Archway Phase 3 Trial of the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration 2-Year Results

Advances in ophthalmic therapeutic delivery: A comprehensive overview of present and future directions

Ophthalmic treatment demands precision and consistency in delivering therapeutic agents over extended periods to address many conditions, from common eye disorders to complex diseases. This diversity necessitates a range of delivery strategies, each tailored to specific needs. We delve into various delivery cargos that are pivotal in ophthalmic care. These cargos encompass biodegradable implants that gradually release medication, nonbiodegradable implants for sustained drug delivery, refillable tools allowing flexibility in treatment, hydrogels capable of retaining substances while maintaining ocular comfort, and advanced nanotechnology devices that precisely target eye tissues. Within each cargo category, we explore cutting-edge research-level approaches and FDA-approved methods, providing a thorough overview of the current state of ophthalmic drug delivery. In particular, our focus on nanotechnology reveals the promising potential for gene delivery, cell therapy administration, and the implantation of active devices directly into the retina. These advancements hold the key to more effective, personalized, and minimally- invasive ophthalmic treatments, revolutionizing the field of eye care.

Intraocular drugs: pharmacokinetic strategies and the influence on efficacy and durability

INTRODUCTION

The modern treatment of chorioretinal vascular diseases follows the recent development and rapid adoption of drugs that inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). All anti-VEGF drugs are delivered intravitreally, with clinical behavior, including efficacy, durability, and safety, largely determined by their pharmacokinetic properties.

AREAS COVERED

Properties of these new drugs include additional binding targets (placental growth factor (PlGF) and angiopoietin 2 (Ang 2)), binding affinity, potency, intravitreal half-life, and increased molar dose. A PubMed search for 'pharmacokinetics of anti-VEGF drugs' was performed from 2000 to 2023. Relevant studies were reviewed and referred to in the manuscript.

EXPERT OPINION

Early developers concentrated on improving efficacy, but since maximum efficacy with VEGF inhibition has been reached, development has pivoted to extending the duration of action. Durability strategies include inhibiting additional pathways (faricimab), increasing molar dose (abicipar, brolucizumab, faricimab, and aflibercept 8 mg), and prolonging the intravitreal half-life (abicipar and KSI-301). Recent phase 3 trials demonstrated modest improvements in durability, but failures that might be attributed to these strategies (conjugation and manufacturing processes) have occurred. Future drug development focuses on extending duration of action with implantable reservoirs (ranibizumab port delivery system), sustained release devices (tyrosine kinase inhibitors), and gene therapy.

Two-year efficacy and safety of different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To compare the 2-year efficacy and safety of various anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed on multiple electronic databases up to April 2023 and updated in June 2024, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Key outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving a vision gain of ≥15 letters and maintaining stable vision (loss of <15 letters) in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), changes in mean BCVA from baseline, serious ocular adverse events (SAEs), adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation and any cause of death at 2 years.

RESULTS

Nineteen trials with 12,654 patients and 25 treatment regimens were analyzed in the study. All anti-VEGF regimens showed superior efficacy compared to sham therapy. Specifically, faricimab 6 mg (4+up to Q16W) and ranibizumab 0.5 mg (2-week T&E) displayed top-level effect in vision gain. Bevacizumab 1.25 mg (2-week T&E) and aflibercept 2 mg (2-week T&E) demonstrated the most stable vision outcomes. Bevacizumab 1.25 mg (2-week T&E) and ranibizumab 0.5 mg (2-week T&E) exhibited the most pronounced mean BCVA improvement. Compared to sham therapy, the risk of SAEs was significantly higher for brolucizumab 6 mg (3 + Q12W/ Q8W) (RR = 6.04, 95% CI: 1.30-28.02) and PDS 100 mg/ml (Q24W) (RR = 10.95, 95% CI: 2.14-56.02), but not for other anti-VEGF regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Ranibizumab 0.5 mg (2-week T&E) emerges as a potentially optimal regimen for nAMD over a 2-year period. Future studies need to consider the impact of baseline characteristics on treatment outcomes.

Systematic Literature Reviews Comparing the Long-Term Safety Outcomes for the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab (PDS) Versus Other Ocular Implants

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the types and rates of post-surgical complications associated with the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) are comparable with those reported for other ocular implants that cross the sclera.

METHODS

Systematic literature reviews were conducted to determine the long-term (≥ 18-month) safety of ocular implants that cross the sclera in clinical trials and real-world studies. Complication types and rates were compared with those reported for the PDS in phase III clinical trials (Archway, Pagoda, and Pavilion).

RESULTS

Sixteen clinical trials (24 publications) and 43 real-world studies were identified reporting 30 complications in eyes with 15 implant types and 8 ocular diseases. Implants were associated with an acceptable, well-characterized safety profile, with most complications resolving spontaneously or with treatment. Device-related complications were reported in 0.7% (0.0-5.0%) of study eyes in clinical trials and 1.3% (0.0-14.5%) of eyes in real-world studies. Rates of conjunctival complications were 2.1% (0.0-22.8%) and 2.2% (0.9-4.6%), respectively. The overall types and rates of adverse events of special interest reported for the PDS in phase III trials (cataract, conjunctival bleb, vitreous hemorrhage, conjunctival erosion, conjunctival retraction, endophthalmitis, implant dislocation, retinal detachment, and hyphema) were within the ranges reported for other ocular implants.

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of complications reported in phase III clinical trials for the PDS were within the ranges reported for other ocular implants that cross the sclera. This suggests that the long-term safety of the PDS is consistent with other ocular devices established in ophthalmology clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews: CRD5202234129, CRD42022343129.

Interim Results of the Phase III Portal Extension Trial of the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

OBJECTIVE

The Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) is approved in the United States for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Portal (NCT03683251) is evaluating long-term safety and tolerability of the PDS in patients with nAMD who completed the phase II Ladder (NCT02510794) or phase III Archway (NCT03677934) trials.

DESIGN

Multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, extension clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

All-PDS safety population (N = 555) comprises patients enrolled in Portal who completed Ladder or Archway. Because of data availability, efficacy population comprises Ladder-to-Portal patients only: patients who previously received PDS 10, 40, or 100 mg/mL pro re nata (as-needed [PRN]; n = 58, 62, and 59, respectively) or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg injections (monthly ranibizumab; n = 41) in Ladder and subsequently enrolled in Portal.

METHODS

Ladder patients received PDS refill-exchanges PRN or monthly ranibizumab. Archway patients received PDS 100 mg/mL with fixed refill-exchanges every 24 weeks (Q24W) or monthly ranibizumab. Once enrolled in Portal, all patients receive PDS Q24W from day 1.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Ocular adverse events of special interest (AESIs); changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and center point thickness (CPT); supplemental ranibizumab treatment between refill-exchange procedures; and PDS Patient Preference Questionnaire results.

RESULTS

In the All-PDS safety population (mean follow-up, 111 weeks), 137 (24.7%) patients had ≥1 ocular AESI; most common were cataract (11.4%), vitreous hemorrhage (6.1%), and conjunctival thickening (bleb)/filtering bleb leak (6.3%). Endophthalmitis occurred in 11 of 555 (2.0%) patients. For Ladder-to-Portal patients previously treated with PDS 100 mg/mL or monthly ranibizumab, BCVA remained stable from baseline to month 48; mean (95% confidence interval) changes from baseline were 0.1 (-6.6 to 6.8; n = 31) and 2.3 (-9.4 to 14.1; n = 15) letters, respectively; CPT remained stable through month 48. Approximately 95% of patients did not need supplemental treatment before each refill-exchange for >2 years since Portal enrollment. Of Ladder-to-Portal previous monthly ranibizumab patients, 92% preferred the PDS over injections.

CONCLUSIONS

Interim results from Portal suggest 4-year maintenance of visual/anatomic outcomes with PDS 100 mg/mL, with the PDS preferred to monthly injections. Long-term safety profile of the PDS is well characterized.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Endophthalmitis in Eyes Treated with the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab: Summary of Cases during Clinical Trial Development

PURPOSE

The Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) is approved in the United States for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The United States Prescribing Information has a Boxed Warning for endophthalmitis and reports the incidence rate in patients developing endophthalmitis after receiving the PDS compared with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab. Endophthalmitis cases noted in the Boxed Warning, treatment outcomes, potential contributing factors, and potential mitigations are summarized.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of endophthalmitis cases in PDS-treated patients in the phase II Ladder (NCT02510794) and phase III Archway (NCT03677934) and Portal (NCT03683251) trials.

PARTICIPANTS

Endophthalmitis cases in the pooled all-PDS safety population (N = 555) including PDS patients in Ladder, Archway, or Portal.

METHODS

Ladder patients received PDS (10, 40, or 100 mg/ml) with pro re nata refill-exchanges. Archway patients received PDS 100 mg/ml with fixed refill-exchanges every 24 weeks (PDS Q24W). Portal patients received PDS Q24W from day 1.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical features, management, and visual outcomes were summarized. Cases were summarized by date of PDS implant and/or refill, other prior invasive procedures/refills, and preceding/concurrent conjunctival complications.

RESULTS

Twelve endophthalmitis events were reported in 11 patients (11/555 [2.0%]) through March 12, 2021. All were cultured (3 were culture positive) and treated with intravitreal antibiotics. Two cases (2/555 [0.4%]) occurred in the immediate postoperative period (days 5 and 6). Nine cases occurred later (day range: 57-853), including 4 before the first refill-exchange (day range: 57-161). Five patients received between 1 and 11 refill-exchanges before the event (onset: 6-168 days after last refill-exchange). Seven cases (7/11 [63.6%]) had preceding/concurrent conjunctival complications. At last follow-up, 7 patients recovered vision to study baseline levels or ≥20/40; 4 patients experienced vision loss of ≥15 ETDRS letters.

CONCLUSIONS

Endophthalmitis is a serious complication that can endanger vision after any ocular procedure, including PDS implantation. Most, but not all, of this limited series of endophthalmitis cases were late onset, associated with conjunctival breach, and recovered vision with treatment. Meticulous attention to PDS surgical techniques with vigilant monitoring of conjunctiva during follow-up may minimize risk of endophthalmitis. Prompt treatment is critical for optimizing patient outcomes.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Advancements in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration: a comprehensive review

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) stands as a leading cause of irreversible blindness, particularly affecting central vision and impeding daily tasks. This paper provides a thorough exploration of AMD, distinguishing between its two main subtypes-Wet and Dry AMD-while shedding light on the prevalence and risk factors, including age, genetics, and smoking. The focus shifts to the current and future treatment landscape, examining both Dry and Wet AMD. Regarding Dry AMD, interventions such as antioxidant supplementation and ongoing clinical trials offer hope. Notable among these is Pegcetacoplan which is the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication, displaying promising results in reducing geographic atrophy lesions. For Wet AMD, anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor therapies like Ranibizumab (Lucentis®) have been instrumental, and newer drugs like Faricimab and OPT-302 show comparable efficacy with extended dosing intervals. Additionally, gene therapies such as RGX-314 present a potential paradigm shift, reducing or eliminating the need for frequent injections. Biosimilars offer cost-effective alternatives. The paper also delves into the integration of technology and artificial intelligence in AMD management, highlighting the role of smartphone apps for patient monitoring and artificial intelligence algorithms for diagnosis and surveillance. Furthermore, patient perspectives on artificial intelligence demonstrate a positive correlation between understanding and trust. The narrative concludes with a glimpse into ground-breaking technologies, including retinal implants and bionic chips, offering hope for vision restoration. Overall, this paper underscores the multifaceted approach in addressing AMD, combining traditional and innovative strategies, paving the way for a more promising future in AMD treatment.

Supplemental Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injections in Eyes Treated with the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab in the Archway Trial

PURPOSE

To determine the proportion and characteristics of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with the Port Delivery System (PDS) with ranibizumab that receive supplemental intravitreal ranibizumab injections because of changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) or central subfield thickness (CST), or both, and to investigate the safety and efficacy of supplemental injections in eyes with the PDS.

DESIGN

Post hoc analyses of data from the phase III, randomized, multicenter, open-label, active-comparator Archway trial (NCT03677934).

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with nAMD diagnosed within 9 months of screening previously responsive to anti-VEGF therapy.

INTERVENTION

Four hundred eighteen patients were randomized to the PDS with ranibizumab 100 mg/ml with fixed refill-exchanges every 24 weeks (Q24W) or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg for 96 weeks.

RESULTS

Of the 246 eyes treated with the PDS Q24W and assessed for supplemental treatment criteria, the vast majority (94.6%-98.4%) did not receive supplemental treatment during each retreatment interval, with 87.4% not receiving supplemental treatment at any point during the trial. Of the 31 eyes receiving supplemental treatment, 58.1% received 1 injection and 32.3% received 2. At baseline, eyes receiving supplemental treatment were significantly more likely to have thicker retinas (mean CST, 370.5μm vs. 304.4μm; P = 0.0001), subretinal fluid (54.8% vs. 21.2%; P < 0.0001), and larger pigment epithelial detachment height (215.7 μm vs. 175.9 μm; P = 0.003). These features have previously been associated with difficult-to-treat nAMD. Although BCVA and CST generally remained constant throughout the trial in eyes without supplemental treatment, the small number of eyes receiving supplemental treatment on average lost 1 line of vision from baseline to week 96 (mean, -5.7 ETDRS score letters) and CST continued to increase over time. Absolute BCVA at week 96 was similar irrespective of supplemental treatment status (71.1 and 73.7 letters). Best-corrected visual acuity and CST generally improved within 28 days of supplemental treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the PDS Q24W effectively maintains vision and retinal stability in most eyes with nAMD, a small proportion of patients with features of difficult-to-treat nAMD may benefit from supplemental intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and initial close monitoring is recommended.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Stability of ranibizumab during continuous delivery from the Port Delivery Platform

The Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) is an innovative intraocular drug delivery system that has the potential to reduce treatment burden in patients with retinovascular diseases. The Port Delivery Platform (PD-P) implant is a permanent, indwelling device that can be refilled in situ through a self-sealing septum and is designed to continuously deliver ranibizumab by passive diffusion through a porous titanium release control element. We present results for the studies carried out to characterize the stability of ranibizumab for use with the PD-P. Simulated administration, in vitro release studies, and modeling studies were performed to evaluate the compatibility of ranibizumab with the PD-P administration components, and degradation and photostability in the implant. Simulated administration studies demonstrated that ranibizumab was highly compatible with the PD-P administration components (initial fill and refill needles) and commercially available administration components (syringe, transfer needle, syringe closure). Subsequent simulated in vitro release studies examining continuous delivery for up to 12 months in phosphate buffered saline, a surrogate for human vitreous, showed that the primary degradation products of ranibizumab were acidic variants. The presence of these variants increased over time and potency remained high. The stability attributes of ranibizumab were consistent across multiple implant refill-exchanges. Despite some degradation within the implant, the absolute mass of variants released daily from the implant was low due to the continuous release mechanism of the implant. Simulated light exposure within the implant resulted in small increases in the relative amount of ranibizumab degradants compared with those seen over 6 months.

Clinical Trials and Future Outlooks of the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab: A Narrative Review

The port delivery system (PDS) of anti-VEGF therapy provides continuous delivery of ranibizumab (RBZ). In October of 2021, the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the PDS with RBZ as a treatment option for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). As the field of PDS with RBZ is progressing rapidly, this narrative review provides a much-needed overview of existing clinical trials as well as ongoing and upcoming trials investigating PDS with RBZ. The phase 2 LADDER trial reported that the mean time to first refill with RBZ PDS 100 mg/ml was 15.8 months (80% CI 12.1-20.6), and pharmacokinetic profiling revealed a sustained concentration of RBZ in serum and aqueous humor. Later, the phase 3 ARCHWAY trial reported that PDS with RBZ (100 mg/ml) refilled every 24 weeks was non-inferior to monthly intravitreal injection (IVI) with RBZ (0.5 mg) in patients with nAMD over 9 months and 2 years. However, patients with PDS had a higher rate of adverse events including vitreous hemorrhage and endophthalmitis. Patients indicate high treatment satisfaction with both PDS and IVI, but the lower number of treatments with PDS was reported as a preferred choice. Several ongoing and future clinical trials, of which details are discussed in this paper, are further exploring the potentials of PDS with RBZ. We conclude that the PDS provides continuous deliverance of RBZ and that clinical efficacy levels are non-inferior to IVI therapy for nAMD. Yet, a higher rate of adverse events remains a concerning detail for widespread implementation. Future studies are warranted to better understand which patients may benefit best from this treatment approach, if long-term efficacy can be sustained, and if safety of PDS can be further improved.

Trends in Formulation Approaches for Sustained Drug Delivery to the Posterior Segment of the Eye

The eye, an intricate organ comprising physical and physiological barriers, poses a significant challenge for ophthalmic physicians seeking to treat serious ocular diseases affecting the posterior segment, such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy (DR). Despite extensive efforts, the delivery of therapeutic drugs to the rear part of the eye remains an unresolved issue. This comprehensive review delves into conventional and innovative formulation strategies for drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye. By utilizing alternative nanoformulation approaches such as liposomes, nanoparticles, and microneedle patches, researchers and clinicians can overcome the limitations of conventional eye drops and achieve more effective drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye. These innovative strategies offer improved drug penetration, prolonged residence time, and controlled release, enhancing therapeutic outcomes for ocular diseases. Moreover, this article explores recently approved delivery systems that leverage diverse polymer technologies, such as chitosan and hyaluronic acid, to regulate drug-controlled release over an extended period. By offering a comprehensive understanding of the available formulation strategies, this review aims to empower researchers and clinicians in their pursuit of developing highly effective treatments for posterior-segment ocular diseases.

Safety of recent ophthalmic drugs and devices for wet macular degeneration

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With frequent antivascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) injections well established as the standard of care in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), focus has now shifted towards decreasing treatment burden without compromising safety and efficacy. This review summarizes clinical stage and recently approved drugs and devices for nAMD, with an emphasis paid to safety concerns and their implications for product adoption.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three strategies have emerged to decrease the treatment burden associated with the current standard of care: more durable intravitreal agents, sustained-release modalities and gene therapy. The appearance of biosimilars will further impact drug availability and cost. As patterns of adverse events emerge from clinical trial or postmarketing surveillance data, manufacturers have proactively responded by appointing independent review committees or issuing voluntary recalls. However, the example of one biosimilar approved outside of the USA and European Union demonstrates how early safety concerns, even when addressed by substantive data, can generate lingering uncertainty.

SUMMARY

As the number of promising new treatments in nAMD continues to grow, so too does the amount of data that providers must sift through. The perception of safety surrounding first movers in each new therapeutic area is sure to affect adoption of that modality more broadly.

Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Retinal Disorders

Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) are key mediator of retinal and choroidal neovascularization as well as retinal vascular leakage leading to macular edema. As such, VEGF plays an important role in mediating visually significant complications associated with common retinal disorders such as diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, and age-related macular degeneration. Various drugs that inhibit vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF therapies) have been developed to minimize vision loss associated with these disorders. These drugs are injected into the vitreous cavity in a clinic setting at regular intervals. This article provides an overview of the various anti-VEGF drugs used in ophthalmology and the common retinal conditions that benefit from this therapy.