HPV status predicts for improved survival following chemotherapy in metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx

Locoregional treatment of primary tumor in synchronous metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

PURPOSE

Patients with synchronous metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (mHNSCC) are at risk of locoregional progression associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to assess whether the addition of aggressive locoregional treatment to systemic therapy could be associated with an improved overall survival (OS) compared to systemic therapy alone in upfront mHNSCC patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients presenting with previously untreated mHNSCC who underwent first-line systemic therapy at a single institution between 1998 and 2018. Locoregional treatment was defined as either exclusive locoregional radiotherapy (RT) or surgery with or without adjuvant RT.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-eight patients were included. Eighty patients were treated with systemic therapy alone and 68 patients were treated with a combination of locoregional treatment and systemic therapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 13 months [10.7-15] and median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.7 month [6.5-8.9]. The addition of a locoregional treatment to systemic therapy compared to systemic therapy alone was associated with improved survival (1-year OS, 65.8% vs. 41.1%, p < .001, and 1-year PFS, 42.5% vs. 18.5%, p < .001). Moreover, RT dose equal to 70 Gy was associated with even longer OS compared to a RT dose below 70 Gy and to no locoregional treatment (23.4 vs. 12.7 vs 7.5 months respectively). In a subgroup analysis on 75 patients presenting with a responding or stable metastatic disease after first-line systemic therapy, oropharyngeal primary tumor site and the addition of a locoregional treatment, especially a high radiation dose of 70 Gy, were evidenced as independent prognostic factors for improved OS.

CONCLUSION

The addition of a high-dose RT locoregional treatment to systemic therapy is associated with prolonged OS in patients with synchronous mHNSCC and should be discussed for patients who respond to or have a stable disease after first-line systemic therapy.

M2 macrophages reduce the radiosensitivity of head and neck cancer by releasing HB‑EGF

The aim of the present study was to examine the potential role of human heparin‑binding epidermal growth factor (HB‑EGF) secreted by M2 macrophages in the development of radioresistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Immunohistochemistry was used to detect radiosensitivity in human papilloma virus (HPV)‑positive and HPV‑negative HNSCC tissues and immunohistochemical staining with specific antibodies for macrophage surface markers was used to assess the infiltration of M1 and M2 macrophages in HPV‑positive and ‑negative HNSCC tissues. The expression of HB‑EGF in HPV‑positive and ‑negative HNSCC tissues was determined by multi‑cytokine detection in order to determine the relationship between HB‑EGF and radiosensitivity. M1 and M2 macrophages were co‑cultured with the HNSCC cell line CAL27 and treated with HB‑EGF and its neutralizing antibodies to assess radiation sensitivity. Finally, the major DNA double‑strand break repair pathways required for the activation of HB‑EGF and promotion of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were identified. The results revealed that radiosensitivity was higher in HPV‑positive HNSCC compared with HPV‑negative. There was a higher infiltration of M2 macrophages in HPV‑negative HNSCC, which were revealed as the main source of HB‑EGF secretion. Furthermore, it was determined that overexpression of HB‑EGF induced radioresistance in HPV‑negative HNSCC. HB‑EGF promoted the activation of the non‑homologous end‑joining pathway by activating EGFR. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the association between HB‑EGF and radiosensitivity in HNSCC. These results indicated that the secretion of HB‑EGF by M2 macrophages could induce radioresistance of HPV‑negative HNSCC.

Survival disparities in vulvar cancer patients in Commission on Cancer®-accredited facilities

OBJECTIVES

To investigate survival disparities and prognostic factors in vulvar cancer by age at diagnosis.

METHODS

Women who underwent surgery and were diagnosed with stage I-IV vulvar cancer from 2004 to 2014 in the National Cancer Database were eligible. Proportions were compared using Chi-Square test. Survival was evaluated using Cox analysis.

RESULTS

There were 18,207 eligible women. Median age at diagnosis was 64 years, and 31% diagnosed ≥75 years old were categorized as elderly. Most vulvar cancers were diagnosed at stage I and with squamous histology. Diagnosis with higher stage or non-squamous histology was more common in elderly vs. non-elderly patients (P < 0.001). Survival was 3.5 times worse in the elderly than the non-elderly (P < 0.0001). Risk of death for each 5-year increment in age increased by 22% for non-elderly and 43% for elderly patients (P < 0.0001). The prognostic value of comorbidity score, stage, regional node assessment and histology was smaller in elderly vs. non-elderly women (each P < 0.05). Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) use in the elderly vs. non-elderly was rare for stage I-II disease (3% vs. 2%) and more common for stage III-IV disease (6% vs. 43%), respectively (P < 0.0001). The survival disadvantage for elderly patients persisted following no adjuvant therapy, radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone, or CTRT (P < 0.0001). In stage III-IV disease, survival was superior following CTRT vs. radiotherapy when diagnosed <75 years (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.69-0.93) but not in the elderly (HR = 0.99, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Age-associated risk of death increased at different rates in vulvar cancer and was larger in elderly vs. non-elderly patients. The impact of other prognostic factors was smaller in elderly vs. non-elderly women. The survival benefit of CTRT over radiotherapy in stage III-IV did not extend to the elderly.