Dexamethasone Inserts in Noninfectious Uveitis: A Single-Center Experience

Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitic Macular Edema with Periocular and Intraocular Corticosteroid Therapies: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To review the evidence on the effectiveness and complications of periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies for noninfectious uveitic macular edema.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted last in December 2021 and a post-assessment search was conducted in March 2023. The searches were limited to articles published in English and no date restrictions were imposed. The combined searches yielded 739 citations; 53 articles were selected for inclusion because the studies (1) evaluated periocular corticosteroid injection, intraocular corticosteroid injection or implant, suprachoroidal corticosteroid injection, or a combination thereof for uveitic macular edema; (2) had outcomes that included visual acuity (VA) or macular edema assessed clinically or imaged by OCT or fluorescein angiography; and (3) included more than 20 patients.

RESULTS

This assessment reviewed 23 articles that provided level I or level II evidence from 18 studies on the use of periocular, suprachoroidal, and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injections and intravitreal dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide implants or inserts in noninfectious uveitic macular edema. These reports consistently demonstrated that all investigated periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies improved VA, macular structure, or both. One comparative study showed that intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and the dexamethasone intravitreal implant had effectiveness superior to that of periocular triamcinolone acetonide injection for these outcomes. As a group, the studies highlighted the potential for these therapies to elevate intraocular pressure and to accelerate cataract formation.

CONCLUSIONS

The published literature provides high-quality evidence that periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies are effective and safe for the treatment of noninfectious uveitic macular edema. However, information on the relative effectiveness and complication rates across the different therapies is limited.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Subconjunctival injection of rapamycin-loaded polymeric microparticles for effective suppression of noninfectious uveitis in rats

Noninfective uveitis is a major cause of vision impairment, and corticosteroid medication is a mainstay clinical strategy that causes severe side effects. Rapamycin (RAPA), a potent immunomodulator, is a promising treatment for noninfective uveitis. However, because high and frequent dosages are required, it is a great challenge to implement its clinical translation for noninfective uveitis therapy owing to its serious toxicity. In the present study, we engineered an injectable microparticulate drug delivery system based on biodegradable block polymers (i.e., polycaprolactone-poly (ethylene glycol)-polycaprolactone, PCEC) for efficient ocular delivery of RAPA via a subconjunctival injection route and investigated its therapeutic efficacy in an experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) rat model. RAPA-PCEC microparticles were fabricated using the emulsion-evaporation method and thoroughly characterized using scanning electron microscopy, fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and differential scanning calorimetry. The formed microparticles exhibited slow in vitro degradation over 28 days, and provided both in vitro and in vivo sustained release of RAPA over 4 weeks. Additionally, a single subconjunctival injection of PCEC microparticles resulted in high ocular tolerance. More importantly, subconjunctival injection of RAPA-PCEC microparticles significantly attenuated the clinical signs of EAU in a dose-dependent manner by reducing inflammatory cell infiltration (i.e., CD45+ cells and Th17 cells) and inhibiting microglial activation. Overall, this injectable microparticulate system may be promising vehicle for intraocular delivery of RAPA for the treatment of noninfective uveitis.

Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Uveitis: Dissecting Responder and Non-Responder Outcomes at a Tertiary Center

Macular edema (ME) remains a primary cause of visual deterioration in uveitis. Visual acuity (VA) can often be maintained using corticosteroid depot systems. This study evaluated the efficacy of a fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN®) in treating non-infectious uveitis using real-world data. This retrospective analysis included 135 eyes subdivided into responders and non-responders. Central retinal thickness (CRT), VA, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were followed over time. A significant decrease in CRT and an increase in VA were observed in all eyes throughout the follow-up period (p < 0.01). An IOP increase (p = 0.028) necessitated treatment in 43% of eyes by Month 6. Non-responders were older (p = 0.004) and had been treated with more dexamethasone (DEX) implants (p = 0.04); 89.3% had a defect in the external limiting membrane (ELM) and inner/outer segment (IS/OS) zone (p < 0.001). Immunomodulatory therapy had no impact on treatment response. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) patients had a mean CRT reduction of 47.55 µm and a reduced effect by Month 24 (p = 0.046) versus non-PPV patients. We conclude that the FAc implant achieves long-term control of CRT and improves VA. Increases in IOP were manageable. Eyes with a previous PPV showed milder results. Data showed a correlation between older age, a damaged ELM and IS/OS zone, frequent DEX inserts, and poorer outcome measures.

Clinical and imaging biomarkers of response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in eyes with non-infectious uveitic macular oedema

OBJECTIVE

To investigate clinical and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) biomarkers correlating with pre-injection visual acuity (VA), post-injection VA, and the likelihood of macular oedema (MO) regression following dexamethasone (DEX) implant injection in non-infectious uveitic (NIU) patients.

METHODS

Patient data from Uveitis Services in Milan, Paris, and Berlin were analysed. Eligible participants were NIU patients aged >18 years with MO as the primary indication for DEX treatment. SD-OCT scans and clinical data were collected at the time of DEX injection (pre-injection visit) and after 3 months (post-injection visit). Multivariable regression models, adjusted for pre-injection VA and lens status, were employed to explore associations. MO regression was defined as the absence of intraretinal/subretinal fluid at the post-injection visit.

RESULTS

Our analysis comprised data from 173 DEX treatments, encompassing 103 eyes from 80 patients, with 38 eyes (37%) receiving repeated DEX injections. The absence of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) layer and disorganisation of the inner retinal layers (DRIL) were associated with worse pre- (+0.19 LogMAR, 95% CI 0.01-0.38, p = 0.06, and +0.10 LogMAR, 95% CI 0.02-0.21, p = 0.01) and post-injection VA (+0.33 LogMAR, 95% CI 0.08-0.57, p = 0.01, and +0.17 LogMAR, 95% CI 0.01-0.32, p = 0.04). EZ disruption and DRIL increased significantly (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04), and the chance of gaining ≥5 letters declined in eyes undergoing repeated DEX (p = 0.002). The rate of MO regression after each DEX was 67%. Prolonged MO duration (OR = 0.75/each year, p = 0.02) was associated with reduced likelihood of MO regression. Subretinal fluid was associated with higher rate of MO regression (OR = 6.09, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Integrity of the inner and outer retina is associated with better visual response to DEX. Long-standing or recurrent MO is associated with less chance of both visual and anatomic response. Timely treatment is necessary to maximise the outcomes of MO in NIU patients.

Steroidal nanoformulations for the treatment of uveitis: potential, promises and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

Intraocular inflammation, commonly referred to as uveitis, is a prevalent ocular disease. The categorization of uveitis may be based on the prevailing anatomical site, which includes anterior, intermediate, and posterior uveitis. There exists a significant body of evidence indicating that T cells play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune uveitis. In addition to the presence of T cells, an elevation in levels of inflammatory cytokines and a reduction in regulatory cytokines were also noted. The primary pharmacological interventions for uveitis comprise of corticosteroids, methotrexate, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antibodies, and sirolimus. These medications offer prompt alleviation for inflammation. Nevertheless, prolonged administration of corticosteroids invariably leads to unfavorable adverse reactions. The traditional topical corticosteroids exhibit certain limitations, including inadequate transcorneal permeation and low corneal retention, leading to reduced ocular bioavailability. Consequently, there is a growing inclination towards the creation of innovative steroid drug delivery systems with the aim of reducing the potential for adverse effects, while simultaneously enhancing the drug's corneal permeation and retention.

CONCLUSION

This review is an attempt to compile all the research work done so far in this field and provides a brief overview of the global efforts to develop innovative nanocarrier-based systems for corticosteroids.

Safety and effectiveness of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in patients with ocular toxocariasis

AIMS

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant in patients with active uveitis due to ocular toxocariasis (OT).

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients with OT were recruited in this retrospective study, including 51 patients in DEX group treated with intravitreal DEX implant and 27 patients in control group without intervention. The reduction of vitreous haze scores (VHS), the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes, intraocular pressure (IOP) and cataract progression and formation were recorded at baseline (V0), 1 (V1), 3 (V3) and 6 months (V6) after treatment in DEX group, and V0 and V6 in control group.

RESULTS

There was no change in VHS and BCVA in control group between V0 and V6. Better VHS (p=0.001) and BCVA (p=0.022) was achieved in DEX group; the rate of VHS=0 was 0%, 67.4%, 42.9% and 44.9% at V0, V1, V3 and V6, respectively (p＜0.001), and the mean BCVA was improved from logMAR 1.5±0.9 to 1.2±0.9 at V1, 1.4±1.0 at V3 and 1.4±1.2 at V6. A favourable BCVA at V1 was associated with older age (p=0.038) and uninvolved macula (p=0.000) in DEX group. No significant difference in IOP elevation ≥10 mm Hg, cataract progression and formation between groups. More eyes needed retinal surgery in control group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first study to investigate use of intravitreal DEX implant in OT patients, which can efficiently reduce ocular inflammation and improve BCVA in macular uninvolved patients.

[Intermediate and Posterior Uveitis - Classification, diagnostics, complications, and therapeutic algorithms]

Intermediate and posterior uveitis describes a broad variety of different types of intraocular inflammation. Before starting treatment of intermediate or posterior uveitis, a differentiation between infectious or non-infectious uveitis must always be made. Pathognomonic symptoms do not exist, visual loss and vitreous floaters are the most common symptoms. The indication for therapy is influenced by the anatomical localization, the degree of inflammation, an association, complications and the activity of the inflammation. In addition to clinical ophthalmological standard examination, angiography and OCT are the most important investigations to classify and assess the course of inflammation. Macular edema is the most common complication of intermediate or posterior uveitis and should be treated at first onset, recurrence, or worsening. Oral, intravenous, or intravitreal corticosteroids are usually the primary therapy for intermediate or posterior uveitis. Systemic immunosuppression is indicated after steroid failure in non-infectious uveitis.

A New Era in Ocular Therapeutics: Advanced Drug Delivery Systems for Uveitis and Neuro-Ophthalmologic Conditions

The eye's intricate anatomical barriers pose significant challenges to the penetration, residence time, and bioavailability of topically applied medications, particularly in managing uveitis and neuro-ophthalmologic conditions. Addressing this issue, polymeric nano-based drug delivery systems (DDS) have surfaced as a promising solution. These systems enhance drug bioavailability in hard-to-reach target tissues, extend residence time within ocular tissues, and utilize biodegradable and nanosized polymers to reduce undesirable side effects. Thus, they have stimulated substantial interest in crafting innovative treatments for uveitis and neuro-ophthalmologic diseases. This review provides a comprehensive exploration of polymeric nano-based DDS used for managing these conditions. We discuss the present therapeutic hurdles posed by these diseases and explore the potential role of various biopolymers in broadening our treatment repertoire. Our study incorporates a detailed literature review of preclinical and clinical studies from 2017 to 2023. Owing to advancements in polymer science, ocular DDS has made rapid strides, showing tremendous potential to revolutionize the treatment of patients with uveitis and neuro-ophthalmologic disorders.

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for macular edema and some other rare indications in uveitis

In the present study, 110 eyes of 81 patients with uveitis who underwent intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) injection and had a follow-up of at least 6 months between January, 2012 and September, 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 298 IDI injections were administered (mean, 2.71±2.37; range, 1-12). The mean age of the patients was 49.44±16.67 years (range, 15-86 years). The mean follow-up time after the first IDI was 34.31±26.53 months (range, 6-115 months). In total, 77 (95.1%) patients had non-infectious uveitis, while 4 patients (4.9%) received IDI for uveitic macular edema in association with infectious uveitis (1 patient with acute retinal necrosis and 3 patients with systemic tuberculosis). IDI was injected under the umbrella of intravitreal ganciclovir injection in the patient with healed acute retinal necrosis for the associated pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. A total of 6 patients (7.4%) received IDI prior to phacoemulsification surgery to control the possible post-operative macular edema. In addition, 3 patients (3.7%) with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease received bilateral IDI as the systemic therapy could not be administered due to side-effects of the systemic treatment. In total, 1 patient (1.2%) with idiopathic retinal vasculitis, aneurysms and neuroretinitis was treated with IDI injections in both eyes in addition to systemic therapy to reduce the ongoing inflammation. Of note, two eyes (1.8%) received simultaneous single IDI and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor administration for the treatment of unilateral extrafoveal macular neovascularization (one with active serpiginous choroiditis and one with sympathetic ophthalmia). IDI was administered for the treatment of uveitic macular edema in 68 patients (83.9%). Best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.69±0.64 to 0.60±0.76 logMAR at the final visit (P=0.008). Baseline mean central macular thickness (CMT) was 499.74±229.60 µm (range, 187-1,187 µm) and the mean final CMT was 296.60±152.02 µm (range, 126-848 µm). Intraocular pressure elevation requiring topical antiglaucomatous eye drops occurred in 28 eyes (25.5%). During the follow-up period, bilateral glaucoma surgery was required in 1 patient (1.2%) and 25 of 65 phakic eyes (38.4%) underwent phacoemulsification. Retinal detachment occurred in one eye (0.9%), endophthalmitis in one eye (0.9%), and transient intravitreal hemorrhage occurred in three eyes (2.7%) after the IDI injections. On the whole, the present study demonstrates that although IDI is mostly employed in non-infectious uveitic eyes with macular edema, it can also be administered in cases with systemic therapy intolerance, pseudophakic macular edema prophylaxis, and with great caution, in selected cases involving infectious uveitis and macular edema.

Mechanisms of macular edema

Macular edema is the pathological accumulation of fluid in the central retina. It is a complication of many retinal diseases, including diabetic retinopathy, retinal vascular occlusions and uveitis, among others. Macular edema causes decreased visual acuity and, when chronic or refractory, can cause severe and permanent visual impairment and blindness. In most instances, it develops due to dysregulation of the blood-retinal barrier which permits infiltration of the retinal tissue by proteins and other solutes that are normally retained in the blood. The increase in osmotic pressure in the tissue drives fluid accumulation. Current treatments include vascular endothelial growth factor blockers, corticosteroids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. These treatments target vasoactive and inflammatory mediators that cause disruption to the blood-retinal barrier. In this review, a clinical overview of macular edema is provided, mechanisms of disease are discussed, highlighting processes targeted by current treatments, and areas of opportunity for future research are identified.

Local versus Systemic Therapy for Noninfectious Uveitis (NIU)

The mainstay of treatment for noninfectious uveitis (NIU) is immunosuppressant therapy. This may come in a localized form that is administered specifically to the eye or a systemic form that penetrates ocular tissues. Over the last twenty years, both local and systemic treatments have undergone advancements in pharmaceutical development. In this review, we will discuss new therapies and analyze the risks and benefits for all existing NIU therapies. Some of these therapies include topical, intravitreal, periocular, and systemic steroids, as well as systemic antimetabolites, tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, T-cell inhibitors, anti-CD 20 agents, interleukin-6 inhibitors, alkylating agents, and intravenous immunoglobulin.

The Use of Sustained Release Intravitreal Steroid Implants in Non-Infectious Uveitis Affecting the Posterior Segment of the Eye

The treatment of non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye has been revolutionized by the development of sustained-release corticosteroid implants over the past decade. Their use is now supported by healthcare systems that have licensed and commissioned them on the basis of the high-quality randomised controlled trials that formed part of their development and which have informed clinicians as to their benefits and risks. In particular, they have provided an alternative mode of treatment for patients who do not wish to be systemically immunosuppressed, or in whom such immunosuppression is less desirable, such as those with unilateral disease or those with concurrent illnesses such as diabetes mellitus, renal disease or osteoporosis that are negatively impacted by systemic corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents. In this article, we review the evidence for the use of the major licensed corticosteroid implants and assess the advantages and disadvantages of each.

Overexpression of miR‑375 reverses the effects of dexamethasone on the viability, migration, invasion and apoptosis of human airway epithelial cells by targeting DUSP6

Airway epithelial cell (AEC) dysfunction has been proven to be involved in the pathogenesis of asthma, which may be induced by the use of dexamethasone (Dex). The altered expression of microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) has been found in asthma. However, the detailed mechanisms responsible for the effects of miR-375 on Dex-induced AEC dysfunction remain elusive. Thus, the present study aimed to elucidate these mechanisms. Following treatment with Dex for 0, 6, 12 and 24 h, AEC viability, migration, invasion and apoptosis were examined using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), wound healing and Transwell assays, and flow cytometry, respectively. The expression levels of miR-375, dual specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6) and apoptosis-related proteins (Bcl-2, Bax, cleaved caspase-3) were measured using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis. The target genes and potential binding sites of miR-375 and DUSP6 were predicted using TargetScan and confirmed using dual-luciferase reporter assay. The viability, migration, invasion and apoptosis of Dex-treated AECs were further assessed with or without miR-375 and DUSP6. In the AECs (9HTE cells), Dex treatment suppressed cell viability and miR-375 expression, whereas it promoted cell apoptosis and the expression of DUSP6, the target gene of miR-375. The overexpression of miR-375 reversed the effects of Dex treatment on miR-375 expression, cell viability, migration and invasion, and apoptosis-related protein expression; in turn, these effects were reversed by the overexpression of DUSP6, with the exception of miR-375 expression. On the whole, the present study demonstrates that the overexpression of miR-375 counteracts the effects of Dex treatment on AEC viability, migration, invasion and apoptosis by targeting DUSP6. Thus, it was suggested that the downregulated expression of miR-375 may be a therapeutic target for AEC dysfunction.

Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressant Therapy for Noninfectious Uveitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To analyze efficacy and safety of immunosuppressant therapy for noninfectious uveitis.

Methods

A network search of PubMed, ResearchGate, and EMBASE databases was conducted for relative literature and studies from the inception of each database to April 2021. Primary outcomes were efficacy and time to treatment failure of immunosuppressant for noninfectious uveitis. Secondary outcome was incidence of adverse events (AEs). Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess risk of bias of included studies. Fixed effects model or random effects model was implemented to assess statistical heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was employed to analyze heterogeneous sources.

Results

Eight studies were deemed eligible for inclusion with a total of 848 patients. Six studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Among them, a single-blind RCT had relatively high measurement bias and performance bias. Immunosuppressant presented favorable efficacy for noninfectious uveitis than placebo, and RR was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.12-1.82). Immunosuppressant for noninfectious uveitis prolonged the time before failure, and HR was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32-0.54). AEs increased after immunosuppressant was applied. Compared with immunosuppressant, RR of AEs with placebo was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.71-1.08).

Conclusion

Immunosuppressant contributed to controlling progression of noninfectious uveitis to some extent. Compared with placebo, it increased incidence of AEs. More studies with low heterogeneity are warranted for stronger evidence in clinical.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implants for Refractory Macular Edema in Eyes with Noninfectious Uveitis

Macular edema (ME) is a common cause of visual loss among eyes with uveitis, and its management can be challenging. Steroids are an effective treatment for ME, and intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants provide sustained steroid release. The purpose of this study is to evaluate intravitreal DEX implant on refractory ME in eyes with noninfectious uveitis. A retrospective study including 52 eyes of 37 patients with refractory uveitic ME was conducted from January 2011 through August 2017 at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan. Patients’ demographic characteristics were collected. In addition, clinical information, including corrected visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and central retinal thickness (CRT) on optical coherence tomography, was recorded and analyzed. During the study period, affected eyes received a total of 110 intravitreal DEX implants (range, one to six in each eye). After the first DEX implant injection in all eyes, VA significantly improved at one and two months. CRT significantly decreased one month after a single DEX implant, and the effect lasted for six months and waned over time. Patients receiving multiple DEX implants still showed significant decreases in CRT one month after the first implant. Increases in IOP were noted one month after the DEX implant, but the IOP could be medically controlled. Intravitreal DEX implants can effectively treat refractory uveitic ME, improving both VA and CRT with an acceptable safety profile. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the effect of multiple implants and long-term outcomes.

New pharmacotherapy options for noninfectious posterior uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Noninfectious inflammation of the posterior eye segment represents an important cause of visual impairment. It often affects relatively young people and causes a significant personal and social impact. Although steroids and nonbiologic- Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (nbDMARDs) are effective both in acute and long- lasting diseases, however they are increasingly being replaced by biologic (DMARDs). bDMARD. This article therefore aims to identify recent advances in the therapy of noninfectious posterior segment uveitis.

METHODS

A Medline-search was conducted using the terms: nbDMARD, bDMARD, posterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, treatment, corticosteroid. In addition, clinical studies were included as registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

RESULTS

Currently two major lines of treatments can be identified: (1) the intraocular application of anti-inflammatory agents and (2) the introduction of new agents, e.g., (bDMARDs) and small-molecule-inhibitors. Whereas intravitreal treatments have the advantage to avoid systemic side effects, new systemic agents are progressively earning credit on the basis of their therapeutic effects.

CONCLUSION

Even when current treatment strategies are still hampered by the limited number of randomized controlled trials, promising progress and continuous efforts are seen.

Structural Endpoints and Outcome Measures in Uveitis

Most uveitis entities are rare diseases but, taken together, are responsible for 5-10% of worldwide visual impairment which largely affects persons of working age. As with many rare diseases, there is a lack of high-level evidence regarding its clinical management, partly due to a dearth of reliable and objective quantitative endpoints for clinical trials. This review provides an overview of available structural outcome measures for uveitis disease activity and damage in an anatomical order from the anterior to the posterior segment of the eye. While there is a multitude of available structural outcome measures, not all might qualify as endpoints for clinical uveitis trials, and thorough testing of applicability is warranted. Furthermore, a consensus on endpoint definition, standardization, and "core outcomes" is required. As stipulated by regulatory agencies, endpoints should be precisely defined, clinically important, internally consistent, reliable, responsive to treatment, and relevant for the respective subtype of uveitis. Out of all modalities used for assessment of the reviewed structural outcome measures, optical coherence tomography, color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, and fluorescein/indocyanine green angiography represent current "core modalities" for reliable and objective quantification of uveitis outcome measures, based on their practical availability and the evidence provided so far.

Current intravitreal therapy and ocular hypertension: A review

To determine the effect of commonly used intravitreal agents on immediate and long-term IOP elevations and their association, if any, with glaucoma. Literature searches in PubMed and the Cochrane databased in January 2020 yielded 407 individual articles. Of these, 87 were selected for review based on our inclusion criteria. Based on the evidence provided, 20 were assigned level I, 27 level II, and 22 level III. Eight articles were rejected because of poor quality, insufficient clarity, or irrelevance based on standardized protocols set out by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. The studies that reported on short-term IOP elevation (i.e., between 0 and 60 min) showed that an immediate increase in IOP is seen in all patients who receive anti-VEGF agents or triamcinolone acetonide when measured between 0 and 30 min of intravitreal injection and that the IOP elevation decreases over time. The data on long-term IOP elevation were mixed; Pretreatment with glaucoma medications, anterior chamber tap, vitreous reflux, longer intervals between injections, and longer axial lengths were associated with lower IOP elevations after injection of anti-VEGF agents, while the position of the implant vis-à-vis, the anterior chamber was important for steroid therapy. Data were mixed on the relationship between IOP increase and the type of intravitreal injection, number of intravitreal injections, preexisting glaucoma, and globe decompression before injection. There were no data on the onset or progression of glaucoma in the studies reviewed in this assessment. However, some studies demonstrated RNFL thinning in patients receiving chronic anti-VEGF therapy. Most, if not all, intravitreal agents cause ocular hypertension, both in the short term and long term. The functional consequences of these observations are not very clear.

Case Report: Posterior Uveitis after Divalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in an Asian Female

SIGNIFICANCE

Vaccine-associated uveitis has appeared in recent years because of various vaccines, whereas cases for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination were rarely reported. With more and more females becoming aware of its importance and choosing HPV vaccination, much more attention should be paid on the adverse effects of it.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report a rare case of posterior uveitis after divalent HPV vaccination in an Asian female.

CASE REPORT

A 29-year-old woman presented with acute vision loss accompanied by symptoms of headache, tinnitus, and myalgia after the third injection of HPV vaccination. The best-corrected visual acuity dropped to 20/500 for both eyes, and optical coherence tomography revealed bilateral multifocal submacular fluid. A short course of oral prednisone as well as Ozurdex intravitreal injection resulted in the reversal of all signs and symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this case resembled Harada disease, we diagnosed it as vaccine-induced uveitis rather than coincidental autoimmune disease based on the rapid response to a short course of systemic corticosteroids. Because vaccine-induced uveitis is rare and difficult to distinguish from coincidental autoimmune disease, our case reminds eye care providers to be aware of the possible association between vaccination and a Harada-like reaction and to ask appropriately directed questions when obtaining history from young patients with uveitis. Based on this case, we also suggest Ozurdex intravitreal injection as a potential therapeutic choice, especially for patients with contraindication or personal concern to systemic corticosteroid.

UVEITIS TREATED WITH DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT

PURPOSE

To evaluate the real-life efficacy and safety of the intravitreal dexamethasone implant in uveitis.

METHODS

This retrospective observational multicentric study included 152 eyes treated exclusively by 358 dexamethasone implant injections. The main outcome measures included change in the best-corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness, and vitreous haze score.

RESULTS

Patients were treated with dexamethasone implant for macular edema (51.3%), vitritis with macular edema (40.1%), vitritis (5.3%), and other causes (3.3%). The mean duration of follow-up was 19.0 months. The mean gain in best-corrected visual acuity during follow-up was +12.1 letters. An improvement in best-corrected visual acuity ≥5, 10, and 15 letters was found in 64.5, 50.7, and 35.5% of cases, respectively. 59.7% of eyes with macular edema at baseline were found to be anatomical responders. Vitritis resolution (vitreous haze = 0+) was obtained in 81.4% of cases. Ocular hypertension (intraocular pressure ≥25 mmHg and/or gain ≥10 mmHg from baseline) occurred in 28.3% of patients. No filtering surgery/laser therapy was required. A total of 40.2% of phakic subjects underwent cataract surgery on average 11.2 months after the first injection.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the efficacy and safety of the dexamethasone implant in noninfectious uveitis. Cataract and ocular hypertension were not uncommon but easily manageable.

Initial Ten Years of Experience with the Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant: A Retrospective Chart Review

Purpose

To evaluate the initial ten years of results from the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX) in patients treated for retinal vein occlusion (RVO), diabetic macular edema (DME) or uveitis.

Methods

Retrospective chart review of patients receiving DEX since its FDA approval. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) on optical coherence tomography, intraocular pressure and cataract status were collected. Baseline data were collected from the initial DEX and post-treatment data at the visit at least four weeks after the last DEX.

Results

In total, 315 eyes received 1216 DEX over 63.9±4.6 weeks. In the branch RVO (n=90), central RVO (n=59) and DME (n=62) cohorts, BCVA improved significantly (p<0.05). The uveitis (n=154) cohort did not have a significant change in BCVA, 0.62±0.04 to 0.61±0.04 logMAR (p=0.34). Younger patients, vitrectomized eyes, and eyes without a history of glaucoma were associated with significantly better BCVA outcomes in the uveitis cohort (p<0.05). Overall, CMT decreased significantly from 376.6±6.8 to 322.7±5.0 µm (p<0.05). Intraocular pressure increased significantly (p<0.001) and the percentage of patients requiring anti-glaucoma medications increased from 33.0% to 67.6%. Of phakic eyes, 58.8% (n=63) had cataract progression or underwent surgery with those who underwent surgery experiencing a significant improvement in BCVA (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Repeated DEX over extended follow-up offers significant anatomic benefits to all cohorts. Visual benefits are only seen in RVO, DME and select uveitis demographics.

Effectiveness of the Dexamethasone Implant in Lieu of Oral Corticosteroids in Intermediate and Posterior Uveitis Requiring Immunosuppression

PURPOSE

To evaluate dexamethasone intravitreal implant effectiveness in lieu of high-dose oral prednisone for short-term treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis in patients requiring immunosuppression.

METHODS

This is a proof-of-concept, open-label, non-comparative clinical trial with 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome was uveitis control without additional prednisone at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were need for multiple implants or additional prednisone, and safety data.

RESULTS

20 patients (28 eyes) were enrolled- 16 eyes had control by 6 months; 20 by 12 months. No patients required high-dose prednisone. 6 patients enrolled on prednisone: 2 stopped; 4 tapered to 7.5 mg daily or less by 12 months. 16 eyes required multiple implants; five required cataract surgery; 12 required drops to control IOP; 2 underwent glaucoma surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The dexamethasone implant was effective in lieu of high-dose prednisone although the majority required multiple implants. All patients decreased or discontinued prednisone during follow-up.

Ocular Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is one of the leading causes of inflammatory eye disease. Any part of the eye and its adnexal tissues can be involved. Uveitis and optic neuropathy are the main manifestations, which may require systemic treatment. Two groups of patients with sarcoid uveitis can be distinguished: one of either sex and any ethnicity in which ophthalmological findings are various and another group of elderly Caucasian women with mostly chronic posterior uveitis. Clinically isolated uveitis revealing sarcoidosis remains a strictly ocular condition in a large majority of cases. Although it can be a serious condition involving functional prognosis, early recognition in addition to a growing therapeutic arsenal (including intravitreal implant) has improved the visual prognosis of the disease in recent years. Systemic corticosteroids are indicated when uveitis does not respond to topical corticosteroids or when there is bilateral posterior involvement, especially macular edema. In up to 30% of the cases that require an unacceptable dosage of corticosteroids to maintain remission, additional immunosuppression is used, especially methotrexate. As with other forms of severe noninfectious uveitis, monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor-α have been used. However, only very rarely does sarcoid uveitis fail to respond to combined corticosteroids and methotrexate therapy, a situation that should suggest either poor adherence or another granulomatous disease. Optic neuropathy often affects women of African and Caribbean origins. Some authors recommend that patients should be treated with high-dose of corticosteroids and concurrent immunosuppression from the onset of this manifestation, which is associated with a poorer outcome.

The effects of intravitreal injections on intraocular pressure and retinal nerve fiber layer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The number of eye diseases treated with intravitreal injections is increasing. Obviously, an injection of fluid into the eye results in an increase of intraocular pressure (IOP), the main risk factor for glaucoma. However, the effect of these repeated IOP increases on the eye is unclear. Therefore, we performed a systematic review with meta-analyses. PubMed, Embase and Clinical Trials Registries were searched for articles investigating the relationship between intravitreal injections (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [anti-VEGF] or steroids) and either IOP, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL)-thickness and glaucoma. Multiple meta-analyses were performed, combining data on intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF medication and dexamethasone implants. A total of 74 articles were eligible for meta-analyses. The short-term effect of an intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF showed a statistically significant increase in IOP. One day after injection of anti-VEGF, however, IOP was significantly lower than baseline. The long-term time-intervals showed no significant difference in IOP. After intravitreal injection of a dexamethasone implant, IOP was significantly higher than baseline 1 month post-injection. RNFL-thickness was significantly reduced 6 and 12 months post-injection of anti-VEGF, as well as at end of follow up. Caution is advised when using intravitreal medication, especially when treating patients with advanced glaucoma; in these cases, prophylactic IOP-lowering medication may be considered.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant as a Sustained Release Drug Delivery Device for the Treatment of Ocular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Drug delivery into the vitreous chamber remains a great challenge in the pharmaceutical industry due to the complex anatomy and physiology of the eye. Intravitreal injection is the mainstream route of drug administration to the posterior segment of the eye. The purpose of this review is to assess the current literature about the widening use of the intravitreal 0.7 mg dexamethasone (Dex) implant, and to provide a comprehensive collection of all the ocular disorders that benefit from Dex administration. Although anti-vascular endothelial growth-factors (VEGFs) have been largely indicated as a first-choice level, the Dex implant represents an important treatment option, especially in selected cases, such as vitrectomized eyes or patients in whom anti-VEGF failed or are contraindicated. In this article, the safety profile as well as the list of the possible complications related to intravitreal Dex injection are also discussed.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in the Treatment of Non-infectious Uveitis

Objectives:

To evaluate the long-term results of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX) for noninfectious uveitis.

Materials and Methods:

The study included 62 eyes of 44 patients treated with DEX implant due to noninfectious uveitis and followed up for at least a year. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness, intraocular pressure (IOP), vitreous haze score, indications, immunomodulatory therapy and steroid usage before/after injection, number of injections, and adverse events were analyzed retrospectively.

Results:

Average follow-up was 20 months (range 12-64 months). The female/male ratio was 29/15. Mean age was 50 years (range 22-75 years). The most frequent uveitis etiologies were idiopathic (25 patients, 40.3%) and Behçet’s uveitis. (17 patients, 27.4%) The signedmost common indication for DEX injection was cystoid macular edema together with resistant vitreous haze (26 eyes, 41.9%). Twenty-two eyes (30%) received more than one DEX injection. Mean BCVA was improved from 0.55 logMAR at baseline to 0.38, 0.32, and 0.35 after 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively (p<0.001 for each). Mean CFT was decreased from 386 μm at baseline to 288, 311, and 302 μm after 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively (p<0.001 for each). Mean IOP did not change significantly during follow-up. Five eyes (8%) received topical anti-glaucoma medication (IOP ≥25 mmHg). Eighteen (46%) of 39 phakic eyes underwent cataract surgery during follow-up. Similar efficacy of the DEX implant was observed in eyes that received multiple injections. Systemic immunomodulatory therapy did not change significantly during follow-up.

Conclusion:

Intravitreal DEX injection does not alter systemic immunomodulatory therapy, but may facilitate the management of noninfectious uveitis by suppressing local intraocular inflammation. Multiple injections yielded comparable visual and anatomical outcomes to single injections. Follow-up for ocular hypertension and cataract formation are important, especially in eyes receiving multiple injections.

[White dot syndromes : Principles, diagnostics, and treatment]

The white dot syndromes include a group of diseases which are characterized by multiple yellowish-white foci in the outer retina, retinal pigment epithelium, and choroid. For clinicians and researchers alike they present significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. White dot syndromes include primary inflammatory choriocapillaropathies, such as acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE)/acute multifocal ischemic choriocapillaropathy (AMIC), multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS)/acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement (AIBSE), multifocal choroiditis (MFC), punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC), serpiginous choroiditis (SC), acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR), and acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN). Among the primary stromal choroiditis is birdshot retinochoroidopathy (BSRC); however, the pathogenesis of these disorders is largely unknown. Immunological reactions to previous viral infections with a genetic disposition seem to be a common denominator.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis

Introduction: Uveitis is a leading cause of visual impairment and a significant burden of blindness. Although corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive agents have been successfully used, these are non-specific, and their long-term use may induce significant adverse effects. Areas covered: This article discusses existing local and systemic applied treatments for ocular inflammation including corticosteroids, non-biologic, and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD). Potential drugs being studied in clinical trials are introduced for both local and systemic use. Expert opinion: Treatment options for uveitis continue to expand. Still, more efforts and research are needed to better understand the mechanisms potentially leading to clinical trials.

Intravitreal dexamethasone implants for non-infectious uveitis

IMPORTANCE

Inflammatory-mediated cystoid macular oedema (CMO) is the most common inflammatory-mediated threat to vision in non-infectious uveitis (NIU). Corticosteroid therapy is the cornerstone to the management of CMO in NIU. Sustained-release dexamethasone (DEX) implant devices provide localized therapy.

BACKGROUND

The authors present a series documenting the efficacy of DEX implants for NIU in an Australian cohort.

DESIGN

A single centre, retrospective case series patients receiving DEX implants for NIU from 2012 to 2018 in a New South Wales tertiary eye hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty eyes of 17 patients receiving DEX implants for confirmed cases of NIU of varying aetiologies.

METHODS

Cases from March 2012 and March 2018 were retrospectively selected with follow-up assessment data recorded and analysed. All patients were seen at 1, 2 and 4 weeks post implant, then monthly. Minimum duration of follow-up was 32 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was change in central retinal thickness (CRT) of >20% at two consecutive visits. Secondary outcomes included change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure and medication regimens.

RESULTS

Ninety-five percent of patients achieved significant CRT reduction at 4, 8 and 16 weeks (P < .01). Sixty-one percent demonstrated improved BCVA at week 8 (P < .05). Ninety percent of patients taking systemic corticosteroid therapy at commencement reduced their dose to below 7.5 mg/day. Adverse event frequency was low.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In keeping with larger studies, the authors suggest that DEX implants may effectively control uveitis refractory to other therapy, while improving BCVA and CRT. In addition, DEX usage has demonstrably reduced systemic steroid burden within the observed cohort.

Long-Term Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Outcomes in Uveitis

Purpose: To describe the long-term clinical outcomes in a cohort of uveitic eyes treated with the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex; Allergan, Inc).Methods: Seventy-nine (63 patients) receiving 134 implant injections over 82 months were included. Indication, visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), vitreous haze score (VHS), central retinal thickness (CRT), time to reinjection, systemic treatments, and complications data were recorded.Results: The cumulative probability of VA improvement was 80% at 1 month and 90% at 12 months, and it was maintained until 60 months. Eyes with baseline vitritis (VHS >0.5; 68%) had a probability of VHS improvement of 33% at 1 month, 75% at 12 months, and 85% at 60 months. The probability of CRT improvement was 33% at 1 month, 75% at 12 months, and 85% at 60 months. The most frequent adverse event was moderate IOP elevation (≥25 mmHg) in 30.3%, no cases of retinal detachment or endophthalmitis were observed.Conclusions: The dexamethasone implant provides favorable VA, CRT, and VHS long-term outcomes in uveitis with a reduced rate of severe adverse events.