Histopathologic and Cytopathologic Diagnostic Discrepancies in Head and Neck Region: Pitfalls, Causes, and Preventive Strategies

Cytopathology approach to rare salivary gland lesions with oncocytic features

Salivary glands located in the head and neck area are known to have different lesions with prominent oncocytic features. Fine needle aspiration is usually the initial approach in the management of these lesions, whether they represent neoplastic or non-neoplastic processes. Owing to the limited material present upon cytopathologic examination, knowledge of variants and subtypes of various oncocytic lesions that can occur in this area is of major importance to provide the most accurate interpretation to the patients and clinicians. In this article, we selected rare lesions of the salivary glands that may exhibit oncocytic changes, and provided a brief discussion of each one of them, with emphasis on challenges in navigating the differential diagnosis that these cases may pose, from the cytopathology standpoint.

The risk for malignancy using the Milan salivary gland classification categories: A 5-year retrospective review

Aims:

Since the six-tier Milan salivary gland classification has been introduced, there are very limited studies in literature reporting the risk stratification of the Milan classification.

Methods:

We retrospectively classified a total of 285 salivary gland cytology cases into Milan reporting categories; there were 23 (8.1%) nondiagnostic, 48 (16.8%) nonneoplastic, 19 (6.7%) atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 138 (48.4%) benign neoplasm, 13 (4.6%) neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (NUMP), 8 (2.8%) suspicious for malignancy, and 36 (12.6%) malignant. Almost 110 cases (38.6%) had surgical follow-up resections.

Results:

The overall risk for malignancy (ROM) was 12.5% for AUS, 3.2% for benign neoplasm, 72.7% for NUMP, and 100% for the suspicious for malignancy and malignant. The ROM for nondiagnostic and nonneoplastic categories was not representative due to limited follow-up resections. The salivary cytology had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 93.0%, 100%, 100%, and 46.2% for neoplasm and 82.3%, 95.8%, 90.3%, and 92.0% for malignant.

Conclusion:

Our study supports the adaptation of the six-tier Milan classification for reporting salivary gland cytology, as well as emphasizing the utility of the NUMP category.

Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound distinguish malignant from reactive lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancers?

The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A consecutive series of 17 patients with known head and neck malignancy scheduled for neck surgery and lymph node clearance were recruited for contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation. Sonographic signal intensity as a function of time, comparing features of time to peak, time to arrival and time to wash-out, was quantified. The selected node was removed surgically and submitted for histology. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination had 100% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity for lymph node involvement. Functional analysis revealed contrast peaks significantly earlier in the malignant nodes (mean ± standard deviation) of 24.14 ± 2.7 s compared with 29.33 ± 3.4 s (p = 0.0128). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound holds promise in the detection and characterization of metastatic nodes that would not be diagnosed as abnormal on the basis of conventional ultrasound criteria.

Fine needle aspiration biopsy in the oral cavity and head and neck region

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of submucous nodules from the oral cavity and head and neck region as an auxiliary diagnostic tool. Fifty patients with nodule lesions in the oral cavity and the head and neck region were selected. All of them were submitted to FNAB and to either incisional or excisional biopsy. The diagnoses from the FNABs were compared with the biopsy diagnosis as the gold standard. All the cases of FNAB were analyzed by a single oral pathologist prior to the biopsy diagnosis. The results showed that the sensitivity of FNAB was 75%, its specificity was 96% and its accuracy was 58.8%. The false positive and false negative rates were 6.7% and 13.3%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 86% and the negative predictive value was 93%. The inconclusive rate was 16/50. FNAB displayed a high success rate for identifying both malignant and benign lesions, but a low accuracy for making a final diagnosis.