Lombardo L, D'Ercole A, Latini MC, Siciliani G. Optimal parameters for final position of teeth in space closure in case of a missing upper lateral incisor.
Prog Orthod 2014;
15:63. [PMID:
25427543 PMCID:
PMC4245477 DOI:
10.1186/s40510-014-0063-8]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2014] [Accepted: 10/31/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to provide clinical indications for the correct management of appliances in space closure treatment of patients with agenesis of the upper lateral incisors.
Methods
Virtual setup for space closure was performed in 30 patients with upper lateral incisor agenesis. Tip, torque and in-out values were measured and compared with those of previous authors.
Results
In the upper dentition, the tip values were comparable to those described by Andrews (Am J Orthod 62(3):296-309, 1972), except for at the first premolars, which require a greater tip, and the first molars, a lesser tip. The torque values showed no differences except for at the canines, where it was greater, and the in-out values were between those reported by Andrews and those by Watanabe et al. (The Shikwa Gakuho 96:209-222, 1996) (except for U3 and U4).
Conclusions
The following prescriptions are advisable: tip 5°, torque 8° and in-out 2.5 for U1; tip 9°, torque 3° and in-out 3.25 for U3; tip 10°, torque −8° and in-out 3.75 for U4; and tip 5°, torque −8° and in-out 4 for U5. Andrews' prescription is suitable for the lower jaw, except for at L6. It is also advisable to execute selective grinding (1.33 ± 0.5 mm) and extrusion (0.68 ± 0.23 mm) on the upper canine during treatment, and the first premolar requires some intrusion (0.56 ± 0.30 mm).
Collapse