Accuracy of autofluorescence and chemiluminescence in the diagnosis of oral Dysplasia and Carcinoma: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

Adjunctive aids for the detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review of systematic reviews

This study presents the results of systematic reviews on adjunctive tools in screening and diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) and to determine if the current literature supports their use as either an adjunctive tool or replacement of gold standard techniques. Systemic reviews and meta-analysis that evaluated adjunctive tools including chemiluminescence, tissue autofluorescence, tissue fluorescence spectroscopy, vital staining and cytology techniques were systematically examined using AMSTAR II. Twenty-seven systematic reviews were included. Five studies had a low quality of evidence, and nine studies had a critically low quality of evidence. This review found limited evidence to recommend chemiluminescence, tissue autofluorescence tools and vital staining as diagnostic tools, but only serve as clinical adjuncts to conventional oral examination. Cytology techniques and narrow-band imaging may be utilised as a non-invasive diagnostic adjunctive tool for the detection of OSCC and the malignant transformation of OPMD. In conclusion, this paper provides evidence on several types of adjunctive tools and provides recommendations on their use in clinical practice. These tools are considered useful as clinical adjuncts but there is insufficient evidence for their use as a diagnostic tool to replace gold standard conventional oral examination and surgical biopsy.

Recent advances in head and neck surgical oncology

In recent years, the field of head and neck oncology has witnessed a remarkable transformation with unprecedented advances that have revolutionized the management of complex tumors in this region. As an intricate subspecialty within oncology, head and neck surgical procedures demand detailed knowledge of the complex anatomy meticulous precision in surgical technique, and expertise to preserve vital functions while ensuring optimal oncological outcomes. With the relentless pursuit of improved patient outcomes, the integration of innovative technologies has significantly enhanced the surgical armamentarium. Robotics, endoscopic platforms, and image-guided navigation have revolutionized the surgical approach, enabling precise tumor resection and sparing healthy tissues. Furthermore, the application of advanced imaging modalities and molecular biomarker profiling has opened new avenues for personalized treatment strategies. From targeted therapies and immunotherapies to adaptive radiation techniques, clinicians are now equipped with an array of tailored options, ushering in a new era of personalized care for patients with head and neck malignancies. This article delves into the unfolding narratives of clinical triumphs, exploring the transformative potential of emerging therapies and the collaborative efforts propelling head and neck surgical oncology toward a future of hope and healing.

Effect of fluorescein dye concentration in oral cancer tissue: Statistical and spectroscopic analysis

Oral cancer screening with exogenous agents is highly demanding due to high sensitivity, as the early diagnosis plays a vital role in achieving favorable outcomes for oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) by facilitating prompt detection and comprehensive surgical removal. Optical techniques utilizing the local application of fluorescein dye or fluorescence-guided surgery offer potential for early OSCC detection. The use of fluorescein dye in oral cancer is significantly less, and there is a need to inspect the local application of fluorescein dye in oral cancer patients. Concentration-based investigations of the dye with OSCC patients are essential to ensure accurate fluorescence-guided surgery and screening with fluorescein labeling and to mitigate possible adverse effects. Additionally, analyzing the dye distribution within OSCC tissues can provide insights into their heterogeneity, a critical indicator of malignancy. The present study includes a concentration-based statistical and spectroscopic analysis of fluorescein dye in ex-vivo and in-vivo OSCC patients. In the ex-vivo examination of OSCC tissues, five concentrations (18.66 ± 0.06, 9.51 ±    0.02, 6.38 ± 0.01, 4.80 ± 0.004, and 3.85 ± 0.002 millimolar) are employed for optical analysis. The ex-vivo OSCC tissues are analyzed for multiple statistical parameters at all concentrations, and the results are thoroughly described. Additionally, spectroscopic analysis is conducted on all concentrations for a comprehensive evaluation. Following optical analysis of all five concentrations in the ex-vivo study, two concentrations, 6.38 ± 0.01 and 4.80 ± 0.004 millimolar, are identified as suitable for conducting in-vivo investigations of oral cancer. A detailed spectroscopic and statistical study of OSCC tissues in-vivo has been done using these two concentrations.

Clinical Evaluation of the Optical Filter for Autofluorescence Glasses for Oral Cancer Curing Light Exposed (GOCCLES®) in the Management of Potentially Premalignant Disorders: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Any oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) must be regularly monitored through clinical examination to detect any possible malignant transformation. Conventional intraoral exams, however, can be difficult because these conditions may resemble benign lesions. For this reason, several non-invasive diagnostic technologies have been developed to help the clinician in detecting and distinguishing between cancerous and benign lesions. Epithelial dysplasia can be considered the most important predictor of malignant evolution. Therefore, in this study we aim to evaluate the ability of an optical filter for autofluorescence Glasses for Oral Cancer Curing Light Exposed (GOCCLES®) and of toluidine blue staining in identifying dysplastic areas in patients with OPMDs.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, medical records, photographs and videos of 25 patients with oral lesions were analyzed. Forty-two biopsy samples in 25 patients with OPMDs and at least one suspicious oral mucosa lesion that were evaluated in white light, autofluorescence with optical filter GOCCLES®, toluidine blue staining and then biopsied with histopathological analysis were analyzed.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity for the autofluorescence evaluation with GOCCLES® for identifying dysplasia or carcinoma were 66% and 48%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 34% and 77%, respectively, and the accuracy was 53%. The sensitivity and specificity for toluidine blue staining were 91% and 68%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 55% and 95%, respectively, and the accuracy was 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

The optical filter for autofluorescence (GOCCLES®) and toluidine blue staining are simple, inexpensive, rapid and non-invasive procedures that can assist the clinician in distinguishing OPMDs from healthy mucosa but they are not able to distinguish benign and malignant lesions.