Bone-patellar tendon-bone graft via a single minimally-invasive approach versus a classical approach in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study

Saphenous nerve injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Reduced numbness area after ligamentoplasty using quadriceps tendon compared with hamstring tendon

PURPOSE

Injury to the infra-patellar branches of the saphenous nerve (IPBSN) is the main neurological complication of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedures. Surgical technique using quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft allows a less invasive tibial approach potentially protecting the IPBSN. The aim of this study was to compare the numbness surface of the cutaneous area supplied by the IPBSN after ACL reconstruction using either hamstring tendon (HT) or QT autografts.

METHODS

This was a retrospective comparative cohort study including 51 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (27 QT and 24 HT) between January 2017 and April 2018. A sensory clinical evaluation was performed on each patient: length of the tibial scar, eventual numbness surface area and the type of sensory disorder were reported. To be considered as an IPBSN lesion, the numbness area had to spread at least one-centimeter away from the scar.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 15 months. In the HT group, the numbness area surface measured 21.2 ± 19 cm² (0-77) and the scar length was on average 31.3 ± 5.6 mm. In the QT group, the numbness area was reduced to 5 ± 10 cm² (P = .0007) as well as the scar length (13.3 ± 2.8 mm, P < .0001). We counted five (17.8%) and 19 (76%) real IPBSN lesions in the QT and HT groups, respectively (P = .0002). Hypoesthesia was the main sensory disorder observed (87.5%).

CONCLUSION

Numbness area of the cutaneous surface supplied by the IPBSN after ACL reconstruction is reduced using QT autograft compared with HT autograft.

Lower donor-site morbidity using QT autografts for ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

Comparing scar cosmesis and regional hypoesthesia at the incision site between quadriceps tendon (QT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Ninety patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with QT, HT or BPTB were evaluated at 1-year post-op. Scar cosmesis was assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) and length of the incision. Sensory outcome was analyzed by calculating the area of hypoesthesia around the scar. The classical ACL reconstruction functional follow-up was measured using the Lysholm score and KOOS.

RESULTS

Concerning QT versus BPTB group, QT patients have a significantly lower mean POSAS (24.8 ± 6.3 vs. 39.6 ± 5.8; p < 0.0001), shorter mean incision (2.8 ± 0.4 cm vs. 6.4 ± 1.3 cm; p < 0.0001), lower extent of hypoesthesia (8.7 ± 5.1 cm² vs. 88.2 ± 57 cm²; p < 0.0001), and better Lysholm score (90.1 ± 10.1 vs. 82.6 ± 13.5; n.s.). No significant difference was seen in KOOS (90.7 ± 7.2 vs. 88.4 ± 7.0; n.s.). Concerning QT versus HT group, no significant difference was found regarding mean POSAS score (24.8 ± 6.3 vs. 31.8 ± 6.2; n.s.), mean length of the incision (2.8 ± 0.4 cm vs. 2.5 ± 0.6 cm; n.s.), KOOS (90.7 ± 7.2 vs. 89.8 ± 8.2; n.s.) and mean Lysholm score (90.1 ± 10.1 vs. 87.8 ± 0.6; n.s.). The mean measured area of hypoesthesia was significantly higher in the HT group (70.3 ± 77.1 cm² vs. 8.7 ± 5.1 cm²; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Quadriceps tendon harvesting technique has the safest incision by causing less sensory loss compared to BPTB and HT. It also has the advantage of a short incision with more cosmetic scar compared to BPTB, with no difference compared to HT. However, no significant difference in terms of functional outcome was shown between the three autografts. These findings provide surgeons evidence about their clinical practice and help with graft choice decisions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.