Evaluation and Decision Making in Frontal Sinus Surgery

[History of frontal sinus surgery and current view of the problem. Part 2]

Surgical treatment of inflammatory diseases of the frontal sinus is one of the biggest challenges of modern otorhinolaryngology. Close proximity of the frontal sinus and frontal sinus drainage pathways to the skull base, the orbit and the anterior ethmoid artery, great limitations with its visualization and instrumentation, and high risk of the frontal recess scarring cause difficulties in either endoscopic or external approaches to the frontal sinus. At the same time endoscopic approach to the frontal sinus is considered as preferred method of frontal sinusitis surgical treatment by majority of peers nowadays. The introduction of extended approaches to the frontal sinus pathology treatment with frontal sinus floor and interfrontal sinus septum drill-out as well as superior septectomy with common drainage pathway formation gave an opportunity to greatly decrease a rate of indications for external frontal sinus procedures. In this paper historical backgrounds of endonasal approaches to frontal sinuses are presented, current controversies in proper selection of extent and methods of the frontal sinus surgery are analyzed and endoscopic as well as external approaches to frontal sinuses are summarized.

Clinical and Radiologic Characterization of Frontal Sinusitis in the Pediatric Population

INTRODUCTION

Frontal sinusitis in the pediatric population is a disease that has not been thoroughly studied or characterized. The goals of this study are to characterize the clinical presentation, radiologic variables, treatment modalities, complications, and prognosis associated with acute and chronic frontal sinus disease in the pediatric population.

METHODS

IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients who were diagnosed with acute (AFS) or chronic frontal sinusitis (CFS) and underwent frontal sinus surgery at a tertiary level Children's Hospital from 2006 to 2016. Patients with AFS were compared to patients with CFS. Statistical analysis completed using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, statistical significance set at P < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients with AFS and 15 patients with CFS were analyzed. There was a male predominance in AFS and female predominance in CFS (P < .05).AFS patients were less likely to have allergies, prior sinus disease, or significant comorbidities (P < .05).Additionally, AFS patients presented with constitutional, neurologic, and ocular symptoms. The CFS group had predominantly sinonasal symptoms. CT-scan analysis showed that AFS patients had higher prevalence of complex frontal anatomy (Type-II cells, concha bullosa) compared with CFS patients (P < .05). Culture results were positive in 78% of the AFS group, with S. Anginosus (53%), Anaerobes (20%), and normal flora (17%). In the CFS group cultures were positive in 60% of the patients, 56% grew normal flora, 13% H. Influenzae, 6.5% Pseudomonas, and 24.5% other species. CFS patients were more likely to have persistent sinus disease and require repeat sinus procedures (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

There are 2 distinct presentations of frontal sinus disease in the pediatric population. Patients with AFS vary significantly from those with CFS. Males, ages 13 to 18 years old, who cultured positive for S. Anginosus (former S.Milleri) dominated the AFS subgroup. Whereas as female patients with a history of allergic rhinitis and muco-cilliary disease were more prominent in the CRS subgroup. Correct identification and understanding of these 2 different entities are crucial for the appropriate short and long-term patient management.

A handheld flexible manipulator system for frontal sinus surgery

Purpose

Draf drainage is the standard treatment procedure for frontal sinus diseases. In this procedure, rigid angled endoscopes and rigid curved instruments are used. However, laterally located pathologies in the frontal sinus cannot be reached with rigid instrumentation. In order to assist surgeons with such complicated cases, we propose a novel handheld flexible manipulator system.

Methods

A cross section of 3 mm × 4.6 mm enables transnasal guiding of a flexible endoscope with 1.4 mm diameter and a standard flexible surgical instrument with up to 1.8 mm diameter into the frontal sinus with increased reachability. The developed system consists of an electrical discharge-machined flexure hinge-based nitinol manipulator arm and a purely mechanical handheld control unit. The corresponding control unit enables upward and left–right bending of the manipulator arm, translation, rolling, actuation and also quick exchange of the surgical instrument. In order to verify the fulfillment of performance requirements, tests regarding reachability and payload capacity were conducted.

Results

Reachability tests showed that the manipulator arm can be inserted into the frontal sinus and reach its lateral regions following a Draf IIa procedure. The system can exert forces of at least 2 N in the vertical direction and 1 N in the lateral direction which is sufficient for manipulation of frontal sinus pathologies.

Conclusion

Considering the fact that the anatomical requirements of the frontal sinus are not addressed satisfactorily in the development of prospective flexible instruments, the proposed system shows great potential in terms of therapeutic use owing to its small cross section and dexterity.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11548-020-02220-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The efficacy of extended Draf IIb procedure by partial nasal septectomy: long-term follow up

Draf IIb procedure is mostly used in a very narrow frontal recess and in a revision frontal sinus surgery. In most cases, the contralateral sinus is not involved. In order to avoid Draf III procedure's reported disadvantages we have commenced the use of the extended Draf IIb procedures in our center. Patients treated with extended Draf IIb procedure at our center between the years 1997 and 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. This procedure includes further widening of the frontal ostium and recces by excising the adjacent most superior nasal septum. Included in our study were patients who have failed previous Draf IIb procedure or had a small and narrow frontal sinus. Collected data included demographics, prior sinus pathology, previous surgical treatment, surgical complications and further treatment if required. All were evaluated by the SNOT-22 questioner pre and post-operatively and all were endoscopically evaluated during the follow up period. 15 patients and 18 frontal sinuses were included in our study, eight males and seven females with a mean age of 50.3 years. The mean pre-operative SNOT-22 fell from 46 to 24 and all patients improved clinically. No surgical complications were reported except for one case of postoperative maxillary sinusitis. Only one patient required further surgical intervention. In most cases the patients had a patent frontal sinus ostium after a follow up of 3-8 years. Extended Draf IIb procedure is less traumatic, safe and effective in the treatment of persistent frontal sinus disease, without surgically involving the healthy contralateral frontal sinus, and may obviate the need for Draf III procedure.