Detection of AR-V7 transcript with RNA in situ hybridization in human salivary duct cancer

Phase 1 study of the HSP90 inhibitor onalespib in combination with AT7519, a pan-CDK inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase 1 trial of the HSP90 inhibitor onalespib in combination with the CDK inhibitor AT7519, in patients with advanced solid tumors to determine the safety profile and maximally tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, preliminary antitumor activity, and to assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects on HSP70 expression in patient-derived PBMCs and plasma.

METHODS

This study followed a 3 + 3 trial design with 1 week of intravenous (IV) onalespib alone, followed by onalespib/AT7519 (IV) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-days cycle. PK and PD samples were collected at baseline, after onalespib alone, and following combination therapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were treated with the demonstration of downstream target engagement of HSP70 expression in plasma and PBMCs. The maximally tolerated dose was onalespib 80 mg/m² IV + AT7519 21 mg/m² IV. Most common drug-related adverse events included Grade 1/2 diarrhea (79%), fatigue (54%), mucositis (57%), nausea (46%), and vomiting (50%). Partial responses were seen in a palate adenocarcinoma and Sertoli-Leydig tumor; a colorectal and an endometrial cancer patient both remained on study for ten cycles with stable disease as the best response. There were no clinically relevant PK interactions for either drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined onalespib and AT7519 is tolerable, though below monotherapy RP2D. Promising preliminary clinical activity was seen. Further benefit may be seen with the incorporation of molecular signature pre-selection. Further biomarker development will require the assessment of the on-target impact on relevant client proteins in tumor tissue.

Guidelines for the Optimization and Validation of In Situ Hybridization

As RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) moves into the mainstream lab and increasingly into clinical adoption and additional multiplexing techniques are developed to enable further RNA ISH identification, a set of guidelines on the validation of ISH is required. These guidelines include choice of methods, appropriate controls, and protocol optimization as well as a central core message of understanding the target, understanding the ISH technique, and using the most appropriate controlling mechanisms to enable reproducible and trustworthy data to be obtained.

Novel therapeutic targets in salivary duct carcinoma uncovered by comprehensive molecular profiling

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare, aggressive salivary gland malignancy, which often presents at an advanced stage. A proportion of SDC are characterized by HER2 amplification and/or overexpression of androgen receptor (AR), which could be targeted in a subset of patients, but the presence of AR splice variant‐7 (AR‐V7) in some SDC cases could result in resistance to anti‐androgen therapy. We evaluated a cohort of 28 cases of SDC for potentially targetable biomarkers and pathways using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next‐generation sequencing (DNA and RNA) assays. Pathogenic genetic aberrations were found in all but 1 case and affected TP53 (n = 19), HRAS (n = 7), PIK3CA, ERBB2 (HER2), and NF1 (n = 5 each); KMT2C (MLL3) and PTEN (n = 3 each); BRAF (p.V600E), KDM5C and NOTCH1 (n = 2 each). Androgen receptor was expressed in all cases and 13 of 27 harbored the AR‐V7 splice variant (including a case without any other detectable genetic alteration). HER2 IHC was expressed in 11 of 28 cases. The majority of SDC cases had no biomarkers predictive of immunotherapy response: 5 cases exhibited low (1%‐8%) programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression in tumor cells, 2 cases exhibited elevated TMB, and no samples exhibited microsatellite instability. Notably, the pre‐treatment biopsies from 2 patients with metastatic disease, who demonstrated clinical responses to anti‐androgen therapy, showed AR expression and no AR splice variants. We conclude that comprehensive molecular profiling of SDCs can guide the selection of patients for targeted therapies involving AR, HER2, PD‐L1, mitogen‐activated protein kinase, and PIK3CA pathways.