The intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell (ipRGC) mediated pupil response in young adult humans with refractive errors

Handheld chromatic pupillometry can reliably detect functional glaucomatous damage in eyes with high myopia

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To assess pupillary light responses (PLRs) in eyes with high myopia (HM) and evaluate the ability of handheld chromatic pupillometry (HCP) to identify glaucomatous functional loss in eyes with HM.

METHODS

This prospective, cross-sectional study included 28 emmetropes (EM), 24 high myopes without glaucoma (HM) and 17 high myopes with confirmed glaucoma (HMG), recruited at the Singapore National Eye Center. Monocular PLRs were evaluated using a custom-built handheld pupillometer that recorded changes in horizontal pupil radius in response to 9 s of exponentially increasing blue (469.1 nm) and red (640.1 nm) lights. Fifteen pupillometric features were compared between groups. A logistic regression model (LRM) was used to distinguish HMG eyes from non-glaucomatous eyes (EM and HM).

RESULTS

All pupillometric features were similar between EM and HM groups. Phasic constriction to blue (p<0.001) and red (p=0.006) lights, and maximum constriction to blue light (p<0.001) were reduced in HMG compared with EM and HM. Pupillometric features of melanopsin function (postillumination pupillary response, PIPR area under the curve (AUC) 0-12 s (p<0.001) and PIPR 6 s (p=0.01) to blue light) were reduced in HMG. Using only three pupillometric features, the LRM could classify glaucomatous from non-glaucomatous eyes with an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.00), sensitivity 94.1% (95% CI 82.4% to 100.0%) and specificity 78.8% (95% CI 67.3% to 90.4%).

CONCLUSION

PLRs to ramping-up light stimuli are unaltered in highly myopic eyes without other diagnosed ocular conditions. Conversely, HCP can distinguish glaucomatous functional loss in eyes with HM and can be a useful tool to detect/confirm the presence of glaucoma in patients with HM.

Non-image-forming vision as measured through ipRGC-mediated pupil constriction is not modulated by covert visual attention

In brightness, the pupil constricts, while in darkness, the pupil dilates; this is known as the pupillary light response (PLR). The PLR is driven by all photoreceptors: rods and cones, which contribute to image-forming vision, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), which mainly contribute to non-image-forming vision. Rods and cones cause immediate pupil constriction upon light exposure, whereas ipRGCs cause sustained constriction throughout light exposure. Recent studies have shown that covert attention modulated the initial PLR; however, it remains unclear whether the same holds for the sustained PLR. We tested this by leveraging ipRGCs' responsiveness to blue light, causing the most prominent sustained constriction. While replicating previous studies by showing that pupils constricted more when either directly looking at, or covertly attending to, bright as compared to dim stimuli (with the same color), we also found that the pupil constricted more when directly looking at blue as compared to red stimuli (with the same luminosity). Crucially, however, in two high-powered studies (n = 60), we did not find any pupil-size difference when covertly attending to blue as compared to red stimuli. This suggests that ipRGC-mediated pupil constriction, and possibly non-image-forming vision more generally, is not modulated by covert attention.

The association between pupillary responses and axial length in children differs as a function of season

The association between pupillary responses to repeated stimuli and adult refractive error has been previously demonstrated. This study evaluated whether this association exists in children and if it varies by season. Fifty children aged 8-17 years (average: 11.55 ± 2.75 years, 31 females) with refractive error between + 1.51 and - 5.69 diopters (non-cycloplegic) participated (n = 27 in summer, and n = 23 in winter). The RAPDx pupilometer measured pupil sizes while stimuli oscillated between colored light and dark at 0.1 Hz in three sequences: (1) alternating red and blue, (2) red-only, and (3) blue-only. The primary outcome was the difference in pupillary responses between the blue-only and red-only sequences. Pupillary constriction was greater in response to blue light than to red for those with shorter eyes in summer (β = - 9.42, P = 0.034) but not in winter (β = 3.42, P = 0.54). Greater constriction comprised faster pupillary escape following red light onset and slower redilation following stimulus offset of both colors (P = 0.017, 0.036, 0.035 respectively). The association between axial length and children's pupillary responses in summer, but not winter may be explained by greater light-associated release of retinal dopamine in summer. Shorter eyes' more robust responses are consistent with greater light exposure inhibiting axial elongation and reducing myopia risk.

The effect of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell (ipRGC) stimulation on axial length changes to imposed optical defocus in young adults

PURPOSE

The intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) regulate pupil size and circadian rhythms. Stimulation of the ipRGCs using short-wavelength blue light causes a sustained pupil constriction known as the post-illumination pupil response (PIPR). Here we examined the effects of ipRGC stimulation on axial length changes to imposed optical defocus in young adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nearly emmetropic young participants were given either myopic (+3 D, n = 16) or hyperopic (-3 D, n = 17) defocus in their right eye for 2 h. Before and after defocus, a series of axial length measurements for up to 180 s were performed in the right eye using the IOL Master following exposure to 5 s red (625 nm, 3.74 × 10¹⁴ photons/cm²/s) and blue (470 nm, 3.29 × 10¹⁴ photons/cm²/s) stimuli. The pupil measurements were collected from the left eye to track the ipRGC activity. The 6 s and 30 s PIPR, early and late area under the curve (AUC), and time to return to baseline were calculated.

RESULTS

The PIPR with blue light was significantly stronger after 2 h of hyperopic defocus as indicated by a lower 6 and 30 s PIPR and a larger early and late AUC (all p<0.05). Short-wavelength ipRGC stimulation also significantly exaggerated the ocular response to hyperopic defocus, causing a significantly greater increase in axial length than that resulting from the hyperopic defocus alone (p = 0.017). Neither wavelength had any effect on axial length with myopic defocus.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest an interaction between myopiagenic hyperopic defocus and ipRGC signaling.

Evaluation of Disk Halo Size and Identification of Correlated Factors in Myopic Adults

This study aimed to evaluate glare source-induced disk halo size and assess its correlation with higher-order aberrations (HOAs), pupillometry findings, and contrast sensitivity in myopic adults (aged 23.8 ± 4.4 years). In this cross-sectional study, 150 eyes of 150 patients were assessed. All patients underwent routine ophthalmic examinations, wavefront aberrometry, halo size measurement, dynamic pupillometry, and contrast sensitivity tests. Spearman's correlation analysis and independent sample t-tests were performed for data analysis. The mean halo radius was 82.5 ± 21.8 and 236.7 ± 52.2 arc min at 5 and 1 cd/m² luminance levels, respectively. The values were inversely correlated with internal spherical aberration (SA) (r = −0.175, p = 0.032 and r = −0.241, p = 0.003, respectively), but not correlated with spherical equivalent (SE, both p > 0.05). Positive correlations were observed between halo radius and pupil size, contraction amplitude, and dilation speed during pupillary light reflex. Halo radii at 5 and 1 cd/m² luminance levels were not significantly correlated with the area under the log contrast sensitivity function (r = −0.093, p = 0.258 and r = −0.149, p = 0.069, respectively). The mean halo radius was not clinically different between myopic and healthy eyes at 5 cd/m² luminance level and did not differ significantly between the high and low-to-moderate myopia at 5 and 1 cd/m² luminance levels (all p > 0.05). According to a stepwise linear regression model, the internal SA had a negative effect on the halo radius under low photpic condition; the average pupil diameter, internal SA and corneal HOAs played a large role in determining the halo radius under mesopic condition.

Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell-driven pupil responses in patients with traumatic brain injury

Previous findings regarding intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell (ipRGC) function after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are conflicting. We examined ipRGC-driven pupil responses in civilian TBI and control participants using two pupillography protocols that assessed transient and adaptive properties: (1) a one second (s) long wavelength "red" stimulus (651 nm, 133 cd/m²) and 10 increasing intensities of 1 s short wavelength "blue" stimuli (456 nm, 0.167 to 167 cd/m²) with a 60 s interstimulus interval, and (2) two minutes of 0.1 Hz red stimuli (33 cd/m²), followed by two minutes of 0.1 Hz blue stimuli (16 cd/m²). For Protocol 1, constriction amplitude and the 6 s post illumination pupil response (PIPR) were calculated. For Protocol 2, amplitudes and peak velocities of pupil constriction and redilation were calculated. For Protocol 1, constriction amplitude and the 6 s PIPR were not significantly different between TBI patients and control subjects for red or blue stimuli. For Protocol 2, pupil constriction amplitude attenuated over time for red stimuli and potentiated over time for blue stimuli across all subjects. Constriction and redilation velocities were similar between groups. Pupil constriction amplitude was significantly less in TBI patients compared to control subjects for red and blue stimuli, which can be attributed to age-related differences in baseline pupil size. While TBI, in addition to age, may have contributed to decreased baseline pupil diameter and constriction amplitude, responses to blue stimulation suggest no selective damage to ipRGCs.

Effects of screen-based retinal light stimulation measured with a novel contrast sensitivity test

Myopia is increasing worldwide hence it exists a pressing demand to find effective myopia control strategies. Previous studies have shown that light, spectral composition, spatial frequencies, and contrasts play a critical role in refractive development. The effects of light on multiple retinal processes include growth regulation, but also visual performance and perception. Changes in subjective visual performance can be examined by contrast sensitivity (CS). This study was conducted to investigate whether retinal light stimulation of different wavelength ranges is able to elicit changes in CS and, therefore, may be used for myopia control purposes. In total, 30 right eyes were stimulated with the light of different wavelength ranges, including dominant wavelengths of ∼480 nm, ∼530 nm, ∼630 nm and polychromatic light via a commercial liquid crystal display (LCD) screen. Stimulation was performed screen full-field and on the optic nerve head only. CS was measured before any stimulation and after each stimulation condition using a novel and time-efficient CS test. Post-stimulation CS changes were analyzed by ANOVA regarding the influencing factors spatial frequency, stimulation wavelength and stimulation location. A priorly conducted verification study on a subset of five participants compared the newly developed CS test to a validated CS test. The novel CS test exhibited good reliability of 0.94 logCS and repeatability of 0.13 logCS with a duration of 92 sec ± 17 sec. No clinically critical change between pre- and post-stimulation CS was detected (all p>0.05). However, the results showed that post-stimulation CS differed significantly at 18 cpd after stimulation with polychromatic light from short-wavelength light (p<0.0001). Location of illumination (screen full-field vs. optic nerve head) or any interactions with other factors did not reveal significant influences (all p>0.05). To summarize, a novel CS test measures the relationship between retinal light stimulation and CS. However, using retinal illumination via LCD screens to increase CS is inconclusive.