1
|
Molteni G, Bassani S, Arsie AE, Zampieri E, Mannelli G, Orlandi E, Bossi P, De Virgilio A. Role of TORS as De-Escalation Strategy in HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer, What We Need to Know. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:1014. [PMID: 38786424 PMCID: PMC11121063 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12101014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) presents unique challenges and opportunities for treatment, particularly regarding de-escalation strategies to reduce treatment morbidity without compromising oncological outcomes. This paper examines the role of Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) as a de-escalation strategy in managing HPV-related OPSCC. We conducted a comprehensive literature review from January 2010 to June 2023, focusing on studies exploring TORS outcomes in patients with HPV-positive OPSCC. These findings highlight TORS's potential to reduce the need for adjuvant therapy, thereby minimizing treatment-related side effects while maintaining high rates of oncological control. TORS offers advantages such as precise tumor resection and the ability to obtain accurate pathological staging, which can guide the tailoring of adjuvant treatments. Some clinical trials provide evidence supporting the use of TORS in specific patient populations. The MC1273 trial demonstrated promising outcomes with lower doses of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following TORS, showing high locoregional tumor control rates and favorable survival outcomes with minimal side effects. ECOG 3311 evaluated upfront TORS followed by histopathologically directed adjuvant therapy, revealing good oncological and functional outcomes, particularly in intermediate-risk patients. The SIRS trial emphasized the benefits of upfront surgery with neck dissection followed by de-escalated RT in patients with favorable survival and excellent functional outcomes. At the same time, the PATHOS trial examined the impact of risk-adapted adjuvant treatment on functional outcomes and survival. The ongoing ADEPT trial investigates reduced-dose adjuvant RT, and the DART-HPV study aims to compare standard adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with a reduced dose of adjuvant RT in HPV-positive OPSCC patients. These trials collectively underscore the potential of TORS in facilitating treatment de-escalation while maintaining favorable oncological and functional outcomes in selected patients with HPV-related OPSCC. The aim of this scoping review is to discuss the challenges of risk stratification, the importance of HPV status determination, and the implications of smoking on treatment outcomes. It also explores the evolving criteria for adjuvant therapy following TORS, focusing on reducing radiation dosage and volume without compromising treatment efficacy. In conclusion, TORS emerges as a viable upfront treatment option for carefully selected patients with HPV-positive OPSCC, offering a pathway toward treatment de-escalation. However, selecting the optimal candidate for TORS-based de-escalation strategies is crucial to fully leverage the benefits of treatment de-intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Molteni
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Sara Bassani
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.E.A.)
| | - Athena Eliana Arsie
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.E.A.)
| | - Erica Zampieri
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.E.A.)
| | - Giuditta Mannelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Firenze, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy;
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Armando De Virgilio
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Contrera KJ, Patel MR, Burtness B, Mehra R, Ferris RL. The role of surgery and deescalation for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer. Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38497569 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Recently published and ongoing trials are helping to define the role of transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer. Evidence to date supports the use of surgery as a valuable tool in the multidisciplinary deescalation of low-risk human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mihir R Patel
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Barbara Burtness
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Ranee Mehra
- University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nyirjesy SC, McCrary HC, Zhao S, Judd RT, Farlow JL, Seim NB, Ozer E, Agrawal A, Old MO, Rocco JW, Kang SY, Haring CT. National Trends in 30-Day Readmission Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 150:133-141. [PMID: 38153724 PMCID: PMC10853828 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.4025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Importance As the incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) continues to rise in the US, an increasing number of patients are being treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Readmission following surgery can potentially delay initiation of adjuvant treatment and affect survival outcomes. Objective To identify risk factors for 30-day postoperative readmission in patients undergoing TORS for OPSCC. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective, population-based cohort study used data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2017. All patients undergoing TORS for OPSCC were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes and included. Exclusion criteria were age younger than 18 years or incomplete information regarding index admission or readmission. The analysis was performed from April to October 2023. Exposure TORS for OPSCC. Main Outcomes and Measures Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors associated with 30-day readmission. Covariates included demographics and medical comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, hospital characteristics, and surgical details. Trends in readmission over time, reasons for readmission, and characteristics of the readmission were also examined. Results A weighted total of 5544 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.7 [0.25] years; 4475 [80.7%] male) underwent TORS for OPSCC. The overall readmission rate was 17.5% (n = 971), and these rates decreased over the study period (50 of 211 patients [23.7%] in 2010 vs 58 of 633 patients [9.1%] in 2017). Risk factors associated with readmission included male sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.07-2.20) and a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (AOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.28-4.58). Factors associated with decreased rate of readmission included undergoing concurrent selective neck dissection (AOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22-0.41). Among the 971 readmissions, the most common readmission diagnoses were bleeding (151 [15.6%]), electrolyte and digestive problems (44 [4.5%]), pneumonia (44 [4.5%]), and sepsis (26 [2.7%]). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, readmission rates following TORS for oropharynx cancer decreased over time; however, a subset of patients required readmission most commonly related to bleeding, infection, and electrolyte imbalance. Concurrent neck dissection may be protective against readmission. Elucidation of risk factors for readmission after TORS for OPSCC offers opportunities for evidence-based shared decision-making, quality improvement initiatives, and improved patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C. Nyirjesy
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Hilary C. McCrary
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Songzhu Zhao
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Ryan T. Judd
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Janice L. Farlow
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Nolan B. Seim
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Enver Ozer
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Amit Agrawal
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Matthew O. Old
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - James W. Rocco
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Stephen Y. Kang
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
| | - Catherine T. Haring
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
- The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu T, Shen C, Zhou X, Zhu L, Xiang J, Wang Y, Zhu Y, He X, Ying H, Wang Y, Ji Q, Hu C, Lu X. Selective Treatment Deintensification by Reducing Radiation Dose and Omitting Concurrent Chemotherapy Based on Response to Induction Chemotherapy in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Arm, Phase 2 Trial (IChoice-01). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:169-178. [PMID: 37574169 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.07.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate the feasibility of deintensification regimen in the light of the response to induction chemotherapy (IC) in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with p16+ OPSCC, T1-2/N1-3M0 (excluding T1N1M0 with single and ≤3 cm lymph node) or T3-4N0-3M0 were enrolled between January 2019 and July 2021. All patients received 2 cycles of IC with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 dL and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 dL every 3 weeks. Those with major responses (≥50% decrease in both primary and lymph nodes) to IC entered the deintensification cohort (cohort D), in which intensity modulated radiation therapy alone was given to a reduced dose of 60 Gy/30 fractions. Those who failed to meet major responsesentered the concurrent chemoradiotherapy cohort (cohort C), where the dose was simultaneously integrated boosted to a standard 70 Gy/35 fractions to nonmajor response sites, concurrently with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 dL,22. Patient-reported swallow function was documented using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) using Simon's 2 stage design. RESULTS A total of 26 of 48 (54.2%) participants met the criteria to enter cohort D and 22 of 48 (45.8%) patients entered cohort C. With a median follow-up time of 29.7 months (6.9-48.0 months), 2-year PFS and OS rates were 85.4% and 93.6%, respectively for all enrolled patients. In cohort D, 2-year PFS and OS rates were both 100%. Grade 3 and 4 IC-related toxicities included leukopenia/neutropenia occurring in 41.7% and hyponatremia in 4.2% of patients. A higher incidence of grade 3 and 4 mucositis (61.9% vs 23.1% P = .022) was observed in cohort C. Consistent decline in longitudinal MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory scores were observed at month 3 after radiation therapy between cohorts and both were found to recover to baseline at month 12. CONCLUSIONS Selective radiation therapy dose reduction and concurrent chemotherapy removal based on IC response in HPV + OPSCC was feasible and promising. Further study of this strategy to balance efficacy and toxicity is warranted in a prospective controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Chunying Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Lin Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Xiang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yulong Wang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongxue Zhu
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiayun He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongmei Ying
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Qinghai Ji
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
| | - Chaosu Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China.
| | - Xueguan Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Patel SH, Ma DJ, Van Abel KM. In Reply to Yigit et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:467-468. [PMID: 37179098 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Daniel J Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|