Lateral Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomy, Biomechanics, Indications and Surgical Techniques

Patellofemoral instability part 1 (When to operate and soft tissue procedures): State of the art

Patellofemoral instability is usually initially treated non-operatively. Surgery is considered in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation and after a first-time patellar dislocation in the presence of either an associated osteochondral fracture or high risk of recurrence. Stratifying the risk of recurrence includes evaluating risk factors such as age, trochlear dysplasia, contralateral dislocation, and patellar height. Surgery with soft tissue procedures includes restoring the medial patellar restraints and balancing the lateral side of the joint. Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament is the most frequent way of addressing the medial soft tissues in patients with patellofemoral instability. Meanwhile, lateral tightness can be achieved by lateral retinaculum lengthening or release. Approaching patellofemoral instability in a patient-specific approach, combined with a shared decision-making process with the patient/family, will guide surgeons to the deliver optimal care for the patellar instability patient.

Surgical Technique for Lateral Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone Tunnels: A New Method

Medial patellar instability (lateral patellofemoral ligament tear) is a rare condition which is commonly associated with lateral release for lateral patellar instability. LPFL is a lateral stabilizer of the patellofemoral joint. Reconstruction of LPFL is necessary to provide stability to the patella-femoral joint in patients with instability. We describe a novel technique of trans-osseous reconstruction of LPFL to gain stability and have better graft incorporation. A doubled peroneus longus graft is inserted into the patellar tunnel and secured with an endo button on the anteromedial aspect of the patella; the other end is then inserted into the insertional point on the femur and secured with an interference screw. This is an easy, novel, and reproducible technique which can be used to reconstruct LPFL.

Patellar Dislocation: Workup and Decision-Making

Acute patellar dislocation (PD) is usually a problem of adolescents and young adults. In most cases, it is a sports-related injury. It is the result of an indirect force on the knee joint, which leads to valgus and external rotation of the tibia relative to the femur. PD is unlikely to occur on a knee with normal patellofemoral joint (PFJ) anatomy. Acute PD consists of an acute injury of the ligamentous medial patellar stabilizers in the background of factors predisposing to patellar instability. These factors are classified into three groups. The first group refers to the integrity of the ligamentous medial patellar restraints, particularly, the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). The second group refers to an abnormal PFJ anatomy, which renders the patella inherently unstable inside the trochlea. The third group refers to the overall axial and torsional profile of the lower limb and to systemic factors, such as ligament laxity and neuromuscular coordination of movement. PD at a younger age is associated with an increased number and severity of patellar instability predisposing factors and lower stress to dislocate the patella. Acute primary PD is usually treated conservatively, while surgical treatment is reserved for recurrent PD. The aim of treatment is to restore the stability and function of the PFJ and to reduce the risk of patellar redislocation. Surgical procedures to treat patellar instability are classified into non-anatomic and anatomic procedures. Non-anatomic procedures are extensor mechanism realignment techniques that aim to center the patella into the trochlear groove. Anatomic procedures aim to restore the PFJ anatomy (ruptured ligaments, osteochondral fractures), which has been severed after the first incident of PD. Anatomic procedures, especially MPFL reconstruction, are more effective in preventing recurrent PD, compared with non-anatomic techniques. Theoretically, all factors that affect PFJ stability should be evaluated and, if possible, addressed. This is practically impossible. Considering that the MPFL ruptures in almost all PDs, MPFL reconstruction is the primary procedure, which is currently selected by most surgeons as a first-line treatment for patients with recurrent PD. Restoration of the axial and torsional alignment of the lower limbs is also increasingly implemented by surgeons. Non-anatomic surgical techniques, such as tibial-tuberosity osteotomy, are used as an adjunct to anatomic procedures. In the presence of multiple PFJ instability factors, acute MPFL reconstruction may be the treatment of choice for acute primary PD as well. Skeletal immaturity of the patient precludes osseous procedures to avoid premature physis closure and subsequent limb deformity. Unfortunately, restoration of the patient's previous activity level or participation in more strenuous sports is questionable and not easy to predict. In the case of competitive athletes, PD may prevent participation in elite levels of sports.

A Review of the Lateral Patellofemoral Joint: Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Surgical Procedures

The lateral patellofemoral joint soft tissues contain key structures that surround and balance the joint. These structures can affect joint tracking, stability, and force distribution. It is important to understand the lateral patellofemoral anatomy and biomechanics, and their relationship with patellofemoral instability, anterior knee pain, and osteoarthritis. Lateral-sided surgical procedures such as lateral release, lateral retinacular lengthening, and partial lateral patellar facetectomy can be useful in the treatment of such patellofemoral problems.

Lateral Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With Semitendinosus Allograft in the Setting of Previous Lateral Release

The lateral patellofemoral ligament acts to resist medial displacement of the patella. When medial subluxation occurs, it usually has an iatrogenic cause such as prior lateral release, an over-tightened medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, or detachment of the vastus lateralis from the patella. The justification for lateral retinacular release has historically been to address extensor mechanism issues such as imbalance of the mechanism due to increased retinacular tension. We present a Technical Note on the treatment of chronic medial patellar instability due to a previous lateral retinacular release using a soft-tissue reconstruction approach with a semitendinosus allograft.

Computational frame of ligament in situ strain in a full knee model

The biomechanical function of connective tissues in a knee joint is to stabilize the kinematics-kinetics of the joint by augmenting its stiffness and limiting excessive coupled motion. The connective tissues are characterized by an in vivo reference configuration (in situ strain) that would significantly contribute to the mechanical response of the knee joint. In this work, a novel iterative method for computing the in situ strain at reference configuration was presented. The framework used an in situ strain gradient approach (deformed reference configuration) and a detailed finite element (FE) model of the knee joint. The effect of the predicted initial configuration on the mechanical response of the joint was then investigated under joint axial compression, passive flexion, and coupled rotations (adduction and internal), and during the stance phase of gait. The inclusion of the reference configuration has a minimal effect on the knee joint mechanics under axial compression, passive flexion, and at two instances (0% and 50%) of the stance phase of gait. However, the presence of the ligaments in situ strains significantly increased the joint stiffness under passive adduction and internal rotations, as well as during the other simulated instances (25%, 75% and 100%) of the stance phase of gait. Also, these parameters substantially altered the local loading state of the ligaments and resulted in better agreement with the literature during joint flexion. Therefore, the proposed computational framework of ligament in situ strain will help to overcome the challenges in considering this crucial biological aspect during knee joint modeling. Besides, the current construct is advantageous for a better understanding of the mechanical behavior of knee ligaments under physiological and pathological states and provide relevant information in the design of reconstructive treatments and artificial grafts.