to 4.6; 652 eyes, 2 RCTs, moderate-certainty evidence).Eyes receiving ocriplasmin were more likely to have an adverse event (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.37, 909 eyes, 4 RCTs, moderate-certainty evidence). Approximately 571/1000 eyes will have an adverse event with sham or placebo injection and 106 more eyes will have an adverse event for every 1000 eyes treated with ocriplasmin (95% CI 52 more to 212 more).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from a limited number of RCTs suggests that ocriplasmin is useful in the treatment of sVMA. However, up to 20% of eyes treated with ocriplasmin will still require additional treatment with PPV within six months. There were more ocular adverse events in eyes treated with ocriplasmin than control (sham or placebo injection) treatment. Many of these adverse events, particularly vitreous floaters and photopsia, are known to be associated with posterior vitreous detachment. At present however, there is minimal published long-term safety data on eyes treated with ocriplasmin. Further large RCTs comparing ocriplasmin with other management options for sVMA would be beneficial.

Pneumatic Vitreolysis for Management of Symptomatic Focal Vitreomacular Traction

Pneumatic vitreolysis (PVL) is the intravitreal injection of a small quantity of expansile gas for the purpose of achieving focal vitreomacular traction (VMT) release for eyes with symptomatic VMT, or inducing VMT release and closure of the macular defect for eyes with a small stage-2 macular hole (MH). Initially, there was limited interest in this technique upon its introduction for clinical treatment in human eyes in 1993. With the advent of optical coherence tomography allowing detailed observation of vitreomacular interface changes and rising importance of medical economics in recent years, there has been increasing interest in PVL, a low-cost procedure for managing symptomatic VMT. The success rates of VMT release in the literature have ranged from 60% to 100% and the rates of closure of small macular holes have ranged from 50% to 80% following PVL. In a recent retrospective consecutive series of 56 eyes in two centers undergoing C3F8 gas injection, Chan and Mein reported an overall success of 86% in VMT release and 60% closure of small macular holes with few adverse events (7% with retinal breaks, retinal detachment, or progression of VMT). Multiple recent studies have shown superior outcome utilizing C3F8 gas compared with SF6 gas for PVL. In conclusion, PVL is a promising, low-cost therapeutic option, with the potential for managing symptomatic focal VMT on a global scale.

TREATMENT OF VITREOMACULAR TRACTION WITH INTRAVITREAL PERFLUOROPROPANE (C3F8) INJECTION

PURPOSE

To assess the posterior vitreous release rates following a single, office-based intravitreal injection of expansile gas in treating vitreomacular traction.

METHODS

Thirty eyes of 29 consecutive patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction received a single, office-based intravitreal injection of up to 0.3 mL of 100% perfluoropropane (C3F8).

RESULTS

Overall, vitreomacular traction release occurred in 25 of 30 eyes by the final follow-up visit (83% final release rate); furthermore, 90% (9 of 10 eyes) with diabetes mellitus released, 83% (5 of 6 eyes) with concurrent epiretinal membrane released, and 83% (5 of 6 eyes) previously treated with ocriplasmin released. Vitreomacular traction release occurred overnight in some patients and was documented on spectral domain optical coherence tomography at an average of 13 days (range, 1-62 days). The phakic release rate was 89% (16 of 18 eyes) versus a 75% pseudophakic release rate (9 of 12 eyes) (P = 0.3173). Ellipsoid zone changes on spectral domain optical coherence tomography occurred in 1 of 30 gas-treated eyes. One patient developed pupillary block.

CONCLUSION

Office-based intravitreal injection of C3F8 offers an inexpensive and effective treatment for vitreomacular traction, including for patients who underwent previous ocriplasmin administration and in patients with diabetes mellitus or epiretinal membrane.

SULFURHEXAFLUORIDE (SF6) VERSUS PERFLUOROPROPANE (C3F8) GAS AS TAMPONADE IN MACULAR HOLE SURGERY

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of macular hole surgery using sulfurhexafluoride (SF6) versus perfluoropropane (C3F8) gas.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, interventional, comparative study. A total of 177 eyes of 166 patients operated over a 3-year period for idiopathic macular holes were included. Sixty-seven eyes had tamponade with SF6 gas (Group 1), whereas 111 eyes received C3F8 (Group 2) as the tamponading agent. The primary outcome measure was the macular hole closure rate. Statistical analysis was done using SPSSv16.

RESULTS

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography-based stagewise distribution of macular holes were similar across both groups (P = 0.99). The hole closure rate was 57/66 (86.4%) with SF6 and 96/111 (86.5%) with C3F8 gas (P = 0.98). Subanalysis demonstrated no significant difference in closure rates regarding macular hole size, stage, or duration. Best-corrected visual acuity improved by a mean of 0.28 logMAR in the SF6 group (P = 0.00) and 0.42 logMAR in the C3F8 group, corresponding to 3 lines and 4 lines of improvement, respectively, on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart (P < 0.05). The difference was not significant (P = 0.06). Rise in intraocular pressure was higher in the C3F8 group (P < 0.05). Progression of cataract was also greater in the C3F8 group (83.3 vs.73.9%), but it was not statistically significant (P = 0.20). Resurgery was done in 9/177 eyes. The closure rate with C3F8 and SF6 reinjections was 3/4 (75%) and 1/5 (20%). Moreover, anatomical hole closure after resurgeries was better in Group 1 (4/5 eyes) than in Group 2 (0/4 eyes).

CONCLUSION

The macular hole closure rate was similar with sulfurhexafluoride and perfluoropropane, irrespective of hole size, stage, or duration. However, sulfurhexafluoride exhibited a decreased incidence of cataract and ocular hypertension with shorter tamponade duration. Perfluoropropane may have a role as the preferred endotamponading agent in failed primary surgeries.

Pneumatic release of focal vitreomacular traction

PurposeTo study the efficacy of a single intravitreal injection of expansile gas as a valuable alternative to current treatment options (conservative, pharmacological, and surgical) in patients with symptomatic, focal vitreomacular traction (VMT).Patients and methodsThis study comprises a retrospective, interventional case series of patients. Twenty eyes in seventeen patients with symptomatic and persisting focal VMT were treated in an outpatient setting with an intravitreal gas injection of 0.2 ml. In 19 eyes, 100% hexafluoroethane (C₂F₆) was used. One eye received sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆). To all but three patients posturing advice was given. Patients were reviewed with a full-eye examination and ocular coherence tomography (OCT) after 14 days and later. The primary outcome measure was the release of VMT on OCT.ResultsIn 17 of the 20 (85.0%) treated eyes, a release of VMT was achieved as documented on OCT. The release of VMT was diagnosed during the first month after injection in 11 eyes of 11 patients and within 3 months in 16 eyes of 15 patients. In all but five of our patients, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) remained stable or improved. In four patients, the progression or development of cataract was the probable cause of the decrease in BCVA. One patient developed a stage II macular hole after injection and needed vitrectomy. None of the treated patients developed retinal breaks.ConclusionIntravitreal expansile gas injection could offer a minimally invasive, low-cost alternative treatment in patients with symptomatic, persisting VMT. Additional studies on a larger number of patients are required.

INTRAVITREAL SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE INJECTION FOR THE TREATMENT OF VITREOMACULAR TRACTION SYNDROME

PURPOSE

Vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome can cause symptomatic metamorphopsia and decreased visual acuity. Although it is typically treated with vitrectomy or intravitreal ocriplasmin injection, these procedures can be invasive and costly. The purpose of this retrospective, consecutive case series was to evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal expansile sulfur hexafluoride gas injection for the treatment of symptomatic VMT syndrome.

METHODS

Nine eyes of 9 patients with symptomatic VMT syndrome on spectral domain optical coherence tomography received an intravitreal injection of 0.3 mL of 100% sulfur hexafluoride. The primary outcome was the number of eyes with release of VMT on spectral domain optical coherence tomography at 1 month after treatment. Secondary outcomes included change in visual acuity and central subfield thickness 1 month after treatment.

RESULTS

Five patients (55.6%) had release of VMT on spectral domain optical coherence tomography by 1 month after injection. Two patients who had Stage I macular holes before injection had closure of the macular holes. Mean visual acuity at 1 month improved slightly after injection by 0.09 logMAR units, although this change was not statistically significant (P = 0.15). Central subfield thickness on spectral domain optical coherence tomography decreased by an average of 35.3 microns after injection (P = 0.004). All eyes with release of VMT had pretreatment vitreomacular adhesion of less than 521 microns and none had epiretinal membranes. One patient (11.1%) developed a peripheral retinal hole at 1 month after injection.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal injection of expansile sulfur hexafluoride gas is a low-cost and minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of symptomatic VMT syndrome. Further study is warranted.

Optimal management of idiopathic macular holes

This review evaluates the current surgical options for the management of idiopathic macular holes (IMHs), including vitrectomy, ocriplasmin (OCP), and expansile gas use, and discusses key background information to inform the choice of treatment. An evidence-based approach to selecting the best treatment option for the individual patient based on IMH characteristics and patient-specific factors is suggested. For holes without vitreomacular attachment (VMA), vitrectomy is the only option with three key surgical variables: whether to peel the inner limiting membrane (ILM), the type of tamponade agent to be used, and the requirement for postoperative face-down posturing. There is a general consensus that ILM peeling improves primary anatomical hole closure rate; however, in small holes (<250 µm), it is uncertain whether peeling is always required. It has been increasingly recognized that long-acting gas and face-down positioning are not always necessary in patients with small- and medium-sized holes, but large (>400 µm) and chronic holes (>1-year history) are usually treated with long-acting gas and posturing. Several studies on posturing and gas choice were carried out in combination with ILM peeling, which may also influence the gas and posturing requirement. Combined phacovitrectomy appears to offer more rapid visual recovery without affecting the long-term outcomes of vitrectomy for IMH. OCP is licensed for use in patients with small- or medium-sized holes and VMA. A greater success rate in using OCP has been reported in smaller holes, but further predictive factors for its success are needed to refine its use. It is important to counsel patients realistically regarding the rates of success with intravitreal OCP and its potential complications. Expansile gas can be considered as a further option in small holes with VMA; however, larger studies are required to provide guidance on its use.

Gas-mediated vitreomacular adhesion release with intravitral ranibizumab injections for exudative age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficiency of gas-assisted vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) release combined with intravitreal ranibizumab injections for exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, interventional case series included a total of 23 eyes of 22 patients. The eyes were treated with intravitreal injection of 0.3 mL of perfluoropropane (C3F8) gas and concomitant intravitreal ranibizumab injection to stimulate VMA release. After three initial loading injections, additional intravitreal ranibizumab injections were performed pro re nata. Over a 12-month period, monthly examinations were performed for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR; logarithm of the minimum angle resolution), optical coherence tomography, and dilated fundus examinations.

RESULTS

After gas injection, 22 eyes (95.7 %) showed complete VMA release at 1 week. Complete VMA was achieved in all eyes at 2 months after VMA release, without serious ocular adverse events except one patient who developed a retinal tear. Mean BCVA was 0.61 ± 0.37 logMAR (20/81 Snellen equivalents) at baseline and 0.46 ± 0.30 logMAR (20/57 Snellen equivalents) at 12 months (P = 0.135). Mean central macular thickness was 357.9 ± 128.6 μm at baseline and 245.6 ± 60.0 μm at 12 months (P = 0.188). Mean numbers of intravitreal ranibizumab injections were 4.8 ± 2.4 times during 12 months (4 to 8 injections).

CONCLUSION

Gas-assisted VMA release can be used as an efficient alternative for exudative AMD patients with obvious VMA.

Determination of macular hole size in relation to individual variabilities of fovea morphology

PURPOSE

To determine the preoperative anatomic factors in macular holes and their correlation to hole closure.

METHODS

Forty-six eyes with consecutive unilateral macular hole who had undergone surgery and followed up for at least 6 months were enrolled. Optical coherence tomography images and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) within 2 weeks prior to operation and 6 months after surgery were analyzed. The maximal hole dimension, foveal degeneration factors (inner nuclear layer cysts, outer segment (OS) shortening) and the widest foveolar floor size of the fellow eyes were measured. For overcoming preoperative individual variability of foveal morphology, an 'adjusted' hole size parameter (the ratio between the hole size and the fellow eye foveolar floor size) was used based on the fact that both eyes were morphologically symmetrical.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative BCVA (logMAR) was 1.03±0.43 and the mean postoperative BCVA was 0.50±0.38 at 6 months. Preoperative BCVA is significantly associated with postoperative BCVA (P=0.0002). The average hole diameter was 448.9±196.8 μm and the average fellow eye foveolar floor size was 461.3±128.4 μm. There was a correlation between hole diameter and the size of the fellow eye foveolar floor (Pearson's coefficient=0.608, P<0.0001). The adjusted hole size parameter was 0.979±0.358 (0.761-2.336), which was a strong predictor for both anatomic (P=0.0281) and visual (P=0.0016) outcome.

CONCLUSION

When determining the extent of preoperative hole size, we have to take into consideration the foveal morphologic variations among individuals. Hole size may be related to the original foveal shape, especially in relation to the centrifugal retraction of the foveal tissues.

Ocriplasmin for symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion: an evidence-based review of its potential

Vitreomacular traction is a multicategory entity that may cause substantial visual loss due to the formation of a macular hole or traction-induced tissue distortion. The advent of optical coherent tomography (OCT) has demonstrated the anatomic features of persistent vitreomacular attachment (VMA) more definitively, including in many asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients. The indications for intervention are unclear, since it is not possible to predict which eyes might be likely to develop progressive visual loss. This has been especially important since for many years, the only treatment option involved surgical intervention (vitrectomy) to release the persistent VMA. Recently, a pharmacolytic agent, ocriplasmin, has become available after many years of development and investigation, and may offer a feasible alternative to surgery, or even a risk/benefit ratio sufficiently favorable to offer intervention at an earlier stage of VMA. Several studies, including a large, prospective clinical trial, have established the foundation of its rationale and efficacy, providing the basis of its approval. The role for ocriplasmin in clinical practice is in the process of being determined. This paper summarizes current knowledge and status of investigations regarding ocriplasmin-induced pharmacologic vitreolysis, and offers some evidence-based considerations for its use.

Comparative study of the effects of room air and sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade on functional and morphological recovery after macular hole surgery: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

To compare the effects of room air and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas tamponade on functional and morphological macular recovery after vitrectomy for the treatment of idiopathic macular hole (MH).

METHODS

A total of 22 eyes of 22 patients with preoperative diameter of MH smaller than 500 µm were retrospectively studied. Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling was performed, followed by fluid-air exchange with room air or 20% SF6. Surgical outcomes were analyzed, regarding best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography images.

RESULTS

The primary closure rate was 100% in both groups, while there was a statistically significant difference in the prone posturing period between the SF6 group (7.0 ± 1.6 days) and the air group (3.7 ± 0.6 days; p < 0.0001, unpaired t test). Mean BCVA at baseline, month 1 and month 3 was 0.25, 0.63 and 0.77 in decimal units in the SF6 group and 0.32, 0.60 and 0.73 in the air group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that room air tamponade may provide equally prompt functional and morphological recovery as well as a comparable rate of MH closure with even a shorter prone posturing period compared with SF6 gas tamponade, at least for MH with relatively small diameters.

Intravitreal injection of expansile perfluoropropane (c(3)f(8)) for the treatment of vitreomacular traction

PURPOSE

To study the efficacy of a single intravitreal injection of expansile gas in releasing vitreomacular traction.

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional case series.

METHODS

Fifteen eyes of 14 consecutive patients with symptomatic and persistent vitreomacular traction (>3 months' duration) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) received a single intravitreal injection of 0.3 mL 100% perfluoropropane (C(3)F(8)) as an alternative to pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Primary outcome was the number of eyes with complete vitreomacular traction release on OCT 1 month following treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in visual acuity (VA), foveal contour, central foveal thickness, and maximal foveal thickness 1 month following treatment, and final VA.

RESULTS

Mean age (± SD) was 72.1 ± 12.6 years. Mean follow-up was 398.7 ± 174.4 days. Vitreomacular traction was idiopathic in 7 eyes and associated with diabetes in 6. One month following treatment, vitreomacular traction was released in 6 eyes (40%). Three further eyes (20%) had resolution of vitreomacular traction within 6 months, 4 (27%) underwent PPV, and 2 (13%) subsequently declined surgery. Foveal contour was restored in 7 eyes (47%). VA and central foveal thickness were similar 1 month following treatment, but maximal foveal thickness decreased by 65.8 μm (P = .041). Mean final VA decreased 0.03 logMAR units from baseline (P = .536). Eyes with vitreomacular traction release within 1 month had less extensive vitreomacular traction (P = .037), low vitreous face reflectivity, and maximal foveal thickness <500 μm (P = .004) pretreatment. There were no associated adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal C(3)F(8) injection could offer a minimally invasive alternative to PPV in patients with symptomatic and persistent vitreomacular traction. It appears particularly effective in eyes with less extensive vitreomacular traction and low vitreous face reflectivity on SD OCT. Further studies are warranted.

Intravitreal expansile gas in the treatment of early macular hole: reappraisal

PURPOSE

To study the effects of intravitreal injection (IVI) of expansile gas for early macular holes (EMH).

METHODS

Prospective interventional case series. Twelve eyes of 12 patients with EMH (stage 2) underwent IVI of perfluoropropane 0.2 ml followed by 5 days' facedown positioning.

RESULTS

Six cases (50%) achieved vitreous-macula separation. Three cases (25%) had hole closure with vision improvement; one of them developed rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and hole re-opening. Another case with persistent hole also developed RRD. Seven of the 9 cases without hole closure and the one where the hole re-opened had vitrectomy, all resulting in hole closure and vision improvement. Duration of symptoms had borderline significance for hole closure (p = 0.11) and subsequent visual improvement (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

With its low success rate, IVI of gas may not be a good option for EMH. Complications include retinal detachment. The procedure seems to not affect hole closure with subsequent vitrectomy.

Intravitreal gas injection for the treatment of diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

This study investigates the efficacy of an intravitreal gas injection in inducing a posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) in patients with clinically significant diabetic macular edema refractory to laser therapy.

METHODS

A local ethics committee-approved technique of an intravitreal injection of pure perfluoropropane gas (C(3)F(8)) was performed for all participants. After a period of prone positioning, the patients underwent regular and detailed clinical review.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The induction of a PVD, change in macular thickness, change in visual acuity.

RESULTS

A PVD was induced in all five eyes with subsequent signs of reduction in macular thickness and resolution of exudates. Mean visual improvement was 11 ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letters (range 4-21). Apart from a transient vitreous hemorrhage in one eye, there were no significant treatment-related complications.

CONCLUSION

The induction of a PVD by pneumatic retinopexy appears to have a significant influence on diabetic macular edema in eyes which have not successfully responded to macular laser therapy. A randomized clinical trial is justified on the basis of the initial promising data.

Equivalent tamponade by room air as compared with SF(6) after macular hole surgery

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effect of tamponade by room air after vitrectomy for the treatment of idiopathic macular hole (MH).

METHODS

There were 156 eyes of 151 patients studied. The patients' ages ranged from 35 to 88 years old (mean: 65.1 years). After conventional pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling, fluid air exchange was performed using 20% SF(6) (Gas group: 91 eyes) or room air (Air group: 65 eyes). Surgical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative hole diameter was 352 microm in the Gas group and 370 microm in the Air group (P = 0.558). The closure rate of all cases was 91.0% after first surgery and 98.7% at last follow-up. The primary closure rate was 90.1% in the Gas group after 7.44 +/- 1.66 (mean +/- SD) days prone positioning period, and 92.3% in the Air group after 3.83 +/- 0.97 days of prone positioning. There was significant difference in prone positioning period (P < 0.0001), but not in the first closure rate (P = 0.132).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that room air may have an equivalent tamponade effect, in spite of the shorter prone positioning period, than SF(6) after MH surgery.

Pneumatic retinopexy for the repair of retinal detachments: a comprehensive review (1986-2007)

Pneumatic retinopexy has become an important surgical technique in the modern era of retinal surgical management for retinal detachments. It is primarily indicated for uncomplicated retinal detachments with retinal breaks involving the superior 8 clock hours of the fundus, although more complex retinal detachments may be successfully managed with this technique on a selected basis. Qualified candidates must be willing to maintain a specific head posture for five or more days for optimal outcome with pneumatic retinopexy. Basic surgical steps of pneumatic retinopexy include retinopexy of retinal breaks with cryotherapy or laser, intraocular gas injection before or after retinopexy, and maintenance of proper head posture by the patient for the required time period after surgery. Phakic eyes fared better than nonphakic eyes for pneumatic retinopexy, with the single-operation successes of 71-84% for the former and 41-67% for the latter. Despite lower single-operation successes with pneumatic retinopexy in comparison to sclera buckling, the multicenter pneumatic retinopexy trial and other published reports have shown that the final anatomical and visual outcomes are not disadvantaged by the initial pneumatic retinopexy. An extensive discussion of complications associated with pneumatic retinopexy is presented. In addition, a key feature of this review is a comprehensive update in the outcome of pneumatic retinopexy in published reports from 1986 to the present in chronological order not available in the current literature. This comprehensive summary shows updated average surgical outcomes for the 4,138 eyes in the 21-year period to be similar to previous reports: single-operation successes (74.4%), final operation successes (96.1%), new retinal breaks (11.7%), and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (5.2%).