Verteporfin plus Ranibizumab for Choroidal Neovascularization in Age-related Macular Degeneration

Gene and cell therapy for age-related macular degeneration: A review

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of irreversible vision loss among the elderly in Western communities, with an estimated global prevalence of 10 - 20% in people older than 65 years. AMD leads to central vision loss due to degeneration of the photoreceptors, retinal pigment epithelium and the choriocapillaris. Beckman's classification for AMD, based upon color fundus photographs, divides the disease into early, intermediate, and late forms. The late, vision-threatening stage includes both neovascular AMD and geographic atrophy. Despite its high prevalence and impact on patients' quality of life, treatment options for AMD are limited. While neovascular AMD can be medically managed with anti-VEGF intravitreal injections, until very recently there has been no approved treatment options for atrophic AMD; however, in February 2023 the first treatment for geographic atrophy - pegcetacoplan - was approved by the US FDA. We describe the current landscape of potential gene and cell therapeutic strategies for late-stage AMD, with an emphasis on the therapeutic options that might become available in the next few years.

Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Chorioretinal Conditions: A Narrative Review

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin involves intravenous administration of a photosensitizer followed by its laser light activation at the target site to inhibit aberrant choroidal vascularization. This narrative review provides an overview of the role verteporfin PDT plays in the management of chorioretinal conditions. A PubMed literature review of all English-language articles published through October 19, 2023, was conducted to identify relevant references. Verteporfin PDT has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration and is often used in combination with a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor. Additionally, patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, a subtype of neovascular age-related macular degeneration, also benefit from verteporfin PDT combined with a VEGF inhibitor for improving visual acuity. Verteporfin PDT has also been effective in treating patients with peripapillary CNV, as well as eyes with CNV due to ocular histoplasmosis and pathologic myopia. Reduced dose and/or fluence PDT protocols have been effective in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy while reducing adverse effects. In eyes with choroidal hemangioma, tumor regression and visual outcomes have been improved with verteporfin PDT treatment. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin continues to play an important role in the management of chorioretinal conditions.

Examining the efficacy of verteporfin photo-dynamic therapy (PDT) at different dose & fluence levels

OBJECTIVES

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a vaso-occlusive treatment for a number of chorioretinal vascular pathologies. We aimed to retrospectively analyse efficiency and safety of PDT for different conditions (central serous retinopathy (CSR), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), macular telangiectasia type 2 and choroidal hemangioma) and with different verteporfin parameters.

METHODS

Clinical parameters were ascertained from the medical records of patients undergoing PDT over a 6-year period. This included indications for PDT, dosing regimens of verteporfin PDT (which includes treatment dose of verteporfin and fluence). Response to treatment was measured by best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) on ocular coherence tomography. Complications and side effects were recorded.

RESULTS

67.4 % (31/46) of PDT treatments performed over the last six years were for CSR. In the CSR cohort, there were significant improvements in BCVA (0.47 ± 0.24 to 0.29 ± 0.27, p < 0.05) and CFT (350.2μm ± 66.9 μm to 286.1μm ± 60.6 μm. In the AMD cohort, there was no change in BCVA (1.08 ± 0.52 to 1.07 ± 0.53, p = 0.96) but significant improvement in CFT (488.2μm ± 164.6 μm to 348.7μm ± 65.7 μm, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in BCVA or CFT for macular telangiectasia type 2 and choroidal hemangioma.

CONCLUSIONS

PDT continues to have a role in the management of medical retina conditions. Our results show PDT is most effective in improving and stabilizing visual acuity in CSR, with earlier intervention resulting in better outcomes.

Prevention Surpasses Treatment: 5-year Follow-Up, Cost-Utility, and Cost-Benefit of Zeaxanthin Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

INTRODUCTION

Oral administration of zeaxanthin (Zx) 20 mg daily in patients with unilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with triple therapy (photodynamic therapy/intravitreal bevacizumab/intravitreal dexamethasone) reduced fellow-eye 2-year nAMD incidence from 23 to 6% (p = 0.02) in a prior clinical trial. We questioned the long-term benefit and thus analyzed case-control 5-year patient data of trial participants and additional participants with 5-year follow-up, also performing cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses.

METHODS

Consecutive, unilateral nAMD patient outcomes for those taking 20 mg Zx supplementation orally for ≥ 5 years were compared with the Comparison of AMD Treatments Trials (CATT) 5-year historical controls for fellow-eye nAMD conversion. Eleven-year mean life expectancy, cost-utility and cost-benefit models were undertaken employing a 3% discount rate and 2020 US real dollars.

RESULTS

Among 227 consecutive patients with nAMD/Zx-supplementation, 202 (90%) had 5-year follow-up. The fellow-eye nAMD 5-year conversion incidence using a Kaplan-Meier cumulative event estimate was 22% (49/227), versus 48% (167/348) with CATT control data (p < 0.0001). An 11-year cost-utility model with estimates for years 6-11 demonstrated a 0.42 (7.7%) QALY (quality-adjusted life-year) gain, including 3 months of life saved per patient due to decreased nAMD fellow-eye conversion. This yielded a direct ophthalmic medical cost perspective, incremental cost-utility ratio (CUR) of -$576/QALY and a societal cost perspective CUR of -$125,071/QALY. Zx supplementation for all 2020 US unilateral nAMD cases would have theoretically saved society, primarily patients, $6.0 billion over 11 years, a 1531% return on investment (ROI), or 31.3% annual ROI, on Zx costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral zeaxanthin supplementation for unilateral nAMD patients appears to decrease fellow-eye long-term incidence and is cost-effective and financially rewarding. It is dominant vs. no supplementation in patients presenting with unilateral nAMD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01527435.

STRICT PRO RE NATA VERSUS TREAT-AND-EXTEND REGIMENS IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

PURPOSE

To compare the visual and anatomical outcomes between strict pro re nata (strict PRN) and treat-and-extend (T&E) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

A meta-analysis of 1-year and 2-year changes between strict PRN and T&E anti-VEGF regimens were conducted in both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies (RWSs). The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and weighted mean numbers of visits and injections were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 19 RCTs and 23 RWSs (2,530 eyes in strict PRN and 4,399 eyes in T&E) were included. Mean BCVA change in strict PRN group in both 1-year and 2-year (5.95 and 5.78, respectively) was noninferior to the T&E group (7.85 and 5.96, respectively). Mean CRT changes were also similar in both strict PRN and T&E groups. Mean number of visits were significantly more in the strict PRN group, whereas mean number of injections was significantly more in the T&E group.

CONCLUSION

The strict PRN regimen demonstrates a noninferior BCVA improvement to the T&E regimen, achieving fewer injections, and may be both economically and medically beneficial. Both selections should be provided to patients with an overall consideration.

Verteporfin reverses progestin resistance through YAP/TAZ-PI3K-Akt pathway in endometrial carcinoma

Progestin resistance is a problem for patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) who require conservative treatment with progestin, and its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. YAP and TAZ (YAP/TAZ), downstream transcription coactivators of Hippo pathway, promote viability, metastasis and also drug resistance of malignant tumors. According to our microarray analysis, YAP/TAZ were upregulated in progestin resistant IshikawaPR cell versus progestin sensitive Ishikawa cell, which implied that YAP/TAZ may be a vital promotor of resistance to progestin. We found YAP/TAZ had higher expression levels among the resistant tissues than sensitive tissues. In addition, knocking down YAP/TAZ decreased cell viability, inhibited cell migration and invasion and increased the sensitivity of IshikawaPR cell to progestin. On the contrary, overexpression of YAP/TAZ increased cell proliferation, metastasis and promoted progestin resistance. We also confirmed YAP/TAZ were involved in progestin resistant process by regulating PI3K-Akt pathway. Furthermore, Verteporfin as an inhibitor of YAP/TAZ could increase sensitivity of IshikawaPR cells to progestin in vivo and in vitro. Our study for the first time indicated that YAP/TAZ play an important role in progestin resistance by regulating PI3K-Akt pathway in EC, which may provide ideas for clinical targeted therapy of progestin resistance.

Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Based on Non-ICGA Criteria in White Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

PURPOSE

To determine prevalence of probable polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) among White patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) using non-indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) criteria DESIGN: Multicenter, multinational, retrospective, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

A total of 208 treatment-naive eyes from Hispanic and non-Hispanic White individuals diagnosed with nAMD were included. All underwent color fundus photography (CFP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography (FFA). De-identified images of study eyes were sent to 2 groups of graders. Group 1 reviewed CFP, OCT, and FFA to confirm nAMD diagnosis. Group 2 reviewed CFP and OCT to determine highly suggestive features for PCV. Probable PCV diagnosis defined as the presence of ≥2 of 4 highly suggestive features for PCV: notched or fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (PED) on CFP, sharply-peaked PED, notched PED, and hyperreflective ring on OCT.

RESULTS

Eleven eyes were excluded because of poor image quality (6) or non-nAMD diagnosis (5). Of 197 eligible eyes (197 patients), the mean age (SD) was 78.8 years (8.9), 44.2% were men, 26.4% were Hispanic, and 73.6% were non-Hispanic White individuals; 41.1%, 23.4%, 9.1%, and 2.5% had ≥1, ≥2, ≥3, and 4 highly suggestive features. Results showed that 23.4% (95% CI, 17.6%-29.9%) had probable PCV diagnosis. Predominantly occult CNV was more frequently found in probable PCV than nAMD subgroup (84.8% vs 64.9%, P = .01). Hispanic White individuals had a lower prevalence of probable PCV than non-Hispanic White individuals (9.6% vs 28.2%, P = .006) CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that probable PCV occurs between 17.6% and 29.9% in White individuals with nAMD, and more commonly in non-Hispanic than in Hispanic White individuals.

Real-world outcomes of combined therapy of photodynamic therapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

OBJECTIVES

To describe the real-world outcomes of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as a rescue therapy in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monotherapy in a British cohort of patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of 53 eyes with PCV. Based on the timing of PDT, the eyes were stratified into two groups (9 in the Initial-PDT group, 44 in the Deferred group). The number of anti-VEGF injections/year and the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after PDT were analysed. Multivariate regression model was created to identify factors predictive of visual outcome and treatment burden after PDT.

RESULTS

The Deferred group received a mean of 9.4 injections/year but significantly reduced to 7.2 after PDT (p < 0.001). The Initial-PDT group required significantly fewer injections after PDT compared to the Deferred group (p = 0.004). The Deferred group experienced improvement in BCVA from 58.7 letters at baseline to 63.8 at 18-months follow-up (p < 0.001), but no significant increase was observed in the Initial-PDT group (p = 0.310). Better baseline BCVA is associated with higher likelihood of achieving good BCVA ≥ 70 letters after PDT (Odd Ratio=1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.21, p = 0.006), while increased number of anti-VEGF injections/year before PDT reduces the likelihood of easing treatment burden to ≥12 weeks apart between each injection after PDT (Odd Ratio=0.724, 95% CI: 0.58-0.91, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

PDT as a rescue therapy is beneficial in the long-term management of PCV, particularly in eyes that had experienced a significant period of prior exposure to anti-VEGF monotherapy.

Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis

Intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) have become the standard of care for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although most pivotal trials have used monthly injections, alternative strategies that enable the injections to be administered on a more flexible schedule, including pro re nata (PRN) and treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens, are being applied more frequently. This review sought to provide further scientific evidence about the visual outcomes and treatment burden among the currently available anti-VEGF agents and regimens, including aflibercept, ranibizumab, abicipar and brolucizumab. To this end, a systematic review of published randomized studies was conducted from the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane library, and a meta-analysis was applied to the obtained data using single-means modeling to compare the efficacy and maintenance among the different available treatments and regimens at Years 1 and 2. Quality analysis identified the best-informed data for modeling purposes. Overall, 47 relevant publications were retrieved for the analysis. Superior efficacy, meaning that there were observed improvements in visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT), occurred with monthly versus PRN regimens, yet a higher IVI number was also observed. Conversely, the T&E regimens displayed similar efficacy to the monthly regimens, but with a reduced IVI number. Aflibercept T&E exhibited similar efficacy to ranibizumab T&E, but with significantly lower IVI numbers at both Year 1 (p < 0.0001) and Year 2 (p = 0.0011). Though all of the regimens resulted in maintained efficacy between Years 1 and 2, the required IVI number varied. The retrieved data did not enable other regimens or newer anti-VEGF agents such as brolucizumab to be compared. In conclusion, the T&E regimens were shown to be the most efficient, optimizing durable effectiveness whilst minimizing the IVI number in newly diagnosed exudative AMD, with aflibercept requiring the lowest IVI number.

Exudative versus Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Physiopathology and Treatment Options

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is an eye disease typically associated with the aging and can be classified into two types—namely, the exudative and the nonexudative AMD. Currently available treatments for exudative AMD use intravitreal injections, which are associated with high risk of infection that can lead to endophthalmitis, while no successful treatments yet exist for the nonexudative form of AMD. In addition to the pharmacologic therapies administered by intravitreal injection already approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in exudative AMD, there are some laser treatments approved that can be used in combination with the pharmacological therapies. In this review, we discuss the latest developments of treatment options for AMD. Relevant literature available from 1993 was used, which included original articles and reviews available in PubMed database and also information collected from Clinical Trials Gov website using “age-related macular degeneration” and “antiangiogenic therapies” as keywords. The clinical trials search was limited to ongoing trials from 2015 to date.

Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

The use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents has profoundly changed the prognosis of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). As clinical experiences have accumulated, it has become mandatory to summarize data to give information that can be useful in everyday practice. We conducted a systematic review to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that reported 12-month changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with nAMD on anti-VEGF monotherapy. Data were analyzed in a random-effects meta-analysis with BCVA change as the primary outcome. Meta-regression was conducted to evaluate the impact of multiple covariates. Four hundred and twelve heterogeneous study populations (109,666 eyes) were included. Anti-VEGFs induced an overall improvement of +5.37 ETDRS letters at 12 months. Meta-regression showed that mean BCVA change was statistically greater for RCTs (p = 0.0032) in comparison with observational studies. Populations following a proactive regimen had better outcomes than those following a reactive treatment regimen. Mean BCVA change was greater in younger populations, with lower baseline BCVA and treated with a higher number of injections (p < 0.001). Our results confirm that anti-VEGFs may produce a significant functional improvement at 12 months in patients with nAMD.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Monotherapies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Mixed Treatment Comparison

Background: We aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy to identify its utilization and prioritization in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing the recommended anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab, bevacizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab, and conbercept) under various therapeutic regimens. Outcomes of interest included the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), serious adverse events, the proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters or lost <15 letters in BCVA, the mean change in central retinal thickness, and the number of injections within 12 months. Results: Twenty-seven trials including 10,484 participants and eighteen treatments were identified in the network meta-analysis. The aflibercept 2 mg bimonthly, ranibizumab 0.5 mg T&E, and brolucizumab 6 mg q12w/q8w regimens had better visual efficacy. Brolucizumab had absolute superiority in anatomical outcomes and a relative advantage of safety, as well as good performance of aflibercept 2 mg T&E. The proactive regimens had slightly better efficacy but a slightly increased number of injections versus the reactive regimen. Bevacizumab had a statistically non-significant trend toward a lower degree of efficacy and safety. Conclusion: The visual efficacy of four individual anti-VEGF drugs is comparable. Several statistically significant differences were observed considering special anti-VEGF regimens, suggesting that brolucizumab 6 mg q12w/q8w, aflibercept 2 mg bimonthly or T&E, and ranibizumab 0.5 mg T&E are the ideal anti-VEGF regimens for nAMD patients. In the current landscape, based on the premise of equivalent efficacy and safety, the optimal choice of anti-VEGF monotherapies seems mandatory to obtain maximal benefit.

An Objective Perimetry Study of Central Versus Peripheral Sensitivities and Delays in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare central versus peripheral retinal sensitivities and delays in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) using US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP).

Methods

We recruited 18 patients with nAMD and commenced Pro re nata intravitreal anti- vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection. We compared macular (±15 degrees) and wide-field (±30 degrees) mfPOP variants. We examined temporal correlations between treated and untreated fellow eyes. We fitted linear models to selected treatment patterns, and compared the ability of central versus peripheral responses to predict the need for treatment.

Results

Central sensitivity decreased by -2.23 ± 0.051 dB/month (P < 0.0002) in treated eyes, and -0.17 ± 0.07 dB/month (P = 0.033) in untreated eyes. Treated eyes showed quicker central responses by 13.08 ± 3.77 ms than untreated eyes (P = 0.001). Based on peripheral responses, we identified two eye-types. Among positive-eyes peripheral sensitivity increased by 9.88 ± 4.41 dB (P = 0.042) before treatment; delays increased by 3.49 ± 1.75 ms/month (P = 0.049). For negative-eyes peripheral delays were shorter a month before treatment by 9.38 ± 3.59 ms (P = 0.013). Correlations between treatment and peripheral sensitivities or delays peaked at 1 to 2 months post-treatment. Peripheral data significantly determined treatment frequency and final acuity (all P < 0.044).

Conclusions

Peripheral macular function of treated and untreated eyes divided eyes into positive and negative groups. Those peripheral responses determined outcomes; changes preceding active disease by 1 to 3 months. Overall, mfPOP may provide potential biomarkers to assist nAMD management.

Translational Relevance

Objective perimetry may identify the requirement for treatment in nAMD that accords with the decision of a skilled clinician based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and clinical findings.

Visual acuity outcomes of anti-VEGF treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in clinical trials

Anti-VEGF treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) has been evaluated in clinical trials. To select the best anti-VEGF drug and the best treatment regimen for nAMD, a thorough understanding of the characteristics of each anti-VEGF drug and treatment regimen is essential. In this review, we summarized visual acuity (VA) changes in 30 previous clinical trials of anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD. In most studies, ranibizumab, aflibercept, and brolucizumab improved the VA by 6 to 12 letters from the baseline VA of 50-65 letters and maintained the VA improvement regardless of the treatment regimen; the VA improved from 0.2-0.4 to 0.3-0.7 in Snellen equivalents. The improvement was rapid during the first month and became slower after the second injection, and 60% to 90% of the VA improvement was attained within the first 3 months. The upper limit of the VA improvement should be determined according to eyes with nAMD themselves, not according to anti-VEGF drugs or treatment regimens. Since a fixed regimen can result in overtreatment, whilst a pro re nata regimen can result in insufficient treatment, a treat-and-extend regimen would be optimal to treat nAMD. Insufficient treatment fails to improve VA to the upper limit and/or to maintain the improved VA, whereas overtreatment can cause macular atrophy. One study reported no difference in the risk of macular atrophy between ranibizumab and aflibercept, whilst many studies have suggested that aflibercept causes more choroidal thinning, one of the risk factors for macular atrophy, than does ranibizumab. Further evaluation of drugs and regimens should be performed from the viewpoint of complications and minimum number of injections required to improve and maintain VA.

Pachychoroid neovasculopathy: A comparative review on pathology, clinical features, and therapy

There have been major changes in our understanding of choroidal diseases in the last decade owing to multiple retinal and choroidal imaging related advances. A major conceptual pivot is establishment of pachychoroid and its spectrum of clinical disorders: pachychoroid pigment epitheliopathy, central serous chorioretinopathy, pachychoroid neovasculopathy, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy/aneurysmal type 1 neovascularization, peripapillary pachychoroid syndrome, and focal choroidal excavation. However, considerable overlaps in manifestations and therapeutics of these disorders make differentiation amongst them difficult. This review is focused on pathogenesis and clinical aspects of pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV). Since PNV was defined as a separate entity around 5 years ago, there have been numerous contrasting observations surrounding it. We review and summarize these studies, and also compare PNV with other disorders of the pachychoroid spectrum in detail. There are important differences between etiologies of neovascular age related macular degeneration and PNV. Yet the current treatment strategies for PNV have been extrapolated from the trials for the former. Future research needs to validate this assumption with long-term results.

Incomplete response to Anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular AMD: Exploring disease mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs have revolutionized the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD). However, many patients suffer from incomplete response to anti-VEGF therapy (IRT), which is defined as (1) persistent (plasma) fluid exudation; (2) unresolved or new hemorrhage; (3) progressive lesion fibrosis; and/or (4) suboptimal vision recovery. The first three of these collectively comprise the problem of persistent disease activity (PDA) in spite of anti-VEGF therapy. Meanwhile, the problem of suboptimal vision recovery (SVR) is defined as a failure to achieve excellent functional visual acuity of 20/40 or better in spite of sufficient anti-VEGF treatment. Thus, incomplete response to anti-VEGF therapy, and specifically PDA and SVR, represent significant clinical unmet needs. In this review, we will explore PDA and SVR in NVAMD, characterizing the clinical manifestations and exploring the pathobiology of each. We will demonstrate that PDA occurs most frequently in NVAMD patients who develop high-flow CNV lesions with arteriolarization, in contrast to patients with capillary CNV who are highly responsive to anti-VEGF therapy. We will review investigations of experimental CNV and demonstrate that both types of CNV can be modeled in mice. We will present and consider a provocative hypothesis: formation of arteriolar CNV occurs via a distinct pathobiology, termed neovascular remodeling (NVR), wherein blood-derived macrophages infiltrate the incipient CNV lesion, recruit bone marrow-derived mesenchymal precursor cells (MPCs) from the circulation, and activate MPCs to become vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and myofibroblasts, driving the development of high-flow CNV with arteriolarization and perivascular fibrosis. In considering SVR, we will discuss the concept that limited or poor vision in spite of anti-VEGF may not be caused simply by photoreceptor degeneration but instead may be associated with photoreceptor synaptic dysfunction in the neurosensory retina overlying CNV, triggered by infiltrating blood-derived macrophages and mediated by Müller cell activation Finally, for each of PDA and SVR, we will discuss current approaches to disease management and treatment and consider novel avenues for potential future therapies.

Application of machine learning methods to bridge the gap between non-interventional studies and randomized controlled trials in ophthalmic patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents is usually lower in real world settings compared with randomized clinical trials (RCTs), often limiting the use of real-world evidence (RWE) in regulatory and healthcare decisions. The current analysis aimed to develop and validate an algorithm to explain the difference in outcomes between RWE studies and RCTs in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

The algorithm was developed using ranibizumab real world data (RWD) from the US and validated on Australian and UK RWD. A decision model was developed using machine learning principles, in which the model learns how to partition the most influential factors (out of 59 variables) so that they maximally relate to the change in visual acuity (VA) over 12 months.

RESULTS

The algorithm identified baseline VA <73 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, presence of baseline subretinal fluid, and administration of three loading doses by Day 90 from drug initiation as the characteristics with the greatest impact on VA at month 12. When applying the different criteria, RWE outcomes became similar to those obtained in known RCTs.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning techniques can be used to classify real world cohorts and identify subsets of patients who benefit to the same extent as that reported in RCTs. This methodology may support the translation of clinical trial findings to treatment performance in the clinical practice setting.

Comparative efficacy and safety of different regimens of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To give a comprehensive efficacy and safety ranking of different therapeutic regimens of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

DESIGN

A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other clinical trial registries were searched up to 1 October 2019 to identify related randomised controlled trials (RCT) of different regimens of ranibizumab for nAMD. The primary efficacy outcome was the changes of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1 year, the primary safety outcome was the incidence of severe ocular adverse events. Secondary outcomes such as changes of central retinal thickness (CRT) were evaluated. We estimated the standardised mean difference (SMD), ORs, 95% CIs, the surface under the cumulative ranking curves and the mean ranks for each outcome using network meta-analyses with random effects by Stata 14.0.

RESULTS

We identified 26 RCTs involving 10 821 patients with nAMD randomly assigned to 21 different therapeutic regimens of ranibizumab or sham treatment. Ranibizumab 0.5 mg (treat and extend, T&E) is most effective in terms of changes of BCVA (letters, SMD=21.41, 95% CI 19.86 to 22.95) and three or more lines of BCVA improvement (OR=2.83, 95% CI 1.27 to 4.38). However, it could not significantly reduce retreatment times compared with monthly injection (SMD=-0.94, 95% CI -2.26 to 0.39). Ranibizumab 0.5 mg (3+pro re nata)+non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is most effective in reducing CRT and port delivery system of ranibizumab (100 mg/mL) could reduce the number of retreatment most significantly. All regimes have no more risk of severe ocular complications (including vitreous haemorrhage, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, retinal tear and retinal pigment epithelium tear) or cardiocerebral vascular complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Ranibizumab 0.5 mg (T&E) is most effective in improving the visual outcome. The administration of topical NSAIDs could achieve additional efficacy in CRT reduction and visual improvement. Both interventions had acceptable risks of adverse events.

Use of biomaterials for sustained delivery of anti-VEGF to treat retinal diseases

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) have become the most common treatment modality for many retinal diseases. These include neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and retinal vein occlusions (RVO). However, these drugs are administered via intravitreal injections that are associated with sight-threatening complications. The most feared of these complications is endophthalmitis, a severe infection of the eye with extremely poor visual outcomes. Patients with retinal diseases typically have to undergo multiple injections before achieving the desired therapeutic effect. Each injection incurs the risk of the sight-threatening complications. As such, there has been great interest in developing sustained delivery platforms for anti-VEGF agents to the posterior segment of the eye. In recent years, there have been various strategies that have been conceptualised. These include non-biodegradable implants, nano-formulations and hydrogels. In this review, the barriers of drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye will be explained. The characteristics of an ideal sustained delivery platform will then be discussed. Finally, the current available strategies will be analysed with the above-mentioned characteristics in mind to determine the advantages and disadvantages of each sustained drug delivery modality. Through the above, this review attempts to provide an overview of the sustained delivery platforms in their various phases of development.

Visual benefit versus visual gain: what is the effect of baseline covariants in the treatment arm relative to the control arm? A pooled analysis of ANCHOR and MARINA

Background

This study aimed to elucidate visual benefits of ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) compared with control arms and identify factors affecting response.

Methods

This is a post-hoc pooled analysis of two phase III studies, ANCHOR and MARINA, of ranibizumab for the treatment of nAMD. ANCHOR included 83 international sites. MARINA included 96 sites in the USA. Analysis included patients (control, n=323; ranibizumab, n=332) with nAMD and a baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥35–<85 letters.

Results

Patients receiving ranibizumab achieved an adjusted mean BCVA superiority of 18.9 and 21.2 letters over 12 and 24 months, respectively, compared with control. Ranibizumab treatment, higher baseline BCVA, lower age and smaller lesion size were positively associated with the ability to achieve BCVA >69 letters. Patients with the highest baseline BCVA had lowest BCVA gains. Ranibizumab treatment, lower baseline BCVA, lower age and smaller lesion size were identified as significant predictors of BCVA gain from baseline at month 24 (all p<0.0001). However, the difference in mean BCVA gains at month 24 between treatment and control groups was similar for all baseline BCVA subgroups (≥35–<55 letters, 21.9 letters; ≥55–<70 letters, 25.2 letters; ≥70–<85 letters, 19.3 letters).

Conclusions

Higher baseline BCVA is associated with lower BCVA gains but a greater likelihood of achieving good final BCVA >69 letters due to smaller gains needed to achieve response. Visual benefits, including maintenance of visual acuity (VA), final VA achieved and relative gain compared with natural disease progression, should be considered when assessing treatment response in nAMD.

Photodynamic therapy of cancer with liposomal photosensitizers

The photodynamic reaction involves the light-induced generation of an excited state in a photosensitizer molecule (PS), which then results in the formation of reactive oxygen species in the presence of oxygen, or a direct modification of a cellular molecule. Most PSs are porphyrinoids, which are highly lipophilic, and are administered usually in liposomes to facilitate their effective delivery to target cells. The currently available liposomal formulations are Visudyne^® and Fospeg^®. Novel PSs were developed and tested for their photodynamic activity against cancer cells. Several compounds were highly phototoxic to oral cancer cells both in free and liposome-encapsulated form, with nanomolar IC₅₀ values. The lowest IC₅₀s (7-13 nM) were obtained with a PS encapsulated in cationic liposomes.

Long-term outcomes of switching to aflibercept for treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To report 4-year outcomes following the switch to aflibercept in treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

In this prospective, open-label, non-controlled, clinical trial, 49 patients with treatment-resistant nAMD received 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept as three loading doses every 4 weeks, followed by injections every 8 weeks for the first 48 weeks, then an individualized regimen for a further 36 months, following previous treatment with ranibizumab and/or bevacizumab. Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height and geographic atrophy (GA) surface area.

RESULTS

Of the 49 patients who were initially recruited, data from 39 eyes of 39 patients were available at 48-month follow-up. Mean age was 76.7 ± 7.2 years. Over the 48 months, these eyes received a mean of 32.1 ± 5.6 injections. The mean BCVA improved significantly following 12 months of treatment (4.9 ± 9.0 ETDRS letters, p < 0.001); however, this was not maintained and was similar to baseline after 48 months (mean difference -0.4 ± 13.3 letters between baseline and 48 months, p < 0.001). The reduction in CRT from baseline was 170.3 ± 143.3 μm (p < 0.001) with absence of macular fluid in 56% of the 39 eyes at the end of month 48. PED height reduced by a mean 77.5 ± 20.0 μm, and geographic atrophy increased by a mean of 4.1 ± 3.4 mm² (p < 0.01) over the 48 months.

CONCLUSION

Aflibercept is an effective alternative therapy for treatment-resistant nAMD. Good anatomical and stable functional responses are achievable with continued therapy. The lack of continued visual improvement may be representative of GA progression, reflecting the progression of late-stage nAMD in these patients.

Anti-VEGF Monotherapy Versus Photodynamic Therapy and Anti-VEGF Combination Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF monotherapy with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) and anti-VEGF combination treatment in neovascular AMD.

Methods

This study used a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Results

We included a total of 16 studies that included 587 patients in the monotherapy group and 673 in the combination treatment group. There was no statistical difference between best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) at end of the study and the proportions of patients who gained ≥15 BCVA letters between the two treatment groups. Nevertheless, combination therapy required fewer anti-VEGF injections than monotherapy. Subgroup analyses showed that CRT at end of the study was thinner in the standard-fluence (SF) PDT combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 17.256; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.423∼29.089; P = 0.004). The reduced-fluence (RF) PDT combination therapy group required fewer anti-VEGF injections than the monotherapy group (WMD: 3.217; 95% CI: 2.798∼3.636; P < 0.001), while the number of anti-VEGF treatments between the SF PDT combination therapy and monotherapy groups was not statistically different (WMD: 0.23; 95% CI: -0.016∼0.475; P = 0.067). In the combination therapy group, there was no difference between the PDT + anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF retreatment regimens.

Conclusions

This study indicates that verteporfin PDT and anti-VEGF combination therapy is effective for achieving BCVA gain and CRT reduction comparable with that of anti-VEGF monotherapy. Combination therapy with RF PDT can potentially decrease the number of anti-VEGF injections needed.

Impact of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism on the efficacy of photodynamic therapy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

The most severe visual impairments due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are frequently caused by the occurrence of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Although photodynamic therapy with verteporfin (PDT-V) is currently a second-line treatment for neovascular AMD, it can be conveniently combined with drugs acting against vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) to reduce the healthcare burden associated with the growing necessity of anti-VEGF intravitreal re-injection. Because the common 677 C > T polymorphism of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR-C677T; rs1801133) has been described as predictor of satisfactory short-term responsiveness of AMD-related CNV to PDT-V, we retrospectively examined the outcomes of 371 Caucasian patients treated with standardized, pro-re-nata, photodynamic regimen for 24 months. Responder (R) and non-responder (NR) patients were distinguished on the basis of the total number of scheduled PDT-V (TN-PDT-V) and change of best-corrected visual acuity (∆-BCVA). The risk for both TN-PDT-V and ∆-BCVA to pass from R to NR group was strongly correlated with CT and TT genotypes of MTHFR-C677T variant resulting, respectively, in odd ratios of 0.19 [95% CI, 0.12-0.32] and 0.09 [95% CI, 0.04-0.21] (P < 0.001), and odd ratios of 0.24 [95% CI, 0.15-0.39] and 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.11] (P < 0.001). These pharmacogenetic findings indicate a rational basis to optimize the future clinical application of PDT-V during the combined treatments of AMD-related CNV, highlighting the role of thrombophilia to be aware of the efficacy profile of photodynamic therapy.

One-Year Effectiveness Study of Intravitreous Ranibizumab in Wet (Neovascular) Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The clinical efficacy of ranibizumab has been examined by a large number of prospective and retrospective studies to date. This meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the current body of evidence on visual acuity (VA) changes with use of ranibizumab in the treatment of wet (neovascular) age-related macular degeneration (wAMD).

METHODS

A literature review of multiple electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, MedMEME) was conducted to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that reported changes in VA while patients with wAMD were on ranibizumab. Study factors analyzed were baseline patient characteristics, study type, sample size, and 12-month change in VA. Data were pooled in a meta-analysis with VA change as the main outcome. Data were then stratified by study design and a meta-regression was conducted to assess 12-month VA change against baseline VA and age.

RESULTS

A total of 42 studies were included for analysis. An overall increase of 5.58 letters (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.42-6.75; p heterogeneity, < 0.001) was shown with use of ranibizumab compared to baseline. Improvements in VA were larger for RCTs, at 7.71 letters (95% CI: 6.66-8.76; p heterogeneity, 0.013), compared to observational studies, at 4.85 letters (95% CI: 3.32-6.38; p heterogeneity, < 0.001). The meta-regression showed a significant decrease in effect size between baseline VA and 12-month VA change.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests visual improvements at 12 months of 0.5-mg ranibizumab use in patients with wAMD. A higher gain in VA was observed when pooling results from RCTs compared to those in observational studies.

Photodynamic therapy in combination with ranibizumab versus ranibizumab monotherapy for wet age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety between photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and ranibizumab monotherapy in treating wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases through December 31, 2017. The methodological quality of the references was evaluated according to the Cochrane quality assessment. RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs involving 817 participants were included. Wet AMD eyes in the mono-group achieved better best-corrected vision acuity (BCVA) than the combination group in month 12 (WMD = -0.19, 95% CI = -0.32 to -0.06, P = 0.004, I² = 18%). The proportion of patients gaining more than 15 letters from baseline in the mono-group was larger than that in the combination group (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.87, P = 0.001). However, the number of ranibizumab injections with combination therapy was smaller than that with mono-therapy (MD = -1.13, 95% CI: -2.11 to -0.15, P = 0.02, I² = 85%). No significant differences were observed in the proportions of patients losing more than 15 letters, central retinal thickness (CRT), lesion size of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy decreased the number of injections of ranibizumab, although its BCVA improvement was inferior to that of monotherapy over 12 months of follow-up. Given the inherent limitations of the included trials, more studies are needed to further validate and update the findings in this area.

Baseline Predictors of Visual Acuity Outcome in Patients with Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of severe vision loss in people over 60 years. Wet AMD (wAMD) causes more severe visual acuity (VA) loss compared with the dry form due to formation of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents such as ranibizumab and aflibercept are now the standard of care treatment for wAMD. Unfortunately, up to a quarter of anti-VEGF-treated wAMD patients might not fully benefit from intravitreal injections and CNV activity may not respond to the treatment and these patients are called anti-VEGF nonresponders. This article aims to discuss the baseline factors associated with VA outcome such as age, initial VA, lesion types, disease duration, optical coherence tomography (OCT) features, fundus autofluorescence findings, and the presence of particular genotype risk alleles in patients with wAMD. Recommendations are provided regarding when to consider discontinuation of therapy because of either success or futility. Understanding the predictive factors associated with VA outcome and treatment frequency response to anti-VEGF therapy may help retina specialists to manage patients' expectations and guide treatment decisions from the beginning of treatment on the basis of “personalized medicine.”

INTRAVITREAL DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT AS ADJUVANT TREATMENT FOR BEVACIZUMAB- AND RANIBIZUMAB-RESISTANT NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Prospective Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To study the benefit of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration resistant to bevacizumab and ranibizumab.

METHODS

Patients with persistent macular fluid on optical coherence tomography despite monthly treatment with at least three consecutive bevacizumab injections followed by at least three ranibizumab injections were prospectively enrolled. A single dexamethasone implant was administered followed by intravitreal ranibizumab 1 week later. Ranibizumab was continued afterward on an as-needed basis. Main outcomes were improvement in central retinal thickness and best-corrected visual acuity.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (19 eyes) were enrolled. There was no significant change in best-corrected visual acuity over 6 months. Greatest reduction in mean central retinal thickness, from 295.2 μm to 236.2 μm, occurred 1 month after dexamethasone implant (P < 0.0001). By Month 6, mean central retinal thickness was 287.3 μm (P = 0.16). Eyes with only intraretinal fluid (13 eyes) achieved a fluid-free macula. Eyes with predominantly subretinal fluid (6 eyes) did not improve central retinal thickness and continued monthly ranibizumab. Mean baseline intraocular pressure was 13.2 mmHg, which peaked at 15.6 mmHg by Month 2 (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant improved only macular intraretinal fluid in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration resistant to bevacizumab and ranibizumab. However, this treatment had a limited duration.

Efficacy and safety of a fixed bimonthly ranibizumab treatment regimen in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results from the RABIMO trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate prospectively the efficacy and safety of a fixed bimonthly ranibizumab treatment regimen (RABIMO) in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and to compare these results with a pro re nata (PRN) treatment scheme.

METHODS

This was a 12-month, phase IV, single center, randomised, non-inferiority study. Following three initial monthly injections, patients were randomised to receive either ranibizumab bimonthly (RABIMO group) or ranibizumab PRN (PRN group) (n = 20 each). Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), number of injections, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

BCVA [median (interquartile range, IQR)] increased significantly in both groups after 12 months [RABIMO group +8.5 (14); PRN group +6.5 (16) ETDRS letters] when compared to baseline (p < 0.0001; p = 0.0085). At month 12, the RABIMO treatment regimen was non-inferior to the PRN scheme (∆BCVA = 3.5 ETDRS letters; p < 0.0001). CRT was significantly reduced in both groups after the 12-month study period (p < 0.0001 each), with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.6772). Number of overall injections [median (IQR)] was 8 (0) in the RABIMO versus 4 (5) in the PRN group (p = 0.0037). Three patients in the RABIMO group received one additional unscheduled injection. We observed no significant differences between groups in the number of patients with reported SAEs/AEs (RABIMO group n = 6/15; PRN group n = 7/13) (p = 0.7357/p = 0.4902).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of significant functional or anatomical differences between the RABIMO and PRN treatment regimens. However, the RABIMO group's number of injections was twice as high as the PRN group's (protocol-driven). In light of potential side effects, the fixed bimonthly treatment regimen might not be advisable for routine clinical care, but it might be a worthwhile treatment option if monthly monitoring is not possible. Eudra-CT number: 2009-017324-11.

Comparing Ranibizumab Monotherapy and Combination with Single Photodynamic Therapy in Wet AMD: Retreatment and Morphologic Results

Purpose

To evaluate retreatment indications/morphologic responses to ranibizumab monotherapy and combination with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT).

Methods

A total of 40 patients received 3 monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.3 mg injections combined with either PDT or sham PDT at baseline (1:1) followed by as-needed ranibizumab based on predetermined vision/anatomical criteria.

Results

Retreatment criteria were visual acuity (VA) loss (59%/58%), central retinal thickness (CRT) increase (27%/26%), or both (14%/16%). One month before retreatment, intraretinal cysts (IRC) were present in 84%/74%, subretinal fluid (SRF) in 70%/63%, and at least one of them in 84%/89% of eyes. A significant decrease in mean leakage area, IRC, and SRF as well as a reduction in presence of hemorrhages and hard exudates occurred in both treatment groups at 12 months (compared to baseline).

Conclusions

Retreatment indications were mostly based on VA loss, probably due to the quantitative optical coherence tomography criterion. Intraretinal cysts and SRF were earlier predictors for recurring choroidal neovascularization (CNV) activity than CRT/VA changes. Both treatment strategies were equally potent in reducing CNV activity.

One-year outcome of combination therapy with intravitreal aflibercept and verteporfin photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the 1-year visual and anatomical outcomes of combination therapy with intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and verteporfin photodynamic therapy (vPDT) for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and to determine the predictors of a good visual outcome.

METHODS

This was a prospective case-series study. Twenty eyes from 20 treatment-naïve PCV patients were treated with combination therapy with IVA and vPDT. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and morphological parameters including polypoidal lesions in indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) were evaluated over 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean logMAR BCVA was significantly improved from 0.30 at baseline to 0.20 at 3 months and 0.18 at 12 months. The mean central retinal thickness was also significantly improved at 3 months and at 12 months. In ICGA, complete regression of polypoidal lesions was found in 14 out of 20 eyes (70 %) at 3 months and in 14 out of 18 eyes (78 %) at 12 months although no ICGA were done on two eyes. In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, the baseline greatest linear dimension was found as a significant predictive factor for good visual improvement (≧0.3 LogMAR units improvement from baseline) at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

In this study, combination therapy with IVA and vPDT gave visual and anatomical improvements to treatment-naïve PCV patients over 12 months of follow-up period.

Systemic safety of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents in age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of review is to summarize the literature addressing nonocular adverse events in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors and to present possible mechanisms of effect.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of overall nonocular serious adverse events varied from 0 to 39.3% and nonocular adverse events ranged from 0 to 86.9%. Few studies have reported a significant association between use of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents and overall incidence of adverse events, stroke, myocardial infarction, nonocular hemorrhage and death, with overall greater concern in patients treated with bevacizumab. Additionally, history of stroke or other arterial thromboembolic event may be a risk factor for future stroke in patients treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents. Theories explaining the mechanisms of increased risk of nonocular adverse events secondary to anti-VEGF agent use surround the necessity of VEGF for the normal functioning of the endothelium and the damage incurred with use of anti-VEGF agents.

SUMMARY

Current data are insufficient to definitively conclude that intravitreal anti-VEGF agents are safe, although there is a trend toward an overall favorable systemic safety profile. Caution should be exerted in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease, as these patients may be at greater risk for nonocular serious adverse events.

Fixed bimonthly aflibercept in naïve and switched neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients: one year outcomes

AIM

To determine real life clinical outcomes in poorly responsive and treatment-naïve neovascular age related macular degeneration (nvAMD) patients using bimonthly fixed dosing aflibercept regimen.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 165 eyes with nvAMD started on aflibercept at Southampton Eye Unit between June 2013 and June 2014. Patients were either switched from pro re nata (PRN) ranibizumab/bevacizumab due to poor response (107 eyes), or treatment-naïve (58 eyes). Patients initially received 3-monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections followed by 2-monthly fixed doses. Clinic visits were scheduled at month 0, 4, 10 and 12. Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) from baseline were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The proportion of patients maintaining BCVA (<15 letters loss) at 12mo was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean BCVA change at month 12 was +3.29 and +4.67 letters in the switched and naïve aflibercept groups respectively (P<0.01). BCVA was maintained in 95.3% of switched and 96.6% of naïve patients. CRT at month 12 showed a decrease of -6.16 µm in the switched group and -35.36 µm in the naïve group (P<0.01). Patients previously treated with ranibizumab/bevacizumab had on average received 7.4 ranibizumab/bevacizumab injections over 12.6mo, attending 10 clinic visits. The fixed dosing aflibercept regimen required an average of 7.1 injections (naïve group), 7.5 injections (switched group) and 4 clinic visits per year.

CONCLUSION

Fixed bimonthly aflibercept is effective in both treatment-naïve and poorly responsive nvAMD patients. Adopting a fixed dosing regimen can reduce patient burden without compromising on outcomes.

Management of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: A Review on Landmark Randomized Controlled Trials

In the last decade, a number of prospective clinical trials with carefully designed study protocols have been conducted for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). These landmark clinical trials such as ANCHOR and MARINA and, more recently, the Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials and VIEW studies have revolutionized the management of neovascular AMD. While AMD continues to remain a leading cause of severe visual loss worldwide, advances in pharmacotherapeutics have led to substantial improvements in the outcome of these patients. The introduction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents has resulted in improvement of visual outcomes and has had a positive impact on the quality of life among elderly population. While the contemporary management of neovascular AMD has been successful in tremendously reducing the visual morbidity, the financial burden of therapy has increased exponentially. To overcome these challenges, newer pharmacologic agents are evaluated for their efficacy and safety in AMD. Ground-breaking advances in bench to bedside research have led to discovery of new pathways that appear to be viable targets for preventing visual loss in AMD. In this review, study designs and results of landmark clinical trials in AMD from the past decade have been summarized.

Long-term outcomes of combination photodynamic therapy with ranibizumab or bevacizumab for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration

Aim:

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of combination of ranibizumab or bevacizumab with photodynamic therapy (PDT) in treating choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) on long-term follow-up.

Materials and Methods:

Of 42 eyes, 18 were treated with bevacizumab (Group A) and 24 with ranibizumab (Group B) in combination with verteporfin PDT. Treatment was initiated after informed consent. Complete ophthalmic examination including optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed at presentation, 1 month, 3 months, and subsequent follow-up visits. OCT measures used were lesion thickness (LT) of the CNV, retinal thickness above the lesion (RT), and central macular thickness (CMT). Mean follow-up period was 33 months (median 18, range 1-84). Additional treatment on follow-up was left at treating surgeon's discretion.

Results:

Visual acuity improved significantly from baseline by 0.3 LogMAR in Group A and 0.26 LogMAR in Group B. LT decreased significantly from 1^st month onward and remained significant at all the subsequent visits, in both the groups. CMT and RT showed a decreasing trend in both the groups. No difference was seen in visual acuity (VA), LT, CMT, and RT between Group A and Group B at any of the visits. The mean number of additional anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections given postcombination therapy were 1.5 (median 1, range 0-7) injections per eye.

Conclusions:

PDT in combination with either ranibizumab or bevacizumab was equally effective in preventing vision loss in eyes with wet-Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). Such combination also reduces the economic burden of the treatment.

Comparison of the efficacy of anti-VEGF monotherapy versus PDT and intravitreal anti-VEGF combination treatment in AMD: a Meta-analysis and systematic review

AIM

To compare the effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monotherapy versus photodynamic therapy (PDT) and anti-VEGF combination treatment in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

A computerized online search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Studies that compared anti-VEGF monotherapy with PDT and anti-VEGF combination treatment of AMD and were designed as randomized controlled trials were included. The means and standard deviations of the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), number of treatments and proportions of patients who gained BCVA ≥15, 10, 5, or 0 letters at 12(th) month were extracted. A systematic review and Meta-analysis of the comparison of the two approaches was conducted using Review Manager 5.2. Subgroup. A sensitivity analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included. When the subgroup and sensitivity analysis was conducted, the results indicated that in the findings that included the monotherapy group and PDT (standard fluence, SF) group of Kaiser's study, the patients in the monotherapy group had a better BCVA compared with the combination group at 12(th) month in the PDT (SF) subgroup [weighted mean difference (WMD): 3.54; 95%CI: 0.36 to 6.73; P=0.03], and there were more patients who gained ≥15 letters of BCVA in the monotherapy group compared with the combination group in the total result [odds ratio (OR): 1.41; 95%CI: 1.02 to 1.95; P=0.04]. The same conclusion was obtained in the total result that included the monotherapy group and PDT (reduced fluence, RF) group of Kaiser's study (OR: 1.56; 95%CI: 1.13 to 2.15; P=0.007). However, there were no significant differences in the other indexes between the two therapies.

CONCLUSION

We found that anti-VEGF monotherapy is more effective on the recovery of visual acuity than combination therapy and more researches with lager sample size should be performed to study on the effect of the two therapy approaches on CRT and number of injections.

Effectiveness of Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Serous Pigment Epithelial Detachment

Background

We sought to observe the effectiveness of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with serous pigment epithelial detachment (sPED).

Material/Methods

A retrospective, noncomparative case series was performed. Twenty-3 eyes of 23 patients with sPED secondary to nAMD who had received intravitreal injections of ranibizumab were included in this study. All patients underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), synchronous fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations. All patients were treated with pro re nata intravitreal injections after 3 loading doses of ranibizumab and were followed up for 12 months. The differences in the BCVAs, maximum PED heights, PED volumes and CFTs of the affected eyes were compared between the baseline and last visit.

Results

Twelve months after the first injection, improved visual acuity was observed in 16 of the 23 eyes. 4 eyes exhibited stable visual acuity, and 3 eyes exhibited impaired visual acuity. The mean post-injection logMAR BCVA was 0.58±0.05, which was much better than that at baseline (0.76±0.08; t=1.751, P=0.0869). The mean maximum PED height at baseline was 350.17±35.73μm and it was decreased to 238.87±36.87μm (t=2.192, P=0.0337) at the last visit. The mean PED volume after injection was 0.34±0.1 mm³, which was significantly decreased compared with that at baseline (0.81±0.21 mm³; t=2.021, P=0.0494).The mean CFT decreased, but this difference was not statistically significant (t=1.003, P=0.3211). None of the patients exhibited endophthalmitis, uveitis or RPE tears.

Conclusions

Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration with serous pigment epithelial detachment safely and effectively improved the patients’ visual acuities and decreased their PED heights volumes.

Photodynamic therapy: current role in the treatment of chorioretinal conditions

Verteporfin photodynamic therapy (vPDT) is a selective vaso-occlusive treatment that targets choroidal vascular abnormalities. It was initially developed to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration using the 'standard' vPDT protocol (verteporfin 6 mg/m(2), vPDT laser fluence 50 J/cm(2)). vPDT therapy has subsequently evolved as an important treatment modality for a range of other chorioretinal conditions including choroidal haemangioma, central serous chorioretinopathy, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, and peripapillary choroidal neovascularisation. Various 'safety-enhanced' vPDT protocols have been devised to optimise treatment outcomes, typically using reduced dose verteporfin (verteporfin 3 mg/m(2)) or reduced fluence vPDT (vPDT laser fluence 25 J/cm(2)). This paper reviews the current role of vPDT therapy in the treatment of chorioretinal conditions.

Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for treating wet age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the main cause of blindness. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor is used to prevent further neovascularization due to wet AMD. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the effect and protocol of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment on wet AMD.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and reference lists. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata12.0 software, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal thickness, and lesion size were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twelve randomized controlled trials spanning from 2010 to 2014 and involving 5,225 patients were included. A significant difference was observed between the intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) group and the intravitreal bevacizumab group (standard mean difference = -0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.23 to -0.05). No significant differences were observed in best corrected VA, retinal thickness, or lesion size between IVR and the intravitreal aflibercept group. Compared to monthly injection, IVR as-needed injections (PRN) can raise VA by 1.97 letters (weighted mean difference = 1.97, 95% CI = 0.14-3.794). Combination therapy of IVR and photodynamic therapy can significantly raise VA by 2.74 letters when combined with IVR monotherapy (weighted mean difference = 2.74, 95% CI = 0.26-5.21).

CONCLUSION

The superiority remains unclear between IVR and intravitreal bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular AMD. Intravitreal aflibercept dosed every 2 months required fewer injection times, but produced similar efficacy as monthly IVR. IVR PRN could significantly increase VA. Combined with photodynamic therapy, IVR therapy could also increase VA effectively.

Current choice of treatments for neovascular AMD

Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in developed countries with the neovascular form accounting for the majority of severe vision loss in the disease. The management of wet age-related macular degeneration has improved drastically in the past decade as anti-VEGF agents took its place at the forefront of treatment. As the choice of therapy is based on a number of factors, this review summarizes the pivotal studies that brought these agents to use and compares the different agents currently available. This review also briefly describes the promising new therapies that are in development.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for wet age-related macular degeneration (INTREPID): influence of baseline characteristics on clinical response

PURPOSE

To determine which patients respond best to stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

Participants (n = 230) receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for neovascular age-related macular degeneration enrolled in a randomized, double-masked sham-controlled trial comparing 16 Gray, 24 Gray, or Sham SRT. In a post hoc analysis, participants were grouped according to their baseline characteristics, to determine if these influenced SRT efficacy.

RESULTS

At 52 weeks, SRT was most effective for lesions ≤4 mm in greatest linear dimension and with a macular volume greater than the median value of 7.4 mm. For 26% of the participants with both these characteristics, SRT resulted in 55% fewer ranibizumab injections (2.08 vs. 4.60; P = 0.0002), a mean visual acuity change that was 5.33 letters superior to sham (+2.18 vs. -3.15 letters; P = 0.0284), and a 71.1-μm greater reduction in mean central subfield thickness (-122.6 vs. -51.5 μm; P = 0.027). Other features associated with a positive response to SRT included pigment epithelial detachment and the absence of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic radiotherapy is most effective for neovascular age-related macular degeneration lesions that are actively leaking at the time of treatment, and no larger than the 4-mm treatment zone.