Correlación citohistológica en tumores de la glándula parótida

Tumores parotídeos: correlación entre estudios de imagen, punción aspiración con aguja fina y los hallazgos histopatológicos

Introducción y objetivo: Nuestro objetivo es establecer la rentabilidad del diagnóstico citológico mediante punción aspiración con aguja fina (PAAF) y la utilidad del estudio de imagen preoperatoria en el manejo de masas parotídeas. Método: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo de una muestra de 142 pacientes con tumoración parotídea intervenidos por el Servicio de Otorrinolaringología del HUPR en los últimos 10 años, con diagnóstico preoperatorio radiológico (ecografía, TC, RNM) y citológico, mediante PAAF. Los resultados de ambas pruebas se han clasificado como positivos o negativos para malignidad y se compararon con el diagnóstico anatomopatológico. Resultados: La edad media fue de 56 años, el 61,3% eran hombres. La PAAF presentó una sensibilidad para detectar malignidad del 75% y una especificidad del 100%; con valores predictivos positivo y negativo (VPN) de 100 y 97%, respectivamente. La sensibilidad del estudio radiológico fue de 25%, y la especificidad del 99%. El valor predictivo positivo para malignidad fue de 80%, y el valor predictivo negativo, de 89%. Conclusiones: La PAAF es una prueba sencilla, pero de utilidad limitada para la orientación diagnóstica debido a su baja sensibilidad y elevados falsos negativos; sin embargo, su alta especificidad y elevado VPN hacen de la misma una prueba con mayor precisión frente a un resultado benigno o negativo. El estudio radiológico previo es útil en el diagnóstico de extensión y características tumorales, aunque se ve limitado por sí solo en el diagnóstico diferencial de malignidad. La RM se ha convertido en la modalidad de imagen de elección.  

[Cyto-histological correlation in the management of parotid gland tumors: A retrospective study of 160 cases]

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to correlate the cytological and histological results and evaluate the diagnostic performance of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the management of parotid gland tumors.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 160 patients with a parotid gland tumor who underwent fine-needle aspiration and parotidectomy surgery between January 2005 and August 2016 at the Limoges university hospital center.

RESULTS

On 160 fine-needle aspirations performed, fine-needle aspiration diagnoses were: 77 benign lesions, 35 malignant lesions and 48 non-diagnostic cases. Final histological diagnosis revealed there were 113 benign lesions and 47 malignant lesions. A hundred and one cytological diagnoses were accurate over 112 contributive fine-needle aspirations: seven false-negative cases and 4 false-positive cases were observed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 82, 95 and 90% respectively for fine-needle aspiration, and 83, 95 and 92% respectively for association of fine-needle aspiration and magnetic resonance imaging. Diagnostic concordance between fine-needle aspiration and final histology for malignant lesions was 78%. A greater number of contributive fine-needle aspirations was observed among experimented operators.

DISCUSSION

Fine-needle aspiration is a reliable, safe and effective diagnostic tool that allows good differentiation between malignant and benign diagnosis in the preoperative management of parotid gland tumors. The association of fine-needle aspiration and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve diagnostic performance.

Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland lesions: A 6-year retrospective review

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in comparison to histologic examination and to recognize possible pitfalls in diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The diagnoses and demographics of all cases of salivary gland FNAs with concurrent or subsequent histologic correlation at our institution over a 6-year period (2006-2011) were retrospectively reviewed and compared for discrepancies. Discrepancies were categorized as either major or minor and due to sampling or interpretive variance.

RESULTS

Overall, the following values were calculated: sensitivity 80.6%, specificity 97.5%, positive predictive value 92.6%, negative predictive value 92.8%, accuracy 92.7%, and concordance rate 90.9%. In addition, concordance rates were calculated for the 2 most common diagnoses: pleomorphic adenoma (97.1%, n = 35) and Warthin tumor (88.9%, n = 9). Five major and 5 minor discrepancies were found. Most of the major discrepancies and all of the minor discrepancies were due to sampling and interpretive variances, respectively. Sampling issues occurred in FNAs with and without ultrasound guidance. The interpretive variance included interpretative discrepancies in monomorphic cellular lesions, abundant inflammation and reactive atypia, cystic changes, abundant matrix deposition or fibrosis, and difficulty in diagnosing mucoepidermoid carcinoma or lymphoma on cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

FNA of salivary gland lesions is a procedure with high specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and concordance with histologic examination; however, discrepancies do exist. Recognizing potential pitfalls is key to avoiding discrepancies.

Verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies for fine- and core needle biopsy of salivary gland lesions in otolaryngology journals: a systematic review and analysis

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies for needle biopsy are frequently published in otolaryngology journals, but this body of literature has not been assessed for verification bias.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of DTA studies on needle biopsy of salivary gland lesions appearing in otolaryngology journals. Studies were assessed by 2 reviewers for verification bias.

RESULTS

We identified 95 DTA studies for needle biopsy of salivary gland lesions. Eighty-one studies (84%) had verification bias. Five of the biased studies provided sufficient data to estimate the extent of bias. Verification bias was associated with an overestimate of sensitivity and an underestimate of specificity. Studies on core needle biopsy (CNB) had a lower rate of verification bias than fine-needle aspiration (FNA) studies.

CONCLUSION

Verification bias is common in DTA studies of needle biopsy for salivary gland lesions published in ear, nose, and throat (ENT) journals. Such studies overestimated sensitivity and underestimated specificity.

[Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in parotid tumours]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a globally accepted technique in the preoperative evaluations of head and neck tumours; however, the effectiveness in the interpretation of salivary glands neoplastic lesions is still controversial. The objective of this study consisted of assessing the efficacy of FNAC in preoperative diagnosis of parotid tumours.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted using 93 patient samples with parotid gland tumoral pathology, treated at the Otorhinolaryngology Department in our institution during the 2007-2011 period. Preoperative FNAC was employed and the patients subsequently submitted to surgical excision with histopathological diagnosis of the specimen. Cytology results were classified as negative for malignancy, positive for malignancy or insufficient sample, and later compared with the definitive histological diagnosis.

RESULTS

The mean age of the studied sample was 52.9 years (range: 11 to 88 years); 55.9% were men. The FNAC showed significant sensitivity of 57.1%, with a specificity of 95.1%, for detecting malignancy in parotid gland tumours. The positive and negative predictive values for malignancy were 50 and 96.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

FNAC is considered a simple test but of limited use for diagnostic guidance in tumour pathology of the parotid gland in our environment, mainly because of its low sensitivity. However, the high specificity and high negative predictive value of FNAC makes it a more accurate test in benign or negative result cases.