Elective supraomohyoid neck dissection for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Is dissection of sublevel IIB necessary?

What is the rate of occult nodal metastasis in squamous cell carcinomas of the sinonasal tract? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The role of elective neck dissection (END) in the management of clinical N0 (cN0) squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the sinonasal tract is unclear. In this systematic review, we evaluate the risk of occult nodal metastasis in sinonasal SCCs with cN0M0 tumors to support clinical decision making.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in the following three electronic databases: Medline/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Articles were assessed for eligibility in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Two independent authors extracted the data. The Methodological Items for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool was used for the assessment of biases of each included study.

RESULTS

Our systematic review included six studies that met the inclusion criteria, all retrospective in design. The rate of histologically proven metastasis of sinonasal SCC to the clinically negative neck is 12.5%. Almost half of the positive cases are pathologically staged as N2 (6.5%).

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review provides the rate of sinonasal SCC occult metastasis to the neck so that the surgeons can discuss with patients the risks and possible merits of adding an elective neck management in the surgical plan.

Predictors of Occult Metastasis and Prognostic Factors in Patients with cN0 Oral Cancer Who Underwent Elective Neck Dissection

Elective neck dissection (END) is recommended for the management of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) because of the risk of occult metastasis (OM). We hypothesized that some factors predict poor prognosis regardless of a cN0 END. This study aimed to investigate the predictors of OM and prognostic factors in patients with cN0 OSCC who underwent supraomohyoid neck dissection (SOHND). A retrospective cohort study design was created and implemented. The primary predictive variables in this study were OM and risk factors for poor prognosis after SOHND. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to adjust for the effects of potential confounders on the risk factors for poor prognoses. Among 86 patients with OSCC, OMs were observed in 9 (10.5%). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and vascular invasion are good markers for detecting OM. A Cox multivariable analysis identified two independent predictors of overall survival: pathologic node (pN) and laterality of END. An independent predictive factor for disease-free survival, the surgical margin, was also identified in this study. According to the pN classification, pN1 patients had a worse survival rate than pN2 patients. Therefore, in the case of pN1, regardless of being cN0, additional adjuvant therapy may be necessary.

Anatomic Variability of the Accessory Nerve: Implications for Dissection of Level IIB

OBJECTIVES

During neck dissection, level IIB lymphadenectomy necessitates manipulation of the spinal accessory nerve that might be avoided and might cause postoperative disability. Current literature does not describe the effect of variation in the spinal accessory nerve in the upper neck. We sought to measure the effect of the dimensions of level IIB on nodal yield in level IIB and on patient reported neck symptoms.

METHODS

We measured the boundaries of level IIB of 150 patients undergoing neck dissection. Level II was dissected and separated into levels IIA and IIB intraoperatively. Patient-reported symptoms were assessed in 50 patients using the Neck Dissection Impairment Inventory. We computed descriptive statistics, and sought to identify correlation with the number and proportion of level IIB nodes and the number of metastatic nodes. Level IIB dimensions were analyzed as predictors of postoperative symptoms.

RESULTS

We measured 184 sides, with 37.7% of level II nodes found in level IIB. Mean accessory nerve length across level II was 2.5 cm. Every additional 1 cm in accessory nerve length was associated with two more level IIB nodes. At all accessory nerve lengths, meaningful numbers of nodes were present in level IIB. Accessory nerve length and other factors did not correlate with NDII scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer lengths of accessory nerve across level IIB correlated with greater nodal yield. However, data did not point to an accessory nerve length cutoff below which level IIB dissection could be avoided. In addition, the dimensions of level IIB did not correlate with postoperative neck symptoms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Laryngoscope, 134:154-159, 2024.

Predictive modelling of level IIb lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma

The aim of the present study was to examine the conditions, characteristics, and risk factors of level IIb lymph node metastases in oral squamous cell carcinoma and to formulate surgical criteria for level IIb lymph node dissection. We analyzed clinical and pathological records for 541 oral squamous carcinoma patients in relation to level IIb metastasis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to detect risk factors for level IIb lymph node metastasis; a predictive model was built based on multivariate analysis and tested in a validation group. Univariate and multivariate analyses using the training group indicated that level IIa metastasis and Lymphovascular permeation (LVP) were two independent risk factors for level IIb lymph node metastasis. This model was built and tested in a validation group, the area under the curve being 0.697 (P < .0.001). The model's sensitivity was 66.7% and specificity was 77.4%. Nomogram incorporating validated variables was developed for level IIb metastasis prediction. Expected survival probabilites were analysed to specify significance of model's variable on patients' overall survival and recurrence. Level IIb dissection should be performed in patients with level IIa metastasis and LVP. However, thorough consideration of the oncologic safety of omitting level IIb dissection is compulsory.

The impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy on the quality of life in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a proven method for staging the neck in patients with early oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma because it results in less comorbidity than the traditional method of selective neck dissection, with the same oncological results. However, the real effect of that method on the quality of life of such patients remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate the quality of life of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma T1/T2N0 submitted to sentinel lymph node biopsy compared to those that received selective neck dissection.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study including 24 patients, after a 36 month follow-up, 15 of them submitted to the sentinel lymph node biopsy and 9 to selective neck dissection. All patients answered the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire.

RESULTS

The evaluation of the questionnaires showed a late worsening of the domains appearance (p=0.035) and chewing (p=0.041), as well as a decrease of about 10% of general quality of life (p=0.025) in patients undergoing selective neck dissection ​​in comparison to those undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy.

CONCLUSION

Patients with early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy presented better late results of general quality of life, mainly regarding appearance and chewing, when compared to patients submitted to selective neck dissection.

2b or not 2b? Shoulder function after level 2b neck dissection: A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Selective neck dissection (SND) is a mainstay of head and neck cancer treatment. A common sequela is shoulder syndrome from spinal accessory nerve (SAN) trauma. Extensive dissection in neck levels 2 and 5 leads to SAN dysfunction. However, it is not known whether limited level 2 dissection reduces SAN injury. The purpose of this double-blind randomized controlled trial was to determine whether omitting level 2b dissection would improve shoulder-related quality of life and function.

METHODS

Patients with head and neck cancers undergoing surgery were randomized 1:1 to SND without level 2b dissection (group 1) or with it (group 2) on their dominant-hand side. Patients, caregivers, and assessors were blinded. The primary outcome was the change in the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) score after 6 months. An a priori calculation of the minimally important clinical difference in the NDII score was determined to establish a sample size of 15 patients per group (power = 0.8). Secondary outcomes included shoulder strength and range of motion (ROM) and SAN nerve conduction. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00765791).

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled, and 30 were included (15 per group). Six months after the surgery, group 2 demonstrated a significant median decrease in the NDII from the baseline (30 points) and in comparison with group 1, whose NDII dropped 17.5 points (P = .02). Shoulder ROM and SAN conduction demonstrated significant declines in group 2 (P ≤ .05). No adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Level 2b should be omitted in SND when this is oncologically safe and feasible. This allows for an optimal balance between function and cancer cure.

Is Superselective Neck Dissection Safer Than Supraomohyoid Neck Dissection for Oral Carcinoma Patients With N0 Neck in Terms of Shoulder Morbidity and Recurrence Rate?

PURPOSE

To estimate the clinical and functional results of patients who underwent distinctive types of neck dissection, with particular emphasis on shoulder function, rate of recurrence, and quality of life in patients with N0 neck.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 2014 to March 2017 in which 20 adult patients with T1 to T3 lesions of the oral cavity and N0 neck were included. Patients were randomly allocated to group I (n = 10; selective neck dissection) or group II (n = 10; superselective neck dissection). All patients were evaluated objectively for degree of arm abduction and subjectively for quality of life using a questionnaire completed pre- and postoperatively at 6 months. Also, locoregional recurrence was investigated for 2.5 years. Data were scrutinized by applying mean and standard deviation, unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kaplan-Meier test.

RESULTS

Mean values of the Arm Abduction Test and quality-of-life scores were statistically significant (P < .05) for group II compared with group I at all intervals. Data analyzed for locoregional recurrence showed a statistically significant difference between groups (P < .05), with group II having the better outcome.

CONCLUSION

The results showed less shoulder morbidity and improved quality of life for superselective neck dissection (group II) compared with selective neck dissection (group I). Furthermore, group II was better for locoregional recurrence, which determines the oncologic safety of the procedure.

A meta-analysis on selective versus comprehensive neck dissection in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients with clinically node-positive neck

OBJECTIVE

Properly management of cervical lymph node metastases is a critical treatment for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However there is no consensus on the optimal treatment for oral cancer patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) neck. This study aims to access the feasibility of selective neck dissection in oral cancer patients with cN+neck.

METHOD

We searched PubMed and EMBASE up to April 2015 to identify the studies which compared selective neck dissection (SND) with comprehensive neck dissection (CND) in OSCC patients with cN+neck. Data were extracted by two authors. The meta-analysis was conducted with regional recurrence and disease specific death as primary endpoints.

RESULT

Five studies with a total of 443 patients met our inclusion criteria. No significant difference was found regarding regional recurrence, disease specific death or overall death between the SND and CND group.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that cN+OSCC patients treated with SND in conjunction with adjuvant therapy got comparable clinical outcome to CND.

Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas

Aims:

The aim was to correlate the incidence of metastasis to Level IIB of neck lymph nodes (LNs) for oral cavity carcinomas with the site, size, and histological grade of tumor.

Settings and Design:

Total 30 patients of either sex, with biopsy-proven oral squamous cell carcinoma of any site, size or histologic grade, but N0/N1 were taken for selective neck dissection (SND).

Materials and Methods:

Thirty patients who underwent SND for oral carcinoma were analyzed for the relation of the site, size, and histological grade of malignancy with metastatic involvement to Level IIB nodes. Level IIB nodes were dissected separately and sent for histopathological examination.

Statistical Analysis Used:

The data were entered in custom written software in Excel (MS office 2007, Windows XP) and the data were analyzed using statistical software STATA version 10.0. The statistical test used for the analysis of the result was Chi-square test. The critical level of statistical significance chosen was P < 0.05.

Results:

Only 2 of 30 patients (6.6%) had the involvement of Level IIB neck nodes. There was no relation between the site, size, and histologic grade of primary tumor with the metastasis to Level IIB. The Level IIA nodes were positive in both the positive cases of Level IIB.

Conclusions:

For tumors in oral cavity (N0/N1), while performing elective or therapeutic SND the dissection of Level IIB nodes could be omitted as it will provide significant decrease in operative time and also less of spinal accessory nerve trauma-related complications.

Incidence and outcome for patients with occult lymph node involvement in T1 and T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

The evidence base to inform the decision making process in patients with early stage oral cancer and a clinical and radiological N0 neck remains insufficient to answer the question when it is safe to "watch and wait" and when to proceed with a selective neck dissection.

METHODS

A total of 327 consecutive cases of histopathologically staged T1-2, N0-1 and M0, but clinically N0, squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue were prospectively analysed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used for statistical analysis and are represented as Kaplan-Meier analyses or Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

In 61 patients (18.65%) lymph node involvement was found in the histopathological processing. The mean survival of all patients was 73.3 ± 48.6 months. The 2-year and 5-year overall survival rates of all patients were 87.5% and 68.4%, respectively. The 2-year and 5-year survival rates for stage N0 were 89.1% and 70.7% compared to 83.3% and 62.9% in N1 situations. The 2-year and 5-year survival rates for stage T1 were 87.9% and 73.6% compared to 87.2% and 65.3% in stage T2, respectively. The time to recurrence in stage N0 was 35.1 ± 30.5 months compared to 25.63 ± 24.6 months in cases with N1 disease. Stage T1 was associated with a time to recurrence of 38.1 ± 33.9 months compared with 27.2 ± 22.7 months in patients classified T2.Variables found to be strongly associated with survival in the univariate analysis included older age, higher tumour and N stage, and grading. Age, tumour stage (p = 0.011, 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.0), nodal stage (p = 0.038, 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.07), and recurrence were independently and significantly associated with survival in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This confirms a high overall disease free survival for patients with T1 and N0 treated with single modality surgery and in common with the literature confirms the poor impact on prognosis of the N positive neck.

Conservative neck dissection in oral cancer patients: a 5 year retrospective study in Malaysia

OBJECTIVE

The impact of ablative oral cancer surgery was studied, with particular reference to recurrence and nodal metastasis, to assess survival probability and prognostic indicators and to elucidate if ethnicity influences the survival of patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent major ablative surgery of the head and neck region with neck dissection were identified and clinical records were assessed. Inclusion criteria were stage I-IV oral and oropharyngeal malignancies necessitating resection with or without radiotherapy from 2004 to 2009. All individuals had a pre-operative assessment prior to the surgery. The post operative assessment period ranged from 1 year to 5 years. Survival distributions were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

87 patients (males:38%; females:62%) were included in this study, with an age range of 21-85 years. Some 78% underwent neck dissections while 63% had surgery and radiotherapy. Nodal recurrence was detected in 5.7% while 20.5% had primary site recurrence within the study period. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the median survival time was 57 months. One year overall survival (OS) rate was 72.7% and three year overall survival rate dropped to 61.5%. On OS analysis, the log-rank test showed a significant difference of survival between Malay and Chinese patients (Bonferroni correction p=0.033). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) analysis revealed that 25% of the patients have reached the event of recurrence at 46 months. One year RFS rate was 85.2% and the three year survival rate was 76.1%. In the RFS analysis, the log-rank test showed a significant difference in the event of recurrence and nodal metastasis (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Conservative neck is effective, in conjunction with postoperative radiotherapy, for control of neck metastases. Ethnicity appears to influence the survival of the patients, but a prospective trial is required to validate this.

Long-term quality of life in young adults treated for oral cavity squamous cell cancer

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the long-term quality of life (QOL) in patients who survived oral cavity squamous cell cancer when they were young and looked for any clinical factors that might adversely affect function and QOL.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case series and questionnaire survey in a tertiary care center. The subjects were consecutive patients treated for oral cancers during a 25-year period, when they were 40 years of age or less. The patients completed the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire and the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). We made an overall descriptive report of swallowing and QOL measures in the study population and looked for any clinical factors associated with functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the 62 patients treated over the course of 25 years, 46 were alive and disease-free. Twenty-six participated. The median follow-up duration was 14.7 years (range, 3 to 27 years). Age at diagnosis and duration of follow-up did not correlate with overall QOL or health-related QOL. Seventy-seven percent rated their overall QOL as outstanding, very good, or good. The key domains affected by cancer were appearance, mood, saliva, and shoulder function. Radiotherapy significantly adversely affected the QOL. The median MDADI scores on all 4 subscales were at least 85%. Higher T-stage and radiotherapy were significantly associated with lower scores on all subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term health-related QOL in this cohort was quite good. Radiotherapy and tumor stage correlated with swallowing outcomes, and only radiotherapy seemed to adversely affect the overall QOL.

Retrospective Study of Selective Submandibular Neck Dissection versus Radical Neck Dissection for N0 or N1 Necks in Level I Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of selective submandibular neck dissection (SMND) in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with or without nodal metastasis. Patients. From a total of 384 patients with untreated OSCC who underwent radical excision, we identified 229 with clinically N0 necks and 68 with clinically N1 necks in level I. Main Outcome Measures. The Kaplan-Meier 5-year regional control and 5-year disease specific survival (DSS) were compared for SMND, radical neck dissection (RND), and modified radical neck dissection (MRND). Results. In clinically node-negative necks, the regional control rates were 85.2% with SMND and 83.3% with MRND (P = 0.89), and 5-year DSS rates were 86.5% and 87.0%, respectively, (P = 0.94). In clinically N1 necks, the regional control rates were 81.3% with SMND and 83.0% with RND (P = 0.72), and the DSS rates were 81.3% and 80.0%, respectively, (P = 0.94). Type of neck dissection was not significantly associated with regional control or DSS on either univariate or multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazard model. Conclusions. SMND can be effectively applied in elective and therapeutic management to patients with OSCC that are clinically assessed as N0 or N1 to level I of the neck.

Recent advances in oral oncology 2008; squamous cell carcinoma imaging, treatment, prognostication and treatment outcomes

This paper provides a synopsis of the main papers on diagnosis, imaging, treatment, prognostication and treatment outcomes in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and head and neck SCC (HNSCC) published in 2008 in Oral Oncology - an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, and all other scientific articles relating to the aetiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck, and orofacial disease in patients with malignant disease.

Elective management of the neck in oral cavity squamous carcinoma: current concepts supported by prospective studies

The incidence of occult cervical metastasis in oral cavity cancer, even in early stages, is significant, necessitating elective treatment of the neck in a majority of cases. There is no method of imaging or other examination that will detect microscopic foci of metastatic disease in cervical lymph nodes. Immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of neck specimens reveals the incidence of occult metastases to be higher than revealed by light microscopy with ordinary hematoxylin and eosin staining. The neck may be treated electively by surgery or irradiation. Surgery has the advantage of permitting pathological staging of the neck, avoiding unnecessary radiation treatment and indicating cases where adjuvant therapy should be employed. As oral cavity cancer rarely metastasizes to level V, a radical or modified radical neck dissection of all five node levels is not necessary. Selective dissection of levels I-III ("supraomohyoid neck dissection") is the usual procedure of choice for elective dissection of the neck. Most of the relatively small number of isolated metastasis to level IV are from primary tumours of the tongue, which are known to produce "skip" metastases. Thus an "extended supraomohyoid neck dissection" of levels I-IV is recommended by some authors for elective treatment of the neck in tongue cancer. A number of recent prospective multi-institutional studies have demonstrated that sublevel IIB is rarely involved with isolated metastasis from oral cavity primary tumours, except from some tongue cancers. Thus it is justifiable to omit dissection of sublevel IIB in elective treatment of most cases of oral cavity cancer. Bilateral neck dissection should be performed in elective treatment of tumours involving midline structures, and in patients with ipsilateral neck metastasis.