Endophthalmitis Rate in Immediately Sequential versus Delayed Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery within the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry Data

Ten-year trends of delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS) in Sweden: a register-based study

PURPOSE

To study the trend of delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS) in Sweden in the past decade.

METHODS

This register-based cohort study utilized data from the Swedish National Cataract Register (NCR) from 2010 through 2019. Register files from patients who underwent cataract surgery in both eyes during the study period were linked using their social security numbers. Bilateral surgeries on different days were classified as DSBCS. The study investigated the association between DSBCS within 3 months and several variables with stratification and multivariate logistic regression. The following variables were used: operation year, region, private or public unit, age, sex, indication for surgery, type of intraocular lens (IOL), preoperative visual acuity, ocular comorbidity, posterior capsule rupture and perioperative difficulties.

RESULTS

During the study period, 368,106 patients underwent DSBCS, of which 62.6% (n = 230,331) had bilateral surgery within 3 months. The median time between the surgeries was 61 days (interquartile range 26-161 days), showing regional variations. Better visual acuity in the fellow eye, presence of ocular comorbidity, various perioperative events and complications were associated with longer time to surgery of the second eye. Conversely, cataract surgery in more recent years, private clinic, increasing age, anisometropia and multifocal IOL were associated with shorter timespan between surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of DSBCS were conducted within a 3-month timeframe, with the interval between surgeries decreasing throughout the study period. Several rational factors were associated with the time difference, in addition to regional variations. Many patients would probably benefit from less time between the surgeries, and we encourage a clinical practice taking the whole patient's visual function into account.

Intravitreal Antibiotics versus Early Vitrectomy plus Intravitreal Antibiotics for Post-Injection Endophthalmitis: an IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight)

PURPOSE

To determine if intravitreal injection of antibiotics alone versus early pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) plus injection of intravitreal antibiotics predicted better or worse visual outcomes for patients with endophthalmitis after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study PARTICIPANTS: Patients developing endophthalmitis after receiving an intravitreal anti-VEGF injection from the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry between 2016 and 2020.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were endophthalmitis diagnosis within 1 to 28 days after anti-VEGF injection and a recorded visual acuity (VA) at baseline, on the day of diagnosis, and post-treatment. Patients in the Injection Only group underwent intravitreal injection of antibiotics alone and in the Early Vitrectomy group received PPV with intravitreal antibiotics or intravitreal injection followed by PPV within 2 days of diagnosis. Patients were excluded if they had cataract surgery during the study, intravitreal steroids before endophthalmitis, or intermediate/posterior uveitis or cystoid macular edema. The study created a 1:1 matched cohort using Mahalanobis Distance Matching, accounting for the differences in VA at baseline and diagnosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Post-treatment logMAR VA RESULTS: 1,044 patients diagnosed with post-injection endophthalmitis met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the unmatched cohort, there were 935 patients in the Injection Only and 109 in the Early Vitrectomy group. In 1:1 matched cohort 218 patients (109 in each group) were included; the median logMAR VAs were 0.32 [20/40-20/50] at baseline, 0.88 [∼20/150] at diagnosis, and 0.57 [20/70-20/80] post-treatment. There were no statistically significant differences in the visual outcomes between the two matched treatment groups (b = 0.05, p = 0.23); including the subgroup of patients with VA worse than 1.0 logMAR (b = 0.05, p = 0.452).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in final VA outcomes between patients receiving Injection Only and those treated with Early Vitrectomy for post-injection endophthalmitis. The findings support the use of either treatment strategy.

Immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery: Prevalence, attitudes and concerns Among Italian ophthalmologists

PURPOSE

to investigate the existing practice patterns of immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) in Italy and to assess ophthalmologists' attitudes towards performing ISBCS in the future for cataract treatment.

METHODS

It is a multicenter cross-sectional study. From February,1st 2023 to March, 1st 2023 the Members of the Italian Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (AICCER) as well as the attendees of its annual national congress were invited to anonymously complete an electronic 7-item questionnaire on their current ICBCS practice. Questions included the average number of procedures per month, the main indications for ICBCS, and the main reasons for performing and not performing ISBCS. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

of the 2300 recipients, 246 (10.7%) completed the survey. Of the respondents, 156 (63.4%) replied to perform ISBCS, most of them (82%) occasionally (1 to 5 procedures per month). Fifty-three percent (130 ophthalmologists) considered adopting ISBCS as routine practice in the near future. The conditions most considered for ISBCS were age-related cataract surgery under general and topical anesthesia and congenital cataract surgery. The availability of separate instruments for the two eyes as well as patient and hospital advantages were the most important reasons for performing ISBCS. The risk of bilateral endophthalmitis and medicolegal issues were the main reasons for not performing ISBCS.

CONCLUSIONS

ISBCS remains controversial among Italian surgeons, despite growing evidence of its safety and efficacy. The risk of potentially blinding complications such as bilateral endophthalmitis, together with medicolegal concerns are the principal barriers to ISBCS implementation in routine practice.

Intraocular Pressure Spike Following Stand-Alone Phacoemulsification in the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight)

PURPOSE

To evaluate risk factors for intraocular pressure (IOP) spike after cataract surgery using the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with IRIS Registry data who underwent stand-alone phacoemulsification from January 1, 2013, through September 30, 2019.

METHODS

Intraocular pressure spike was defined as postoperative IOP of > 30 mmHg and > 10 mmHg from the baseline within the first postoperative week. Odds ratios (ORs) for demographic and clinical characteristics were calculated with univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence and OR of IOP spike.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 1 191 034 eyes (patient mean age, 71.3 years; 61.2% female sex; and 24.8% with glaucoma). An IOP spike occurred in 3.7% of all eyes, 5.2% of eyes with glaucoma, and 3.2% of eyes without glaucoma (P < 0.0001). Multivariable analyses of all eyes indicated a greater risk of IOP spike with higher baseline IOP (OR, 1.57 per 3 mmHg), male sex (OR, 1.79), glaucoma (OR, 1.20), Black race (OR, 1.39 vs. Asian and 1.21 vs. Hispanic), older age (OR, 1.07 per 10 years), and complex surgery coding (OR, 1.22; all P < 0.0001). Diabetes (OR, 0.90) and aphakia after surgery (OR, 0.60) seemed to be protective against IOP spike (both P < 0.0001). Compared with glaucoma suspects, ocular hypertension (OR, 1.55), pigmentary glaucoma (OR, 1.56), and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (OR, 1.52) showed a greater risk of IOP spike and normal-tension glaucoma (OR, 0.55), suspected primary angle closure (PAC; OR, 0.67), and PAC glaucoma (OR, 0.81) showed less risk (all P < 0.0001). Using more baseline glaucoma medications was associated with IOP spike (OR, 1.18 per medication), whereas topical β-blocker use (OR, 0.68) was protective (both P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher baseline IOP, male sex, glaucoma, Black race, older age, and complex cataract coding were associated with early postoperative IOP spike, whereas diabetes and postoperative aphakia were protective against a spike after stand-alone phacoemulsification. Glaucomatous eyes demonstrated different risk profiles dependent on glaucoma subtype. The findings may help surgeons to stratify and mitigate the risk of IOP spike after cataract surgery.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Using Natural Language Processing to Identify Different Lens Pathology in Electronic Health Records

PURPOSE

Nearly all published ophthalmology-related Big Data studies rely exclusively on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) billing codes to identify patients with particular ocular conditions. However, inaccurate or nonspecific codes may be used. We assessed whether natural language processing (NLP), as an alternative approach, could more accurately identify lens pathology.

DESIGN

Database study comparing the accuracy of NLP versus ICD billing codes to properly identify lens pathology.

METHODS

We developed an NLP algorithm capable of searching free-text lens exam data in the electronic health record (EHR) to identify the type(s) of cataract present, cataract density, presence of intraocular lenses, and other lens pathology. We applied our algorithm to 17.5 million lens exam records in the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE) repository. We selected 4314 unique lens-exam entries and asked 11 clinicians to assess whether all pathology present in the entries had been correctly identified in the NLP algorithm output. The algorithm's sensitivity at accurately identifying lens pathology was compared with that of the ICD codes.

RESULTS

The NLP algorithm correctly identified all lens pathology present in 4104 of the 4314 lens-exam entries (95.1%). For less common lens pathology, algorithm findings were corroborated by reviewing clinicians for 100% of mentions of pseudoexfoliation material and 99.7% for phimosis, subluxation, and synechia. Sensitivity at identifying lens pathology was better for NLP (0.98 [0.96-0.99] than for billing codes (0.49 [0.46-0.53]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our NLP algorithm identifies and classifies lens abnormalities routinely documented by eye-care professionals with high accuracy. Such algorithms will help researchers to properly identify and classify ocular pathology, broadening the scope of feasible research using real-world data.

Perception of Canadian ophthalmologists on immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery: insights and implications

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perception of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) among Canadian ophthalmologists.

DESIGN

An anonymous survey was sent to all active members of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society.

METHODS

Basic demographic information, cataract surgery practice patterns, and perceived advantages, disadvantages, and concerns regarding ISBCS were collected from respondents.

RESULTS

A total of 352 ophthalmologists answered the survey. Among these, 94 respondents (27%) practice ISBCS routinely, 123 (35%) practice ISBCS in exceptional cases, and 131 (37%) do not practice ISBCS. ISBCS practitioners were significantly younger than nonpractitioners (p < 0.001) and had a shorter duration of practice (p < 0.001). The prevalence of ISBCS practitioners also varied significantly by province (p < 0.001): most practitioners who routinely practice ISBCS were from Quebec (n = 44; 48%), where financial disincentives are lowest in the country. The main work setting of ISBCS practitioners was academic centres (n = 39; 42%) as opposed to private or community settings (p < 0.001). The main reason for performing ISBCS was more efficient operating theatre use (n = 142; 65%). The main concerns regarding ISBCS were the risk of bilateral complications (n = 193; 57%) and the lack of refractive outcomes for second-eye surgery (n = 184; 52%). The COVID-19 pandemic positively influenced the view of 152 respondents (43%), but this was mostly among practitioners who already performed ISBCS routinely (n = 77; 84%).

CONCLUSIONS

ISBCS practitioners are more likely younger ophthalmologists working in academic centres. Quebec has the highest prevalence of ISBCS practitioners. ISBCS practitioners were positively influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic to offer ISBCS more often compared with non-ISBCS practitioners.

Immediate versus delayed sequential bilateral ICL implantation: A retrospective comparison of vault height and visual outcomes

PURPOSE

To compare the visual outcomes and risks of suboptimal vault-related complications between immediate sequential bilateral ICL surgery (ISBICLS) and delayed sequential bilateral ICL surgery (DSBICLS).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Patients who underwent bilateral ICL implantation between November 2014 and December 2021 at the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University (Shanghai, China) were included and divided into two groups: (1) ISBICLS: both eye surgeries performed on the same day, and (2) DSBICLS: second eye surgery performed < 7 days following the first one. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare the visual outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of the suboptimal vaults.

RESULTS

Finally, 10,985 eyes were included. After PSM, 204 first surgery eyes and 162 s surgery eyes with complete postoperative data were matched. The safety and efficacy indices did not statistically differ between groups (all > 1.00), except that ISBICLS first surgery eyes achieved better efficacy index than DSBICLS group (1.03 ± 0.26 vs. 1.08 ± 0.23, P = 0.034). Excessive vault was observed in eight (4.06 %) ISBICLS first eyes, one (0.50 %) DSBICLS first eye, and none in the second surgery eye in either group. An insufficient vault was observed in one second eye and one DSBICLS second eye. We found no evidence of differences in the rate of excessive vault (OR = 0.831, 95 % CI: 0.426-1.622, P = 0.588) or insufficient vault (OR = 0.609, 95 % CI:0.062-5.850, P = 0.668).

CONCLUSION

ISBICLS provided safety, efficacy, and refraction predictability comparable to DSBICLS without increasing the risk of suboptimal vault-related complications.

Immediate Sequential Bilateral Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery Is Safe and Effective

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical outcomes and safety profiles of patients who underwent immediate sequential bilateral phakic lens surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 254 consecutive patients (508 eyes) who underwent bilateral same-day Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) (STAAR Surgical) surgery. The authors focused on 1-year postoperative clinical outcomes and adverse events.

RESULTS

In the initial cohort, 176 patients (352 eyes) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 335 eyes underwent myopic ICL placement, and 17 eyes received a hyperopic ICL. Notably, 87% of eyes achieved ±0.50 diopters (D) and 95% achieved ±1.00 D of the intended refraction. One year postoperatively, 78% of eyes demonstrated optimal vaulting (250 to 750 µm), with a significant 19% reduction in vaulting observed over the 12 months (P < .001). Only minor adverse events, including early cataract formation (1 case), secondary toric ICL rotation (3 cases), and ICL exchange due to inappropriate vaulting (6 cases), were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings corroborate the safety and efficacy of immediate sequential bilateral phakic lens surgery and indicate its potential as a treatment option. The low incidence of minor adverse events further reinforces its favorable safety profile. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(5):e313-e320.].

One-stage versus two-stage bilateral implantable collamer lens implantation: a comparison of efficacy and safety

Implantable collamer lens implantation (ICL) represents a safe and effective treatment for myopia and myopic astigmatism. To compare the outcomes of a bilateral one-stage same day approach to a two-stage approach, the databases of the University Eye Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilians-University and Smile Eyes Linz, Austria were screened for eyes that had undergone ICL implantation. Two-stage surgery was performed at an interval of 1 day (17 patients), 2 days (19 patients) and 1 week (2 patients). Variables analyzed were preoperative, 1-day and last follow-up uncorrected distance (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, refractive spherical equivalent (SEQ), astigmatism, age, endothelial cell count (ECD), intraocular pressure (IOP) and ICL vaulting. In total, 178 eyes (100 eyes one-stage, 78 eyes two-stage) of 89 patients were included in this study. Mean follow-up was 1.1 ± 0.8 and 1.3 ± 0.5 years. Mean preoperative SEQ was - 7.9 ± 2.6 diopters (D) in the one-stage and - 8.0 ± 1.7 D in the two-stage group (p = 0.63) and improved to 0.00 ± 0.40 and - 0.20 ± 0.40 D at end of follow-up, showing slightly better stability in the one-stage group (p = 0.004). There was no difference in the efficacy (1.1 vs. 1.2, p = 0.06) and the safety index (1.2 vs. 1.2, p = 0.60) between the two groups. No eye (0%) in either group lost 2 lines or more of UDVA (p > 0.99). Refraction within ± 0.50 D and ± 1.00 D around target was achieved comparably often (89 vs. 86%, p = 0.65; 99 vs. 99%, p > 0.99). Endothelial cell loss was slightly higher in the two-stage group (1.3 vs. 4.3%). Vaulting at the final follow up was higher in the one-stage group (373.8 ± 205.4 µm vs. 260.3 ± 153.5 µm, p = 0.00007). There were no serious intraoperative complications in either group. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that both the one- and two-stage approaches are equally effective, predictable and safe. Regarding endothelial cell loss, vaulting and SEQ stability, the one-stage group showed slightly better outcomes, but these results are clinically questionable because they are so small. Larger studies are needed to quantitatively evaluate a potential benefit.

New Approaches to Overcoming Antimicrobial Resistance in Endophthalmitis

Endophthalmitis is a rare but vision-threatening infection characterized by marked inflammation of intraocular fluids and tissues, uncommonly seen following surgery and intravitreal injection. Antimicrobials are used worldwide in the prophylaxis and treatment of bacterial and fungal infections of the eye and are standard treatment in the preoperative and postoperative care of surgical patients. However, antimicrobials are reported to be overprescribed in many parts of the world, which contributes to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). AMR complicates the prophylaxis and treatment of endophthalmitis. This article examines the prevalence and mechanisms of AMR in ocular microorganisms, emphasizing the importance of understanding AMR patterns for tailored treatments. It also explores prophylaxis and management strategies for endophthalmitis, with a discussion on the use of intracameral antibiotic administration. The use of prophylactic intracameral antibiotics during cataract surgery is common in many parts of the world but is still controversial in some locations, especially in the US. Finally, it highlights the role of stewardship in ophthalmology and its benefits in the treatment of endophthalmitis.

Early Endophthalmitis Incidence and Risk Factors after Glaucoma Surgery in the Medicare Population from 2016 to 2019

PURPOSE

To determine early endophthalmitis incidence and risk factors after glaucoma surgeries in the Medicare population.

DESIGN

Retrospective, longitudinal study.

PARTICIPANTS

Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries in the United States aged 65 years or older undergoing glaucoma surgery.

METHODS

Medicare claims were used to identify all patients who underwent glaucoma, cataract, or combined cataract/glaucoma surgery from 2016 to 2019. Endophthalmitis cases within 42 days of the index surgery were identified using the diagnostic codes. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with postoperative endophthalmitis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The 42-day postoperative endophthalmitis incidence and risk factors associated with endophthalmitis after glaucoma surgery.

RESULTS

There were 466 928 glaucoma surgeries, of which 310 823 (66.6%) were combined with cataract surgery. Cataract surgeries alone (n = 8 460 360) served as a reference group. Microinvasive glaucoma surgeries constituted most glaucoma procedures performed (67.8%), followed by trabeculectomy (14.0%), tube shunt (10.9%), and other procedures (7.3%). There were 572 cases of endophthalmitis identified after all glaucoma surgeries. Endophthalmitis incidence after glaucoma, combined cataract/glaucoma, and cataract surgeries alone was 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-1.7), 1.1 (95% CI, 1.0-1.2), and 0.8 (95% CI, 0.8-0.8) per 1000 procedures, respectively. The median day of diagnosis of endophthalmitis was later for glaucoma surgeries (16.5 days) compared with combined cataract/glaucoma or cataract surgeries alone (8 and 6 days, respectively). Compared with microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), tube shunts were the only surgery type to be a significant risk factor for endophthalmitis for both stand-alone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.8, P = 0.002) and combined surgery (aOR 1.8, P = 0.047). The other risk factor for both stand-alone (aOR 1.1, P = 0.001) and combined (aOR 1.06, P = 0.049) surgeries was the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Age (aOR 1.03, P = 0.004) and male gender (1.46, P = 0.001) were significant risk factors for combined cataract and glaucoma surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with cataract surgery, early endophthalmitis incidence was higher for both glaucoma and combined cataract/glaucoma surgeries, with the highest incidence among tube shunts.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Endophthalmitis rates and risk factors following intraocular surgeries in the medicare population from 2016 to 2019

AIMS

To determine endophthalmitis rates and risk factors following intraocular surgeries in the Medicare population.

METHODS

Retrospective, cross-sectional study from 2016 to 2019 in Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. 100% Medicare claims were used to identify eyes that underwent intraocular surgery. Exclusion criteria included eyes that had intraocular surgery 42 days before or after and eyes in patients with a history of endophthalmitis within 12 months.

RESULTS

9 744 400 intraocular surgeries were performed among Medicare beneficiaries from 2016 to 2019. A 42-day postoperative endophthalmitis rate was 0.09%. Endophthalmitis rate by surgery type was 0.43% for corneal transplant, 0.36% for secondary intraocular lens (IOL), 0.24% for retina, 0.16% for glaucoma, 0.11% for cataract combined with other procedures and 0.08% for cataract surgeries alone. On multivariable analysis, the risk of endophthalmitis was increased for all intraocular surgery types when compared with cataract surgeries; adjusted OR (aOR) 5.30 (p<0.01) for corneal transplant, aOR 4.50 (p<0.01) for secondary IOL, aOR 3.00 (p<0.01) for retina, aOR 1.93 (p<0.01) for glaucoma, aOR 1.45 (p<0.01) for combined cataract surgeries. Increased risk of developing endophthalmitis was associated with older age (≥85 vs 65-75 years: aOR 1.36; p<0.01), male sex (aOR 1.20; p<0.001) and greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (≥7 vs 0: aOR 1.79; p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative endophthalmitis rate after intraocular surgeries was 0.09% between 2016 and 2019 for Medicare beneficiaries. Endophthalmitis rates were highest for corneal transplant surgeries followed by secondary IOL surgeries and lowest for cataract surgeries. Older age, male gender and higher comorbidity index were associated with risk of endophthalmitis.

Tracing the barriers to decarbonising ophthalmology: A review

As climate change demands increasingly urgent mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions, the health sector needs to do its part to decarbonise. Ophthalmologists share concerns about climate change and seek opportunities to reduce their environmental impact. When measuring the footprint of ophthalmology, major contributions are from patient travel to clinics, and from the large amounts of single-use disposable materials that are consumed during surgeries and sterile procedures. Ophthalmic services in India have already demonstrated systems that consume far fewer of these products through efficient throughput of patients and the safe reuse of many items, while maintaining equivalent safety and quality outcomes. Choosing these low-cost low-emission options would seem obvious, but many ophthalmologists experience barriers that prevent them operating as Indian surgeons do. Understanding these barriers to change is a crucial step in the decarbonisation of ophthalmology and the health sector more broadly.

Immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) based on recent studies, illustrate the safety of this approach, the cost-effectiveness, and present the importance of inclusion protocols for the best results.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent studies, the authors found no evidence of an increased risk of bilateral devastating complications such as endophthalmitis with ISBCS based on descriptive evidence compared to delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS). Furthermore, recent studies on cost analyses showed that ISBCS resulted in fewer costs and significant cost savings to third-party payers, patients, and society compared to DSBCS.

SUMMARY

The ISBCS surgical approach decreases hospital visits, reduces costs, and provides rapid visual rehabilitation and neuro adaptation. The risk of bilateral simultaneous complications is now recognized to be very rare with intracameral antibiotics and compliance with correct protocols. With new generations of optical biometry and lens calculation formulas, refractive surprises are occasional for normal eyes. However, refractive surprise is controversial, especially in the implantation of presbyopia correction intra-ocular lenses, which must be evaluated carefully in the ISBCS approach.

Concept Coverage Analysis of Ophthalmic Infections and Trauma among the Standardized Medical Terminologies SNOMED-CT, ICD-10-CM, and ICD-11

Purpose

Widespread electronic health record adoption has generated a large volume of data and emphasized the need for standardized terminology to describe clinical concepts. Here, we undertook a systematic concept coverage analysis to determine the representation of clinical concepts in ophthalmic infection and ophthalmic trauma among standardized medical terminologies, including the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT), the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) version 10 with clinical modifications (ICD-10-CM), and ICD version 11 (ICD-11).

Design

Extraction of concepts related to ophthalmic infection and ophthalmic trauma and structured search in terminology browsers.

Data Sources

The American Academy of Ophthalmology Basic and Clinical Science Course (BCSC), SNOMED-CT, and ICD-10-CM terminologies from the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics Athena browser, and the ICD-11 terminology browser.

Methods

Concepts pertaining to ophthalmic infection and ophthalmic trauma were extracted from the 2022 BCSC free text and index terms. We searched terminology browsers to identify corresponding codes and classified the extent of semantic alignment as equal, wide, narrow, or unmatched in each terminology. The overlap of equal concepts in each terminology was represented in a Venn diagram.

Main Outcome Measures

Proportions of clinical concepts with corresponding codes at various levels of semantic alignment.

Results

A total of 443 concepts were identified: 304 concepts related to ophthalmic infection and 139 concepts related to ophthalmic trauma. The SNOMED-CT had the highest proportion of equal coverage, with 82.0% (249 of 304) among concepts related to ophthalmic infection and 82.0% (115 of 139) among concepts related to ophthalmic trauma. Across all concepts, 28% (124 of 443) were classified as equal in ICD-10-CM and 52.8% (234 of 443) were classified as equal in ICD-11.

Conclusions

The SNOMED-CT had significantly better semantic alignment than ICD-10-CM and ICD-11 for ophthalmic infections and ophthalmic trauma. This demonstrates opportunity for continuing advancement of representation of ophthalmic concepts in standardized medical terminologies.

The association between developmental delay and endophthalmitis after pediatric cataract surgery using an insurance claims database

PURPOSE

To evaluate risk factors for postoperative endophthalmitis in pediatric cataract surgery based on an analysis of a large insurance claims database.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed pediatric (0-18 years) cataract surgeries from the IBM MarketScan Research Database from 2004 to 2017. Suspect cases of endophthalmitis were identified by International Classification of Diseases codes; confirmed cases, by Current Procedural Terminology codes within 7 days of diagnosis. Odds ratios (OR) were assessed for age, sex, aphakia, concomitant vitrectomy, open-globe injury, uveitis, lens displacement, developmental delay, trisomy 21, and immunocompromised status.

RESULTS

Among 5,304 eyes of 6,835 patients, the following were factors significantly associated with pediatric cataract surgery-related suspect endophthalmitis: open-globe injury (OR = 7.75; 95% CI, 3.32-18.09; P < 0.001), ocular trauma (OR = 3.64; 95% CI, 1.83-7.24; P < 0.001), aphakia (OR = 2.33, CI 1.15-4.69, P = 0.018), and developmental delay (OR = 4.24, 95% CI, 1.00-18.02; P = 0.05). With univariate analysis of confirmed endophthalmitis cases, the following were identified as statistically significant: open-globe injury (OR = 8.1; 95% CI, 2.64-24.87; P < 0.001), ocular trauma (OR = 4.34, CI 1.72-10.97; P = 0.002), subluxated or dislocated lens (OR = 3.62; 95% CI, 1.04-12.57; P = 0.043), aphakia (OR = 2.86; 95% CI, 1.13-7.26; P = 0.027), and developmental delay (OR = 8.24; 95% CI, 1.86-36.44; P = 0.005). Age, sex, concomitant vitrectomy, and uveitis were not associated with increased risk of endophthalmitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Developmental delay may be a risk factor for postoperative endophthalmitis in pediatric cataract surgery. Surgeons can assess preoperative risk by performing a detailed medical and social history for challenges particular to this population that may complicate the postoperative course.

Immediate sequential vs delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

The main aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) compared with delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS). MEDLINE Ovid, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched. Outcome measures were postoperative visual acuity, postoperative spherical equivalent (refractive outcome), endophthalmitis, corneal edema, pseudophakic macular edema, and posterior capsule rupture (PCR). 13 articles met criteria for final inclusion. A total of 11 068 622 participants (18 802 043 eyes) were included. No statistically significant differences between ISBCS and DSBCS were identified in all the postoperative outcomes evaluated. However, a higher risk for PCR was identified in the ISBCS group from the pooled analysis of nonrandomized studies (risk ratio, 1.34, 95% CI, 1.08-1.67, P = .0081). In our view, the ISBCS approach has an acceptable safety-efficacy profile, comparable with DSBCS. Future investigations are warranted, with a focus on the analysis of risk factors for surgical complications, patient-reported outcome-measures, and cost effectiveness.

Safety of office-based lens surgery: U.S. multicenter study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the rate of adverse events after office-based lens surgery performed across multiple private practices in the United States.

SETTING

36 private practices across the U.S.

DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter study.

METHODS

This analysis included case records of all consecutive patients who underwent office-based lens surgery for visually significant cataract, refractive lens exchange, or phakic intraocular lens implantation between August 2020 and May 2022 at 36 participating sites across the U.S. The study outcome measures included the assessment of intraoperative and postoperative complications such as the incidence of unplanned vitrectomy, iritis, corneal edema, and endophthalmitis after lens surgery. The frequency of patients requiring a return to the operating room (OR) or referral to a retina surgeon and the frequency of patients requiring hospitalization or calling emergency services (911) for any reason were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The study reviewed 18 005 cases of office-based cataract or refractive lens surgery performed at 36 clinical sites. The rates of postoperative endophthalmitis, toxic anterior segment syndrome, and corneal edema were 0.028%, 0.022%, and 0.027%, respectively. Unplanned anterior vitrectomy was performed in 0.177% of patients. Although 0.067% of patients needed to return to the OR, 0.011% of patients were referred to the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of adverse events for office-based cataract or refractive lens surgery is similar to or less than the reported adverse event rate for modern cataract surgery in the ambulatory surgery center setting.

Immediate Sequential Bilateral Surgery in Refractive Lens Exchange Patients: Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) in patients who underwent bilateral same-day refractive lens exchange (RLE).

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients of a private intraocular surgery provider in the United Kingdom who underwent RLE in both eyes on the same day with treatment dates between March 2018 and December 2021.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes and AEs were collected for a continuous cohort of patients undergoing bilateral same-day RLE (in the absence of visually significant cataracts) or had mild cataracts (corrected visual acuity ≥ 20/40). One-month clinical outcomes were analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Refractive outcomes and visual acuity, intraoperative and postoperative AEs, and secondary surgical interventions recorded within the first month after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 17 330 patients (34 660 eyes) were included in the analysis. Of these, 28 827 eyes received a multifocal intraocular lens (IOL), and 5833 eyes had a monofocal IOL. The percentage of eyes within ±0.50 diopters (D) of intended refraction was 85.5% and 86.2% for monofocal and multifocal IOL eyes, respectively. There was a total of 55 intraoperative AEs recorded in 55 eyes of 54 patients (per-eye incidence: 0.159%). Posterior capsule tear was the most common intraoperative event occurring in 37 eyes (0.107%). The number of AEs recorded within the first postoperative month was 267, occurring in 263 eyes of 177 patients (per-eye incidence: 0.759%). These included cystoid macular edema (CME) (172 eyes; 0.496%), significant corneal edema (28 eyes; 0.081%), persistent inflammation (27 eyes; 0.078%), significantly raised intraocular pressure (27 eyes; 0.078%), toxic anterior segment syndrome (8 eyes; 0.023%), wound leak (3 eyes; 0.009%), retinal detachment (1 eye; 0.003%), and retinal tear (1 eye; 0.003%). There were 56 secondary surgical interventions recorded within the first month of surgery, occurring in 54 eyes of 47 patients (per-eye incidence: 0.156%). The most common secondary intervention was the rotation of a misaligned toric IOL (24 eyes; 0.069%).

CONCLUSIONS

Elective same-day bilateral RLE had a low incidence of serious AEs, and high refractive predictability.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of immediate versus delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery in the Netherlands (BICAT-NL study): a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In an ageing population, efficiency improvements are required to assure future accessibility of cataract care. We aim to address remaining knowledge gaps by evaluating the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) versus delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS). We hypothesised that ISBCS is non-inferior to DSBCS, regarding safety and effectiveness, and being superior in cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial, which included participants from ten Dutch hospitals. Eligible participants were 18 years or older, underwent expected uncomplicated surgery, and had no increased risk of endophthalmitis or refractive surprise. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the ISBCS (intervention) group or DSBCS (conventional procedure) group, using a web-based system stratified by centre and axial length. Participants and outcome assessors were not masked to the treatment groups because of the nature of the intervention. The primary outcome was the proportion of second eyes with a target refractive outcome of 1·0 dioptre (D) or less 4 weeks postoperatively, with a non-inferiority margin of -5% for ISBCS versus DSBCS. For the trial-based economic evaluation, the primary endpoint was the incremental societal costs per quality-adjusted life-year. All analyses were done by a modified intention-to-treat principle. Costs were calculated by multiplying volumes of resource use with unit cost prices and converted to 2020 Euros (€) and US$. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03400124, and is now closed for recruitment.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 4, 2018, and July 10, 2020, a total of 865 patients were randomly assigned to either the ISBCS group (427 [49%] patients; 854 eyes) or DSBCS group (438 [51%] patients; 876 eyes). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, the proportion of second eyes with a target refraction of 1·0 D or less was 97% (404 of 417 patients) in the ISBCS group versus 98% (407 of 417) in the DSBCS group. The percentage difference was -1% (90% CI -3 to 1; p=0·526), thereby establishing non-inferiority for ISBCS compared with DSBCS. Endophthalmitis was not observed or reported in either group. Adverse events were comparable between groups, with only a significant difference in disturbing anisometropia (p=0·0001). Societal costs were €403 (US$507) lower with ISBCS than with DSBCS. The cost-effectiveness probability of ISBCS versus DSBCS was 100% across the willingness-to-pay range of €2500-80 000 (US$3145-100 629) per quality-adjusted life-year.

INTERPRETATION

Our results showed non-inferiority of ISBCS versus DSBCS regarding effectiveness outcomes, comparable safety, and superior cost-effectiveness of ISBCS. National cost savings could amount to €27·4 million (US$34·5 million) annually, advocating for ISBCS if strict inclusion criteria are applied.

FUNDING

Research grant from The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) and Dutch Ophthalmological Society.

Application of big data in ophthalmology

The advents of information technologies have led to the creation of ever-larger datasets. Also known as big data, these large datasets are characterized by its volume, variety, velocity, veracity, and value. More importantly, big data has the potential to expand traditional research capabilities, inform clinical practice based on real-world data, and improve the health system and service delivery. This review first identified the different sources of big data in ophthalmology, including electronic medical records, data registries, research consortia, administrative databases, and biobanks. Then, we provided an in-depth look at how big data analytics have been applied in ophthalmology for disease surveillance, and evaluation on disease associations, detection, management, and prognostication. Finally, we discussed the challenges involved in big data analytics, such as data suitability and quality, data security, and analytical methodologies.

Cataracts

94 million people are blind or visually impaired globally, and cataract is the most common cause of blindness worldwide. However, most cases of blindness are avoidable. Cataract is associated with decreased quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Most cases of cataract occur after birth and share ageing and oxidative stress as primary causes, although several non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors can accelerate cataract formation. In most patients, phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation is the preferred treatment and is highly cost-effective. There has been an increase in the use of comprehensive cataract surgical services, including diagnoses, treatment referrals, and rehabilitation. However, global inequity in surgical service quality is still a limitation. Implementation of preoperative risk assessment, risk reduction strategies, and new surgical technologies have made cataract surgery possible at an earlier stage of cataract severity with the expectation of good refractive outcomes. The main challenge is making the service that is currently available to some patients accessible to all by use of universal health coverage.

Big data in corneal diseases and cataract: Current applications and future directions

The accelerated growth in electronic health records (EHR), Internet-of-Things, mHealth, telemedicine, and artificial intelligence (AI) in the recent years have significantly fuelled the interest and development in big data research. Big data refer to complex datasets that are characterized by the attributes of "5 Vs"-variety, volume, velocity, veracity, and value. Big data analytics research has so far benefitted many fields of medicine, including ophthalmology. The availability of these big data not only allow for comprehensive and timely examinations of the epidemiology, trends, characteristics, outcomes, and prognostic factors of many diseases, but also enable the development of highly accurate AI algorithms in diagnosing a wide range of medical diseases as well as discovering new patterns or associations of diseases that are previously unknown to clinicians and researchers. Within the field of ophthalmology, there is a rapidly expanding pool of large clinical registries, epidemiological studies, omics studies, and biobanks through which big data can be accessed. National corneal transplant registries, genome-wide association studies, national cataract databases, and large ophthalmology-related EHR-based registries (e.g., AAO IRIS Registry) are some of the key resources. In this review, we aim to provide a succinct overview of the availability and clinical applicability of big data in ophthalmology, particularly from the perspective of corneal diseases and cataract, the synergistic potential of big data, AI technologies, internet of things, mHealth, and wearable smart devices, and the potential barriers for realizing the clinical and research potential of big data in this field.

An update on immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to present an overview of recent publications and opinions in the field of same-day bilateral cataract surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

A Cochrane review was published comparing immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) and delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS) with regard to safety outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness. In addition, several large database studies provided more information on incidences of rare complications such as unilateral and bilateral endophthalmitis rates.

SUMMARY

Recently available evidence showed that ISBCS is an effective and cost-effective alternative to DSBCS. Nonetheless, additional (randomized) registry studies, randomized controlled trials and cost-effectiveness studies are needed to evaluate bilateral endophthalmitis rates, refractive outcomes and cost-effectiveness of ISBCS compared with DSBCS.

Immediate or Delayed Sequential Bilateral ICL Surgery: a Survey of Chinese Ophthalmologists

INTRODUCTION

In China, the demand for implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery is booming. Immediate sequential bilateral ICL surgery (ISBICLS) benefits patients and clinics, but it remains controversial and lacks standardization. We aim to investigate the prevalence of, factors for, and surgeon attitudes toward ISBICLS.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional survey study, an electronic questionnaire about the practice and attitudes toward performing ISBICLS or delayed sequential bilateral ICL surgery (DSBICLS) was distributed to 792 qualified ICL surgeons in Mainland China, between 4 April and 22 April 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 531 surgeons (66.79%) from 30 provinces in Mainland China responded. Among them, 374 (67.23%) were currently performing ISBICLS. Fifty-two percent (277) of surgeons reported performing ISBICLS more than 50% of the time, while 85.05% of surgeons chose to perform the second eye surgery 1 day after the first eye surgery. Seventy percent (248) of surgeons performing ISBICLS chose to perform the second eye surgery less than 30 min after the first eye surgery. Surgeons who started ICL surgery earlier (before 2010, OR = 2.772, 95% CI = 1.290-5.957, P = 0.009; 2011-2013, OR = 2.479, 95% CI = 1.060-5.800, P = 0.036), completed one-eye ICL surgery faster (< 3 min, OR = 3.936, 95% CI = 1.505-10.293, P = 0.005) and modified the second eye ICL selection less frequently (1-25%, OR = 0.203, 95% CI = 0.054-0.771, P = 0.019; 26-50%, OR = 0.173, 95% CI = 0.041-0.726, P = 0.017; 51-75%, OR = 0.299, 95% CI = 0.041-0.726, P = 0.123; 76-100%, OR = 0.163, 95% CI = 0.039-0.688, P = 0.014) tended to perform ISBICLS. No significant association was found among clinical settings, preoperative measurement devices, and hospital policies with performing ISBICLS. Regarding their attitudes toward ISBICLS, 54.63% preferred ISBICLS and 45.37% preferred DSBICLS. The main supporting reasons were patient convenience (98.64%), faster vision rehabilitation (73.56%), and improved perioperative compliance (73.22%). The concerns regarding ISBICLS included the risk of endophthalmitis (62.22%), lack of recommendation in expert consensus (61.67%), and decreased vault predictability (60.93%). The most common desires for further adoption were expert consensus on surgical criteria and patient indicators for ISBICLS (82.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

ISBICLS has been gradually adopted in Mainland China, but has not been widely accepted as a routine procedure. Surgeons' experience and skills mainly influence whether ISBICLS is performed. Further research is needed to explore standardized protocols to prevent endophthalmitis, the appropriate time interval of two eye surgery, and requisitions for surgeon skills.

Visual recovery after immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery at a veterans' hospital

PURPOSE

To answer patient questions about the expected timeline for recovery, the objective postoperative visual acuities were reviewed for patients undergoing immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS).

SETTING

Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, Missouri.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

All patients who underwent ISBCS in 2019 were evaluated. A total of 116 patients (232 eyes) were studied. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) for postoperative day 0 or 1 (POD0/1), postoperative week 1 (POW1), and postoperative month 1 (POM1) were required for study inclusion. Patients with ocular comorbidities were not excluded, although all patients passed an initial screening to qualify for ISBCS. The outcome measures included POD0/1, POW1, and POM1 UDVA.

RESULTS

Postoperative UDVA was stable or improved compared with preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) for 48% (66/138) of eyes on POD0, 79% (74/94) of eyes on POD1, and 90% (209/232) of eyes on POW1. 83% of patients at POD1 and 90% of patients at POW1 had stable or improved visual acuity in at least 1 eye. 92% (214/232) of eyes had a POW1 UDVA of 20/40 or better. Of the 18 eyes with a postoperative POW1 UDVA of 20/50 or worse, 5 (28%) were known preoperatively to have limited visual potential. 99% (115/116) of patients had at least 1 eye 20/40 or better.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the patients who underwent ISBCS demonstrated meaningful improvement in UDVA compared with preoperative CDVA as early as POD1. These results serve to guide discussion of postoperative expectations with patients interested in ISBCS.

The American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research In Sight): current and future state of big data analytics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the drivers, development, and current state of the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research In Sight), and analytics involving deidentified aggregate IRIS Registry data.

RECENT FINDINGS

The IRIS Registry has a core mission of quality improvement and reporting. In addition, analytic projects performed to date have included characterizing patient populations and diseases, incidence, and prevalence; clinical outcomes and complications; risk factors and effect modifiers; practice patterns; and trends over time. Pipeline projects include application of artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches for predictive modeling and analytics, disease mapping, detecting patterns and identifying cohorts, and optimizing treatment based on patient-specific characteristics.

SUMMARY

The IRIS Registry is the nation's largest single specialty clinical registry, with unique data elements specific to ophthalmology. It offers a wealth of opportunities involving big data analytics, including traditional inferential statistics as well as machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches scalable on massive amounts of data.

Patient Attitudes and Desirability Regarding Immediate Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery

Purpose

To analyze patient attitudes and desirability regarding routine immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS).

Methods

This study was conducted as a prospective, consecutive survey-based case series from a single private practice institution serving a mostly rural population. A standardized phone survey assessing patient perspectives on ISBCS was administered to patients before and after routine delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS) was performed. Subject responses were analyzed, including a subset analysis on patient responses under a variety of circumstances.

Results

There were 61 patients enrolled into the study and 47 completed the surveys before and after routine DSBCS (77.0% completion rate). Thirty-nine (83.0%) of respondents had a favorable outlook of ISBCS preoperatively, whereas 36 (76.6%) had a favorable outlook of ISBCS postoperatively (p>0.05). On the postoperative questionnaire, twenty-five (53.2%) of respondents were willing to accept additional surgical risk if necessary to receive ISBCS, and this finding was significant between the subgroup of patients with systemic health co-morbidities compared to those without systemic health co-morbidities (p=0.05).

Conclusion

Most patients had a favorable outlook of ISBCS before and after undergoing DSBCS. Patients with underlying systemic health co-morbidities were most likely to accept additional surgical risk if necessary to receive ISBCS. From a patient’s perspective, ISBCS may be an acceptable option to routinely implement when cataract surgery is required for both eyes.

Ophthalmologists' attitudes towards immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS): a Dutch national survey

PURPOSE

To evaluate current practice patterns of immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) in the Netherlands and assess ophthalmologists' attitudes towards performing ISBCS in future cataract care.

SETTING

Dutch ophthalmic society members.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study (national survey).

METHODS

An electronic survey on ISBCS was sent as part of an annual survey on cataract practice patterns to members of the Dutch ophthalmic society. Questions regarding current ISBCS practice patterns, willingness to perform ISBCS routinely in future care, reasons for performing ISBCS and reasons for not performing ISBCS were included. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

In total, 237/520 survey recipients (45.6%) responded to the overall survey. Data on the ISBCS questions was available from 227 respondents. Sixty-two ophthalmologists (27.3%) currently performed ISBCS, predominantly in low patient-volumes (90.3% in one to five patients per month). However, 108/227 ophthalmologists (47.6%) considered performing ISBCS routinely in future practice. Procedures for which ISBCS was mainly considered included age-related cataract surgery using topical and general anaesthesia. Availability of separate products and instruments for both eyes and patient advantages were considered of high importance when performing ISBCS. Main reasons for not performing ISBCS included the risk of endophthalmitis and potential medico-legal aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ISBCS is currently no routine procedure in the Netherlands, it is considered by almost 50% of surgeons. In order to improve implementation on a national level, potential barriers identified in this survey (fear of bilateral endophthalmitis, potential medico-legal issues, a lack of availability of separate products for both eyes) should be addressed.

Trends, Factors, and Outcomes Associated with Immediate Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery (ISBCS) Among Medicare Beneficiaries

PURPOSE

To report the incidence of immediate (ISBCS) and delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS) and identify factors associated with undergoing ISBCS.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 who underwent ISBCS and DSBCS from 2011 to 2019.

METHODS

Population-based analysis of the 100% Medicare fee-for-service carrier claims data. Logistic regression models were performed to evaluate factors associated with ISBCS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

1) Incidence of ISBCS and DSBCS, 2) demographic, ocular and medical characteristics associated with receipt of ISBCS, and 3) rates of endophthalmitis and cystoid macular edema (CME) after ISBCS or DSBCS.

RESULTS

A total of 4,014 (0.2%) ISBCS and 1,944,979 (99.8%) DSBCS patients were identified. Black (OR:2.31, 95%CI: 2.06-2.59), Asian (OR:1.82, 95%CI: 1.51-2.12), or Native American (OR:2.42, 95%CI: 1.81-3.23) patients were more likely to receive ISBCS compared to White patients. Patients residing in rural areas had higher likelihood of ISBCS (OR:1.26, 95%CI: 1.17-1.35) compared to metropolitan areas. Patients operated at a hospital compared to ambulatory setting (OR:2.71, 95%CI: 2.53-2.89) were more likely to receive ISBCS. Patients with bilateral complex vs. non-complex cataract (OR:3.23, 95%CI: 2.95-3.53) were more likely to receive ISBCS. Patients with a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 1-2 (OR:1.45, 95%CI: 1.29-1.62), 3-4 (OR:1.70, 95%CI: 1.47-1.97), 5-6 (OR:1.97, 95%CI: 1.62-2.39), and CCI≥7 (OR:1.97, 95%CI: 1.55-2.50) were all more likely to receive ISBCS compared to those with CCI=0. In contrast, patients with glaucoma (OR:0.82, 95%CI: 0.76-0.89), macular degeneration (OR:0.75, 95%CI: 0.68-0.82), and macular hole/epiretinal membrane (OR:0.55, 95%CI: 0.48-0.65) were less likely to undergo ISBCS compared to those without. Cumulatively, there was no significant difference in endophthalmitis rate within 42 days between ISBCS (1.74 per 1,000 ISBCS) and DSBCS (1.01 per 1,000 DSBCS; p=0.15). Similarly, there was no significant cumulative difference between ISBCS (1.79 per 100 ISBCS) and DSBCS (1.96 per 100 DSBCS) CME rates (p=0.48).

CONCLUSION

Overall utilization of ISBCS among Medicare beneficiaries remains low over the past decade, though rates of endophthalmitis and CME were comparable to DSBCS. Race, geography, systemic and ocular comorbidities were associated with receiving ISBCS. ISBCS represents a potential opportunity to improve access to cataract surgery.