Improved refractive outcome for ciliary sulcus-implanted intraocular lenses

Long-term functional outcome between Yamane technique and retropupillary iris-claw technique in a large study cohort

PURPOSE

To evaluate which secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation technique was more successful in achieving the best postoperative results and refractive outcomes between retropupillary iris-claw IOL (ICIOL) and flanged intrascleral IOL (FIIOL) fixation with the Yamane technique.

SETTING

Eye Clinic of the University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

METHODS

116 eyes of 110 patients who underwent ICIOL or FIIOL were analyzed. Patients with follow-up shorter than 6 months or with incomplete clinical data were excluded. Collected data included demographics, ocular comorbidity, indication of surgery, intraocular pressure, early (≤1 month) and late (>1 month) postoperative complications, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and manifest refraction at the last follow-up visit.

RESULTS

50% (n = 58) of eyes underwent FIIOL and 50% (n = 58) ICIOL implantation for aphakia (n = 44, 38%) and IOL dislocation (n = 72, 62%). No statistically significant differences in demographics, comorbidity, follow-up duration, postoperative complications, and surgical indications were found. The refractive prediction error (RPE) was 0.69 ± 0.94 diopter (D) in the FIIOL group and 0.21 ± 0.75 D in the ICIOL group ( P = .03), indicating residual hyperopia after both techniques. RPE, mean absolute error, and median absolute error were higher in the FIIOL group ( P = .003). ICIOL implantation was more successful in obtaining a RPE between -0.50 D and +0.50 D (52% of ICIOL, n = 30, and 31% of FIIOL, n = 18).

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques were effective in increasing preoperative CDVA with no statistical difference between them. Although complication rates did not significantly differ, the FIIOL group exhibited less predictable refractive outcomes. Adjusting the dioptric power of the 3-piece IOL, as performed in ciliary sulcus implantation, to prevent myopic shift, is not recommended.

Six-point scleral fixation of a three-looped haptics one-piece posterior chamber intraocular lens by a single suture

To evaluate a novel technique for six-point scleral fixation of a three-looped haptics posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) by a single suture. Nine eyes of nine patients were studied from September 2021 to March 2023. All patients had undergone vitrectomy. Only a single 9-0 polypropylene suture was used for scleral fixation. The three looped haptics were fixed at 12, 4, and 8 o'clock with six-point scleral fixation. The entire procedure took about 30 min. Among the nine patients, eight (88.8%) eyes had a significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity, whereas one (11.2%) eye showed no change. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. By ultrasonic biomicroscopy examination, intraocular lenses were well positioned and stable with no tilt in the horizontal and vertical axis. The method of six-point scleral fixation of a three-looped haptics PCIOL by a single suture is safe and effective.

Assessment of refractive outcomes in eyes that underwent intraocular lens implantation in the posterior chamber but not "in-the-capsular bag:" A comparative retrospective study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report visual and refractive outcomes in eyes that underwent intraocular lens (IOL) fixation in the absence of capsular support.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of cases undergoing posterior chamber iris-fixated IOL (IFIOL) and scleral-fixated IOL (SFIOL) implants from June 2014 to March 2020 with more than 3 months of follow-up and having a preoperative best-corrected visual acuity of 20/80 and more.

RESULTS

Records of 120 eyes of 112 patients were reviewed. The mean age of the patients was 46.9 ± 22.3 (14.4-98.0) years, and 62% (n = 70) of participants were male. Most of the eyes (102: 85%) were aphakic at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up was 22.95 ± 17.1 months. The efficacy index of sutured IFIOL and glued SFIOL outperformed sutured SFIOL at 3 months and final visits postoperatively (P < 0.001). All techniques studied here resulted in a similar safety index at 3 months (P = 0.4). The mean predictive error (postoperative spherical equivalent refraction minus intended target refraction) was +0.07 ± 1.5 D and -0.12 ± 1.4 D at 3 months and the final postoperative visit, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The studied techniques have relatively good visual and refractive outcomes in this series. In addition, techniques involving a small corneal incision with foldable IOL fixation to the iris or scleral tissue have superior efficacy and safety indices compared to creating large corneoscleral wounds for rigid IOL fixation techniques.

Outcomes of Secondary Intracapsular Intraocular Lens Implantation in Patients following Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

This study reports the outcomes of a secondary IOL implantation technique in patients that suffered from rhegmatogenous retinal detachment combined with a cataract, which included reopening the capsular bag, enabling secondary intracapsular intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. We included consecutive cases with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) treated with vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade, and subsequent secondary IOL implantation during silicone oil removal between September 2019 and June 2022. Demographics, pre- and postoperative clinical data, and complications were collected. Visual and refractive outcomes and IOL position were evaluated. Thirty eyes were included and followed up for a mean of 24.2 ± 5.06 months. Compared with the preoperative values, no significant changes were observed in the intraocular pressure (p = 0.170) and endothelial cell density (p = 0.336); however, the best-corrected visual acuity (Snellen: 20/83 vs. 20/38; logMAR: 0.66 ± 0.23 vs. 0.37 ± 0.32; p < 0.001) and spherical equivalent (p < 0.001) improved significantly. The mean prediction error (ME) was -0.45 ± 0.68 D (-1.9-0.54 D), and the mean absolute prediction error (MAE) was 0.62 ± 0.52 D (0.01-1.9 D). The macula-on subgroup demonstrated significantly better refractive outcomes than the macula-off subgroup (ME, p = 0.046; MAE, p = 0.008). The IOL was well positioned, with a mean horizontal and vertical tilt and decentration of 0.53 ± 0.49° and 0.21 ± 0.16 mm, and 0.54 ± 0.45° and 0.22 ± 0.16 mm, respectively. Secondary intracapsular IOL implantation provided a good and stable IOL position and satisfactory refractive outcomes, and is a feasible treatment option for patients with RRD.

Choice of intraocular lens calculation formula for cataract patients with prior pars plana vitrectomy

PURPOSE

To determine the optimal intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula for vitrectomized eyes with diverse surgical and biometric characteristics.

SETTING

Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive case series study.

METHODS

This study included 974 vitrectomized eyes (974 patients) scheduled for phacoemulsification with IOL implantation. 11 formulas were evaluated: Barrett Universal II (BUII), Emmetropia Verifying Optical, Hoffer-QST, Kane, Ladas Super Formula, Pearl-DGS, Radial Basis Function (RBF), Haigis, HofferQ, Holladay1, and SRK/T. Risk factors for prediction error (PE) exceeding 1 diopter (D) were determined using multiple logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were performed based on surgical history and biometric parameters.

RESULTS

The risk of hyperopic PE (>1 D) was higher in patients with silicone oil tamponade (odds ratio [OR], 1.82) and longer axial length (AL) (OR, 1.55), while patients with previous scleral buckling (OR, 2.43) or ciliary sulcus IOL implantation (OR, 6.65) were more susceptible to myopic PE (<-1 D). The Kane formula had the highest overall prediction accuracy, and also the best in silicone oil-filled eyes and the flat cornea subgroup. The BUII and RBF displayed the optimal performance in eyes with previous scleral buckle and steep cornea, respectively. In eyes with an AL ≥ 26 mm, the Holladay1 with the nonlinear version of the Wang-Koch AL adjustment (Holladay1-WKn) showed the lowest absolute PE and highest percentage within ± 1.0 D of PE.

CONCLUSIONS

The Kane achieved the highest overall prediction accuracy in vitrectomized eyes. The optimal formula for eyes with previous scleral buckle, steep cornea, or long AL was BUII, RBF, and Holladay1-WKn, respectively.

Camellens FIL622-1 IOL Implantation in the Ciliary Sulcus: Refractive Outcomes and Optimization of A-constant

PURPOSE

To assess the refractive outcomes of patients who had sulcus implantation of the Camellens FIL622-1 intraocular lens (IOL) (Soleko) after posterior capsular rupture, and to optimize the A-constant suggested by the manufacturer.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent secondary Camellens FIL622-1 IOL implantation in the ciliary sulcus after complicated cataract surgery with posterior capsular rupture. IOL power was calculated by the SRK/T formula, using the recommended A-constant (118.8) for ciliary sulcus implantation. A new optimized A-constant was obtained and used to evaluate the refractive outcomes. The main outcome measures were mean prediction error (PE), median absolute error (MedAE), mean absolute error (MAE), and percentage of eyes with a PE within ±0.50, ±1.00, and ±2.00 diopters (D).

RESULTS

Forty patients (40 eyes) were included in the study. The new optimized A-constant was 117.5, and the mean PE, MedAE, and MAE was -0.02 ± 0.73, 0.34, and 0.54, respectively. The percentage of eyes with a PE within ±0.50, ±1.00, and ±2.00 D was 65%, 87.5%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Camellens FIL622-1 IOL represents a valid option as sulcus implantation after posterior capsular rupture and it would guarantee the surgeon an on-label option with a more accurate biometric calculation, at the time of surgical implantation, with the new optimized A-constant. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(12):806-811.].

Comparison of the actual diameter of capsulotomy and predicted diameter of capsulotomy after femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy

PURPOSE

To compare the consistency between the actual diameter of capsulotomy (ADC) and the predicted diameter of capsulotomy (PDC) in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and analyze the factors that influence the deviation of the diameter of capsulotomy (DDC) between the actual and predicted.

SETTING

Aier Eye Hospital of Wuhan University, China.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case series.

METHODS

Patients who underwent FLACS from March 2020 to March 2021 were reviewed. The ADC in FLACS was measured and compared with the PDC. The effects of age, sex, and biometrics on DDC were analyzed.

RESULTS

412 eyes of 336 patients were included. The mean age was 53.0 ± 0.91 years (range 3 to 91 years). When the PDC was set to 4.50 mm, the results showed that the ADC was 5.21 ± 0.21 mm with a significant difference between them ( P &amp;lt; .05). However, when the PDC was set to 5.2 mm, the ADC was 5.10 ± 0.38 mm without a significant difference between them ( P &amp;gt; .05). No correlation ( P &amp;gt; .05) was found between the DDC and the axial length, the DDC and the anterior chamber depth (ACD), and the DDC and the mean keratometry (Km), but a negative correlation was found between the DDC and the lens thickness (LT) ( r = -0.21; P &amp;lt; .05) and the DDC with age ( r = -0.70; P &amp;lt; .05). Using curvilinear regression analysis, a development of an age-depending correction formula was predicted: ADC = PDC + 1.23 - 0.30 ln (x) (x = age ≥3) ( R2 = 0.65; F = 752.39; P = .00).

CONCLUSIONS

The consistency of the ADC and PDC was influenced by age and LT. For patients aged 40 years or younger, the younger the patient, the wider the DDC; for patients older than 40 years, the DDC was small. The thicker the LT, the smaller the DDC.

Refractive error induced by intraocular lens tilt after intrascleral intraocular lens fixation

PURPOSE

To investigate the spherical shift of intraocular lens (IOL) tilt after intrascleral fixation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent flanged intrascleral IOL fixation with transconjunctival 25- or 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy at the Department of Ophthalmology of the Jikei University Hospital. The minimum follow-up duration was 3 months. Second-generation anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA2; TOMEY) was used to obtain the values of tilt and decentration of the intrasclerally fixated IOL and postoperative anterior chamber depth. We investigated the relationship between refractive error and various parameters, such as IOL tilt and decentration, axial length, and keratometry. In addition to our clinical investigation, we conducted optical simulations using Zemax to evaluate the spherical shift of the IOL tilt by means of the through-focus response and change in spherical equivalent power.

RESULTS

The study involved 72 eyes of 67 patients. The degree of IOL tilt was correlated with the amount of refractive error (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient [CC] = - 0.32; P = 0.006). In particular, a tilt angle greater than 10° strongly affected the refractive error. The postoperative anterior chamber depth also correlated with the refractive error (CC = 0.50; P < 0.001), as opposed to decentration (CC = - 0.17; P = 0.15), axial length (CC = - 0.08; P = 0.49), and keratometry (CC = - 0.06; P = 0.64). Optical simulations also revealed a myopic shift that exponentially increased as the tilt became greater.

CONCLUSION

IOL tilts that are greater than 10° induce refractive error.

POSITION OF IN-THE-BAG POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR LENSES RELATIVE TO THE LIMBUS: Applications to Scleral-Sutured Lenses

PURPOSE

To characterize the true position of in-the-bag intraocular lenses (IOLs) relative to the limbus using ultrasound biomicroscopy and estimate scleral-sutured IOL positioning.

METHODS

This prospective single-center study included 70 eyes of 41 patients with in-the-bag posterior chamber IOLs. Four vertical ultrasound biomicroscopy captures were performed in each eye in the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal quadrants. Postoperative biometric data were collected. The primary outcome was the vertical distance of the in-the-bag IOL from the sclerocorneal limbus. Secondary outcomes included anterior shift and refractive change of a theoretical scleral-sutured IOL using sclerotomies at 2.5 mm and 3 mm posterior to the limbus.

RESULTS

A total of 265 ultrasound biomicroscopy images were analyzed, including 64 superior, 69 inferior, 66 nasal, and 66 temporal. The true in-the-bag IOL position measured as distance posterior to the sclerocorneal limbus was 4.23 ± 0.56 mm superiorly, 4.22 ± 0.46 mm inferiorly, 3.95 ± 0.48 mm nasally, and 3.86 ± 0.52 mm temporally. The anterior shift of a theoretical scleral-sutured IOL was 0.60 mm for a 3-mm sclerotomy and 0.93 mm for a 2.5-mm sclerotomy, resulting in a theoretical myopic shift of 0.45 diopter (D) and 0.79 D, respectively, assuming a 15-D IOL. Larger biometric measurements correlated with a more posterior in-the-bag position.

CONCLUSION

True in-the-bag IOL position was found to be more posterior than estimates of scleral-sutured IOLs. Additional corrections in scleral-sutured IOL calculations may improve refractive outcomes.

Predictive Value of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulae in Children

Purpose

To compare the accuracy of IOL power calculation formulae in a large cohort of children who underwent IOL implantation.

Setting

Cairo University Children Hospital.

Design

Retrospective, case series.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of all children <14 years, who underwent primary or secondary IOL implantation in Cairo University Children Hospital from January 2016 to December 2019, was performed. Absolute prediction error (APE) was calculated for SRKII, SRK/T, Holladay I and Hoffer-Q formulae using the patients' AL, keratometric (K) readings, implanted IOL power and refraction done two months postoperatively.

Results

The study included 308 eyes of 255 patients with a mean age of 4.74 ± 3.19 years at the time of surgery. The mean K-reading was 43.42 ± 3.57 diopters (D) and mean AL was 22.01 ± 1.93 mm. The percentage of eyes with APE within 0.5D was 27.7% (85 eyes), 32.2% (99 eyes), 30.6% (94 eyes) and 25.4% (78 eyes) with SRK II, SRK/T, Holladay I and Hoffer-Q formulae, respectively. APE was significantly lower with the SRK/T formula (P≤0.004) and significantly higher with the Hoffer-Q formula (P≤ 0.002). There was a negative correlation between the age of the patient and the APE of the SRK II formula (P=0.02). Moreover, the SRK/T, Holladay and Hoffer-Q formulae APEs were affected by the average k-readings (P=0.019, 0.005 and 0.035) respectively.

Conclusion

The SRK/T and Holladay I formulae were the most predictable formulae in IOL power calculation in pediatric eyes.

Iris and Lens Trauma - Iris Reconstruction

Iris and lens injuries entail a large spectrum and occur in closed and open globe injuries. Depending on accompanying ocular trauma (e.g. corneal involvement) as well as on the extend of the injuries several different surgical options are available ranging from suturing techniques to special individualized implants. The aim of this article is to present and discuss current treatment options for lens and iris trauma in regards to typical cases.

Comparison of refractive deviations after phacovitrectomy according to the intraocular lens insertion method

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare refractive deviations between in-the-bag insertion, trans-scleral ciliary sulcus fixation, ciliary sulcus insertion, and ciliary sulcus insertion with optic capture after phacovitrectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-unit, single-surgeon, retrospective study.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent phacovitrectomy and intraocular lens (IOL) out-of-the-bag insertion simultaneously were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent phacovitrectomy with IOL in-the-bag insertion were also included for comparison with those who underwent phacovitrectomy with out-of-the-bag insertion. Patients were classified into four groups based on the IOL insertion method. The average difference from the target spherical equivalent (SE) to postoperative SE was defined as the refractive deviation. Refractive deviations of the groups were compared.

RESULTS

The refractive deviation for the in-the-bag insertion (43 eyes) was -0.18 ± 0.50 Df, -0.84 ± 0.81 D for the trans-scleral ciliary sulcus fixation (43 eyes), -0.93 ± 0.68 D for the ciliary sulcus insertion (25 eyes), and -0.27 ± 0.50 D for the ciliary sulcus insertion with optic capture group (24 eyes). The trans-scleral ciliary sulcus fixation and ciliary sulcus insertion groups had significantly different deviations than the in-the-bag group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the ciliary sulcus insertion with optic capture and the in-the-bag insertion groups (p = 0.100).

CONCLUSION

Refractive deviation was significantly different between the eyes that underwent trans-scleral ciliary sulcus fixation or ciliary sulcus insertion and the eyes that underwent in-the-bag insertion. However, there was no significant deviation among the eyes that underwent ciliary sulcus insertion with optic capture.

Sutured Intrascleral Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Fixation with Ciliary Sulcus Location Guided by Ultrasonic Biological Microscopy: A Retrospective Analysis of Anatomical and Refractive Outcome

PURPOSE

To report the outcome of sutured intrascleral posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC IOL) fixation with ciliary sulcus location guided by ultrasonic biological microscopy (UBM).

METHODS

Patients who underwent a sutured intrascleral PC IOL fixation were reviewed and divided into four groups. In group 1, the traditional sulcus fixation (2 mm from limbus) of IOL was performed. In groups 2, 3, and 4, UBM was performed before surgery to locate the position of the ciliary sulcus as the haptics insertion position. IOL power was selected by decreasing the calculated value of the IOL power by 1.0 D, 1.0 D, 0.5 D, and 0.0 D, respectively.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (63 eyes) were included in the four groups. After 4.1 ± 3.0 months' follow-up, the postsurgery spherical equivalent (SE) was 0.73 ± 1.86, 0.71 ± 0.84, 1.14 ± 0.45, and 0.07 ± 0.89 diopters (D), respectively. Statistical significance was reached for the postsurgery SE with target refraction between group 1 (p = 0.027, <0.05), group 2 (p = 0.003, <0.01), and group 3 (p = 0.017, <0.05). No significant difference existed for the postsurgery SE with target refraction in group 4 (p = 0.779, >0.05), and the postsurgery SE in group 4 was the nearest to target refraction.

CONCLUSION

Intrascleral PC IOL fixation guided by UBM is helpful for locating the ciliary sulcus and satisfactory visual outcomes with a predictable IOL power calculation.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and intraocular lens implantation in cases of aphakic bullous keratopathy

Purpose: To present the results of a modified sutured transcleral or sutureless intrascleral three-piece foldable intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in cases of aphakic bullous keratopathy (ABK) with inadequate capsular support.Methods: Twenty-one eyes of 21 patients with ABK and inadequate capsular support who underwent DMEK with three-piece foldable IOL implantation from September 2015 to June 2018 were analyzed, retrospectively. Two techniques were used in IOL implantation; sutureless intrascleral fixation of the IOL (ISF-IOL) and sutured transscleral-fixated IOL (TSF-IOL) implantation.Results: Rebubblings due to the graft detachment were needed in 9 (43%) of 21 eyes in the early postoperative period. At the last follow-up visit, 18 (85.7%) of DM grafts were attached. Any complication related to IOL implantation was not observed in the ISF-IOL cases. Exposure of the fixation suture in 1 (25%) of 4 TSF-IOL cases was seen, postoperatively. The increase in the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the last follow-up visit was statistically significant when compared to the mean preoperative BCVA (p < .001). The mean preoperative central corneal thickness was decreased from 883.3 ± 111.8 (700-1150) μm to 582.3 ± 118.2 (490-990) μm at the last follow-up visit (p < .001).Conclusion: DMEK combined with sutureless/sutured three-piece foldable IOL implantation appears to be a feasible method for the management in ABK without adequate capsular support. A faster visual recovery can be obtained with the techniques presented.

Secondary intraocular lens implantation: Complication rates, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes

PURPOSE

To compare complication rates, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes of secondary intraocular lens (IOLs) implantation.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

All secondary IOLs placed by the anterior segment service were reviewed. Preoperative data, operative reports, and data from each subsequent postoperative visit were evaluated. Patients were divided into 5 groups based on the final IOL position: (1) sulcus with optic capture, (2) sulcus without optic capture, (3) anterior chamber (AC), (4) iris-fixated, and (5) transscleral-sutured. Complication rates, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes were compared for each group.

RESULTS

The sulcus with and without optic capture groups had the lowest complication rates and best visual acuity outcomes. There was no difference in final corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) between the transscleral-sutured IOL, iris-fixated IOL, and AC IOL groups, although the AC IOL group had the lowest rates of early postoperative complications and a significant improvement in vision. The transscleral-sutured IOL group had the highest complication rates, and 25% of patients in the iris-fixated IOL group lost 2 or more lines of CDVA.

CONCLUSIONS

When a secondary IOL cannot be placed within the capsular bag, sulcus with optic capture is the best alternative, followed by sulcus without optic capture. There was no difference in visual acuity outcomes between transscleral-sutured IOLs, iris-fixated IOLs, and AC IOLs. Anterior chamber IOLs resulted in fewer early complications.

The effect of intraocular lens tilt on visual outcomes in scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of scleral-fixated intraocular lens (IOL) tilt on visual outcomes.

METHODS

Ninety-four eyes of consecutive 94 patients who underwent scleral-fixated IOL implantation with Z-suture technique were included in this prospective study. The values of pre- and postoperative 12th month uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), cylindrical refractive error, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and corneal and lenticular astigmatism were recorded. The position of the implanted IOL was evaluated with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). The relationships between the AS-OCT measurements and the visual acuity or refractive errors were investigated.

RESULTS

The IOL position was evaluated as tilted in 68 (72.3%) patients: 29 (30.8%) in both vertical + horizontal axes, 30 (31.9%) in the horizontal axis and 9 (9.6%) in the vertical axis. There were no significant differences between patients with and without tilt IOL position in terms of the UCVA, BCVA, cylindrical refractive error and lenticular astigmatism (p > 0.05, for each). The mean BCVA was significantly higher in the no-tilt group than in the both horizontal + vertical tilt and the vertical tilt groups (p = 0.03, p = 0.04, respectively). The mean lenticular astigmatism was significantly higher in the vertical tilt group than the other groups (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Tilting in IOL position occurs commonly; however, IOLs with tilting on any of the axes do not have significantly worse outcomes when compared with IOLs with no tilt, in terms of visual results and refractive errors. On the other hand, tilting on the vertical axis is observed less commonly, yet is more effective on visual results and refractive errors, when compared with tilting on the horizontal axis.

Refractive Outcomes after Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Scleral Fixated Intraocular Lens with Gore-Tex Suture

PURPOSE

To evaluate refractive outcomes after combined pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and scleral fixation of an intraocular lens (IOL) using Gore-Tex suture.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-five eyes from 53 patients who underwent PPV with a Gore-Tex sutured IOL from June 2013 through December 2017.

METHODS

Patients who underwent combined PPV and scleral fixation of an IOL with Gore-Tex suture were identified. All eyes underwent scleral fixation of either an Akreos A060 or enVista MX60 IOL and were fixated either 2 mm or 3 mm posterior to the limbus. Postoperative manifest refractions were performed at least 3 months after surgery and were compared with preoperative predicted target refraction based on in-the-bag IOL calculations. Subgroup analyses based on sclerotomy placement and IOL models were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative manifest refraction and difference with sclerotomy placement and IOL model.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative spherical equivalent (SEQ) was -0.99±1.00 diopters (D). The mean difference in SEQ (ΔSEQ) from preoperative predicted target was -0.64±1.00 D. The IOL was fixated 2 mm posterior to the limbus in 14 eyes and 3 mm in 41 eyes. Within these 2 subgroups, the mean postoperative SEQ was -1.53±1.35 D for fixation 2 mm posterior to the limbus and -0.82±0.83 D for fixation 3 mm posterior to the limbus (P = 0.09). The mean ΔSEQ was -0.43±0.71 D for fixation 3 mm posterior to the limbus and -1.35±1.32 D for fixation 2 mm posterior to the limbus (P = 0.03). The mean amount of surgically induced astigmatism in the overall cohort was 0.77±0.65 D. The mean ΔSEQ and induced astigmatism were similar between IOL models.

CONCLUSIONS

After combined PPV and Gore-Tex-sutured IOL implantation, mean postoperative refractive outcomes were more myopic when the IOL was fixated 2 mm from the limbus compared with 3 mm from the limbus. No significant difference was found between IOL models. Based on these results, future implant power calculations may be adjusted to approximate preoperative target refraction more accurately.

Reinforced scleral fixation of foldable intraocular lens by double sutures: comparison with intrascleral intraocular lens fixation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to describe a new technique for small-incision scleral fixation of intraocular lens (IOL) using double 10-0 polypropylene sutures, and to report the outcomes of IOL position compared with intrascleral IOL fixation at 12-month follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study.

METHOD

This new technique, called double sutured scleral fixated-IOL (DSF-IOL), was created to help with long-term knots strengthening by applying double sutures to each IOL haptic using an augmented Clove-hitch knot instead of the conventional knots tied by single suture. The tilt and decenter of IOL were measured by Scheimpflug camera and other refractive outcomes were compared between two groups at 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

This study consisted of 26 eyes (54.2%) from the DSF-IOL group, and 22 eyes (45.8%) from the intrascleral fixated IOL (ISF-IOL) group. No significant differences of mean absolute degree of IOL tilt (2.90 ± 0.77 vs 2.82 ± 0.72; p = 0.633) and IOL decenter (151.90 ± 59.80 vs 175.0 ± 73.14 microns; p = 0.265) were found between the two groups. Post-operative LogMAR visual acuity was not statistically different between the two groups (0.32 ± 0.17 vs 0.41 ± 0.19, p = 0.089). Early post-operative hypotony was only present in the ISF-IOL group (13.6%).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that DSF-IOL is as effective as ISF-IOL. This technique can be a simpler approach to optimize small-incision scleral fixation of IOL without the complications associated with intrascleral IOL fixation.

Scleral-Fixated Intraocular Lenses: Past and Present

Intraocular lenses (IOLs) can have inadequate support for placement in the capsular bag as a result of ocular trauma, metabolic or inherited conditions such as Marfan's syndrome or pseudoexfoliation, or complicated cataract surgery. Surgical options for patients with inadequate capsular support include alternative placement in the anterior chamber (ACIOLs), fixation to the iris, or fixation to the sclera. The surgical techniques for each of these approaches have improved considerably over the last several decades resulting in improved visual and ocular outcomes. If no capsular or iris support exists, the surgeon can fixate an IOL to the sclera or the patient can remain aphakic. IOLs can be fixated to the sclera using sutures or by tunneling the IOL haptics into the sclera without sutures. This review summarizes the pre-operative considerations, surgical techniques, outcomes, and unique complications associated with implantation of scleral-fixated IOLs.

Posterior Vault Distance of Ciliary Sulcus-Implanted Three-piece Intraocular Lenses According to Ciliary Sulcus Diameter

PURPOSE

To investigate the correlation among preoperative biometry data, postoperative ciliary sulcus diameter, posterior vault distance, and effective lens position of ciliary sulcus-implanted intraocular lenses (IOLs).

DESIGN

Retrospective interventional case series.

METHODS

Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of a ZA9003 IOL (Abbott Medical Optics Inc, Santa Ana, California, USA) in the ciliary sulcus. We analyzed correlations among preoperative biometry data and ultrasound biomicroscopy measurements, ciliary sulcus diameter, posterior vault distance, and effective lens position. Regression analyses were performed to identify which combination of preoperative biometry data, average corneal power (keratometry [K]), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and axial length (AL) was best for predicting effective lens position.

RESULTS

The sulcus diameter was shorter in eyes that had a steep cornea and shorter AL. The posterior vault distance was negatively correlated with sulcus diameter in subjects who had shorter postoperative time intervals (≤24 months) (R² = 0.336 and P = .038). The posterior vault distance decreased with each passing postoperative month (R² = 0.158 and P = .045). The R² value for predicting the effective lens positions of sulcus-implanted IOLs based on the entire average K, ACD, and AL was higher than those based on parts of these values.

CONCLUSIONS

The effective lens position of sulcus-implanted IOLs can be affected by sulcus diameter, and lens position can change, especially in the early postoperative period. We recommend using the entire average K, ACD, and AL to predict the effective position of sulcus-implanted IOLs.

Modified Haigis Formula Effective Lens Position Equation for Ciliary Sulcus-Implanted Intraocular Lenses

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of a modified Haigis formula effective lens position equation on improving refractive outcomes in eyes with ciliary sulcus-implanted intraocular lenses (IOLs).

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-two eyes of 132 consecutive patients who underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of a ZA9003 (Abbott Medical Optics Inc, Santa Ana, California, USA; 69 eyes) or AR40e (Abbott Medical Optics Inc; 63 eyes) IOL in the ciliary sulcus were enrolled. The modified effective lens position (ELP) equation based on the corneal radius (CR) (ELP - β0 - β1 × CR, where β0 and β1 are parameters in the linear regression analysis) was obtained using linear regression analysis in each IOL group, and was applied to the other IOL group in order to evaluate its effect on refractive outcomes in an independent data set. The median absolute error (MedAE) was predicted using the modified effective lens position equation and was compared with that predicted using the adjusted IOL power.

RESULTS

The modified effective lens position equation was ELP + 11.662 - 1.6225 × CR in the ZA9003 group and ELP + 10.606 - 1.4817 × CR in the AR40e group. The MedAE that was predicted using the modified effective lens position equation (0.34 diopter [D] in the ZA9003 group and 0.42 D in the AR40e group) was significantly smaller than that predicted using the adjusted IOL power (0.47 D in the ZA9003 group and 0.66 D in the AR40e group) (P < .001 and P = .005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

IOL power calculation using the modified Haigis formula effective lens position equation improved refractive outcomes in eyes with sulcus-implanted IOLs.

Defining the ideal femtosecond laser capsulotomy

Purpose

We define the ideal anterior capsulotomy through consideration of capsular histology and biomechanics. Desirable qualities include preventing posterior capsular opacification (PCO), maintaining effective lens position (ELP) and optimising capsular strength.

Methods

Laboratory study of capsular biomechanics and literature review of histology and published clinical results.

Results

Parameters of ideal capsulotomy construction include complete overlap of the intraocular lens to prevent PCO, centration on the clinical approximation of the optical axis of the lens to ensure concentricity with the capsule equator, and maximal capsular thickness at the capsulotomy edge to maintain integrity.

Conclusions

Constructing the capsulotomy centred on the clinical approximation of the optical axis of the lens with diameter 5.25 mm optimises prevention of PCO, consistency of ELP and capsular strength.

Management of traumatic cataract in adults at a reference center in Mexico City

The purpose of the study was to determine the clinical presentation, mode of injury, surgical, and postoperative outcomes in adult patients with traumatic cataract. This is a clinical, observational, and retrospective study with review of records of patients in the period 2010-2012. Eighty patients were included, of whom 67 (83.75 %) were male. The mean age at presentation was 46 years (range 18-82 years). Sixty-four patients (80 %) had a closed-globe blunt ocular trauma and 16 (20 %) had an open-globe penetrating trauma. Seventy-seven (96.25 %) patients underwent phacoemulsification; 13.7 % (n = 11) required placement of capsular tension rings and 22.5 % (n = 18) automated anterior vitrectomy. In 53 % of the cases the intraocular lens (IOL) was placed in the capsular bag. Forty-seven patients (58.75 %) achieved a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. In 57 (71.25 %) the final refraction was obtained, with a mean spherical equivalent of -0.56D (range -3.50D to +2.00 D). The improvement in visual acuity was significantly higher when the IOL was placed in the capsular bag compared to when it was placed in the sulcus (average difference of 0.667, p = 0.001). The most common mechanism of trauma is closed globe. Phacoemulsification was the procedure most common performed, with the IOL placed most commonly in the capsular bag. The final best-corrected visual acuity in most patients was 20/40 or better. Placing the IOL in the capsular bag represented an improvement in visual acuity compared to placement in the sulcus.

[Implantation of intraocular lenses in the ciliary sulcus]

Implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) into the ciliary sulcus is the second most common implantation site after the regular capsular bag (in the bag) placement of an IOL. Although mainly not primarily intended, it is very often used in both complicated cataract surgery and secondary implantation due to IOL dislocation or aphakia. In most cases stable positioning is possible, especially when using optic capture techniques. A variety of difficulties can occur with sulcus implantation depending on the anatomical and surgical conditions present at the time of implantation. The most anterior position of the sulcus lense has to be considered for calculation of the refractive power of the IOL.