Impact of Cataract Surgery during Treatment with Ranibizumab in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema

From randomised controlled trials to real-world data: Clinical evidence to guide management of diabetic macular oedema

Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are generally considered the gold-standard for providing scientific evidence for treatments' effectiveness and safety but their findings may not always be generalisable to the broader population treated in routine clinical practice. RCTs include highly selected patient populations that fit specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Although they may have a lower level of certainty than RCTs on the evidence hierarchy, real-world data (RWD), such as observational studies, registries and databases, provide real-world evidence (RWE) that can complement RCTs. For example, RWE may help satisfy requirements for a new indication of an already approved drug and help us better understand long-term treatment effectiveness, safety and patterns of use in clinical practice. Many countries have set up registries, observational studies and databases containing information on patients with retinal diseases, such as diabetic macular oedema (DMO). These DMO RWD have produced significant clinical evidence in the past decade that has changed the management of DMO. RWD and medico-administrative databases are a useful resource to identify low frequency safety signals. They often have long-term follow-up with a large number of patients and minimal exclusion criteria. We will discuss improvements in healthcare information exchange technologies, such as blockchain technology and FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources), which will connect and extend databases already available. These registries can be linked with existing or emerging retinal imaging modalities using artificial intelligence to aid diagnosis, treatment decisions and provide prognostic information. The results of RCTs and RWE are combined to provide evidence-based guidelines.

Pre-operative versus post-operative intravitreal aflibercept injection for management of DME in patients undergoing cataract surgery

AIM

The aim of this paper is to investigate the need of deferring cataract surgery until treating the co-existing diabetic macular edema (DME) using intravitreal (IVI) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF).

METHODS

A prospective randomized interventional study included diabetic patients with visually significant cataract and DME. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A received three preoperative intravitreal (IVI) aflibercept injections with a monthly interval; the third injection was given intra-operatively. Group B received a single intra-operative injection, and two post-operative injections with a monthly interval. The primary outcome measure was the change in central macular thickness (CMT) at 1st and 6th month post-operative. The secondary outcome measures were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at same points and any documented adverse effects.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled in the study, 20 patients in each group. Means of CMT at 1 month post-operatively were significantly higher in group B than group A but no statistical difference at 6 months. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups regarding BCVA at 1 or 6 months post-operatively. Compared with the baseline values, BCVA and CMT improved significantly after 1 and 6 months within both groups.

CONCLUSION

IVI of aflibercept given before cataract surgeries does not seem to have superior effect over postoperative injections in either macular thickness or visual outcomes. Hence, preoperative controlling of DME might not be mandatory in patients undergoing cataract surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study is registered in clinical trial. Gov (NCT05731089).

Therapeutic effect of cataract surgery with simultaneous intravitreal injection of aflibercept on diabetic macular edema: An observational study

This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of cataract surgery along with simultaneous intravitreal injection (IVI) of aflibercept on diabetic macular edema (DME). This cohort study enrolled 106 patients aged >40 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus and DME who received cataract surgery from January 1, 2016, to October 31, 2020. The baseline and mean data of the following parameters were collected: age, sex, glycated hemoglobin level, diabetic retinopathy (DR) grading, previous DR treatments including IVI of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and pan-retinal photocoagulation, intraocular pressure, use of intraocular pressure-lowering medication, central subfield thickness (CST), and log MAR visual acuity (VA). Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on whether they received aflibercept IVI or not during cataract surgery and were compared using the t test and Fisher exact test for continuous and discrete variables, respectively. Beta coefficient and standard error were calculated using multiple linear regression analysis to identify the explanatory variables predictive of the net change of CST and log MAR VA. There was no difference in the net change in CST (15.24 ± 45.07 μm vs 18.62 ± 33.84 μm, P = .772) and log MAR VA (-0.27 ± 0.29 vs -0.37 ± 0.31, P = .215). Gender, glycated hemoglobin level, aflibercept IVI during cataract surgery, and baseline CST did not interfere with the morphological and functional outcomes of DME in cataract surgery. Older age was significantly and independently associated with a greater net change in log MAR VA. Proliferative DR was significantly and independently associated with a greater net change in CST and log MAR VA. A greater baseline log MAR VA was significantly and independently associated with lower net change in log MAR VA. Simultaneous aflibercept IVI for treating DME may not interfere with the functional and tomographic parameters of cataract surgery relative to cataract surgery alone. Factors influencing the outcomes of patients with DME undergoing cataract surgery are as follows: age, baseline DR staging, and baseline VA. Identifying these factors of DME preoperatively may be an important consideration in preventing it from progressing and for improving the overall visual prognosis.

Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema pathways and management: UK Consensus Working Group

The management of diabetic retinopathy (DR) has evolved considerably over the past decade, with the availability of new technologies (diagnostic and therapeutic). As such, the existing Royal College of Ophthalmologists DR Guidelines (2013) are outdated, and to the best of our knowledge are not under revision at present. Furthermore, there are no other UK guidelines covering all available treatments, and there seems to be significant variation around the UK in the management of diabetic macular oedema (DMO). This manuscript provides a summary of reviews the pathogenesis of DR and DMO, including role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and non-VEGF cytokines, clinical grading/classification of DMO vis a vis current terminology (of centre-involving [CI-DMO], or non-centre involving [nCI-DMO], systemic risks and their management). The excellent UK DR Screening (DRS) service has continued to evolve and remains world-leading. However, challenges remain, as there are significant variations in equipment used, and reproducible standards of DMO screening nationally. The interphase between DRS and the hospital eye service can only be strengthened with further improvements. The role of modern technology including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and wide-field imaging, and working practices including virtual clinics and their potential in increasing clinic capacity and improving patient experiences and outcomes are discussed. Similarly, potential roles of home monitoring in diabetic eyes in the future are explored. The role of pharmacological (intravitreal injections [IVT] of anti-VEGFs and steroids) and laser therapies are summarised. Generally, IVT anti-VEGF are offered as first line pharmacologic therapy. As requirements of diabetic patients in particular patient groups may vary, including pregnant women, children, and persons with learning difficulties, it is important that DR management is personalised in such particular patient groups. First choice therapy needs to be individualised in these cases and may be intravitreal steroids rather than the standard choice of anti-VEGF agents. Some of these, but not all, are discussed in this document.

Outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes with diabetic macular oedema: Data from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry

IMPORTANCE

There are limited data on real-world outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes receiving intravitreal treatments for diabetic macular oedema (DMO).

BACKGROUND

Cataract surgery may exacerbate oedema in some eyes with DMO resulting in inferior outcomes.

DESIGN

Matched, case-controlled retrospective study of observational data in routine clinical practice.

PARTICIPANTS

Eyes receiving intravitreal treatments for DMO tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.

METHODS

Eyes that underwent cataract surgery were identified and matched 1:1 with phakic controls also receiving intravitreal injections for DMO. We also assessed potential factors that were associated with better visual acuity (VA) outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in VA 6 months after cataract surgery.

RESULTS

Cataract surgery was identified in 208 eyes of 156 patients of which 147 eyes had 6 months of observations before and after surgery. The mean VA 6 months after surgery improved by 10.6 letters and was similar to their matched phakic controls (68.8 vs 69.2 letters; P = 0.8). Mean CST both 6 months before (341 μm) and after (360 μm) surgery were similar (P = 0.08). However, these eyes had thicker maculae and they received more injections than their matched phakic controls both before and after surgery. Eyes with worse VA before surgery and those that had received intravitreal treatment in the 4 weeks preceding surgery were more likely to gain vision.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Visual outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes receiving intravitreal therapy for DMO were reasonably better. Their maculae were thicker and required more injections in the 6 months before and after surgery than their phakic controls.

Visual Acuity Outcomes after Cataract Extraction with Intraocular Lens Implantation in Eyes with Diabetic Retinopathy

PURPOSE

To evaluate change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with diabetes and diabetic retinopathy (DR) after cataract extraction (CE).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Diabetic eyes of patients 18 years of age or older that underwent CE at the Cleveland Clinic from 2012 through 2018.

METHODS

Chart review examining visual acuities from patient visits before and after surgery, as well as OCT images. Statistical analysis was carried out using multiple linear regression models.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was change in BCVA during the first postoperative year. The secondary end point was the association of central subfield thickness at baseline with change in BCVA. Additional preoperative factors examined were age, race, gender, laterality, insulin use, hemoglobin A1c, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

RESULTS

Diabetic eyes without DR (n = 138) and eyes with mild/moderate nonproliferative DR (NPDR; n = 125), severe NPDR (n = 20), and proliferative DR (PDR; n = 72) were included. A year after surgery, eyes without DR gained a median of 11.0 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (interquartile range [IQR], 5.0-20.0) from 65.0 (IQR, 58.0-70.0) before surgery, eyes with mild or moderate DR gained 10.0 letters (IQR, 5.0-22.0) from 65.0 (IQR, 58.0-76.0), eyes with severe NPDR gained 20.5 letters (IQR, 8.0-28.5) from 55.0 (IQR, 26.0-65.0), and eyes with PDR gained 15.0 letters (IQR, 6.0-29.5) from 55.0 (IQR, 35.0-61.0). Eyes without DR or mild or moderate NPDR showed significantly greater improvements in VA 1 year after surgery compared with eyes with severe NPDR or PDR when controlling for baseline visual acuity (VA), with eyes with more severe DR showing less expected VA gain (P < 0.001). Length of disease most strongly related to baseline DR severity (ρ = 0.431; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract surgery is beneficial in most patients with DR without severe concurrent macular pathologic features. However, preoperative VA and the severity of DR can limit visual outcomes.

Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Requiring Cataract Surgery in VISTA and VIVID Studies

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of cataract surgery on visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) or laser control and who did not require rescue therapy.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of 2 phase 3 trials, Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema (VISTA) and Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Vision Impairment Due to DME (VIVID).

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-four patients (laser treatment, n = 11; IAI, n = 43) who underwent cataract surgery during the study period.

METHODS

In VISTA and VIVID, patients received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks, IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses, or laser control through week 100. Starting at week 24, if rescue treatment criteria were met, IAI patients received laser therapy, and laser therapy patients received IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks (after 5 monthly doses). Patients who received rescue treatment before cataract surgery were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) in the laser control and pooled IAI groups before and after cataract surgery.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of cataract surgery did not depend on treatment group assignment (rate ratio, = 1.517; 95% confidence interval, 0.782-2.944; P = 0.2174). At the last study visit before surgery, BCVA was 62.2 and 56.9 letters and CRT was 342 μm and 301 μm in the laser control and IAI groups, respectively. At the first study visit after cataract surgery, BCVA was improved significantly in both the laser control and IAI groups to 73.5 letters (P = 0.010 compared with last visit before surgery) and 67.2 letters (P < 0.001 compared with last visit before surgery), respectively. Corresponding change in CRT was a modest increase to 364 μm (P > 0.05 compared with last visit before surgery) and 359 μm (P = 0.013 compared with last visit before surgery), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of cataract surgery was similar in both treatment groups. Despite a modest worsening in CRT after cataract surgery, BCVA was improved in both treatment groups.

Pharmacotherapeutic management of macular edema in diabetic subjects undergoing cataract surgery

INTRODUCTION

Cataracts and diabetes are widespread pathologies that are of growing concern to the global population. In diabetic patients who have had cataract surgery, the worsening of preexisting diabetic macular edema or occurrence of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema are common causes of visual impairment even with the most advanced surgical techniques available today for phacoemulsification.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors assess the available literature to evaluate and compare different drugs, with the aim of establishing the best pharmacological strategies for the prevention and treatment of macular edema in diabetic patients undergoing cataract surgery.

EXPERT OPINION

Guidelines for the optimal management of diabetic macular edema in conjunction with cataract surgery or treatment of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema in diabetic patients are still lacking. To treat these conditions, clinicians need to understand the pharmacokinetics, posology, and efficacy of available drugs: topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), and both topical and intravitreal steroids. Diabetic patients undergoing cataract surgery should receive topical NSAIDs to prevent pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Intravitreal anti-VEGFs and steroids, in association with cataract surgery, are indicated for patients with preexisting diabetic macular edema or those at high risk of macular edema after surgery.