Badepalli RR, Kuttimani A, Cr V, Polisetty SK, Rajan J, Antony T. Comparative Analysis of Pharyngeal Airway Changes Following All Four Versus All Five Premolar Extractions in Orthodontic Treatments: A Cephalometric Study.
Cureus 2024;
16:e60393. [PMID:
38882986 PMCID:
PMC11179032 DOI:
10.7759/cureus.60393]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Orthodontic treatment, particularly involving premolar extractions, has been a subject of ongoing debate within the orthodontic community. The impact of such interventions on the pharyngeal airway, a critical component of the respiratory system, remains a topic of exploration.
OBJECTIVE
This retrospective cephalometric study aims to investigate changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following orthodontic treatment involving either all four or all five premolar extractions.
METHODS
A sample of 68 participants, extracted from orthodontic records, underwent cephalometric analysis to quantify changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions. The study compared two groups: those treated with all four premolar extractions (n=34) and those treated with all five premolar extractions (n=34). Cephalometric radiographs taken before and after treatment were analyzed, focusing on airway width, length, and volume.
RESULTS
Preliminary findings indicate significant changes in airway dimensions within each group. In the all four premolar extraction group, there was a statistically significant decrease in airway width (p=0.02) and volume (p=0.04). Similarly, the all five premolar extraction group exhibited significant reductions in airway width (p=0.03) and volume (p=0.02). However, the between-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in changes between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
This study sheds light on the intricate relationship between orthodontic interventions, specifically premolar extractions, and changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions. While significant changes were observed within each group, the lack of significant differences between the all four and all five premolar extraction groups raises intriguing questions about the specific impact of premolar extraction patterns on the upper airway.
Collapse