The Use of Preoperative Prophylactic Systemic Antibiotics for the Prevention of Endopthalmitis in Open Globe Injuries: A Meta-Analysis

Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies

Intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) remain a severe complication of ocular trauma commonly encountered worldwide. This literature review aimed to discuss current practice patterns, areas of controversy, and advances in the management of IOFBs. Injuries involving IOFBs carry significant ocular morbidity and management can be extremely challenging. A systematic approach to preoperative evaluation and IOFB surgical management is detailed in this article and should be applied in each case. The location and composition of an IOFB have important implications on surgical approach and timing, especially in cases of toxic metals and vegetable matter. The advantages, disadvantages, and previous literature regarding immediate versus delayed foreign body removal are presented. Surgical approaches are described, with an emphasis on posterior chamber IOFB management and removal via pars plana vitrectomy. Final visual acuity is variable, but approaches have been used to prognosticate outcomes including the Ocular Trauma Score. By synthesizing current IOFB literature, the goal is to provide practitioners with guidance that will maximize the chances of surgical success and patient outcomes.

Early versus Delayed Timing of Primary Repair after Open-Globe Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

TOPIC

The timing of primary repair of open-globe injury is variable in major trauma centers worldwide, and consensus on optimal timing is lacking.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgery is the mainstay of open-globe injury management, and appropriate timing of surgical repair may minimize the risk of potentially blinding complications such as endophthalmitis, thereby optimizing visual outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews identifier, CRD42023442972). The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, and ISRCTN registries and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception through October 29, 2023. Prospective and retrospective nonrandomized studies of patients with open-globe injury with a minimum of 1 month of follow-up after primary repair were included. Primary outcomes included visual acuity at last follow-up and the proportion of patients with endophthalmitis. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, reporting a total of 8497 eyes. The most common injury types were penetrating and intraocular foreign body (IOFB). Meta-analysis found that primary repair less than 24 hours after open-globe injury was associated with 0.30 odds of endophthalmitis compared with primary repair conducted more than 24 hours after trauma (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.79; I2 = 95%; P = 0.01). No significant difference was found in reported visual outcomes between patients whose open-globe injuries were repaired more than, compared with less than, 24 hours after trauma (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.61-1.29; I2 = 70%; P = 0.52). All included studies were retrospective and nonrandomized, demonstrating an overall low certainty of evidence on GRADE assessment.

DISCUSSION

Only retrospective data exist around the effect of timing of open-globe repair, resulting in low certainty of the available evidence. However, this review of current evidence, predominantly including penetrating and IOFB injuries, suggests that primary repair performed less than 24 hours after open-globe injury is associated with a reduced endophthalmitis rate compared with longer delays, consistent with delay to primary repair increasing endophthalmitis risk.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Management of open globe injury: a narrative review

Open globe injuries are a significant global cause of visual loss, including unilateral and bilateral blindness. Prognosis is predicted by injury severity, with lower presenting visual acuity and more posterior injuries associated with poor visual outcomes, although even the most severely injured eyes with no perception of light vision may regain some visual function. In addition to severity of the primary injury, the secondary injuries and complications causing poor outcomes include proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis is common after open globe injury, affecting up to 16.5% of patients. Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis is commonly used, with a limited evidence base, while intraocular antibiotics are less commonly used but have stronger supporting evidence of efficacy. Endophthalmitis rates are also reduced by prompt primary repair, which may also support recovery of visual acuity. PVR is not prevented or treated by any pharmacologic interventions in current clinical practice, but the incidence of post-traumatic PVR may be reduced by early vitrectomy within the first 4-7 days after injury. Ocular trauma training is often limited in Western ophthalmic surgical training programmes, and patients with ocular trauma often require the input of multiple subspecialists. In this context, it is important that patients have an overview and coordination of the different aspects of their care, with ownership by one lead clinician.