Vision-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Intravitreal Aflibercept: The AQUA Study

Near vision in patients with DME and RVO treated with aflibercept and correlation with NEI VFQ-25 questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate near and distance visual acuity (VA) and their correlation with the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) treated with aflibercept.

METHODS

In this prospective study, we included 87 eyes of patients diagnosed with DME (n = 61) and RVO (n = 26), who received aflibercept treatment and were followed until the 8th injection. Near VA was examined on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 6th, and 8th injection, and patients completed the NEI VFQ-25 on the 1st, 4th, and 8th aflibercept injection.

RESULTS

The mean near VA at baseline in all eyes was 0.89 ± 0.12 logMAR. With every administration, there was a statistically significant improvement; on the 4th (0.70 ± 0.19; p = 0.000) and the 8th application (0.60 ± 0.19; p = 0.000). At baseline, the mean NEI VFQ-25 total score was 71 ± 14%, and improved to 81 ± 13% (p = 0.000) on the 8th injection. The most significant score gain was recorded in the near VA subscale (+ 20 ± 14%, p = 0.000). There was no statistically significant difference between DME and RVO group in the questionnaire or near VA outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Aflibercept treatment resulted in a remarkable improvement of near vision by 4 lines of logMAR optotype after the 8th application. The near vision questionnaire subscale, initially scoring the lowest, exhibited the greatest gain during the treatment period. This underscores the importance of near vision and reading ability for patients with DME and RVO.

Maintenance of Vision Needed to Drive after Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy in Patients with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and visual acuity (VA)/driving vision maintenance over 4 years in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) or diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational, clinical practice cohort study using data from the Vestrum Health database.

PARTICIPANTS

Initial diagnosis (January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2019) of nAMD or DME and ≥ 1 year of treatment/follow-up history. The VA analysis required 4 years of treatment/follow-up history. For the driving vision maintenance analysis, patients required Snellen VA of 20/40 or better at baseline and for ≥ 6 months during year 1 after index intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in the better-seeing eye.

METHODS

A loss-of-driving event was the first clinic visit with VA worse than 20/40 sustained for ≥ 6 consecutive months. Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated the probability of maintaining driving vision over 4 years stratified by year-1 injection number. Cox proportional hazard models examined associations between baseline clinical characteristics and year-1 injection frequency and the risk of losing driving vision.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean change in VA over time and by baseline VA, driving vision maintenance probability over time and stratified by anti-VEGF injection frequency, and baseline factors predictive of driving vision maintenance.

RESULTS

In year 1, the nAMD and DME cohorts gained 8.5 and 9.5 ETDRS letters, respectively. Between years 1 and 4, patients with nAMD and DME lost 6.6 and 2.7 ETDRS letters, respectively. The probability of maintaining driving vision over 4 years was 56% (nAMD) and 72% (DME); among patients who received 1 to 5, 6 to 7, and ≥ 8 anti-VEGF injections in year 1, corresponding probabilities were 50%, 56%, and 65% (nAMD; P < 0.001) and 63%, 72%, and 77% (DME; P < 0.001). Baseline factors associated with driving vision loss included older age, worse index VA, geographic atrophy (nAMD), and worsening baseline diabetic retinopathy (DME).

CONCLUSIONS

Older age and worse index VA were risk factors for driving vision loss, whereas a greater year-1 injection number was associated with driving vision maintenance through year 4, supporting early initiation and frequent anti-VEGF injections for maintaining driving vision in nAMD or DME.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Management of treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema patients: Review of real-world clinical data

The high prevalence of Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a real global health problem. Its complex pathophysiology involves different pathways. Over the last decade, the introduction of intravitreal treatments has dramatically changed the management and prognosis of DME. Among the different treatment options, inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and intravitreal steroids implants represent the first-line therapy of DME. We conducted a review of electronic databases to compile the available evidence about the clinical management of DME in a clinical setting, with a special focus on treatment-naïve patients. Anti-VEGF therapies represent a valuable option for treating DME patients. However, many patients do not respond properly to this treatment and, due to its administration regimen, many patients receive suboptimal treatment in real life. Current evidence demonstrated that in patients with DME, DEX-i improved significantly both anatomic and visual outcomes. Besides eyes with insufficient anti-VEGF respond or recalcitrant DME cases, DEX-i can be effectively and safely used in treatment-naïve DME patients as first line therapy. DEX-i may be considered first line therapy in different clinical scenarios, such as DME eyes with a greater inflammatory component, patients with cardiovascular events, vitrectomized eyes, or those requiring cataract surgery. In conclusion, there are still many points for improvement pending in the clinical management of the patient with DME. Since DME treatment must follow a patient-tailored approach, selecting the best therapeutic approach for each patient requires a good understanding of the pathophysiology of DME.

Daily Functionality of People with Low Vision: The Impact of Visual Acuity, Depression, and Life Orientation-A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Low vision (LV) has a significant negative impact on the activities of daily life as well as on the psychological health of patients.

Objectives

The objective of this study is to investigate psychological, clinical, and demographic factors that may impact the daily functionality of patients with LV.

Methods

A convenience sample of 53 patients, meeting the WHO criteria for LV, was recruited. Questionnaires on daily functionality, depression, and life orientation (in terms of optimism/pessimism) were administered along with a semistructured personal interview. Key Findings. The main results revealed a significant negative correlation between daily functionality and depression (r = -0.423, p < 0.001). Conversely, there is a positive correlation between daily functionality and visual acuity (r = 0.415, p < 0.001), while years since diagnosis were negatively correlated with depression (r = -0.345, p < 0.001). Depression seems to be a moderate predictor of a person's daily functionality (β = -0.389, p < 0.002), followed by visual acuity (β = -0.344, p = 0.006), explaining the 31.1% of the total variance.

Conclusions

The study supports a correlation between daily functionality and both depression and visual acuity. Optimism as a personality characteristic did not factor into the prediction model for daily functionality, but it showed a strong correlation with lower levels of depressive symptoms. This highlights the potential for developing coping strategies for chronic disease management. Recommendations. The study could serve as a useful guide and may urge clinicians to pay attention to the psychological evaluation of these patients, supporting their unique emotional needs. Mental health professionals can use patients' positive resources to provide appropriate counseling and embrace the coping skills that encourage their engagement in activities of daily life.

Innovations in Diabetic Macular Edema Management: A Comprehensive Review of Automated Quantification and Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Intervention

Diabetic macular edema (DME) poses a significant threat to the vision and quality of life of individuals with diabetes. This comprehensive review explores recent advancements in DME management, focusing on integrating automated quantification techniques and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) interventions. The review begins with an overview of DME, emphasizing its prevalence, impact on diabetic patients, and current challenges in management. It then delves into the potential of automated quantification, leveraging machine learning and artificial intelligence to improve early detection and monitoring. Concurrently, the role of anti-VEGF therapies in addressing the underlying vascular abnormalities in DME is scrutinized. The review synthesizes vital findings, highlighting the implications for the future of DME management. Promising outcomes from recent clinical trials and case studies are discussed, providing insights into the evolving landscape of personalized medicine approaches. The conclusion underscores the transformative potential of these innovations, calling for continued research, collaboration, and integration of these advancements into clinical practice. This review aims to serve as a roadmap for researchers, clinicians, and industry stakeholders, fostering a collective effort to enhance the precision and efficacy of DME management.

Expert Panel Consensus for Addressing Anti-VEGF Treatment Challenges of Diabetic Macular Edema in Spain

Purpose

The treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) has evolved rapidly in the past decade, highlighting the need to address the challenges of routine clinical practice decision-making through expert consensus agreements.

Methods

After a literature review and discussion of real-world experience on DME management, a group of ten retina specialists agreed on a consensus of recommendations for the most appropriate management of DME patients using vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGF) in Spain.

Results

The panel recommended early treatment initiation in DME patients with worse baseline visual acuity (VA) to maintain or improve outcome. For patients with good VA, an observation strategy was recommended, considering the presence of diabetic retinopathy, optical coherence tomography biomarkers, and impact on patient's quality of life. Based on the available evidence and clinical experience, the panel recommended the use of anti-VEGF intensive loading doses with the objective of achieving anatomic and visual responses as soon as possible, followed by a Treat & Extend (T&E) strategy to maintain VA improvement. Aflibercept was recommended for patients with a baseline decimal VA <0.5, followed by a T&E strategy, including the possibility to extend frequency of injections up to 16 weeks.

Conclusion

An expert panel proposes a consensus for the management of DME in Spain. Early treatment initiation with anti-VEGF in DME patients is recommended to maintain or improve VA; aflibercept is recommended for patients with a poor baseline VA.

Dosing Regimens of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Beyond the First Year: VIOLET, a Prospective Randomized Trial

INTRODUCTION

The purpose was to compare two flexible regimens of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) with fixed dosing every 8 weeks, beyond the first year of treatment, in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). VIOLET was a 100-week, randomized, Phase IIIb, non-inferiority study in patients with center-involving DME previously treated with IVT-AFL for ≥ 1 year according to the European label.

METHODS

Patients received an initial dose of IVT-AFL at study baseline and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to treat-and-extend (T&E), pro re nata (PRN), or fixed regimens. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline (randomization) to Week 52.

RESULTS

Full analysis set comprised 458 patients (baseline mean BCVA: 72.5, 71.0, and 72.7 letters in the T&E, PRN, and fixed-dose groups, respectively). Patients received a mean (min-max) of 10.0 (2-14; T&E), 11.5 (1-25; PRN), and 12.3 (3-13; fixed) injections over 100 weeks, with 13.3 (4-23), 25.0 (3-29), and 16.1 (5-25) clinic visits, respectively. At Week 52, mean (± standard deviation) BCVA changes from baseline were + 0.5 ± 6.7 (T&E), + 1.7 ± 6.8 (PRN), and + 0.4 ± 6.7 (fixed-dosing) letters (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]: T&E 0.01 [- 1.46, 1.47] and PRN 0.95 (- 0.52, 2.42) letters versus fixed dosing; p < 0.0001 for both non-inferiority tests [4-letter margin]). The IVT-AFL safety profile was consistent with previous studies.

CONCLUSION

The treatment burden associated with intravitreal injections for DME is lowest with T&E regimens, but there are a range of flexible IVT-AFL dosing regimens, allowing physicians to adopt an individualized treatment plan.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02818998.

Safety and outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept in diabetic macular edema - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence on the role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the pathogenesis of ischemia and microvascular hyperpermeability leading to macular edema has brought anti-VEGF intravitreal therapy into the limelight.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic literature review focusing on the outcomes and safety of the intravitreal use of aflibercept in diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

The studies documented cases with at least three consecutive intravitreal injections of aflibercept (IVA) repeated monthly with a follow-up period of at least one year. The outcomes were evaluated in terms of reported functional and anatomical improvement of the macula, as reflected by changes in visual acuity and macular thickness measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). In addition, for safety assessment, all reported local and general adverse effects were analyzed.

RESULTS

All studies showed an overall significant anatomical and functional improvement. In patients with the 5 IVA monthly at the beginning of the therapy, the visual gain at 52 weeks varied widely between 5 and 18.9 EDRS letters, with a mean value of 9.48 letters. The higher gain was obtained in treatment naïve patients, with worse VA and increased CST at baseline. The lower gain was obtained in patients previously treated with anti-VEGF. Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration-defined arterial thromboembolic events were not statistically different between the aflibercept group and the laser group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal aflibercept therapy provides significant improvement in visual acuity and a good safety profile. Randomized studies are needed to document the optimal frequency of intravitreal injections for optimal treatment.

Predictors of vision-related quality of life in patients with macular oedema receiving intra-vitreal anti-VEGF treatment

PURPOSE

To determine which demographic and clinical characteristics are predictive of vision-related quality of life (VrQoL) and quality of life (QoL) in patients with macular oedema receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment.

METHODS

Vision-related quality of life (VrQoL) and quality of life (QoL) were measured in 712 patients with retinal exudative disease receiving anti-VEGF treatment at baseline, 6 and 12 months. VrQoL was measured using an item-response theory based 47-question item bank (EyeQ), whereas QoL was measured using the EuroQol Five Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire. The EQ-5D score was dichotomized into a perfect score of 1 and a suboptimal score of <1. Demographic and clinical patient characteristics were considered as possible predictors of (Vr)QoL. Prediction models for (Vr)QoL were created with linear mixed models and generalised estimating equations, using a forward selection procedure.

RESULTS

A worse VrQoL was predicted by poorer LogMAR visual acuity of the better eye, female sex, single civil status, older age, longer length of anti-VEGF treatment at baseline and the presence of non-ocular and ocular comorbidities. Suboptimal EQ-5D scores were predicted by poorer LogMAR visual acuity of the better eye, female sex, single civil status, older age, the presence of non-ocular comorbidities and a lower educational background.

CONCLUSIONS

Along with visual acuity of the better eye, which is the main factor used in clinical decision making, other patient characteristics should also be considered for the risk assessment of (Vr)QoL, such as sex, age, civil status, comorbidities and length of anti-VEGF treatment.

Efficacy and safety of aflibercept therapy for diabetic macular edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose:

To assess the real-world efficacy and safety of aflibercept for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods:

A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases. Articles were included if participants had DME and received aflibercept treatment for a minimum of 52 ± 4 weeks. Primary outcomes included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). A risk of bias assessment of studies was completed, pooled estimates were obtained, and a meta-regression was performed. Information on adverse events was collected.

Results:

The search yielded 2112 articles, of which 30 were included. Aflibercept was more effective than laser photocoagulation functionally (12-month BCVA-weighted mean difference [WMD] = 10.77 letters, P < 0.001; 24 months = 8.12 letters, P < 0.001) and anatomically (12-month CMT WMD = –114.12 μm, P < 0.001; 24 months = –90.4 μm, P = 0.004). Compared to bevacizumab, aflibercept was noninferior at improving BCVA at 12 months (WMD = 1.71 letters, P = 0.34) and 24 months (WMD = 1.58 letters, P = 0.083). One study found that aflibercept was more effective than bevacizumab anatomically at 1 and 2 years (P < 0.001 at 12 and 24 months). Compared to ranibizumab, aflibercept rendered a greater improvement in BCVA at 1 year (WMD = 1.76 letters, P = 0.001), but not 2 years (WMD = 1.66 letters, P = 0.072). CMT was not significantly different between both therapies at 12 months (WMD = −14.30 μm, P = 0.282) and 24 months (P = 0.08). One study reported greater functional improvement with aflibercept compared with dexamethasone (P = 0.004), but inferiority in reducing CMT (P < 0.001). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that dosing schedule was found to impact outcomes at 12 and 24 months, while study design and sample size did not impact outcomes at 12 months. There were minimal safety concerns using aflibercept therapy.

Conclusions:

Aflibercept is a safe and effective therapy option for DME in the clinical setting, performing superiorly to laser photocoagulation. Evidence regarding comparisons with bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and dexamethasone is mixed and limited.

Long-term outcomes of intravitreal therapy for symptomatic diabetic macular oedema in a real-world setting in Switzerland

Objective

To assess the long-term visual outcomes in eyes with symptomatic diabetic macular oedema (DME) under intravitreal treatment (IVT) in a clinical routine setting.

Methods

Patients with newly diagnosed DME were included in this retrospective study if they had received at least three IVTs and a follow-up period ≥ 2 years. Due to altered treatment patterns since the approval of ranibizumab for DME in 2012, patients were subdivided according to their first IVT before 2013 (group 1) or thereafter (group 2). The primary outcome measure was the evolution of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over time.

Results

Of 217 eyes (191 patients) with DME, 151 eyes (117 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria (63 eyes in the first period, 88 in the second period). Mean follow-up time was 7.9 ± 3.1 (group 1) and 4.1 ± 1.4 years (group 2; p < 0.001). Visual gains were similar in the first year (group 1: + 5.3 ± 15.5, group 2: + 7.3 ± 12.2 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters; p = 0.44), but not thereafter (after 2 years in group 1: + 4.4 ± 15.0, group 2: + 8.3 ± 13.0 ETDRS letters; p = 0.038). During the first year, group 1 patients received less clinical examinations (group 1: 6.6 ± 3.3, group 2: 7.5 ± 2.1; p = 0.007) and less injections (group 1: 3.6 ± 2.7, group 2: 6.1 ± 2.7; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A greater visual gain, in response to more intensive treatment during the first year, was maintained for at least 5 years in group 2 subjects. Our data confirm that in a real-world setting, early intensive treatment results in satisfying long-term visual outcomes.

Managing Diabetic Macular Edema in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Strategies and Treatment Options

Purpose

This meta-analysis aims to summarize 12-month best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) outcomes in response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy and dexamethasone implant for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and to identify factors affecting treatment response using evidence generated from meta-regression.

Methods

A systematic review of electronic databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-life/observational studies that reported 12-month changes in BCVA in patients with DME on anti-VEGF or dexamethasone implant treatment in monotherapy. Study factors that were analyzed are baseline patient characteristics, study type, drug employed, number of injections and 12-month change in BCVA. Data were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis with BCVA change as the main outcome. Meta-regression was conducted to assess the impact of multiple covariates.

Results

One-hundred-five heterogeneous study populations (45,032 eyes) were identified and included in the analysis. The use of anti-VEGFs and dexamethasone implant induced an overall increase of +8.13 ETDRS letters in BCVA at 12 months of follow-up. Meta-regression provided evidence that mean BCVA change using anti-VEGFs was not statistically higher for RCTs (p=0.35) compared to observational studies. Dexamethasone implant showed a trend for better results in observational studies over RCTs. Populations following a fixed aflibercept regimen performed better than those following a reactive treatment regimen. Mean BCVA gain was higher in younger populations (p<0.001), with lower baseline BCVA (p<0.0001) and longer diabetes duration (p<0.0001), receiving a higher number of injections (p<0.0001).

Conclusion

Intravitreal therapy with anti-VEGFs or dexamethasone implant produces a significant improvement in BCVA at 12 months in patients with DME. Meta-regression identified the modifiable covariates that can be targeted in order to maximize functional results.

[Impact of a more stringent organization of intravitreal injection treatment on the number of treatments and examinations in routine practice]

BACKGROUND

Results from recent studies show that less intravitreal injections are often performed in everyday practice than in controlled trials, which subsequently leads to worse treatment success. In this study we analyzed the introduction of a more stringent organization of treatment using workflow optimization and new IT systems and analyzed the effect on treatment continuity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the second quarter of 2019 a new medical practice management software and a software for automated injection planning were implemented. There was also a change of the treatment regimen from pro re nata (PRN) to treat and extend (T&E ). We analyzed the results of the patients regarding the frequency of injections and treatment controls three quarters before (Q3/2018-Q1/2019) and three quarters after the change (Q2/2019-Q4/2019). Treatment-naive and pretreated patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

In group 1 (Q3/2018-Q1/2019) the average number of injections per quarter was 1.74 (SD = 0.4). Eyes of patients from group 2 (Q2/2019-Q4/2019) received on average 2.17 (SD = 0.3) injections. The number of check-ups per quarter was 1.71 (SD = 0.3) before the introduction, and thereafter 2.16 (SD = 0.3). There was a significant increase in the number of OCTs from 1.18 (SD = 0.2) to 1.98 (SD = 0.3). The visual acuity was stable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

We were able to show that the introduction of the medical practice management software and the change of the regimen from PRN to T&E can achieve numbers of injections, check-ups and OCT similar to those in studies. A standardized procedure facilitates efficient treatment planning and enables a better patient management.

Effects of Long-Term DME Control With 0.2 µg/Day Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant on Quality of Life: An Exploratory Analysis From the FAME Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Exploratory investigation of the effect of diabetic macular edema (DME) control with the 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant on quality of life (QOL) outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Post-hoc analysis of patients from the FAME study who received the FAc implant and had answered the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (NEI-VFQ-25) at baseline and Year 3 (N = 324). Patients were divided into quartiles (area under the curve [AUC]-central subfield thickness [CST]/day; n = 81/quartile). NEIVFQ-25 and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes were analyzed per quartile during a period of 3 years.

RESULTS

NEI-VFQ-25 scores were significantly higher in patients with low AUC-CST/day (Quartiles 1 [P < .001] and 2 [P = .004]). Increases in NEIVFQ-25 subscale scores correlated with AUC-CST/day quartiles. BCVA significantly improved in patients with the lowest AUC-CST/day (Quartiles 1 and 2 [P < .001]).

CONCLUSION

There was a positive and sustained correlation between the long-term control of DME and patient-reported QOL outcomes for up to 3 years following a single FAc implant in patients with controlled DME. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:658-667.].