Comparative effectiveness of induction chemotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based analysis

The influence of tumor volume on the risk of distant metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Distant metastases (DM) in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are in most circumstances non-curable. The TNM staging system is insufficient to predict the risk of DM. This study investigates if the DM risk can be predicted using a multivariate model including pre-treatment total tumor volume for both p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and all other sites (other HNSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study includes patients with localized pharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas treated with primary radiotherapy from 2008-2017 from three head and neck cancer centers. Patients were identified in the Danish Head and Neck Cancer (DAHANCA) database. Total (nodal and primary) tumor volume (Gross Tumor Volume, GTV) was extracted from local treatment planning systems. The GTV was grouped by volume (cm3) in four intervals and included in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression controlled for pre-selected clinical values incl. stage.

RESULTS

The study includes 2,865 patients, of which 321 (11 %) had DM post-treatment. The risk of DM was assessed in a multivariate model based on 2,751 patients (p16-positive OPSCC: 1,032; and other HNSCC: 1,719). There was a significant association between GTV and the risk of DM, and in tumor volumes ≥ 50 cm3 hazard ratios of 7.6 (2.5-23.4) for p16-positive OPSCC and 4.1 (2.3-7.2) in other HNSCC were observed.

CONCLUSION

Tumor volume is an independent risk factor for DM. The addition of total tumor volume to a predictive model is important to identify subgroups of HNSCC patients at high risk of DM.

Response to induction chemotherapy predicts survival outcomes in oropharyngeal cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of induction chemotherapy (IC) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) remains controversial. Its interpretation can be confounded by heterogeneity in chemosensitivity and human papillomavirus (HPV) status. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of IC response in HPV-positive and -negative OPSCC.

METHODS

Patients with OPSCC who underwent IC and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Radiologic response to IC by ≥50% was defined as IC-sensitive (IC-s), while lesser response was deemed as IC-resistant (IC-r). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 51 HPV-positive and 57 HPV-negative patients were included. IC-s patients accounted for 55.6%, 62.7%, and 49.1% in the entire cohort, HPV-positive, and HPV-negative subgroup, respectively. Compared with IC-r subgroup, IC-s was associated with better clinical outcomes either in the entire cohort (3y-PFS 91.7%vs.43.7%, P < 0.001; 3y-OS 98.3% vs. 67.4%, P = 0.002), the HPV-positive subgroup (3-year PFS 94.7% vs. 47.9%, P < 0.001; 3-year OS 100% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.055) or the HPV-negative subgroup (3-year PFS 88.2% vs. 40.9%, P = 0.001; 3-year OS 96.4% vs. 63.1%, P = 0.026). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that response to IC represents an independent prognosticator for 3-year PFS (HR, 0.088; 95% CI, 0.027-0.289; P < 0.001) and 3-year OS (HR, 0.100; 95% CI, 0.021-0.477; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Response to IC exerts a critical predictive effect on prognosis of both HPV-positive and -negative OPSCC. Personalized treatment strategy based on IC response is worthy of further exploration in the future.

Suppression of TLR signaling by IRAK-1 and -4 dual inhibitor decreases TPF-resistance-induced pro-oncogenic effects in HNSCC

Combination of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU, known as TPF, is an FDA-approved treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Acquired chemo-resistance to TPF, a primary reason for non-responsiveness to the treatment and relapse of tumor is a major concern for treatment failure, especially in elder patients. In this study, we investigated the role of Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinases (IRAK) mediated Toll-like receptor (TLR)-signaling in chemo-resistance using a cell line-based in-vitro TPF-resistant HNSCC model of laryngeal origin. TPF chemo-resistant state showed over-expression and phosphorylation of the active downstream kinases IRAK-1 and IRAK-4 along with enhanced proliferative potential, survival, stemness and metastatic capability as compared to the parent cell line. Pharmacological inhibition of IRAK-1 and -4 had a cytostatic effect on chemo-resistant cells and re-sensitized them to chemotherapy. The treatment also decreased the pro-oncogenic effects of the chemo-resistant cells. Our study provides insights into the pro-oncogenic role of amplified IRAK-1 and-4 mediated TLR signaling in TPF-resistant HNSCC. Pharmacological inhibition of IRAK-1 and-4 signaling is a promising therapeutic strategy for TPF-resistant HNSCC. It can also be used as a combination therapy or a chemo-drug sparing regimen in HNSCC.

Treatment de-escalation for HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) related oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) carries a better prognosis compared with HPV-counterparts, thereby pushing the adoption of de-intensification treatment approaches as new strategies to preserve superior oncologic outcomes while minimizing toxicity. We evaluated the effect of treatment de-intensification in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional and distant control (LRC and DM) by selecting prospective or retrospective studies, providing outcome data with reduced intensification versus standard curative treatment in HPV+ OPC patients, with a systematic analysis till September 2020. The primary outcome of interest was OS. Secondary endpoints were PFS, LRC, and DM expressed as HR. A total of 55 studies (from 1393 screened references) were employed for quantitative synthesis for 38 929 patients. Among n = 48 studies with data available, de-intensified treatments reduced OS in HPV+ OPCs (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.52; p < 0.01). In de-escalated treatments, PFS was also decreased (HR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.65-2.69; p < 0.01). Compared with standard treatments, reduced intensity approaches were associated with reduced locoregional and distant disease control (HR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.75-3.59; p < 0.01; and HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.25-2.9; p < 0.01). Chemoradiation improved survival in a definitive curative setting compared with radiotherapy alone (HR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.16-1.75; p < 0.01). When adjuvant treatments were compared, standard and de-escalation strategies provided similar OS. In conclusion, in patients with HPV+ OPC, de-escalation treatments should not be widely and agnostically adopted in clinical practice, as therein lies a concrete risk of offering a sub-optimal treatment to patients.

Human Papillomavirus-Negative Oropharyngeal Cancer Survival Outcomes Based on Primary Treatment: National Cancer Database Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare survival outcomes between primary surgery and primary radiation therapy (RT) in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

National Cancer Database.

METHODS

A National Cancer Database review was conducted of 2635 patients with HPV-negative OPSCC who underwent surgery or RT ± chemotherapy between 2010 and 2014. Univariate analysis was performed on all variables and entered into a multivariate model. The main outcome was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 2635 patients with HPV-negative OPSCC were organized into 4 groups based on cancer staging. In group 1 (T1-2 N0-1; n = 774), up-front surgery had significantly better 5-year OS (76.2%) than RT (56.8%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.76; P = .009; 95% CI, 1.15-2.69) and chemoradiation therapy (CRT; 69.5%; aHR, 1.56; P = .019; 95% CI, 1.08-2.26). In group 2 (T3-4 N0-1; n = 327), no significant difference existed between surgery and CRT (5-year OS, 51.3% vs 52.4%; aHR, 0.96; P = .88; 95% CI, 0.54-1.69). In group 3a (T1-2 N2-3; n = 807), surgery with adjuvant treatment showed significantly better 5-year OS than CRT (78.6% vs 68.8%; aHR, 1.51; P = .027; 95% CI, 1.05-2.18). In group 3b (T3-4 N2-3; n = 737), surgery with adjuvant treatment was not statistically associated with better 5-year OS as compared with CRT (61.0% vs 43.7%; aHR, 1.53; P = .06; 95% CI, 0.98-2.39).

CONCLUSION

Primary surgery may provide improved survival outcomes in many cases of HPV-negative OPSCCs. These data should be used in weighing treatment options and may serve as a basis to better delineate treatment algorithms for HPV-negative disease.

Outcomes of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation compared with those treated with concurrent chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

Induction chemotherapy (IC) has been associated with a decreased risk of distant metastasis in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, its role in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is not well established.

METHODS

The outcomes of patients with OPSCC treated with IC followed by concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) were compared with the outcomes of those treated with CRT alone. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary end points were the times to locoregional and distant recurrence.

RESULTS

In an existing database, 585 patients met the inclusion criteria: 137 received IC plus CRT, and 448 received CRT. Most patients were positive for human papillomavirus (HPV; 90.9%). Patients receiving IC were more likely to present with a higher T stage, a higher N stage, and low neck disease. The 3-year OS rate was significantly lower in patients receiving IC (75.7%) versus CRT alone (92.9%). In a multicovariate analysis, receipt of IC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.4; P < .001), HPV tumor status (aHR, 0.36; P = .002), and receipt of concurrent cetuximab (aHR, 2.7; P = .002) were independently associated with OS. The risk of distant metastasis was also significantly higher in IC patients (aHR, 2.8; P = .001), whereas an HPV-positive tumor status (aHR, 0.44; P = .032) and completion of therapy (aHR, 0.51; P = .034) were associated with a lower risk of distant metastasis. In HPV-positive patients, IC remained associated with distant metastatic progression (aHR, 2.6; P = .004) but not OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to prior studies, IC was independently associated with worse OS and a higher risk of distant metastasis in patients with OPSCC. Future studies are needed to validate these findings.

Association between treatment delays and oncologic outcome in patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

This study sought to determine the oncologic impact of delays to surgery, radiotherapy, and completion of therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

The impact of biopsy to surgery (BTS) time, surgery to start of radiation time (STSR), and radiation treatment time (RTT) on locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastases (DMs), and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was examined. The cumulative incidences (CI) of LRR, DMs, and CSM were examined using Fine-Gray testing.

RESULTS

A total of 277 patients treated with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy were analyzed. On multivariable testing, BTS >50 days was associated with DM (P = .03), whereas RTT and STSR were not. RTT >43 days was associated with LRR (P = .02) in patients with non-p16-positive-oropharynx cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in DM appears to be the mechanism by which prolonged time to treatment initiation leads to worse overall survival. Prolonged RTT has the greatest impact on patients with non-p16 positive oropharynx cancers.

Hypopharyngeal Cancer Treatment Delays: Benchmarks and Survival Association

Objective

To characterize treatment delays in hypopharyngeal cancer, identify factors associated with delays, and associate delays with overall survival.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort.

Setting

Commission on Cancer hospitals nationwide.

Subjects and Methods

We included patients in the National Cancer Database who were treated for hypopharyngeal cancer with primary radiation, concurrent chemoradiation, or induction chemotherapy and radiation. We identified median durations of diagnosis to treatment initiation (DTI), radiation treatment duration (RTD), and diagnosis to treatment end (DTE). We associated delays with patient, tumor, and treatment factors and overall survival via multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression, respectively.

Results

A total of 3850 patients treated with primary radiation or concurrent chemoradiation were included. Median durations of DTI, RTD, and DTE were 37, 52, and 92 days, respectively. Nonwhite race was associated with delays in DTI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51-0.80; P < .001) and DTE (OR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.49-0.75; P < .001). Medicaid insurance was associated with delays in DTI (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07-1.90; P = .015), RTD (OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.06-1.83; P = .018), and DTE (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.12-1.97; P = .007). Delays in RTD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.11-1.37; P < .001), not DTI (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82-1.03; P = .150) or DTE (HR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.15; P = .825), were associated with impaired overall survival. We identified 922 patients who received induction chemotherapy. Delays in DTI, RTD, and DTE were not associated with overall survival in this cohort (HR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.87-1.39; P = 0.435; HR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83-1.32; P = 0.686; HR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.88-1.41; P = 0.377, respectively).

Conclusions

The median durations identified can serve as national benchmarks. Delays during radiation are associated with impaired overall survival among patients treated with primary radiation or chemoradiation but not patients treated with induction chemotherapy.

Assessing cumulative acute toxicity of chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer with or without induction chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

To compare cumulative acute toxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone (CCRT) versus induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by CCRT (I/CCRT).

METHODS

77 patients underwent definitive CCRT (30 I/CCRT and 47 CCRT). Toxicity was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Using the TAME adverse event reporting system, short-term toxicity (T) scores were generated for IC (T_IC), CCRT (T_CCRT), total treatment duration (T_Rx), post-treatment period (T_PT) and an overall score (T_overall) from treatment start to post treatment period.

RESULTS

Acute toxicity other than dysphagia, odynophagia, or dermatitis was reported in 90.0% and 66.0% of I/CCRT and CCRT patients, respectively (P=0.02). Compared to CCRT group, I/CCRT patients reported greater mean T_Rx (T_Rx: 2.11 vs. 2.87, P=0.01) and T_overall (T_overall: 2.60 vs. 3.70, P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

I/CCRT patients reported more cumulative acute toxicity during treatment compared to CCRT patients using the TAME reporting system.

Survival impact of induction chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis

BACKGROUND

Adding induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) has generally not improved the overall survival (OS) in randomized trials of patients with head and neck cancer. This failure may stem from inadequate power or inappropriate patient selection, prompting this National Cancer Data Base analysis.

METHODS

8031 patients with T4 or N2b to N3 disease undergoing RT and chemotherapy were divided into induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy cohorts. Multivariate analysis was used to explore the association of treatment with survival and to identify predictors of radiation dose.

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis incorporating sociodemographic and clinical variables, survival of the induction chemotherapy cohort was not significantly different from that of the concurrent cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.05; p = .35), nor on subgroup analyses of advanced disease. Multivariate analysis demonstrated increased odds of receiving <66 Gy among the patients in the induction chemotherapy cohort (p < .01).

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy subjects experienced no survival advantage over concurrent chemotherapy subjects but were more likely to receive lower RT doses. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 1113-1121, 2017.