The Use of β-Blockers for the Treatment of Periocular Hemangiomas in Infants: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

New insights on circumscribed choroidal hemangioma: "bench to bedside"

Circumscribed choroidal hemangioma is a rare vascular hamartoma of the choroid, presenting as a red-orange mass at the posterior pole on fundoscopic examination. Despite its benign origin, associated complications such as subretinal fluid, serous retinal detachment, retinoschisis and neovascular glaucoma may lead to serious visual impairment in more than half patients. Because of its similarity to amelanotic choroidal melanoma and choroidal metastasis, differential diagnosis is still challenging for specialists. Multimodal imaging such as ultrasonography, fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, optical coherence tomography, and optical coherence tomography angiography guides the clinician to the correct diagnosis and the proper follow-up. Treatment is indicated in symptomatic cases in order to resolve exudation and improve visual acuity. Treatment options include photocoagulation, transpupillary thermotherapy, radiation therapy, photodynamic therapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Currently, photodynamic therapy is the treatment of choice due to its effectiveness and safety. The purpose of this review is to describe the latest knowledge in the etiopathogenesis of the circumscribed choroidal hemangioma, the most recent multimodal imaging findings, and the available treatment options.

Long-Term Results of Oral Propranolol Treatment Protocol for Periocular Infantile Hemangioma: Should There Be Any Contraindication?

PURPOSE

The authors report long-term results of the oral propranolol treatment protocol for periocular infantile hemangioma regardless of conventional indications.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study (2008-2018) on children with propranolol treatment protocol for periocular infantile hemangioma and last follow-up (FU) of ≥4 months after treatment and age of >24 months. After systemic evaluation, it was started with 0.5 and increased by 0.5 every 3 days to reach 2 mg/kg/day. If there was no good response, it would be gradually increased up to 3 mg/kg/day. Tapering (0.5 mg/kg/day every 4 weeks) was started when patients were on treatment for ≥6 months and ≥12 months old and there was no change in the infantile hemangioma size for ≥3 months. Rebound growth was based on the parents' report and would be treated by increasing the dose to at least 2 mg/kg/day for 3 months. FU was either in-person or via social media. Change in periocular infantile hemangioma size on the photos was scored by 3 masked observers (visual analog scale) and presented as excellent (≥50% reduction), good (1%-49%), fair (no change), and failure (enlarged).

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were included. Orbital involvement was in 49%, ptosis in 58%, and risk of amblyopia in 63%. Mean treatment, tapering, and FU duration were 37, 13, and 74 months, respectively. Mean age at presentation, start of propranolol treatment protocol, tapering, stop, and last FU were 1.5, 5, 29, 42, and 78 months, respectively. Twenty-seven patients received 2, seven 2.5, and nine 3 mg/kg/day. Mean visual analog scale significantly increased from 43% (FU1) to 92% (last FU) when 97.6% of patients showed an excellent response. The remaining skin lesions were observed in 35%. No side effect was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results of the propranolol treatment protocol for periocular infantile hemangioma showed an excellent response in 97.6% of patients with no side effects. A residual skin lesion was observed in 1/3 of the patient.

Propranolol Treatment for Infantile Hemangiomas: Short-Term Adverse Effects and Follow-Up to Age Two

Objective

To analyse the short-term adverse effects (AEs) of propranolol in the treatment of infantile hemangiomas (IHs) and their relevant factors, as well as the relationship between child growth and propranolol.

Methods

A total of 506 patients with confirmed or suspected IHs were enrolled, and a total of 439 cases were included in the study. Short-term AEs were analysed using single-factor analysis and binary logistic regression. Out of 439 patients, 292 were enrolled to examine the effect of propranolol on 2-year-olds' height and body weight (BW), by comparison with reference range and among groups. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between BW, height, and duration of propranolol treatment.

Results

Among 439 patients, 70 (16.0%) experienced AEs. Among them, 48 had gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, 23 had central nervous system (CNS) symptoms, 8 had both symptoms above, and 7 had other symptoms. Most of the AEs occurred on the starting day (day 0), and 6 children's AEs were transient. Starting age of no older than 3 months led to more CNS symptoms, and starting age of older than 3 months was a protective factor against CNS symptoms, with an OR value of 0.303 (0.117–0.783). Height and BW of 292 two-year-old children were no less than the reference levels, although those of 3 females and 1 male were less than the average −2 standard deviation (−2SD). The height and BW of the children at the age of two was not related to the length of time of propranolol treatment.

Conclusion

Oral propranolol has a good tolerance in the treatment of IHs. Oral propranolol exerts more adverse effects on the CNS of lower age children, and it has exhibited no effect on the growth of two-year-old children.