Improved Staging of Ciliary Body and Choroidal Melanomas Based on Estimation of Tumor Volume and Competing Risk Analyses

Prognostic implications of tenascin C in peripheral blood and primary tumours at the time of uveal melanoma diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prognostic implication of tenascin C (TNC) in posterior uveal melanoma (UM).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 162 patients diagnosed with posterior UM.

METHODS

A peripheral blood sample was obtained from 82 patients at the time of UM diagnosis between 1996 and 1999. Samples were kept frozen at -80°C until the concentration of TNC was measured in 2021. Primary tumour TNC RNA sequencing data were collected from another 80 patients (The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort). Patients were separated based on median TNC values. Cumulative incidences of metastatic death (UM mortality) from competing risks data were calculated as well as Cox regression hazard ratios.

RESULTS

Patients with high and low TNC levels had tumours of similar size and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage at Bonferroni-corrected significance levels. The exception was a significantly smaller tumour diameter in patients with high serum TNC levels (p = 0.003). In competing risks analysis, patients with high serum TNC levels (≥7 ng/mL) had a higher UM mortality rate (44% vs 17% at 20 years; p = 0.008). Similarly, patients with higher primary tumour TNC RNA levels (≥1 transcripts per million) had higher UM mortality (83% vs 27% at 5 years; p = 0.003). In multivariate Cox regressions, TNC levels in peripheral blood and primary tumours were predictors of metastatic death independent of American Joint Committee on Cancer stage.

CONCLUSIONS

TNC is a prognostic biomarker in UM. At the time of primary tumour diagnosis, it is measured in higher levels in both peripheral blood and tumour tissue from patients who will eventually suffer from metastatic death.

Delays between Uveal Melanoma Diagnosis and Treatment Increase the Risk of Metastatic Death

PURPOSE

To investigate if the interval between diagnosis and treatment of posterior uveal melanoma (UM) is associated with metastatic death.

DESIGN

Retrospective, single-center cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1145 patients consecutively diagnosed with posterior UM at St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, from 2012 to 2022, with recorded dates of diagnosis and primary treatment. This cohort represents 81% of all diagnosed patients in Sweden during this period.

METHODS

Data on the interval between diagnosis and treatment were collected for all patients. Its prognostic importance was examined with univariate and multivariate competing risks regressions, and cumulative incidence analyses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of metastatic death (UM mortality) for patients with prompt (< 1 month from diagnosis) versus delayed treatment (≥ 1 month) and subdistribution hazard ratios (exp(βj)) for every additional 10-day delay in treatment.

RESULTS

The mean interval between diagnosis and treatment was 34 days (SD, 56, range, 0-932). Patients treated promptly had larger tumors at diagnosis, but there were no differences in patient age, tumor distance to the optic disc, rates of ciliary body involvement (CBI) or extraocular extension (EXE), or symptom duration before diagnosis. Those who were treated more than 1 month after diagnosis had greater UM mortality in American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II and III. In stage I, UM mortality for delayed treatment was lower for the first 10 years, followed by a marked spike in the 11th year. In multivariate competing risks regressions of all 1145 patients with tumor diameter, thickness, CBI, and EXE as covariates, the risk for UM mortality increased with 1% for every additional 10-day delay in treatment (exp(βj) 1.01). Among 355 patients treated with enucleation, this delay was associated with UM mortality, independent of AJCC stage, cytomorphology, and level of immunohistochemical BAP-1 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing time between diagnosis and treatment of UM is associated with a higher risk of metastatic death. These results challenge a central concept in the understanding of metastatic progression and may indicate the existence of late metastatic seeding. They also underscore the importance of prompt treatment. Validation in independent cohorts is recommended.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.