1
|
Wan T, Li QC, Qin MY, Wang YL, Zhang FS, Zhang XM, Zhang YC, Zhang PX. Strategies for Treating Traumatic Neuromas with Tissue-Engineered Materials. Biomolecules 2024; 14:484. [PMID: 38672500 PMCID: PMC11048257 DOI: 10.3390/biom14040484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Neuroma, a pathological response to peripheral nerve injury, refers to the abnormal growth of nerve tissue characterized by disorganized axonal proliferation. Commonly occurring after nerve injuries, surgeries, or amputations, this condition leads to the formation of painful nodular structures. Traditional treatment options include surgical excision and pharmacological management, aiming to alleviate symptoms. However, these approaches often offer temporary relief without addressing the underlying regenerative challenges, necessitating the exploration of advanced strategies such as tissue-engineered materials for more comprehensive and effective solutions. In this study, we discussed the etiology, molecular mechanisms, and histological morphology of traumatic neuromas after peripheral nerve injury. Subsequently, we summarized and analyzed current nonsurgical and surgical treatment options, along with their advantages and disadvantages. Additionally, we emphasized recent advancements in treating traumatic neuromas with tissue-engineered material strategies. By integrating biomaterials, growth factors, cell-based approaches, and electrical stimulation, tissue engineering offers a comprehensive solution surpassing mere symptomatic relief, striving for the structural and functional restoration of damaged nerves. In conclusion, the utilization of tissue-engineered materials has the potential to significantly reduce the risk of neuroma recurrence after surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teng Wan
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China; (T.W.)
- Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
- National Centre for Trauma Medicine, Beijing 100044, China
- Beijing Laboratory of Trauma and Nerve Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Qi-Cheng Li
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China; (T.W.)
- Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
- National Centre for Trauma Medicine, Beijing 100044, China
- Beijing Laboratory of Trauma and Nerve Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Ming-Yu Qin
- Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou 215026, China
| | - Yi-Lin Wang
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China; (T.W.)
- Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
- National Centre for Trauma Medicine, Beijing 100044, China
- Beijing Laboratory of Trauma and Nerve Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Feng-Shi Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China; (T.W.)
- Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
- National Centre for Trauma Medicine, Beijing 100044, China
- Beijing Laboratory of Trauma and Nerve Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Xiao-Meng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China; (T.W.)
- Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
- National Centre for Trauma Medicine, Beijing 100044, China
- Beijing Laboratory of Trauma and Nerve Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Yi-Chong Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China; (T.W.)
- Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
- National Centre for Trauma Medicine, Beijing 100044, China
- Beijing Laboratory of Trauma and Nerve Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Pei-Xun Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China; (T.W.)
- Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
- National Centre for Trauma Medicine, Beijing 100044, China
- Beijing Laboratory of Trauma and Nerve Regeneration, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
- Peking University People’s Hospital Qingdao Hospital, Qingdao 266000, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Butkus JM, Awosanya S, Scott ER, Perlov N, Hannikainen P, Tekumalla S, Armache M, Stewart M, Willcox T, Chiffer R. Multimodal Analgesia and Patient Education Reduce Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Otology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023. [PMID: 36939618 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study sought to validate alternative pain management strategies that can reduce reliance on opioids for postoperative pain management in otology. STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Single tertiary-care facility. METHODS Adult patients who underwent outpatient otologic surgery from September 2021 to July 2022 were randomized into treatment cohorts. The opioid monotherapy cohort received a standard opioid prescription. The multimodal analgesia cohort received the same opioid prescription, prescriptions for acetaminophen and naproxen, and additional pain management education with a flyer on discharge. All patients completed a questionnaire 1 week after surgery to evaluate opioid usage and pain scores. RESULTS Eighty-six patients completed the study. The opioid monotherapy cohort (n = 42) and multimodal analgesia cohort (n = 44) were prescribed an average of 42.1 ± 20.4 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and 38.4 ± 5.7 MME, respectively (p = 0.373). Four patients (9.52%) in the opioid monotherapy cohort required opioid refills compared to 1 patient (2.27%) in the multimodal analgesia cohort (p = 0.156). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the multimodal analgesia cohort consumed significantly fewer opioids on average than the opioid monotherapy cohort (11.9 ± 15.9 MME vs 22.8 ± 28.0 MME, respectively). There were no significant differences in postoperative rehospitalizations (p = 0.317) or Emergency Department visits (p = 0.150). Pain scores on the day of surgery, postoperative day (POD) 1, POD3, and POD7 were not significantly different between cohorts (p = 0.395, 0.896, 0.844, 0.765, respectively). CONCLUSION The addition of patient education, acetaminophen, and naproxen to postoperative opioid prescriptions significantly reduced opioid consumption without affecting pain scores, refill rates, or complication rates after otologic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joann M Butkus
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Samiat Awosanya
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth Reilly Scott
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Natalie Perlov
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Paavali Hannikainen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sruti Tekumalla
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maria Armache
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew Stewart
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas Willcox
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rebecca Chiffer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kirubalingam K, Nguyen P, Klar G, Dion JM, Campbell RJ, Beyea JA. Opioid Prescriptions Following Otologic Surgery: A Population-Based Study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 167:141-148. [PMID: 34582291 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211045364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine postoperative opioid-prescribing patterns following otologic surgery. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective population-based descriptive study. SETTING All hospitals in the Canadian province of Ontario. METHODS Of all patients with advanced ear surgery between July 1, 2012, and March 31, 2019, 7 cohorts were constructed: tympanoplasty with or without ossiculoplasty (n = 7812), atticotomy/limited mastoidectomy (n = 1371), mastoidectomy (n = 3717), semicircular canal occlusion (SCO; n = 179), stapedectomy (n = 2735), bone-implanted hearing aid insertion (n = 280), and cochlear implant (n = 2169). Prescriptions filled for narcotics postoperatively were calculated per morphine milligram equivalent (MME) opioid dose. Multivariable regression was used to determine predictors of higher opioid doses. RESULTS The mean ± SD MMEs prescribed were as follows: tympanoplasty with or without ossiculoplasty, 246.77 ± 1380.78; atticotomy/limited mastoidectomy, 283.32 ± 956.10; mastoidectomy, 280.56 ± 1018.50; SCO, 328.61 ± 1090.86; stapedectomy, 164.64 ± 657.18; bone-implanted hearing aid insertion, 326.11 ± 1054.66; and cochlear implant, 200.87 ± 639.93. SCO (odds ratio [OR], 1.69 [95% CI, 1.16-2.48]) and mastoidectomy (OR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.36-1.66]) were associated with higher opioid doses than tympanoplasty-ossiculoplasty. Asthma (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.12-1.38]), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.12-1.47]), myocardial infarction (OR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.05-1.68]), diabetes (OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.08-1.39]), and substance-related and addictive disorders (OR, 2.59 [95% CI, 1.67-4.00]) were associated with higher opioid doses prescribed. Overall MME prescribed by year demonstrates a sharp drop from 2017-2018 to 2018-2019. CONCLUSION This large comprehensive population study provides insight into the prescribing patterns following otologic surgery. The large amounts prescribed and substantial variation require further study to determine barriers that limit good opioid-prescribing stewardship in the postoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Nguyen
- ICES Queen's, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Gregory Klar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Joanna M Dion
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | | | - Jason Atkins Beyea
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.,ICES Queen's, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|