Transoral Endoscopic Surgery

Resection of Tumors at the Root of the Tongue and Free Flap Reconstruction: Midline Split With Bilateral Lingual Artery Preservation

The removal of tumors at the root of the tongue can be challenging due to anatomic constraints (deep location of the root of the tongue, obstruction by the mandible), leading to poor surgical visibility. Clear visibility of the surgical field is crucial for complete excision to reduce recurrence, hence the need to choose an appropriate surgical approach based on the tumor's location and size. In this report, the authors describe a case where a midline mandibulotomy and temporary midline glossectomy were utilized to expose and resect a tumor at the root of the tongue. This approach allowed for the complete removal of the tumor while preserving the anterior tongue tissue and bilateral lingual arteries. The defect was then reconstructed using an anterolateral thigh flap. The patient showed good postoperative recovery with significant improvement in swallowing and speech functions. The authors emphasize that the surgical treatment of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) at the root of the tongue should strive to ensure radical tumor removal while preserving surrounding healthy tissues and critical anatomic structures, particularly the lingual arteries, to facilitate better postoperative recovery for patients.

Transoral Laser Microsurgery versus Robot-Assisted Surgery for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue Base (Oncological and Functional Results)-A Retrospective GETTEC Multicenter Study

The base of the tongue (BOT) is the second most common site for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the oropharynx. There are currently no clear guidelines for the management of BOT SCC. Our main objective was to compare the oncological outcomes of two minimally invasive approaches, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robot-assisted surgery (TORS). This was a retrospective French GETTEC (Groupe d'Études des Tumeurs de la Tête et du Cou) multicenter study of patients with BOT SCC removed surgically either by TLM or TORS between 2005 and 2021. The study group included 16 patients treated by TLM and 38 by TORS, with median follow-up times of 14.4 and 37.2 months, respectively. The overall survival (OS) rates at 2 and 3 years were 67% in the TLM group and 90% at 2 years and 86% at 3 years in the TORS group (p = 0.42, p = 0.20). There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the two techniques after 2 and 3 years. The tumors removed by TORS were significantly larger. Operative times were significantly shorter in the TLM group. There were no differences in feeding resumption; none of the patients in the TLM group required a tracheotomy. Postoperative hemorrhagic complication rates were similar in the two groups (12% for TLM and 13% for TORS). Both TORS and TLM showed encouraging oncological, functional, and safety results in BOT SCC even in recurrence or second primary cancer patients, without a technique being found superior in terms of OS or RFS. Tumors removed by TORS were larger without an increase in postoperative bleeding, extending the possibilities of transoral treatment.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2022

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses. Occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM) are also addressed. The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's most recent recommendations regarding management of HPV-positive oropharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.

The impact of socioeconomic and geographic factors on access to transoral robotic/endoscopic surgery for early stage oropharyngeal malignancy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of social and geographic factors on the likelihood of receiving transoral robotic surgery (TORS) or non-robotic transoral endoscopic surgery treatment in early stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried to form a cohort of patients with T1-T2 N0-N1 M0 OPSCC (AJCC v.7) who underwent treatment from 2010 to 2016. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment type, social, and geographic factors were all collected. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were then performed.

RESULTS

Among 9267 identified patients, 1774 (19.1%) received transoral robotic surgery (TORS), 1191 (12.9%) received transoral endoscopic surgery, and 6302 (68%) received radiation therapy. We found that lower cancer stage, lower comorbidity burden and HPV- positive status predicted a statistically significant increased likelihood of receiving surgery. Patients who reside in suburban or small urban areas (>1 million population), were low-to- middle income, or rely on Medicaid were less likely to receive surgery. Patients that reside in Medicaid-expansion states were more likely to receive TORS (p > .0001). Patients that reside in states that expanded Medicaid January 2014 and after were more likely to receive non-robotic transoral endoscopic surgery (p > .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Poorer baseline health, lower socioeconomic status and residence in small urban areas may act as barriers to accessing minimally invasive transoral surgery while residence in a Medicaid-expansion state may improve access. Barriers to accessing robotic surgery may be greater than accessing non-robotic surgery.

The CO2 waveguide laser with flexible fiber in transoral resection of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: a retrospective cohort study on postoperative and quality of life outcomes

The aim of this study was to evaluate the CO₂ waveguide laser (WG CO₂ laser) with flexible fiber (Lumenis Ltd., Yokneam, Israel) in the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers, specifically focusing on postoperative outcomes, pain, and quality of life (QoL). Eighty-one patients, 43 women and 38 men, with oral or oropharyngeal cancer who consecutively underwent transoral resection by WG CO₂ laser from August 2015 to April 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Resections were performed in super pulsed mode with a power setting ranging between 3 and 10 W. Data about frozen sections, reconstruction, complication rate, length of hospital stay, tracheostomy rate and time to decannulation, nasogastric feeding tube rate and time to oral feeding, pain, and QoL were reviewed. Continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation. Concordance between intraoperative frozen section examination and definitive histology was calculated using Cohen's K test of agreement. The mean length of hospital stay was 13 days. The feeding tube rate was 81%; the tracheostomy rate was 35%; the feeding tube was left in place for 8 days on average, and the time to decannulation was 9 days. The only complication was a postoperative bleeding in 4 patients. The median postoperative pain score measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 was 0 and there was a constant decrease in painkiller use over the days. The overall mean composite QoL score was 77 ± 14, with excellent results in saliva, taste, pain, and speech domains. Frozen section evaluation had a specificity of 99% and a negative predictive value of 98%. WG CO₂ laser is a good and safe tool for transoral tailored resection of oral and oropharyngeal cancers. It ensures a good overall QoL and guarantees fast recovery and a very low postoperative pain.

Oncologic outcomes of human papillomavirus-associated oropharynx carcinoma treated with surgery alone: A 12-institution study of 344 patients

BACKGROUND

The oncologic outcomes of surgery alone for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition (AJCC 7th) pN2a and pN2b human papillomavirus-associated oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+OPSCC) are not clear.

METHODS

The authors performed a 12-institution retrospective study of 344 consecutive patients with HPV+OPSCC (AJCC 7th pT0-3 N3 M0) treated with surgery alone with 6 months or more of follow-up using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The 2-year outcomes for the entire cohort were 91% (182 of 200) disease-free survival (DFS), 100% (200 of 200) disease-specific survival (DSS), and 98% (200 of 204) overall survival (OS). The 18 recurrences within 2 years were 88.9% (16 of 18) local and/or regional recurrences and 11.1% (2 of 18) distant metastases. Recurrences were not significantly associated with smoking, pT stage, or pN stage. The 16 patients with locoregional recurrences within 2 years all underwent successful salvage treatments (median follow-up after salvage: 13.1 months), 43.8% (7 of 16) of whom underwent salvage surgery alone for a 2-year overall salvage radiation need of 4.5% (9 of 200). The 2-year outcomes for the 59 evaluable patients among the 109 AJCC 7th pT0-2 N2a-N2b patients with 1 to 3 pathologic lymph nodes (LNs) were as follows: local recurrence, 3.4% (2 of 59); regional recurrence, 8.4% (5 of 59); distant metastases, 0%; DFS, 88.1% (52 of 59); DSS, 100% (59 of 59); OS, 96.7% (59 of 61); and salvage radiation, 5.1% (3 of 59).

CONCLUSIONS

With careful selection, surgery alone for AJCC 7th pT0-T2N0-N2b HPV+OPSCC with zero to 3 pathologic LNs without perineural invasion, extranodal extension, or positive margins results in high DFS, DSS, OS, and salvage treatment success. Because of the short-term follow-up, these data support further investigation of treatment de-escalation in this population.

Post-operative outcomes of different surgical approaches to oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: a case-matched study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the post-operative outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery, lateral pharyngotomy and transmandibular surgery in oropharyngeal cancer management.

METHODS

Records of 162 patients treated with transmandibular surgery, transoral laser microsurgery or lateral pharyngotomy were reviewed. The transoral laser microsurgery cohort was matched with the lateral pharyngotomy and transmandibular surgery cohorts for tumour stage, tumour subsite and human papilloma virus status, and the intra- and post-operative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Duration of surgery and hospital stay were significantly longer for transmandibular surgery. Tracheostomy and nasogastric feeding tube rates were similar, but time to decannulation and to oral feeding were longer in the transmandibular surgery group. Transmandibular surgery more frequently required flap reconstruction and had a greater complication rate. Negative margins were fewer in the lateral pharyngotomy group than in the transoral laser microsurgery and transmandibular surgery groups.

CONCLUSION

In comparison with transmandibular surgery, transoral laser microsurgery and lateral pharyngotomy were associated with fewer complications and faster functional recovery. Lateral pharyngotomy had a higher rate of positive margins than transoral laser microsurgery, with a consequently greater need for adjuvant therapy. Many patients are nonetheless unsuitable for transoral surgery. All these factors should be considered when deciding on oropharyngeal cancer surgical treatment.

Endoscopic-Assisted Oropharyngectomy for Early Oropharyngeal Cancer in Trismus Patients

Objective: Management of the early-stage oropharyngeal carcinoma in trismus patients underlying with multiple head and neck cancer history is a clinical challenge because minimal invasive surgery such as transoral robotic surgery or transoral laser microsurgery is contraindicated, while open surgery or concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) wound cause long-term adverse effect. Therefore, we developed a novel endoscopic surgical approach for these patients. Methods: Four patients were enrolled for endoscopic-assisted oropharyngectomy. The oropharyngeal tumor was resected with an adequate margin via a one-surgeon bimanual approach with the aid of a high-resolution videoendoscopic system, scope holder, and designed surgical instruments. The postoperative surgical margin status, trismus status, perioperative complication, average hospital stay, and follow-up period were recorded. Results: The endoscopic-assisted oropharyngectomy was successfully applied in all 4 patients with en bloc tumor excision and adequate free margin status. The mean hospital stay was 6.5 days, and all patients could tolerate oral diet within 2 weeks. There was no perioperative complication noted. No tumor recurrence was identified in patients followed up 2 years after surgery. Conclusion: Endoscopic-assisted oropharyngectomy for patients with trismus and multiple head and neck cancer history is a safe, minimal invasive, and effective treatment choice other than open surgery or CCRT. It provides a safe option for patients with limited mouth opening.

Innovations and Future Directions in Head and Neck Microsurgical Reconstruction

Head and neck reconstructive microsurgery is constantly innovating because of a combination of multidisciplinary advances. This article examines recent innovations that have affected the field as well as presenting research leading to future advancement. Innovations include the use of virtual surgical planning and three-dimensional printing in craniofacial reconstruction, advances in intraoperative navigation and imaging, as well as postoperative monitoring, development of minimally invasive reconstructive microsurgery techniques, integration of regenerative medicine and stem cell biology with reconstruction, and the dramatic advancement of face transplant.

Review of surgical resection and reconstruction in head and neck cancer. Traditional versus current concepts

This review summarizes the development of head and neck cancer resection and reconstruction. The developments in the treatment of cancer patients are reflected in their surgical outcomes, in addition to functional and aesthetic improvements. New technologies, such as surgical simulation and planning, minimally invasive surgery, and microsurgery have been added to the field to improve surgical resection of the tumor and reconstruction. The field is still growing to optimize the management of head and neck cancer.

Radiotherapy Alone or With Chemotherapy in the Management of Carcinoma of the Supraglottic Larynx: A 25-Year Community Hospital Experience

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review outcomes for patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx at a community hospital and to compare our results with the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Treatment records of 46 patients with localized carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx treated from January 1987 through January 2012 were reviewed. Overall, 18 (39%) presented with stage I or II disease, whereas 28 (61%) presented with stage III to IV. In total, 30 patients (65%) were treated using hyperfractionation, whereas 16 (35%) received once-daily fractionation. Twelve patients (26%) received concurrent chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess outcomes.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the living patients was 6.7 years (range, 1.7 to 23.1 y). At 5 years, the local-regional control (LRC), ultimate LRC, laryngeal preservation, and overall survival (OS) rates were 70%, 82%, 65%, and 53%, respectively. At 5 years, disease-free survival and cause-specific survival rates were 75% and 76%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates by American Joint Committee on Cancer stage were as follows: I to II, 61%; III, 51%; and IV, 44%. For those receiving concurrent chemotherapy, there was no improvement in 5-year LRC (83% vs. 66%; P=0.4081) or OS (55% vs. 50%; P=0.7697). For those receiving hyperfractionation, there was no improvement in 5-year LRC (75% vs. 63%; P=0.3369) or OS (55% vs. 50%; P=0.4161).

CONCLUSIONS

Our outcomes are similar to those reported in the literature. Neither hyperfractionation nor chemotherapy appeared to confer a benefit for disease control or OS possibly owing to small sample size and the inherent bias of a retrospective review.

Transoral endoscopic head and neck surgery (eHNS) for minor salivary gland tumors of the oropharynx

Background

Transoral endoscopic head and neck surgery (eHNS), including transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS), provides access to subsites in the head and neck that have traditionally been difficult to approach. Minor salivary gland tumors, while relatively uncommon, are frequently malignant and can occur at sites in the oropharynx accessible by transoral eHNS. Presented here is the largest review to date of patients with minor salivary gland tumors of the oropharynx managed with transoral eHNS as primary or salvage therapy.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed, including data from 20 patients with minor salivary gland tumors of the oropharynx managed with transoral eHNS at 2 tertiary, academic medical centers. Details of tumor pathology, margin analysis, adjuvant therapy, and an assessment of oncologic outcome were included.

Results

The base of tongue was the most common tumor site (75%). Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) accounted for most cases (35%), and negative margins were obtained in most (95%) through an endoscopic-only approach. Overall, 50% of patients received post-operative radiation therapy. Postoperative complications were limited, with one patient (5%) returning to the OR for control of post-operative oropharyngeal bleeding. On average follow-up of 36 months, 90% of patients were alive with no evidence of recurrence.

Conclusion

In this experience, transoral eHNS provided a safe and consistent surgical approach to management of minor salivary gland malignancies, with low complication rates and good locoregional control. Thus, transoral eHNS may play a valuable role in the multi-disciplinary management of these malignancies.

Trial registration number

None/not applicable

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41199-017-0024-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Utility of the Highly Articulated Flex Robotic System for Head and Neck Procedures: A Cadaveric Study

OBJECTIVE

Robotic head and neck surgery potentially reduces the morbidity associated with traditional open procedures. This study's goal was to employ a novel highly articulated robotic system (Flex Robotic System) for head and neck procedures, including a postauricular facelift approach thyroidectomy, submandibular gland (SMG) removal, and cervical lymphadenectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

It was hypothesized that the Medrobotics Flex Robotic System could be used for transcervical head and neck surgical procedures.

METHODS

Three fresh upper body human cadavers were used. The Flex Robotic System was used to complete a thyroidectomy, neck dissection, and SMG removal on each cadaver.

RESULTS

A postauricular incision and flap was manually raised. The robotic system was positioned on the right side of the cadaver's head. The system's manually controlled flexible instruments and highly shapeable, robot-assisted scope were used to perform a thyroid lobectomy. Neck dissection and SMG removal were also performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a promising technology, the current robotic system (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale, California, USA) has limitations due to its rigid and large configuration, which decreases exposure and access. The new system's shapeable, computer-assisted scope seeks to reduce some of these difficulties and may be better adapted for transcervical approaches to the neck operations.

Comparative Performance in Single-Port Versus Multiport Minimally Invasive Surgery, and Small Versus Large Operative Working Spaces: A Preclinical Randomized Crossover Trial

BACKGROUND

Surgical approaches such as transanal endoscopic microsurgery, which utilize small operative working spaces, and are necessarily single-port, are particularly demanding with standard instruments and have not been widely adopted. The aim of this study was to compare simultaneously surgical performance in single-port versus multiport approaches, and small versus large working spaces.

METHODS

Ten novice, 4 intermediate, and 1 expert surgeons were recruited from a university hospital. A preclinical randomized crossover study design was implemented, comparing performance under the following conditions: (1) multiport approach and large working space, (2) multiport approach and intermediate working space, (3) single-port approach and large working space, (4) single-port approach and intermediate working space, and (5) single-port approach and small working space. In each case, participants performed a peg transfer and pattern cutting tasks, and each task repetition was scored.

RESULTS

Intermediate and expert surgeons performed significantly better than novices in all conditions (P < .05). Performance in single-port surgery was significantly worse than multiport surgery (P < .01). In multiport surgery, there was a nonsignificant trend toward worsened performance in the intermediate versus large working space. In single-port surgery, there was a converse trend; performances in the intermediate and small working spaces were significantly better than in the large working space.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-port approaches were significantly more technically challenging than multiport approaches, possibly reflecting loss of instrument triangulation. Surprisingly, in single-port approaches, in which triangulation was no longer a factor, performance in large working spaces was worse than in intermediate and small working spaces.

Transoral robotic surgery vs. radiotherapy for management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma - A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with or without concurrent chemotherapy is widely utilized for the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). However, due to significant acute and late toxicities there has been increasing interest in minimally invasive surgical approaches, particularly transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in an attempt to preserve patient quality of life while maintaining oncologic outcomes. The aim of this study was to review the current literature in order to compare primary IMRT versus TORS in the management of OPSCC.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify studies reporting on the outcomes of TORS or IMRT in the treatment of OPSCC. Reference lists were also reviewed for relevant articles. Oncologic, functional, and quality of life data is summarized and discussed.

RESULTS

One hundred-ninety papers were identified through the MEDLINE search. An additional 52 papers were retrieved by hand searching the reference lists. Ultimately, 44 papers were identified that discussed outcomes after IMRT or TORS for OPSCC. No outcomes from randomized trials were identified.

CONCLUSION

No randomized trials comparing TORS versus IMRT to each other were identified. Uncontrolled reports from the current literature suggest comparable oncologic outcomes with TORS compared to IMRT and functional outcomes may be superior. However, the median follow-up was relatively short and the TORS studies included patients with earlier stage OPSCC on average compared to IMRT studies. Prospective, randomized controlled trials and direct, well-matched comparisons are needed to further elucidate the role for TORS in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Transoral surgery for laryngo-pharyngeal cancer - The paradigm shift of the head and cancer treatment

Transoral surgery is a less invasive treatment that is becoming a major strategy in the treatment of laryngo-pharyngeal cancer. It is a minimally invasive approach that has no skin incision and limits the extent of tissue dissection, disruption of speech and swallowing muscles, blood loss, damage to major neurovascular structures, and injury to normal tissue. Transoral approaches to the laryngo-pharynx, except for early glottis cancer, had been limited traditionally to tumors that can be observed directly and manipulated with standard instrumentation and lighting. Since the 1990s, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) has been used as an organ preservation strategy with good oncological control and good functional results, although it has not been widely used because of its technical difficulty. Recently, transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is becoming popular as a new treatment modality for laryngo-pharyngeal cancer, and surgical robots are used widely in the world since United States FDA approval in 2009. In spite of the global spread of TORS, it has not been approved by the Japan FDA, which has led to the development of other low-cost transoral surgical techniques in Japan. Transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS) was developed as a new transoral surgery system for laryngo-pharyngeal lesions to address the problems of TLM. In TOVS, a rigid endoscope is used to visualize the surgical field instead of a microscope and the advantages of TOVS include the wide operative field and working space achieved using the distending laryngoscope and videolaryngoscope. Also, with the spread of narrow band imaging (NBI), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), which are widely used for superficial cancers in the gastrointestinal tract, have been applied for the superficial laryngo-pharyngeal cancer. Both EMR and ESD are performed mainly by gastroenterologists with a sharp dissector and magnifying endoscopy (ME)-NBI with minimal surgical margin. Endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery (ELPS) was developed to treat laryngo-pharyngeal superficial cancer by modifying the ESD procedure. The concept of ELPS is the same as that of ESD, however, the resection procedure is performed by a head and neck surgeon with both hands using a ME-NBI and rigid curved laryngo-pharyngoscope. These four procedures are low cost with similar oncological and functional outcomes to TORS. TORS may be less expensive than chemoradiotherapy, but the number of hospitals that can afford da Vinci surgical systems is limited. Even in the era of robotic surgery, these four procedures will be good options for laryngo-pharyngeal cancer.

Robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer

Oropharyngeal cancer represents a growing proportion of head and neck malignancies. This has been associated with the increase in infection of the oropharynx by oncogenic strains of human papillomavirus (HPV). Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has opened the door for minimally invasive surgery for HPV-related and non-HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer. Compared to traditional open surgical approaches, TORS has been shown to improve functional outcomes in speech and swallowing, while maintaining good oncologic outcomes.