Robotic Ear Surgery

Variability in Manual Segmentation of Temporal Bone Structures in Cone Beam CT Images

PURPOSE

Manual segmentation of anatomical structures is the accepted "gold standard" for labeling structures in clinical images. However, the variability in manual segmentation of temporal bone structures in CBCT images of the temporal bone has not been systematically evaluated using multiple reviewers. Therefore, we evaluated the intravariability and intervariability of manual segmentation of inner ear structures in CBCT images of the temporal bone.

METHODS

Preoperative CBCTs scans of the inner ear were obtained from 10 patients who had undergone cochlear implant surgery. The cochlea, facial nerve, chorda tympani, mid-modiolar (MM) axis, and round window (RW) were manually segmented by five reviewers in two separate sessions that were at least 1 month apart. Interreviewer and intrareviewer variabilities were assessed using the Dice coefficient (DICE), volume similarity, mean Hausdorff Distance metrics, and visual review.

RESULTS

Manual segmentation of the cochlea was the most consistent within and across reviewers with a mean DICE of 0.91 (SD = 0.02) and 0.89 (SD = 0.01) respectively, followed by the facial nerve with a mean DICE of 0.83 (SD = 0.02) and 0.80 (SD = 0.03), respectively. The chorda tympani had the greatest amount of reviewer variability due to its thin size, and the location of the centroid of the RW and the MM axis were also quite variable between and within reviewers.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed significant variability in manual segmentation of some of the temporal bone structures across reviewers. This variability needs to be considered when interpreting the results in studies using one manual reviewer.

Three-dimensional finite element analysis on cochlear implantation electrode insertion

Studying the insertion process of cochlear implant (CI) electrode array (EA) is important to ensure successful, sufficient, and safe implantation. A three-dimensional finite element (FE) model was developed to simulate the insertion process. The cochlear structures were reconstructed from an average statistical shape model (SSM) of human cochlea. The electrode is simplified as a long and tapered beam of homogeneous elastic materials, contacting and interacting with the stiff cochlear structures. A quasi-static insertion simulation was conducted, the insertion force and the contact pressure between the electrode and the cochlear wall, were calculated to evaluate the smoothness of insertion and the risk of potential cochlear trauma. Based on this model, different EA designs were analyzed, including the Young's modulus, the straight or bended shape, the normal or a more tapped section size. The influence of the insertion angle was also discussed. Our simulations indicate that reducing the EA Young's modulus, tapering and pre-bending are effective ways to ensure safe and successful EA implantation. This model is beneficial for optimizing EA designs and is potentially useful for designing patient-specific CI surgery.

Robot-Assisted Electrode Insertion in Cochlear Implantation Controlled by Intraoperative Electrocochleography-A Pilot Study

Robotics in otology has been developing in many directions for more than two decades. Current clinical trials focus on more accurate stapes surgery, minimally invasive access to the cochlea and less traumatic insertion of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays. In this study we evaluated the use of the RobOtol^® (Collin, Bagneux, France) otologic robot to insert CI electrodes into the inner ear with intraoperative ECochG analysis. This prospective, pilot study included two adult patients implanted with Advanced Bionics (Westinghouse PI, CA, USA) cochlear implant, with HiFocus™ Mid-Scala electrode array. The standard surgical approach was used. For both subjects, who had residual hearing in the implanted ear, intraoperative and postoperative ECochG was performed with the AIM^TM system. The surgeries were uneventful. A credible ECochG response was obtained after complete electrode insertion in both cases. Preoperative BC thresholds compared to intraoperative estimated ECochG thresholds and 2-day postoperative BC thresholds had similar values at frequencies where all thresholds were measurable. The results of the ECochG performed one month after the surgery showed that in both patients the hearing residues were preserved for the selected frequencies. The RobOtol^® surgical robot allows for the correct, safe and gentle insertion of the cochlear implant electrode inside the cochlea. The use of electrocochleography measurements during robotic cochlear implantation offers an additional opportunity to evaluate and modify the electrode array insertion on an ongoing basis, which may contribute to the preservation of residual hearing.

Robotics and cochlear implant surgery: goals and developments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cochlear implantation (CI) is a viable option for patients with severe sensorineural hearing loss. Advances in CI have focused on minimizing cochlear trauma to improve hearing preservation outcomes, and in doing so expanding candidacy to patients with useful cochlear reserve. Robotics holds promise as a potential tool to minimize intracochlear trauma with electrode insertion, improve surgical efficiency, and reduce surgical complications. The purpose of this review is to summarize efforts and advances in the field of robotic-assisted CI.

RECENT FINDINGS

Work on robotics and CI over the past few decades has explored distinct surgical aspects, including image-based surgical planning and intraoperative guidance, minimally invasive robotic-assisted approaches mainly through percutaneous keyhole direct cochlear access, robotic electrode insertion systems, robotic manipulators, and drilling feedback control through end effector sensors. Feasibility and safety have been established and many devices are undergoing clinical trials for clinical adoption, with some having already achieved approval of national licensing bodies.

SUMMARY

Significant work has been done over the past two decades that has shown robotic-assisted CI to be feasible and safe. Wider clinical adoption can potentially result in improved hearing preservation and quality of life outcomes to more CI candidates.

Patient Benefit and Quality of Life after Robot-Assisted Head and Neck Surgery

Robotic systems for head and neck surgery are at different stages of technical development and clinical application. Currently, robotic systems are predominantly used for transoral surgery of the pharynx and larynx. Robotic surgery of the neck, the thyroid, and the middle and inner ear is much less common; however, some oncological and functional outcomes have been reported. This article provides an overview of the current state of robot-assisted head and neck surgery with a special emphasis on patient benefit and postoperative quality of life (QoL). The focus is placed on the role of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for the resection of oropharyngeal carcinomas. For this application, reported long-term outcomes show functional post-operative advantages for selected oropharyngeal cancer patients after TORS compared to open surgery and primary radiotherapy. Since TORS also plays a significant role in the context of potential therapy de-escalation for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients, ongoing trials are presented. Regarding the evaluation of the therapeutic benefit and the QoL of cancer patients, special attention has to be paid to the large degree of variability of individual patients' preferences. Influencing factors and tools for a detailed assessment of QoL parameters are therefore detailed at the beginning of this article. Notably, while some robotic systems for ear and skull base surgery are being developed in Europe, TORS systems are mainly used in North America and Asia. In Europe and Germany in particular, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) is a well-established technology for transoral tumor resection. Future trials comparing TORS and TLM with detailed investigation of QoL parameters are therefore warranted and might contribute to identifying suitable fields for the application of the different techniques.

Robotics, automation, active electrode arrays, and new devices for cochlear implantation: A contemporary review

In the last two decades, cochlear implant surgery has evolved into a minimally invasive, hearing preservation surgical technique. The devices used during surgery have benefited from technological advances that have allowed modification and possible improvement of the surgical technique. Robotics has recently gained popularity in otology as an effective tool to overcome the surgeon's limitations such as tremor, drift and accurate force control feedback in laboratory testing. Cochlear implantation benefits from robotic assistance in several steps during the surgical procedure: (i) during the approach to the middle ear by automated mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy or through a tunnel from the postauricular skin to the middle ear (i.e. direct cochlear access); (ii) a minimally invasive cochleostomy by a robot-assisted drilling tool; (iii) alignment of the correct insertion axis on the basal cochlear turn; (iv) insertion of the electrode array with a motorized insertion tool. In recent years, the development of bone-attached parallel robots and image-guided surgical robotic systems has allowed the first successful cochlear implantation procedures in patients via a single hole drilled tunnel. Several other robotic systems, new materials, sensing technologies applied to the electrodes, and smart devices have been developed, tested in experimental models and finally some have been used in patients with the aim of reducing trauma in cochleostomy, and permitting slow and more accurate insertion of the electrodes. Despite the promising results in laboratory tests in terms of minimal invasiveness, reduced trauma and better hearing preservation, so far, no clinical benefits on residual hearing preservation or better speech performance have been demonstrated. Before these devices can become the standard approach for cochlear implantation, several points still need to be addressed, primarily cost and duration of the procedure. One can hope that improvement in the cost/benefit ratio will expand the technology to every cochlear implantation procedure. Laboratory research and clinical studies on patients should continue with the aim of making intracochlear implant insertion an atraumatic and reversible gesture for total preservation of the inner ear structure and physiology.

Precision head and neck surgery: robotics and surgical vision technology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the molecular basis of head and neck cancer becomes more clearly defined, precision medicine has gradually refined the multidisciplinary treatment paradigm for patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Although precision medicine is often thought to refer to new molecular diagnostics or unique medical therapy, the recent adoption of robotic surgery has ushered in the era of 'precision' head and neck surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgeons now routinely utilize a virtual reality environment to reduce the morbidity of head and neck surgical care and improve oncologic and functional outcomes. The development and subsequent FDA approval of the da Vinci SP system, a single-arm system with a flexible camera, has allowed for improved visualization and access to the deep oropharynx and larynx. Groups investigating anti-EGFR antibodies tagged with fluorescent dye as well as inherent autofluorescence differences between normal and cancerous mucosal tissues show promise for improving positive surgical margin rates.

SUMMARY

The evolution of robotics and visualization for oropharyngeal cancer represents a novel and innovative utilization of new technology to improve care. Further advancements in techniques, from refinement of the robotic platform itself, to novel real-time tumour imaging options will be critical to further advance precision care for these patients.