Efficacy of Topical Timolol Eye Drops for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

The effect of combination therapy with intravitreal bevacizumab and topical timolol-dorzolamide eye drops on diabetic macular edema: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The mainstay of treatment in diabetic macular edema (DME) is intravitreal administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs). Aqueous depressants may enhance the effects of anti-VEGF agents by prolonging their clearance via aqueous outflow.

PURPOSE

To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and topical timolol-dorzolamide versus IVB alone.

METHOD

In this randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, patients with center-involving DME (ci-DME) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/30 or less were enrolled and randomly allocated to two treatment arms. One group received three monthly IVB injections and timolol-dorzolamide eye drops twice a day (IVB + TD group); the other group received three monthly IVB injections and artificial tear drops as placebo (IVB group). Patients underwent ophthalmic evaluations and macular optical coherence tomography scans at baseline and 1 month after the third injection.

RESULT

Forty-six eyes from 46 patients with ci-DME were recruited. There was no intergroup difference regarding age, gender distribution, diabetic retinopathy stage, glycemic indices, BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), or intraocular pressure at baseline. BCVA was significantly improved in the IVB + TD group (0.46 ± 0.18 to 0.36 ± 0.18 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR], p = 0.002), in contrast to IVB group (0.40 ± 0.17 to 0.35 ± 0.22 logMAR, p = 0.113). Similarly, the IVB + TD group showed a significant reduction in CMT (p < 0.001), unlike the IVB group (p = 0.086); and the CMT change in the former was greater than in the latter (- 0.57 ± 57.67 vs. - 25.52 ± 68.02 μm, p = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the short-term effectiveness of topical timolol-dorzolamide as adjunctive therapy to IVB injections in managing center-involving DME in terms of anatomical and visual outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05083689 (October 19, 2021).

Topical Dorzolamide as Adjunctive Treatment With Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Bilateral Diabetic Macular Edema

BACKGROUND

 Intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents is accepted as the gold standard treatment for center-involving diabetic macular edema (CI-DME). Adjunctive administration of topical dorzolamide may enhance the therapeutic effects of anti-VEGF agents. In this study, we compared the efficacy of topical dorzolamide plus intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) versus IVB alone in patients with bilateral DME.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized contralateral eye study was carried out in a tertiary referral ophthalmology center, Al-Zahra Eye Hospital, Zahedan, Iran, between April 2021 and April 2022. This study included 50 eyes of 25 patients with bilateral DME. All eyes received three consecutive monthly injections of IVB. For each patient, one eye was randomized to instill dorzolamide eye drops three times a day as an intervention, and the other received artificial tear drops as a placebo. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were evaluated before starting treatment and then monthly for the first three months.

RESULTS

Among 25 included patients, the average age was 56.64 ± 7.97 years, and 48% were female. BCVA did not improve significantly in any groups (P > 0.05). No significant difference was observed in terms of BCVA between the intervention and control groups (P > 0.05). The present study showed a decrease in CMT in both study groups (P < 0.05). At month 3, the decrease in mean CMT from baseline was significantly higher in eyes receiving topical dorzolamide compared to the control group (-88.92 ± 82.90 vs. -37.64 ± 86.16 µM, respectively; P = 0.037). IOP decreased significantly only in eyes receiving dorzolamide (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study indicate that adjunctive administration of topical dorzolamide has a beneficial effect on CMT reduction from baseline, but it did not have an additive effect on BCVA improvement compared to IVB monotherapy.

Topical treatment of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common microvascular complication in diabetes and may cause severe visual impairment. Until late stages of DR, treatment options are limited. The aim of the present review was to investigate whether changes of DR might be influenced by topical treatment with eye drops. This systematic review included both randomized and non-randomized human clinical studies on the subject. A systematic search of PubMed Medline, Embase and Scopus databases yielded 710 studies. No inclusion criteria regarding classification of DR were defined. Reference lists as well as first authors were screened for the inclusion of additional studies. Potential bias of the randomized studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Nineteen studies suitable for inclusion were identified. Seven studies were randomized trials. These examined 11 different pharmacological groups of drugs in DR. A favourable effect of corticosteroid eye drops in diabetic macular oedema (DMO) was reported in four studies, and another study reported a positive trend. Eye drops with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were also reported to have a favourable effect in DMO, but not in non-center involving DMO. Application of neuroprotective agents was found effective in patients with pre-existing neurodegeneration in three studies. The remaining studies of DMO and DR were heterogeneous in both designs and results. Studies on treatment of DR with topical eye drops vary with regards to patient population, interventional drugs, study design, and outcome measures. Treatment of DR with eye drops was found effective in the aforementioned cases, but there is still a need for further investigations of long-term, randomized controlled trials in any of the reported pharmacological group.