Intra-arterial Chemotherapy as Primary Treatment for Cavitary Retinoblastoma: Excellent Response in Eight Tumors

Cavitary retinoblastoma: A review of literature

Cavitary retinoblastoma is a rare tumor variant manifesting in the form of ophthalmoscopically visible translucent cavities within the tumor. The pathogenesis of the cavitary variant is unknown. Histopathologically, the cavitary spaces represent photoreceptor differentiation in the areas adjacent to the cavitations, which might explain variable response to chemotherapy with lower risk of reactivation and good prognosis. There is, however, little understanding about its origin, frequency, pathogenesis, and clinical significance. In this systematic review of the literature, we analyze epidemiology, clinical presentation, genetic implications, imaging, and treatment outcomes of various regimens (intravenous, intra-arterial, and focal) in terms of local control, recurrences, and globe salvage rates.

Efficacy, Toxicity, and Pharmacokinetics of Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy Versus Intravenous Chemotherapy for Retinoblastoma in Animal Models and Patients

Purpose

Through controlled comparative rabbit experiments and parallel patient studies, our purpose was to understand mechanisms underlying differences in efficacy and toxicity between intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) and intravenous chemotherapy (IVC).

Methods

In rabbits, ocular tissue drug levels were measured following IAC and IVC. Retinal toxicity was assessed using electroretinography, fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography. Efficacy to eradicate retinoblastoma orthotopic xenografts was compared. In IAC and IVC patients, we measured blood carboplatin pharmacokinetics and compared efficacy and toxicity.

Results

In rabbits receiving IAC, maximum carboplatin levels were 134 times greater in retina (P = 0.01) and 411 times greater in vitreous (P < 0.001), and total carboplatin (area under the curve) was 123 times greater in retina (P = 0.005) and 131 times greater in vitreous (P = 0.02) compared with IVC. Melphalan levels were 12 times greater (P = 0.003) in retina and 26 times greater in vitreous (P < 0.001) for IAC. Blood levels were not different. IAC melphalan (but not IV melphalan or IV carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine) caused widespread apoptosis in retinoblastoma xenografts but no functional retinal toxicity or cytopenias. In patients, blood levels following IVC were greater (P < 0.001) but, when adjusted for treatment dose, were not statistically different. Per treatment cycle in patients, IVC caused higher rates of anemia (0.32 ± 0.29 vs. 0.01 ± 0.04; P = 0.0086), thrombocytopenia (0.5 ± 0.42 vs. 0.0 ± 0.0; P = 0.0042), and neutropenia (0.58 ± 0.3 vs. 0.31 ± 0.25; P = 0.032) but lower treatment success rates (P = 0.0017).

Conclusions

The greater efficacy and lower systemic toxicity with IAC appear to be attributable to the greater ocular-to-systemic drug concentration ratio compared with IVC.

Translational Relevance

Provides an overarching hypothesis for a mechanism of efficacy/toxicity to guide future drug development.