1
|
Huth A, Roth M, Viestenz A. [Endogenous Candida endophthalmitis]. DIE OPHTHALMOLOGIE 2024; 121:272-281. [PMID: 38252295 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-023-01978-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Endogenous Candida endophthalmitis is a rare but vision-threatening disease. In most cases, endogenous endophthalmitis caused by Candida species has a better prognosis than endogenous endophthalmitis caused by other fungal species or bacteria but the prognosis still depends heavily on the time required for diagnosis and subsequent treatment as well as the initial visual acuity. Suggestions for treatment algorithms have already been made in the past but binding guidelines in ophthalmology only exist sporadically due to the rarity of the disease. This review discusses the current knowledge on endogenous Candida endophthalmitis and draws conclusions from the current study situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Huth
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde Halle (Saale), Universitätsmedizin Halle, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
| | - M Roth
- Augenklinik Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - A Viestenz
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde Halle (Saale), Universitätsmedizin Halle, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huth A, Viestenz A, Viestenz A, Heichel J, Gabel-Pfisterer A. [Endogenous Candida endophthalmitis: diagnostics and treatment options based on case studies]. DIE OPHTHALMOLOGIE 2024; 121:291-297. [PMID: 38252294 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-023-01977-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endogenous Candida endophthalmitis is an emergency that can threaten vision and the eye as a whole organ but also the life of the patient due to its systemic cause. MATERIAL AND METHOD Retrospective case evaluation of the University Hospital for Ophthalmology Halle (Saale) and the Eye Clinic of the Ernst von Bergmann Hospital Potsdam from 2017-2022. (Age, gender, side involvement, underlying diseases, symptoms, preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, diagnostics, treatment and complications). The standardized procedures for endogenous Candida endophthalmitis are explained, the data are compared with the literature and treatment suggestions are presented. RESULTS 8 patients with 14 eyes were treated for endogenous Candida endophthalmitis. Of the patients 2 were women and 6 were men. The overall average age was 70.25 years (53-82 years), 6 patients had bilateral eye involvement and 2 patients were affected on one side. All patients had several serious immunocompromising underlying diseases that were the cause of the candidemia. All patients underwent a pars plana vitrectomy (ppV) on the affected eyes except for one male patient who did not obtain permission for anesthesia. In addition to systemic treatment with antimycotics, voriconazole was routinely administered intravitreally during ppV. The patients received further intravitreal doses of voriconazole based on the findings. Vitreous body samples were taken from all patients during the ppV and detection of Candida albicans was possible in all cases. As part of the local perioperative treatment 1 patient received parabulbar administration of a triamcinolone depot in both eyes, 7 patients received a dexamethasone depot in 11 eyes and all 8 patients received findings-oriented local treatment with prednisolone acetate eye drops. visual acuity increased from preoperatively 1.2 logMar to 1.0 logMar. Postoperative retinal detachment did not occur and there were no serious perioperative complications. 2 patients died from one of the underlying diseases after 3 and 25 months, respectively. CONCLUSION Despite an increasing number of case series, there are still no uniform guidelines for ophthalmologists in Germany. There is agreement regarding systemic treatment and the intravitreal administration of antifungal agents. The role of ppV has not yet been clearly defined and the question of the adjuvant use of steroids (systemic and/or local) has also not been conclusively clarified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Huth
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde Halle, Universitätsmedizin Halle, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle, Deutschland.
| | - A Viestenz
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde Halle, Universitätsmedizin Halle, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle, Deutschland
| | - A Viestenz
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde Halle, Universitätsmedizin Halle, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle, Deutschland
| | - J Heichel
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde Halle, Universitätsmedizin Halle, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle, Deutschland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Phongkhun K, Pothikamjorn T, Srisurapanont K, Manothummetha K, Sanguankeo A, Thongkam A, Chuleerarux N, Leksuwankun S, Meejun T, Thanakitcharu J, Walker M, Gopinath S, Torvorapanit P, Langsiri N, Worasilchai N, Moonla C, Plongla R, Kates OS, Nematollahi S, Permpalung N. Prevalence of Ocular Candidiasis and Candida Endophthalmitis in Patients With Candidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76:1738-1749. [PMID: 36750934 PMCID: PMC10411939 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infectious diseases and ophthalmology professional societies have disagreed regarding ocular screening in patients with candidemia. We aimed to summarize the current evidence on the prevalence of ocular candidiasis (OC) and Candida endophthalmitis (CE) according to the standardized definitions. METHODS A literature search was conducted from the inception date through 16 October 2022 using PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS. Pooled prevalence of ocular complications was derived from generalized linear mixed models (PROSPERO CRD42022326610). RESULTS A total of 70 and 35 studies were included in the meta-analysis for OC and concordant CE (chorioretinitis with vitreous involvement), respectively. This study represented 8599 patients with candidemia who underwent ophthalmologic examination. Pooled prevalences (95% CI) of OC, overall CE, concordant CE, and discordant CE were 10.7% (8.4-13.5%), 3.1% (2.1-4.5%), 1.8% (1.3-2.6%), and 7.4% (4.5-12%) of patients screened, respectively. Studies from Asian countries had significantly higher concordant CE prevalence (95% CI) of patients screened (3.6%; 2.9-4.6%) compared with studies from European countries (1.4%; .4-5%) and American countries (1.4%; .9-2.2%) (P <.01). Presence of total parenteral nutrition and Candida albicans was associated with CE, with pooled odds ratios (95% CI) of 6.92 (3.58-13.36) and 3.02 (1.67-5.46), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Prevalence of concordant CE overall and among Asian countries was 2 and 4 times higher than the prevalence previously reported by the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) of <0.9%, respectively. There is an urgent need to study optimal screening protocols and to establish joint recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and AAO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasidis Phongkhun
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thananop Pothikamjorn
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Kasama Manothummetha
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Anawin Sanguankeo
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Achitpol Thongkam
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nipat Chuleerarux
- Department of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital/University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Surachai Leksuwankun
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tanaporn Meejun
- Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | | | - Morgan Walker
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shilpa Gopinath
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Pattama Torvorapanit
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nattapong Langsiri
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Chatphatai Moonla
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Rongpong Plongla
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Olivia S Kates
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Saman Nematollahi
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Nitipong Permpalung
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bhikoo R, Ingram PR, Cunningham W, Gounder P, Host B, Chen FK. Risk of Klebsiella pneumoniae Endogenous Endophthalmitis during Bacteremia: Implications for Screening. Infect Chemother 2021; 53:381-383. [PMID: 34216132 PMCID: PMC8258283 DOI: 10.3947/ic.2021.0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Riyaz Bhikoo
- Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Paul Robert Ingram
- School of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.,Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - William Cunningham
- Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Pavindran Gounder
- Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Benjamin Host
- Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Fred K Chen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (incorporating Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Ophthalmology, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|