French surgical experience in the role 3 medical treatment facility of KaIA (Kabul International Airport, Afghanistan): the place of the orthopedic surgery

Head Face and Neck Surgeon Deployment in the New French Role 2: The Damage Control Resuscitation and Surgical Team

INTRODUCTION

High-intensity conflict is back after decades of asymmetric warfare. With the increase in the incidence of head, face, and neck (HFN) injuries, the French Medical Military Service has decided to deploy HFN surgeons in the new French Role 2: the Damage Control, Resuscitation, and Surgical Team (DCRST). This study aims to provide an overview of HFN French surgeons from their initial training, including the surgical skills required, to their deployment on the DCRST.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The DCRST is a tactical mobile medico-surgical structure with several configurations depending on the battlefield, mission, and flux of casualties. It represents the new French paradigm for the management of combat casualties, including HFN injuries.

RESULTS

The HFN's military surgeon training starts during residency with rotation in the different subspecialties. The HFN surgeon follows a training course called "The French Course for Deployment Surgery" that provides sufficient background to manage polytrauma, including HFN facilities on modern warfare. We have reviewed the main surgical procedures required for an HFN military surgeon.

CONCLUSION

The systematic deployment of HFN surgeons in Role 2 is a specificity of the French army as well as the HFN surgeon's training.Currently, the feedback from an asymmetric conflict is encouraging. However, it will have to innovate to adapt to modern warfare.

Military Orthopedic Surgeons Are Not Just Traumatologists

INTRODUCTION

Each French military orthopedic surgeon is both an orthopedic surgeon and a trauma surgeon. Their mission is to support the armed forces in France and on deployment. The aim of this study was to describe the type of orthopedic surgery performed for the armed forces in France. Our hypothesis was that scheduled surgery was more common than trauma surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective descriptive analysis of the surgical activity for military patients in the orthopedic surgery departments of the four French military platform hospitals. All surgical procedures performed during 2020 were collected. We divided the procedures into the following categories: heavy and light trauma, posttraumatic reconstruction surgery, sports surgery, degenerative surgery, and specialized surgery. Our primary endpoint was the number of procedures performed per category.

RESULTS

A total of 827 individuals underwent surgery, 91 of whom (11%) were medical returnees from deployment. The surgeries performed for the remaining 736 soldiers present in metropolitan France (89%) consisted of 181 (24.6%) trauma procedures (of which 86.7% were light trauma) and 555 (75.4%) scheduled surgery procedures (of which 60.8% were sports surgery). Among the medical returnees, there were 71 traumatology procedures (78%, of which 87.3% were light traumatology) and 20 procedures corresponding to surgery usually carried out on a scheduled basis (22%, of which 95% were sports surgery).

CONCLUSION

Military orthopedic surgeons are not just traumatologists; their activity for the armed forces is varied and mainly consists of so-called programmed interventions.

Review of a Role 2 in Afghanistan: Understanding the Data on Medical and Surgical Volumes in a Deployed Setting

INTRODUCTION

The U.S. forward military surgical assets have deployed throughout the Iraq and Afghanistan theaters of operations to maintain surgical support for injured service members in compliance with the "golden hour" as specified in the Gates Memorandum. The support of evacuation times of less than 60 minutes to a surgical capability has resulted in smaller surgical teams being deployed to an increased number of locations. Over the last 5 years, the combat trauma patient encounters have decreased. Although some Role 2 medical treatment facilities (MTFs) maintain a medical mission, most of them are set up to provide trauma care. The largest and busiest Role 2 MTF is located near Kabul and serves the NATO population. The aims of this review are to examine the epidemiological data of the largest Role 2 MTF in theater, to examine damage control surgical capability optimization in a facility with a largely medical mission, and to analyze what this may mean in the context of surgical skill atrophy.

METHODS

As part of a performance improvement project, a retrospective review of prospectively collected data at the Hamid Karzai NATO Role 2 MTF was conducted. Four years of clinical and epidemiological data were reviewed. Independent source verification of the records was conducted by validating records via comparison to the ancillary services' records. When available, data on other MTFs in Afghanistan were used for comparison. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographics, evacuations, surgeries, and admissions.

RESULTS

Over the studied period, 0.7% of patients were seen for battle injuries. The average number of patients seen was 636 per month with 184 per month in 2016 and a steady increase to 805 per month in 2019. The operative volume was a mean of 2.8 surgeries per month with a median of 2 surgeries per month (orthopedic and general surgery combined). Other Role 2 facilities were on average seeing even fewer operative patients, although there were some treating more operative patients. From available data, no other Role 2 MTFs were treating close to as many total patients (all types combined). The two Role 3 facilities evaluated saw significantly more operative patients at an average of 53 surgeries per month.

CONCLUSION

The ratio of operative cases per surgeon is substantially higher at these Role 3 facilities, when compared to Role 2 facilities, although still significantly lower than would be expected at an U.S. Level 1 trauma center. This is consistent with other larger epidemiological studies on forward MTF workload. The vast majority of patient care is related to treatment of disease and preventative medicine. Only 0.7% of the large volume of patient visits evaluated were for battle injuries. There is a scarcity of both surgical and trauma patients, with a more pronounced reduction at Role 2 compared to Role 3 facilities. This is especially evident here with a facility that has such a large patient population but low trauma or surgical patient volume. Sustaining trauma and surgical skills for both surgeons and trauma teams with a paucity of trauma patients is a significant concern.

Aeromedical Evacuations Within the French Armed Forces: Analysis of 2,129 Patients

INTRODUCTION

The doctrine of medical support during French military operations is based on a triptych: forward medical stabilization, forward damage control surgery, and early strategic aeromedical evacuation (Strategic-AE). The aim of this study was to describe the last piece, the evacuation process of the French Strategic-AE.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using patient records from 2015 to 2017. All French service members requiring an air evacuation from a foreign country to a homeland medical facility were included. Data collected included age, medical diagnosis, priority categorization, boarding location, distance from Paris, type of plane and flight, medical team composition, timeline, and dispatch at arrival.

RESULTS

We analyzed 2,129 patients evacuated from 71 countries, most from Africa (1,256), the Middle East (382), and South America (175). Most patients (1,958) were not severely injured, although some considered priority (103) or urgent (68). Diagnoses included disease (48.6%), nonbattle injuries (43%), battle stress (5.3%), and battle injuries (3%). 246 Strategic-AE used medical teams in flight, 136 of them in a dedicated Falcon aircraft. The main etiologies for those evacuations were battle injuries (24%), cardiovascular (15.4%), infections (8%), and neurologic (7.3%). The median time of management for urgent patients was about 16 hours but longer for priority patients (26 hours). Once in France, 1,146 patients were admitted to a surgery department and 96 to an intensive care unit.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to analyze the French Strategic-AE system, which is doctrinally unique when compared to its North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies. North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies favor care in the theatre in place of the French early Strategic-AE. However, in the event of a high intensity conflict, a combination of these two doctrines could be useful.

Bone reconstruction by the induced membrane technique. What differences between conventional and ballistic trauma?

BACKGROUND

The induced membrane technique (IMT) has been widely evaluated for reconstruction of post-traumatic bone defects. However, no specific evaluation was conducted in ballistic injuries. The objective of the present study was to compare IMT in conventional trauma (CT) versus ballistic trauma (BT) managed in a military trauma center.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted between 2009 and 2018 in patients treated by IMT for post-traumatic bone defects, whatever the defect location. Endpoints comprised bone union, residual infection, additional bone grafting and lower-limb amputation.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included: 24 in the CT and 12 in the BT group. Demographics and injury pattern were similar in both groups, with open fracture and infected lesions predominating. The only significant difference was that tibial bone defects were larger in the BT group. Operative parameters and results were also similar. At a mean 24 months' follow-up, bone union rate was 83% in both groups, without significant differences in residual infection, complementary grafting or late amputation.

CONCLUSION

IMT is appropriate to bone reconstruction in the aftermath of ballistic trauma, with similar results to those obtained in conventional trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Description of trauma among French service members in the Department of Defense Trauma Registry: understanding the nature of trauma and the care provided

BACKGROUND

Since 2001, the French Armed Forces have sustained many casualties during the Global War on Terror; however, even today, there is no French Military trauma registry. Some French service members (SMs) were treated in US Military Medical Treatment Facilities (MTFs) and were recorded in the US Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR). Our objective was to conduct a descriptive analysis of the injuries sustained by French SMs reported in the DoDTR and subsequent care provided to them to assist in understanding the importance of building a French Military trauma registry.

METHODS

Using DoDTR data collected from 2001 to 2017, a retrospective descriptive analysis was conducted. We identified 59 French SMs treated in US MTFs. The characteristics of the SMs' demographics, injuries, care provided to them, and discharge outcomes were summarized.

RESULTS

Among the 59 French SMs identified, 46 (78%) sustained battle injuries (BIs) and 13 (22%) sustained nonbattle injuries (NBIs). There were 47 (80%) SMs injured in Afghanistan (Opération Pamir), while 12 (20%) were injured in Opération Chammal in Iraq and Syria. Explosives accounted for 52.5% of injuries, while 25.4% were due to gunshot wounds; all were BIs. The majority of reported injuries were penetrating (59.3%), most of which were BIs (71.7%). The mean Injury Severity Score for BIs was 12 (SD = 8.9) compared to 6 (SD = 1.7) for NBIs. Around half of SMs (n = 30; 51%) were injured in Afghanistan between the years 2008-2010. Among a total of 246 injuries sustained by 59 patients, extremities were the body part most prone to BIs followed by the head and face. Four SMs died after admission (6.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The DoDTR provides extensive data on trauma injuries that can be used to inform injury prevention and clinical care. The majority of injuries sustained by French SMs were BIs, caused by explosives, and predominantly occurring to the extremities; these findings are similar to those of other studies conducted in combat zones. There is a need to establish a French Military trauma registry to improve the combat casualty care provided to French SMs, and its creation may benefit from the DoDTR model.

Four years of orthopaedic activities in Chinese Role 2 Hospital of eastern Mali peacekeeping area

INTRODUCTION

The Chinese Role 2 Hospital (CHN-Role 2H) Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) was founded in July 2013 as part of the Chinese commitment to Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA). It provides medical care for approximately 5200 personnel of the whole Sector East of MINUSMA including UN military personnel, UN police and UN civilian staff. The aim of this study was to determine the orthopaedic surgical activity over a 4-year period to facilitate the training of future Chinese military surgical teams.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surgical records of all patients operated on at the CHN-Role 2H between 28 March 2014 to 28 March 2018 were identified, and all orthopaedic activity were analysed.

RESULTS

During this period, 1190 patients underwent 2024 surgical procedures. Orthopaedic procedures represented 961/2024 (47.5%) of all the procedures. Battle injury (BI) represented 43% of patients. Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) were responsible for 15.8 % casualties. Fractures (49%) and soft tissue injures (43%) were the most common injuries, with 61% of the fractures being open. Damage control surgery including debridement (23.52%) and external fixation (17.90%) were the most frequently performed interventions.

CONCLUSION

Orthopaedic surgery is the most frequently performed surgery in the CHN-Role 2H in Mali. The complexity and severity of injuries demonstrate the urgent need for tailored training and extended skill sets for deploying military orthopaedic surgeons.

Military neurosurgery in operation: experience in the French role-3 medical treatment facility of Kabul

BACKGROUND

In 2009, during the war in Afghanistan, the increasing number of head injuries led to the deployment of a military neurosurgeon at the Kabul International Airport (KaIA) medical treatment facility, in March 2010. The main goal of this study was to depict the neurosurgical activity in this centre and to analyse its different aspects.

METHOD

A retrospective study of all the neurosurgical patients treated in KaIA from March 2010 to June 2013.

RESULTS

Three hundred and seventy-three interventions performed by the neurosurgeon deployed were reported for 373 surgeries, in 335 patients, representing 10.6 % of the overall surgical activity of the centre. Among the 69 interventions performed on soldiers, 57 surgeries were undertaken in emergency (82.6 %), while 12 were elective procedures (17.4 %). On the other hand, 289 surgeries were performed in civilian Afghans, with 126 emergency procedures in (43.6 %), against 163 elective interventions (56.4 %). Among the 44.5 % (n = 149) of the traumatic casualties, cerebral lesions represented 28.7 % (n = 96) and spinal lesions 12.4 % (n = 42). Ninety patients had multiple injuries. Additionally, patients without trauma accounted for 55.5 % (n = 186) of the overall population. Thus, 49 % (n = 164) were operated on for non-traumatic lesion of the spine. These were mostly civilian Afghans treated under medical aid to the population (90.2 %, n = 148/164).

CONCLUSIONS

The military neurosurgeon had two roles in KaIA: both to support the armed forces and to manage medical aid to the civilian population. This study gives food for thought on the neurosurgical needs in modern warfare, and on the skills required for the military neurosurgeon.

Surgical challenges in a new theater of modern warfare: The French role 2 in Gao, Mali

INTRODUCTION

On January 11th 2013, France launched Operation Serval in Mali following Resolution 2085 of the Security Council of the United Nations. Between January and March 2013, more than 4000 French soldiers were deployed to support the Malian National Army and the African Armed Forces.

METHODS

All of the patients who had surgery during Operation Serval were entered into a computerised database. Patients' demographic data (age, sex, status) and types of performed surgical procedures (specialties, injury mechanisms) were recorded.

RESULTS

268 patients were operated on in Gao's Role 2 with a total of 296 surgeries. Among those operated on, 40% were Malian civilians, 24% were French soldiers, and 36% were soldiers of the International Coalition Forces. The majority of the surgeries were orthopaedic, and visceral surgeries were common as well, representing 43% of the total surgeries. Specialised surgical procedures including neurosurgery, thoracic, and vascular surgery were also performed. Forty percent of the surgeries were scheduled. War-related traumatic surgeries represented 22% of the surgical procedures, with non-war related surgeries and non-trauma emergency surgeries making up the rest.

CONCLUSION

this analysis confirms the specific characteristic of asymmetric warfare that it results in a relatively reduced number of war-related casualties. Forward surgical teams have to deal with a wide range of injuries requiring several surgical specialties. Surgeries dedicated to medical aid provided to the population also represented an important part of the surgical activity. Because of the diversity and the technicality of the surgical procedures in Role 2, surgeons had to be trained in war surgery covering all of the surgical specialties, while they maintained their specific skills. In France in 2007, the French Military Health Service Academy (École du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France) offered an advanced course in surgery for deployment in combat zones, with a special focus on damage control surgeries and the management of mass casualties incidents.

Extremity injuries in soldiers during the conflict in Mali: experience of Togo Level two Hospital

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyse war-related and non-war-related extremity injuries in soldiers in the Mali conflict.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was performed from 1 May 1 to 31 December 2014. It concerned extremity injuries in soldiers treated at Togo Level 2 Hospital.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients with an average age of 31.19 years were assessed. Among them, 50 were admitted after war injury and 29 from nonwar injury. Most war-related injuries were due to improvised explosive devices (IEDs) (36 %); road traffic accidents (51.72 %) were the main mechanism of non-war injury. A total of 125 injuries were analysed. Limb fractures were identified in 37 patients (29.6 %), and 22 cases (59.46 %) were open fractures. Twenty-six (20.8 %) patients had soft tissue wounds. The other injuries were sprains (18.4 %), muscle contusions (15.2 %), dislocations (8.8 %), traumatic amputations (4 %) and burns (3.2 %). Surgical debridement and external fixator application were the most frequently performed surgical procedures. Thirty-nine per cent of patients were evacuated to a level 3 hospital for better care.

CONCLUSION

The severity of injuries and their rapid treatment require orthopaedic surgeons to have high levels of surgical experience and knowledge pertaining to military or disaster surgical doctrine.

War-related extremity injuries in children: 89 cases managed in a combat support hospital in Afghanistan

BACKGROUND

Meeting paediatric needs is among the priorities of western healthcare providers working in Afghanistan.

HYPOTHESIS

Insufficient information is available on paediatric wartime injuries to the extremities. Our objective here was to describe these injuries and their management on the field.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive cases of injuries to the extremities in children (< 16 years of age) due to weapons and managed at the Kabul International Airport (KaIA) Combat Support Hospital between June 2009 and April 2013. We identified 89 patients with a mean age of 10.2 ± 3.5 years and a total of 137 elemental lesions.

RESULTS

Explosive devices accounted for most injuries (78.6%) and carried a significantly higher risk of multiple lesions. There were 54 bone lesions (traumatic amputations and fractures) and 83 soft-tissue lesions. The amputation rate was 18%. Presence of bone lesions was associated with a higher risk of injury to blood vessels and nerves. Of the 89 patients, four (4.5%) died and eight (9%) were transferred elsewhere. Of the 77 remaining patients, at last follow-up (median, one month; range, 0.1-16 months), 73 (95%) had achieved a full recovery (healed wound and/or fracture) or were recovering with no expectation that further surgery would be needed.

DISCUSSION

Despite the absence of paediatric surgeons, the combat support hospital provided appropriate care at the limb salvage and reconstruction phases. The highly specialised treatments needed to manage sequelae were very rarely provided. These treatments probably deserve to be developed in combat support hospitals.