Preoperative prediction model to evaluate salvage surgery in patients with recurrent or second primary oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Clinical outcomes of cetuximab-based treatment for distant metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A real-world study using Taiwan Head Neck Society registry database

BACKGROUND

For R/M HNSCC, the differences in prognosis and treatment options between distant metastasis (DM) and locoregional recurrence, especially in the DM group, remain unclear.

METHODS

From the Taiwan Head Neck Society registry database, patients who were diagnosed with R/M HNSCC and received cetuximab-based frontline therapy were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

Among the enrolled patients, 59.3% (491/827) belonged to the DM group. The DM group had less primary site of oral cavity, less betel nut chewing, higher lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and higher LDH/albumin ratio compared with the non-DM group. For the patients with primary site of oral cavity and current smokers, DM coexisted with poorer outcomes. In the DM group, EXTREME-like regimen was more suitable for older patients, those with elevated LDH, and those with higher LDH/albumin ratio than TPExtreme-like regimen.

CONCLUSION

DM coexisted with poorer prognosis in certain groups. LDH-associated biomarkers may aid treatment options for DM patients.

Survival Benefit from Cancer-Directed Surgery for Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to gather evidence for the survival benefit of cancer-directed surgery (CDS) in metastatic head and neck cancer (M1 HNC) and identify which patients will benefit most from CDS.

METHODS

Patients with M1 HNC were identified within the SEER database. According to whether received CDS, patients were divided into the CDS and non-CDS groups. The bias between the two groups was minimized using Propensity Score Matching (PSM), and the prognostic role of CDS was investigated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard models. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 3215 patients with M1 HNC were extracted, including 566 patients who received CDS that were 1:1 propensity score-matched with patients who did not receive CDS. In the matched dataset, the median OS and CSS in CDS groups were significantly higher than in non-CDS groups (OS: 19.0 vs. 9.0 months, p < 0.001; CSS: 21.0 vs. 9.0 months, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, multivariable Cox regression analysis also revealed that CDS was a favorable prognostic factor for both OS and CSS. Furthermore, subgroups of patients with M1 HNC (younger age, being married, grade I-II, oropharynx site, earlier T/N stage, radiotherapy) were inclined to benefit from CDS, while those patients who received chemotherapy failed to benefit from CDS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that CDS was associated with improved survival in M1 HNC, especially for those subpopulations that benefit more from CDS treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:1288-1298, 2024.