1
|
Babst N, Gniesmer S, Sonntag SR, Furashova O, Krestanova G, Heindl LM, Müller M, Grisanti S, Kakkassery V. [Clinical approach for solid intraocular metastases]. DIE OPHTHALMOLOGIE 2024; 121:352-365. [PMID: 38649497 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-024-02031-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraocular metastases arising from solid tumors are found in approximately 2% of patients with metastatic tumor diseases and are therefore more frequent than originally assumed. They often affect the uvea and are associated with a poor prognosis. Due to the difficult diagnosis and an inconsistent treatment regimen, ophthalmologists have a special responsibility here. OBJECTIVE This article gives a summary of the various types of intraocular metastases with respect to clinical features, diagnostics, treatment and prognosis as well as recommendations for follow-up care. METHODS A selective literature search was carried out on the topic of intraocular metastases using PubMed and Google Scholar. RESULTS Intraocular metastases most frequently affect the uvea, specifically the choroid. In most cases the underlying disease is breast or lung cancer, but other rarer primary tumors have also been reported in the literature. Metastatic lesions can show very different morphological manifestations but can be distinguished based on the corresponding structure of manifestation in the eye and with the aid of targeted staging, thus providing valid information on the type of primary tumor. The treatment is partly experimental and usually depends on the primary tumor and leading symptoms of the patient. A differentiation between a curative or palliative treatment situation must always be made. CONCLUSION Intraocular metastases are the most frequent intraocular tumor and are usually associated with a poor prognosis. Accurate diagnostics for finding the treatment as well as interdisciplinary collaboration and the presentation of the patient on the tumor board are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neele Babst
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland.
| | - Stefanie Gniesmer
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Svenja Rebecca Sonntag
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Olga Furashova
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Deutschland
| | | | - Ludwig Maximilian Heindl
- Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Köln, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
- Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO) Aachen-Bonn-Köln-Düsseldorf, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Martin Müller
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Immunologie, Klinikum Region Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Salvatore Grisanti
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Vinodh Kakkassery
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kang HG, Kim JD, Lee J, Byeon SH, Kim SS, Kim M. Clinical features, treatment factors, and long-term outcomes of optic disc pit maculopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2022; 260:2867-2875. [PMID: 35445878 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05661-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the clinical features, treatment factors, and long-term visual and anatomical outcomes of optic disc pit maculopathy (ODPM) in Korean patients. METHODS Consecutive patients diagnosed between January 2000 and September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomical changes (determined by macular thickness reduction and fluid resorption). Secondary outcomes included factors associated with poor visual outcomes (> 3-line decrease or < 20/200 vision). RESULTS Of the 24 eyes (24 patients, mean age, 42.8 years) in this study, two peak incidence groups were noted: children younger than 14 years (six patients; mean age, 9.7 years) and middle-aged adults (18 patients; 53.8 years). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of clinical features, treatment, and outcomes (P > 0.05). The primary treatment involved immediate (7 eyes) or delayed (9) vitrectomy, laser only (2), or observation only (6). Good (50%) or partial (33%) anatomical response was noted in most cases at the final follow-up (P > 0.05). However, regression analyses showed that poor visual outcomes were associated with low preoperative BCVA (OR, 8.73; 95%CI, 1.34-56.85; P = 0.023) and delayed vitrectomy (OR, 13.00; 95%CI, 1.70-99.38; P = 0.013), while presence of intraretinal fluid in the inner and outer layers reduced the risk (OR, 0.086; 95%CI, 0.01-0.88; P = 0.039). CONCLUSION Patients with ODPM may have two peak incidence groups with similar clinical features and treatment outcomes, supporting the idea of heterogeneous mechanisms triggering fluid accumulation. Although the primary treatment choice may not impact long-term anatomical outcomes, delayed vitrectomy may be associated with poorer visual outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Goo Kang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Severance Eye Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Translational Genome Informatics Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Dong Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Eonjuro 211, Gangnam-gu, 06273, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Junwon Lee
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Eonjuro 211, Gangnam-gu, 06273, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Suk Ho Byeon
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Severance Eye Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Soo Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Severance Eye Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Eonjuro 211, Gangnam-gu, 06273, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|