1
|
MiriMoghaddam M, Bohlouli B, Lai H, Viegas S, Amin M. Trends and predictors of unplanned hospitalization among oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients; an 8-year population-based study. Oral Oncol 2024; 151:106742. [PMID: 38460285 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of oral cancers, particularly HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer, is steadily increasing worldwide, presenting a significant healthcare challenge. This study investigates trends and predictors of unplanned hospitalizations for oral cavity cancer (OCC) and oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients in the province of Alberta, Canada. METHODS This retrospective, population-based, cohort study used administrative data collected from all hospitals in the province. Using the Alberta Cancer Registry (ACR), a cohort of adult patients diagnosed with a single primary OCC or OPC between January 2010 and December 2017 was identified. Linking this cohort with the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD), trends in hospitalizations, primary diagnoses, and predictors of unplanned hospitalization (UH) and 30-day unplanned readmission were analyzed. RESULTS Of 1,721 patients included, 1,244 experienced 2,228 hospitalizations, with 48 % being categorized as UH. The UHs were significantly associated with a higher mortality rate, 18.5 % as compared to 4.6 % for planned, and influenced by sex, age groups, comorbidities, cancer types, stages, and treatment modalities. The rate of UH per patient decreased from 0.69 to 0.54 visits during the study period (P = 0.02). Common diagnoses for UH were palliative care and post-surgical convalescence, while surgery-related complications such as infection and hemorrhage were frequent in 30-day unplanned readmissions. Predictors of UH included cancer stage, material deprivation, and treatment, while cancer type and comorbidity predicted readmissions. CONCLUSION The rate of UHs showed a noteworthy decline in this study, which could be a result of enhanced care coordination. Furthermore, identified primary diagnosis and predictors associated with UHs and readmissions, provide valuable insights for enhancing the quality of care for cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masoud MiriMoghaddam
- School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - Babak Bohlouli
- School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - Hollis Lai
- School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - Shefali Viegas
- School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - Maryam Amin
- School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nyirjesy SC, Zhao S, Judd R, McCrary H, Kuhar HN, Farlow JL, Seim NB, Rocco JW, Kang SY, Haring CT. Hypothyroidism as an Independent Predictor of 30-day Readmission in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Laryngoscope 2023; 133:2988-2998. [PMID: 36974971 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To define the role of hypothyroidism and other risk factors for unplanned readmissions after surgery for head and neck cancer. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. METHODS The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was used to identify patients who underwent surgery for mucosal head and neck cancer (oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx) between 2010 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine patient, tumor, and hospital related risk factors for 30-day readmission. Readmitted patients were stratified by preoperative diagnosis of hypothyroidism to compare readmission characteristics. RESULTS For the 131,013 patients who met inclusion criteria, the readmission rate was 15.9%. Overall, 11.91% of patients had a preoperative diagnosis of hypothyroidism. After controlling for other variables, patients with a preoperative diagnosis of hypothyroidism had 12.2% higher odds of readmission compared to those without hypothyroidism (OR: 1.12, 1.03-1.22, p = 0.008). Patients with hypothyroidism had different reasons for readmission, including higher rates of wound dehiscence, fistula, infection, and electrolyte imbalance. Among readmitted patients, the length of stay for index admission (mean 10.5 days vs. 9.2 days, p < 0.001), readmission (mean 7.0 vs. 6.6 days, p = 0.05), and total hospital charge were higher for hypothyroid patients ($137,742 vs. $119,831, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Hypothyroidism is an independent risk factor for 30-day readmission following head and neck cancer resection. Furthermore, hypothyroid patients are more likely to be readmitted for wound complications, infection, and electrolyte imbalance. Targeted interventions should be considered for hypothyroid patients to decrease readmission rates and associated patient morbidity, potentially leading to earlier initiation of adjuvant treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 133:2988-2998, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C Nyirjesy
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Songzhu Zhao
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, 320 Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Drive, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA
| | - Ryan Judd
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Hilary McCrary
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Hannah N Kuhar
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Janice L Farlow
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Nolan B Seim
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - James W Rocco
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Stephen Y Kang
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Catherine T Haring
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hey C, Goeze A, Sader R, Zaretsky E. FraMaDySc: dysphagia screening for patients after surgery for head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:2585-2592. [PMID: 36786927 PMCID: PMC10066133 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-07865-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oropharyngeal dysphagia is one of the most common postoperative consequences in head and neck cancer patients. Above all, these patients often suffer from aspiration and limitations of oral intake. However, no reliable dysphagia screening is available for this target group. This study aimed to develop and validate a screening, FraMaDySc, based on a water swallow test (WST) for the identification of postsurgical patients with a risk of aspiration, limitations of oral intake, and, as their derivate, a relevant oropharyngeal dysphagia in general (OD) that constituted the main reference standard. METHODS A total of 184 postsurgical head and neck cancer patients were tested with a WST. The patients were, on average, 62 years old and predominantly male (71%). After WST, they underwent Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES®). FEES® results were dichotomized by Penetration aspiration scale and Functional oral intake scale. Patients with a "fail" result on one of these two scales were classified as having OD. Quality criteria of WST were quantified by means of cross-tabulation with FEES® results. RESULTS OD was found in 65% of patients, aspiration in 44%, limitations of oral intake in 56%. WST delivered a "fail" result in 65% of patients. WST showed sensitivity 91% and specificity 88% for OD. Quality criteria for aspiration (sensitivity 64%, specificity 93%) and limitations of oral intake (sensitivity 80%, specificity 87%) were lower. CONCLUSION FraMaDySc is a standardized, quick, and valid WST and therefore an excellent screening tool for the identification of OD in postoperative head and neck cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane Hey
- Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Marburg University Hospital, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Almut Goeze
- Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Marburg University Hospital, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Robert Sader
- Oral, Cranio-, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Frankfurt (Main) University Hospital, University of Frankfurt (Main), Frankfurt (Main), Germany
| | - Eugen Zaretsky
- Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Marburg University Hospital, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goeze A, Zaretsky E, Lehner U, Wermter L, Mayer M, Stuck BA, Birk R, Neff A, Fisher I, Stöver T, Kramer S, Ghanaati S, Sader R, Hey C. [Post-operative prevalence of dysphagia in head-and-neck cancer patients in the acute care units]. Laryngorhinootologie 2021; 101:320-326. [PMID: 34187052 DOI: 10.1055/a-1528-7584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Dysphagia constitutes a frequent post-operative functional impairment in head-and-neck cancer patients. This impairment can result in aspiration/penetration and limitations of oral intake. Therefore, often it requires a therapeutic intervention. In this study, prevalence of post-operative dysphagia and its associations with the tumour stage, localisation, patients' age, and biological sex were analysed for the inpatient treatment setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 201 adult head-and-neck cancer patients (mean age 63 years) were analysed prospectively by FEES in two university hospitals in regard to their penetration/aspiration, limitations of oral intake, and need for therapeutic interventions directly after the operative tumour treatment. Additionally, the influence of the same patients' characteristics on these three parameters were analysed by means of univariate and multivariate statistical methods. RESULTS Out of 201 patients, 66.7 % needed a therapeutic intervention because of their dysphagia, 57.2 % needed a nasogastral or PEG tube due to limitations of oral intake, 45.3 % had an aspiration. In the latter subgroup, 38.5 % had a silent aspiration. Higher tumour stage, patients' higher age and male sex were shown to be significant influence factors for dysphagia, tumour localisation showed only a marginally significant result. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated a clinical importance and relevance of the consequent and systematic treatment of post-operative dysphagia in head-and-neck cancer patients in the acute care units as a constituent of a modern oncological therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Almut Goeze
- Abt. für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, KHNO,Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Eugen Zaretsky
- Abt. für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, KHNO,Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Uta Lehner
- Abt. für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, KHNO,Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Laura Wermter
- Abt. für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, KHNO,Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Miriam Mayer
- Abt. für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, KHNO,Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Boris A Stuck
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Richard Birk
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Neff
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Ingo Fisher
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Timo Stöver
- Klinik für HNO-Heilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt/Main, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - Sabine Kramer
- Schwerpunkt für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt/Main, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Shahram Ghanaati
- Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer-, Plastische Gesichtschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt/Main, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Robert Sader
- Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer-, Plastische Gesichtschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt/Main, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Christiane Hey
- Abt. für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, KHNO,Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jacobs D, Kafle S, Earles J, Rahmati R, Mehra S, Judson BL. Prolonged inpatient stay after upfront total laryngectomy is associated with overall survival. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2021; 6:94-102. [PMID: 33614936 PMCID: PMC7883619 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate factors and complications associated with prolonged inpatient length of stay (LOS) in patients who receive total laryngectomy (TL), and to analyze its effect on short-term and long-term overall survival (OS). METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried from 2004 to 2016 for patients with laryngeal cancer, who received TL within 60 days of diagnosis, and who had an inpatient LOS ≥1 night. Multivariable binary logistic regression and survival analyses on propensity score matched cohorts with Kaplan-Meier analysis and extended Cox regression were utilized. RESULTS Eight thousand two hundred and ninety-eight patients from the NCDB were included. Median inpatient LOS was 8 days after TL (IQR: 7, 12). Prolonged LOS was defined as above the 75th percentile or 13 days or greater. On multivariable analysis, increasing patient age (OR 1.14 per 10 years, P = .003), female sex (OR 1.35, P < .001), and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score of ≥2 compared to a score of 0 (OR 1.43, P < .001) were associated with prolonged LOS. Patients treated at high surgical case volume centers had a decreased likelihood for prolonged LOS (OR 0.67, P < .001). Ninety-day mortality increased over time in patients who stayed ≥13 days. Prolonged LOS was independently associated with worse OS on multivariable analysis (HR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.22, 1.61) in a matched cohort. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged LOS after TL serves as a strong indicator for postoperative long-term mortality and may help identify patients who warrant closer surveillance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Jacobs
- Yale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Samipya Kafle
- Yale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Joseph Earles
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of SurgeryYale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Rahmatullah Rahmati
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of SurgeryYale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Saral Mehra
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of SurgeryYale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Benjamin L. Judson
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of SurgeryYale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Noel CW, Forner D, Wu V, Enepekides D, Irish JC, Husain Z, Chan KKW, Hallet J, Coburn N, Eskander A. Predictors of surgical readmission, unplanned hospitalization and emergency department use in head and neck oncology: A systematic review. Oral Oncol 2020; 111:105039. [PMID: 33141060 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify predictors of unplanned hospitalization and emergency department (ED) use among head and neck oncology patients. METHODS Peer reviewed publications were identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL. Studies describing a cohort of HNC patients that detailed predictors of unplanned hospitalization or ED use in risk-adjusted models were eligible for inclusion. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality In Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool and an adapted version of the GRADE framework. RESULTS Of the 932 articles identified, 39 studies met our inclusion criteria with 31/39 describing predictors of surgical readmission and 10/39 describing predictors of ED use or unplanned hospitalization during radiation/chemoradiation treatment. Risk factors were classified into either 'patient-related', 'cancer severity' or 'process' factors. In the subset of studies looking at readmission following surgery wound complications (10/14 studies), presence of comorbidity (16/28 studies), low socioeconomic status (8/17 studies), cancer stage (9/14 studies), and prolonged hospital stay (7/18 studies) were the variables most frequently associated with readmission on multivariable analysis. Presence of comorbidity (6/10) and chemotherapy use (4/10) were more frequently associated with ED use and unplanned hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS Several consistent predictors have been identified across a variety of studies. This work is a critical first step towards the development of readmission and ED prediction models. It also enables meaningful comparison of hospital readmission rates with risk adjustment in HNC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W Noel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Forner
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Vincent Wu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danny Enepekides
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan C Irish
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zain Husain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelvin K W Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natalie Coburn
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Antoine Eskander
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|