Influence of screw type on initial coronal and sagittal radiological correction with hybrid constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Correction priorities

Predicting development of severe clinically relevant distal junctional kyphosis following adult cervical deformity surgery, with further distinction from mild asymptomatic episodes

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective cohort study aimed to develop a formal predictive model distinguishing between symptomatic and asymptomatic distal junctional kyphosis (DJK). In this study the authors identified a DJK rate of 32.2%. Predictive models were created that can be used with high reliability to help distinguish between severe symptomatic DJK and mild asymptomatic DJK through the use of surgical factors, radiographic parameters, and patient variables.

METHODS

Patients with cervical deformity (CD) were stratified into asymptomatic and symptomatic DJK groups. Symptomatic: 1) DJK angle (DJKA) > 10° and either reoperation due to DJK or > 1 new-onset neurological sequela related to DJK; or 2) either a DJKA > 20° or ∆DJKA > 20°. Asymptomatic: ∆DJK > 10° in the absence of neurological sequelae. Stepwise logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with these types of DJK. Decision tree analysis established cutoffs.

RESULTS

A total of 99 patients with CD were included, with 32.2% developing DJK (34.3% asymptomatic, 65.7% symptomatic). A total of 37.5% of asymptomatic patients received a reoperation versus 62.5% symptomatic patients. Multivariate analysis identified independent baseline factors for developing symptomatic DJK as follows: pelvic incidence (OR 1.02); preoperative cervical flexibility (OR 1.04); and combined approach (OR 6.2). Having abnormal hyperkyphosis in the thoracic spine, more so than abnormal cervical lordosis, was a factor for developing symptomatic disease when analyzed against asymptomatic patients (OR 1.2). Predictive modeling identified factors that were predictive of symptomatic versus no DJK, as follows: myelopathy (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score 12-14); combined approach; uppermost instrumented vertebra C3 or C4; preoperative hypermobility; and > 7 levels fused (area under the curve 0.89). A predictive model for symptomatic versus asymptomatic disease (area under the curve 0.85) included being frail, T1 slope minus cervical lordosis > 20°, and a pelvic incidence > 46.3°. Controlling for baseline deformity and disability, symptomatic patients had a greater cervical sagittal vertical axis (4-8 cm: 47.6% vs 27%) and were more malaligned according to their Scoliosis Research Society sagittal vertical axis measurement (OR 0.1) than patients without DJK at 1 year (all p < 0.05). Despite their symptomatology and higher reoperation rate, outcomes equilibrated in the symptomatic cohort at 1 year following revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 32.2% of patients with CD suffered from DJK. Symptomatic DJK can be predicted with high reliability. It can be further distinguished from asymptomatic occurrences by taking into account pelvic incidence and baseline cervicothoracic deformity severity.

Sagittal reduction of spinal deformity: Superior versus lateral screw-rod connection

INTRODUCTION

Spinal malalignment can greatly impact a patient's quality of life. Various sagittal parameters are used as realignment goals; however, about 50% of patients end up being under-corrected postoperatively. To improve the correction, prebent rods are available with a radius of curvature corresponding to the patient's "ideal" sagittal alignment. But no studies have been done on how the radius of curvature changes according to the type of connection between the pedicle screws and rods. The goal of this experimental study was to quantify how much prebent rods flatten based on the method used to connect the screw and rod: top-loading screw vs. dome screw with lateral connector.

METHODS

The experiment was done on a material testing system in axial compression on three constructs consisting of two rods secured with top-loading screws and three other constructs consisting of two rods secured with dome screws and lateral connector. The maximum angle of the construct was measured during loading and after removing the load. The primary outcome measure was the mean angle in each construct at each step.

RESULTS

The mean angle of the constructs with top-loading screws when subjected to 500 N load was significantly less than in the constructs with dome screws and lateral connector: 18.6° vs. 24.5° respectively (p<0.0003). The mean angle of the constructs with top-loading screws after removing the load was significantly less than in the constructs with dome screws and lateral connector: 25.7° vs. 32.3° respectively, (p<0.0005).

CONCLUSION

In vitro, top-loading screws produced significantly greater flattening than dome screws with lateral connector. These findings must be confirmed in vivo. Understanding the behavior of rods as a function of the type of screw connection can be an important factor to minimize the risk of under-correction in the sagittal plane.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of surgical correction rates between titanium and cobalt-chrome-alloy as rod materials in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Numerous biomechanical studies comparing titanium (Ti) and cobalt-chrome-alloy (CCM) rods are described in the literature. However, there is a dearth of literature comparing the two rod materials in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the correction rates of Ti and CCM rods in the treatment of AIS with double major curves. We enrolled 45 patients with AIS who underwent surgery between 2009 and 2012. We divided patients into two groups, Group A (n = 29) treated with six-millimeter Ti rods and Group B (n = 16) treated with six-millimeter CCM rods. The rod-derotation maneuver was used for correction. We measured pre- and postoperative indices of coronal alignment (Cobb's angle, coronal balance, T1-tilt, clavicle angle) and sagittal alignment (sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis). In our study, there were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to demographics or curve characteristics (P > 0.05). In Group A, thoracic and lumbar curvature correction rates were 71.2% and 66.8% respectively, and in Group B they were 71.2% and 73.3%, respectively (P = 0.664 and 0.09). There were no significant differences between the two groups in coronal or sagittal factors (P > 0.05) except for greater postoperative lumbar lordosis in the CCM group (P < 0.001). In conclusion, Ti and CCM rods showed similar correction rates in the sagittal and coronal planes for the surgical correction of AIS with double major curves. Biomechanical studies of Ti and CCM rods in vitro is different in biological condition.

Mismatch between rod bending and actual post-operative lordosis in lumbar arthrodesis with poly axial screws

BACKGROUND

The question of rod bending is essential during posterior lumbar fusion. The role of posterior instrumentation during spinal surgery remains to be defined. Despite an appropriate bending, a mismatch between rod lordosis and lumbar lordosis can occur. There is no study on the link between rod bending and lordosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate parameters that explain the mismatch between lumbar lordosis and rod bending in lumbar surgery using polyaxial screws.

HYPOTHESIS

Radiological parameters explain the mismatch between the rod and the lordosis.

METHODS

This study was monocentric, retrospective, descriptive and analytic. All patients with posterior L3L5 fusion in an university-affiliated hospital in 2017 were included. Patients with past surgical history of anterior fusion on the levels L3L5, Coronal malalignment with a Cobb angle superior to 5°, the use of dynamic fixation systems were excluded. We measured on immediate post-operative standing profile x-ray: pelvic incidency, lumbar lordosis, lordosis of the instrumented segment, the distance between posterior wall and rod (EcarT) which reflect how homogeneously the screws are put in depth, the angle between screw and rod (thetaMA), the angle between screw and superior endplate (lambdaMA), the rod lordosis. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted to see if there was a link between all those parameters and the mismatch: vertebral lordosis-rod lordosis.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients were included, mean age was 67. Eighteen were 360° fusion and 56 were postero-lateral fusions. There was no statistical association between demographic data, pelvic parameters, use of interbody devices and the mismatch. There was a statistical association between thetaMA, lambdaMA, EcarT and the mismatch (P<0,0001). A multivariate linear regression model was developed to create a new index: Mismatch analysis index.

CONCLUSION

Our study is the first on the link between rod bending and lumbar lordosis. Three radiologic factors are involved in not obtaining the planned lordosis in short lumbar fusion with polyaxial screws. Two factors depend on the way the surgeon positions screw parallel to the superior vertebral endplate(lambdaMA), and with a homogeneous depth (EcarT). And the last factor: ThetaMA is depending on the surgical technique (compression on screws, osteotomies, monoaxial screws, use of interbody devices).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Cobalt-chrome and titanium alloy rods provide similar coronal and sagittal correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Cobalt-chrome (CoCr) and the titanium alloy TA6V (Ti) are the materials most widely used for spinal instrumentations in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The objective of this work was to compare the effectiveness of CoCr and Ti rods in terms of coronal and sagittal correction by pedicle screw constructs in patients with AIS.

HYPOTHESIS

Correction is similar with CoCr and Ti rods in patients with AIS.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective single surgeon study was conducted in patients with AIS managed using pedicle screw posterior spinal fusion with high implant density and reduction by postero-medial translation. Follow-up was more than 2 years in all patients. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether the rods used were made of CoCr (n=30) or Ti (n=33). The groups were identical for age, Risser classification, follow-up duration, type of curve, and implant density. Coronal and sagittal parameters on standing full-spine radiographs were analysed using graphics software before surgery then 1 month after surgery and at last follow-up. Quantitative data were compared by applying Student's t test.

RESULTS

The percentage of main curve correction at last follow-up was the same in the two groups (76%/75%) (p=0.7). Gains in thoracic kyphosis (12°/13°) and lumbar lordosis (8°/10°) were not significantly different between groups. At last follow-up, 3 patients had proximal junctional kyphosis, 1 in the CoCr group and 2 in the Ti group (p=0.6).

CONCLUSION

For posterior spinal fusion to treat AIS, with a high density of pedicle screws, correction by translation, and 6 mm rods, CoCr rods and Ti rods produce the same amount of coronal and sagittal correction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, comparative retrospective study with no control group.

Pedicle screw versus hybrid construct instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: meta-analysis of thoracic kyphosis

STUDY DESIGN

A quantitative meta-analysis was conducted on publishing studies reporting results of spinal surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with instrumentation of pedicle screw or hybrid construct.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective is to get overview of the power to restore thoracic kyphosis using 2 different instrumentations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

During the past years, surgery has mainly focused on correcting the coronal curve, but nowadays, the aims of posterior fusion and instrumentation are to achieve a stable, well-balanced spine in the coronal as well as in the sagittal planes.

METHODS

A PubMed and EMBASE search was conducted using combinations of the key words "hybrid construct" or "pedicle screw" with "adolescent idiopathic scoliosis" up to October 2013. A hand search of reference lists of obtained articles was also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies were identified and included in this meta-analysis. Of this, 12 included pedicle screw group only, 5 included hybrid construct group only, and 7 included both groups. The total number of patients was 1615. Age ranged from 9 to 26 years, with a mean of 15. For pedicle screw group, we got standard mean difference (SMD) as 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.50); I= 91.4%. For hybrid construct group, we got SMD as 0.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.26). Both intervals of SMD lay in positive value side. Overall SMD was 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.37). The positive value of SMD means thoracic kyphosis improves after surgery, whereas negative value means kyphosis loss after surgery.

CONCLUSION

There is overall tendency for both instrumentations to restore thoracic kyphosis. Hybrid construct seems to be more powerful in restoring kyphosis than pedicle screw. Preoperative important factor was found to be reasonably distributed or balanced. For operative factor, rod stiffness, fashion of hybrid construct, in situ bending, and rod rotation maneuver could have influence on results of kyphosis in different ways. Loss of correction and limited restoration of loss may do exist after correction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with posteromedial translation: radiologic evaluation with a 3D low-dose system

PURPOSE

Computed tomography can be used for three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients, but at the expense of high radiation exposure, and with the limitation of being performed in the supine position. These drawbacks can now be avoided with low-dose stereoradiography, even in routine clinical use. The purpose of this study was to determine the 3D postoperative correction of AIS patients treated by posteromedial translation.

METHODS

Forty-nine consecutive patients operated for AIS (Lenke 1-4) using posteromedial translation were included. Corrections were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively and after at least 2 years using the EOS imaging system. 3D angles were measured in the plane of maximum deformity.

RESULTS

Mean number of levels fused and operative time were 13.5 ± 1 and 215 ± 25 min, respectively. Main thoracic, proximal thoracic, and lumbar curves corrections averaged 64.4 ± 18, 31 ± 10 and 69 ± 20 %, respectively. Mean T4-T12 kyphosis increased 18.8° ± 9° in the subgroup of hypokyphotic patients. Mean apical vertebral rotation reduction was 48.3 ± 20 %. Trunk height gain averaged 27.8 ± 14 mm. There was no pseudarthrosis or significant loss of correction in any plane during follow-up. Two patients (4 %) developed asymptomatic proximal junctional kyphosis, despite having normal thoracic kyphosis. Their sagittal balance was shifted posteriorly by 36 and 47 mm, respectively, by the operation, but revision surgery was not performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose stereoradiography provided 3D reconstructions of the fused and unfused spine in routine clinical use. Postoperative 3D analysis showed that posteromedial translation enhanced sagittal balance correction, without sacrificing frontal or axial correction of the deformity.