Anesthesia and Enhanced Recovery After Head and Neck Surgery

A 5-year experience with midline catheters in the management of major head and neck surgery patients

BACKGROUND

In the perioperative management of major head and neck surgery (HNS) patients, the performance of midline catheters (MCs) has been never tested. We present here our 5-year experience by reporting MC-related complications and by identifying the preoperative risk factors associated with their development.

METHODS

Clinical variables were extracted and the dwell time, the number, and the type of postprocedural complications of MCs were retrieved. Complications were classified into major (needing MCs removal and including catheter-related bloodstream infection or deep vein thrombosis or catheter occlusion) and into minor (accidental dislodgement, leaking, etc.). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used in order to identify the predictors of complications.

RESULTS

A total of 265 patients were included, with a mean age of 67.4 years. Intraprocedural complications occurred in 1.1% of cases, while postprocedural complications occurred in 13.9% of cases (12.05/1000 days), but they were minor in more than 7.0% (5.4/1000 catheter-days). There were 19 minor complications (7.1% or 5.4/1000 catheter-days) while 18 (7%, 5.1/1000 catheter-days) patients experienced at least one major complication. Female sex (OR = 1.963, 95% CI 1.017-3.792), insertion in the right arm (OR = 2.473, 95% CI 1.150-5.318), and an ACE-27 score >1 (OR = 2.573, 95% CI 1.295-5.110) were independent predictors of major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

MCs appear to represent an effective option in the setting of major HNS. The identification of patients most at risk for MC-related complications should prompt a postoperative watchful evaluation.

Enhanced recovery after surgery, current, and future considerations in head and neck cancer

Objectives

Review of the current and relevant literature to develop a list of evidence-based recommendations that can be implemented in head and neck surgical practices. To provide rationale for the multiple aspects of comprehensive care for head and neck surgical patients. To improve postsurgical outcomes for head and neck surgical patients.

Methods

Extensive review of the medical literature was performed and relevant studies in both the head and neck surgery and other surgical specialties were considered for inclusion.

Results

A total of 18 aspects of perioperative care were included in this review. The literature search included 276 publications considered to be the most relevant and up to date evidence. Each topic is concluded with recommendation grade and quality of evidence for the recommendation.

Conclusion

Since it's conception, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have continued to push for comprehensive and evidence based postsurgical care to improve patient outcomes. Head and neck oncology is one of the newest fields to develop a protocol. Due to the complexity of this patient population and their postsurgical needs, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to facilitate recovery while minimizing complications. Current and future advances in head and neck cancer research will serve to strengthen and add new principles to a comprehensive ERAS protocol.

Level of Evidence

2a.

Optimizing Perioperative Care in Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: Considerations for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To identify key recommendations for maximizing the efficiency and efficacy of perioperative care in transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.

METHODS

The authors performed a comprehensive literature search of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols implemented for patients undergoing transsphenoidal adenomectomy (TSA); individual recommendations were abstracted, and the evidence base thoroughly reviewed.

RESULTS

The authors identified 19 individual recommendations pertinent to the care of patients undergoing TSA, which were subdivided into preoperative (n=6), intraoperative (n=6), and postoperative (n=7) interventions. Key factors recommended for minimizing length of stay, preventing readmission, and improving patient outcomes included comprehensive patient education, multidisciplinary evaluation, avoidance of routine lumbar drain placement and nasal packing, and rigorous postoperative monitoring of pituitary function and salt-water imbalances. The overall level of evidence for 7/19 (37%) implemented recommendations was found to be low, suggesting a need for continued research in this patient population.

CONCLUSION

Several key interventions should be considered in the development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for TSA, which may aid in further decreasing length of stay and promoting positive patient outcomes.

Integration of an enhanced recovery after surgery program for patients undergoing pituitary surgery

Evidence-based enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs aim to improve patient outcomes and shorten hospital stays. The objective of this study is to describe the development, implementation, and evolution of an ERAS protocol to optimize the perioperative management for patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery for pituitary tumors. A systematic review of the literature was performed, best practices were discussed with stakeholders, and institutional guidelines were established and implemented. Key performance indicators (KPI) were measured and patient-reported outcome surveys were collected. The ERAS protocol was introduced successfully at our institution. We describe the process of initiation of the program and the perioperative management of our patients. We demonstrated the feasibility of integration of ERAS protocols for pituitary tumors with multidisciplinary engagement, with a particular emphasis on the use of data informatics and metrics to monitor outcomes. We expect that this approach will translate to improved quality of care for these often-complex patients.

Ketamine reduces the dose of remifentanil required during prolonged head and neck surgery: a propensity-matched analysis

High-dose opioids induce hyperalgesia and tolerance, which negatively affects postoperative recovery. Prolonged surgery inevitably requires higher opioid doses. Ketamine reduces perioperative opioid consumption and prevents opioid-induced tolerance. However, its effects in cases of prolonged surgery remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the dose of intraoperative remifentanil, an ultrashort-acting µ-opioid agonist, administered after an intravenous ketamine bolus during prolonged head and neck surgery. This single-center, retrospective, observational study included 251 patients who underwent head and neck surgery (operation time ≥8 h) between January 2015 and December 2019. The participants were stratified into two groups: those who received an intravenous bolus of ketamine and those who did not (ketamine group and non-ketamine group, respectively). Propensity score-matching was used to match patients in a 1:1 ratio between the two groups, based on their covariates. The difference in intraoperative remifentanil dose administered between the two groups was assessed. After 1:1 propensity score-matching, 89 matched patients were selected from each group. The mean ± standard deviation dose of remifentanil administered was significantly lower in the ketamine group than in the non-ketamine group before (0.15±0.05 vs 0.17±0.05 µg/kg/min; P=0.01) and after matching (0.15±0.06 vs 0.17±0.05 µg/kg/min; P=0.03). In conclusion, intravenous ketamine administration may reduce the intraoperative dose of remifentanil required during prolonged head and neck surgery. However, further studies are required to evaluate the effect of this finding on enhanced recovery after surgery.