2
|
Outcome of Early-Stage Glottic Laryngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated with Radical Radiotherapy Using Different Techniques. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2019; 2019:8640549. [PMID: 31781218 PMCID: PMC6874992 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8640549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The aim was to evaluate the treatment outcomes and prognostic characteristics of patients with early-stage glottic laryngeal carcinoma who underwent radical radiotherapy (RT) with different techniques. Patients and Methods Radiotherapy was applied using the 2D conventional technique between 1991 and 2004 (130 patients), 3DCRT until 2014 (125 patients), and by VMAT until January 2017 (44 patients). Clinical T stages were 38 (12.7%) for Tis, 209 (69.9%) for T1, and 52 (17.4%) for T2. Radiotherapy technique and energy, anterior commissure involvement, and stage were analyzed as prognostic factors. Results The median total dose was 66 (50–70) Gy, and median follow-up time was 72 (3–288) months; 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 95.8%, 95.5%, and 88.6%, respectively, in Tis, T1, and T2 stages. In multivariate analyses, anterior commissure involvement was found significant for all survival and local control rates. The patients treated with VMAT technique had better local control and DSS rates. However, these results were not statistically significant. Conclusion In early-stage laryngeal carcinomas, radical RT is a function sparing and effective treatment modality, regardless of treatment techniques.
Collapse
|
3
|
Puram SV, Bhattacharyya N. Surgery versus radiation for T1 glottic carcinoma: Second primary considerations. Laryngoscope 2019; 129:2713-2715. [PMID: 30767222 DOI: 10.1002/lary.27854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Although early glottic carcinoma is managed with radiation therapy (RT) or surgery, there is limited data on differences in second primary cancers of the larynx. We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to query T1 glottic carcinomas and assess the incidence of second primary laryngeal malignancies. Cumulative hazard for second primary laryngeal malignancies was compared with the log-rank method. Among 844 surgical and 2,272 RT cases, observed-to-expected incidence ratios of laryngeal second primaries were 10.19 (5.89-16.55) and 6.87 (4.64-9.81) per 10 thousand person-years, respectively. Mean person-years at risk were comparable at 8.16 years (surgery) and 8.01 years (RT), and relative increased risk of laryngeal second primary was 20.95 (surgery) versus 14.09 (RT) per 10 thousand person-years. Mean times to development of a second primary were also comparable (304 vs. 305 months, P = 0.898). Thus, second laryngeal primary development is analogous between cases treated with surgery alone versus RT. Continued discussion and investigation of surgery versus RT for early glottic squamous cell carcinoma will need to leverage these findings, along with ongoing investigation of voice and survival outcomes, to develop more well-informed treatment algorithms. Laryngoscope, 129:2713-2715, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,The Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Neil Bhattacharyya
- Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Locatello LG, Pietragalla M, Taverna C, Bonasera L, Massi D, Mannelli G. A Critical Reappraisal of Primary and Recurrent Advanced Laryngeal Cancer Staging. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2018; 128:36-43. [DOI: 10.1177/0003489418806915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) can involve different anatomic subunits with peculiar surgical and prognostic implications. Despite conflicting outcomes for the same stage of disease, the current staging system considers different lesions in a single cluster. The aim of this study was to critically discuss clinical and pathologic staging of primary and recurrent advanced LSCC in order to define current staging pitfalls that impede a precise and tailored treatment strategy. Methods: Thirty patients who underwent total laryngectomy in the past 3 years for primary and recurrent advanced squamous cell LSCC were analyzed, comparing endoscopic, imaging, and pathologic findings. Involvement of the different laryngeal subunits, vocal-fold motility, and spreading pattern of the tumor were blindly analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy and differences between clinicoradiologic and pathologic findings were studied with standard statistical analysis. Results: Discordant staging was performed in 10% of patients, and thyroid and arytenoid cartilage were the major diagnostic pitfalls. Microscopic arytenoid involvement was significantly more present in case of vocal-fold fixation ( P = .028). Upstaging was influenced by paraglottic and pre-epiglottic space cancer involvement, posterior commissure, subglottic region, arytenoid cartilage, and penetration of thyroid cartilage; on the contrary, involvement of the inner cortex or extralaryngeal spread tended to be down-staged. Radiation-failed tumors less frequently involved the posterior third of the paraglottic space ( P = .022) and showed a significantly worse pattern of invasion ( P < .001). Conclusions: Even with the most recent technologies, 1 in 10 patients with advanced LSCC in this case series was differently staged on clinical examination, with cartilage involvement representing the main diagnostic pitfall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Giovanni Locatello
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Pietragalla
- Division of Radiology, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Cecilia Taverna
- Institute of Pathology, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonasera
- Division of Radiology, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Massi
- Institute of Pathology, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuditta Mannelli
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ahn SH, Hong HJ, Kwon SY, Kwon KH, Roh JL, Ryu J, Park JH, Baek SK, Lee GH, Lee SY, Lee JC, Chung MK, Joo YH, Ji YB, Hah JH, Kwon M, Park YM, Song CM, Shin SC, Ryu CH, Lee DY, Lee YC, Chang JW, Jeong HM, Cho JK, Cha W, Chun BJ, Choi IJ, Choi HG, Lee KD. Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 10:1-43. [PMID: 28043099 PMCID: PMC5327593 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2016.01389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to develop clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer. This Task Force conducted a systematic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to identify relevant articles, using search terms selected according to the key questions. Evidence-based recommendations were then created on the basis of these articles. An external expert review and Delphi questionnaire were applied to reach consensus regarding the recommendations. The resulting guidelines focus on the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer with the assumption that surgery is the selected treatment modality after a multidisciplinary discussion in any context. These guidelines do not, therefore, address non-surgical treatment such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy. The committee developed 62 evidence-based recommendations in 32 categories intended to assist clinicians during management of patients with laryngeal cancer and patients with laryngeal cancer, and counselors and health policy-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery Guideline Task Force
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Daejin Medical Center, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seonam University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Soon-Hyun Ahn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Jun Hong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Soon Young Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kee Hwan Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong-Lyel Roh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Junsun Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jun Hee Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seung-Kuk Baek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Guk Haeng Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sei Young Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Choon Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Man Ki Chung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hoon Joo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Bae Ji
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Hun Hah
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Minsu Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Young Min Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Daejin Medical Center, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Chang Myeon Song
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Chan Shin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Chang Hwan Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Doh Young Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Chan Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Won Chang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Ha Min Jeong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
| | - Jae-Keun Cho
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Wonjae Cha
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Byung Joon Chun
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seonam University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ik Joon Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Geun Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kang Dae Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tomifuji M, Araki K, Yamashita T, Shiotani A. Salvage Transoral Videolaryngoscopic Surgery for radiorecurrent hypopharyngeal and supraglottic cancer. Auris Nasus Larynx 2016; 44:464-471. [PMID: 27856033 DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2016.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2016] [Revised: 09/16/2016] [Accepted: 10/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of Transoral Videolaryngoscopic Surgery (TOVS) for radiorecurrent supraglottic and hypopharyngeal cancer, and to compare survival and complications between primary and radiorecurrent cases. METHODS Twelve cases of salvage TOVS for radiorecurrent cancer and 53 cases of TOVS as an initial treatment (primary cases) were evaluated. Days to resume soft diet, Functional Outcomes of Swallowing Scale (FOSS), postoperative complications, epithelization days and survival outcomes were assessed by retrospective chart review. RESULTS FOSS score was significantly worse in salvage cases compared with primary cases. Bleeding and airway compromise was slightly greater in salvage cases than in primary cases; however, this was not statistically significant. Wound healing was significantly delayed in salvage cases compared with primary cases (P<0.001). In primary cases, wounds were re-epithelized within 60 days in 83% of patients and within 90 days in almost all patients, while in salvage cases 42% of patients required more than 90 days for wound healing. In salvage cases, the 5-year overall survival, disease specific survival rate, local control rate, and laryngeal preservation rate was 85.7%, 85.7%, 62.5%, and 78.0%, respectively, and 85.7%, 98.0%, 91.3%, and 97.8%, respectively, for primary cases. Local control rate was significantly better in primary cases than in salvage cases. CONCLUSION Salvage TOVS was feasible in highly selected cases. After serial transoral surgery, the final laryngeal preservation rate was satisfactory. Swallowing function in salvage cases tended to be worse than in primary cases, and a significantly longer time was required for wound healing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Tomifuji
- National Defense Medical College, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Saitama, Japan.
| | - Koji Araki
- National Defense Medical College, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Saitama, Japan
| | - Taku Yamashita
- Kitasato University School of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Akihiro Shiotani
- National Defense Medical College, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|