Outcomes of talar dome osteochondral defect repair using osteocartilaginous autografts: 37 cases of Mosaicplasty®

Retroarticular drilling for osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Opinions differ on the optimal treatment for stable talar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) with intact cartilage. Some recommend conservative management, while others prefer surgical care, which includes debridement and micro-fractures, transarticular drilling through a direct or medial malleolus approach and retroarticular drilling. The rationale behind retroarticular drilling is to induce bone marrow healing without touching the intact cartilage. The goal of this systematic review is to summarize the clinical outcomes of retroarticular drilling as a standalone procedure for stable talar OCD with intact cartilage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature prospectively registered in the PROSPERO register was performed along the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, EMBASE and Evidence-Based Medicine databases were searched from inception to December 2021 for retroarticular drilling for stable talar OCD with an intact cartilage. Two independent evaluators screened the search results, selected the articles to be included in the analysis and assessed the methodological quality of all included articles with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

Twelve studies, on 99 patients were included in the final analysis. Methodological quality was poor for all the included studies. High heterogeneity prevented any pooling or meta-analysis, but favorable clinical results were reported according to excellent post-intervention scores on the American Orthopedic Foot and Anke Score (AOFAS), ranging from 88.9 to 100. There was also significant improvement in pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging between 2.3 and 5.9.

DISCUSSION

Favorable results seem to be achieved with retroarticular drilling without grafting for stable talar OCD with intact cartilage, but more powered comparative studies between surgical options and conservative management are needed to establish the gold standard treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Osteochondral lesions of the talar dome

Ankle pain and/or instability is a frequent, non-specific reason for consultation, and may reveal an osteochondral lesion of the talar dome (OLTD). There are 2 types of OLTD: (1) posteromedial, usually idiopathic, wide and deep, featuring isolated pain with severe functional impact; (2) anterolateral, often implicating trauma and associated in 30% of cases with lateral ligament involvement, in a clinical presentation associating pain and instability. The aim of the present study was to review the issue of OLTD, with 5 questions: HOW TO ESTABLISH THE DIAGNOSIS, WITH WHAT WORK-UP?: There are no specific clinical signs. A diagnosis of OLTD should be considered in all cases of painful and/or unstable ankle and especially in case of history of sprain. The clinical work-up screens systematically for laxity or associated hindfoot malalignment. CT-arthrography is the gold-standard, enabling morphologic analysis of OLTD. WHAT CLASSIFICATIONS SHOULD BE USED?: CT-arthrography determines length, depth and any cartilage dissection, classifying OLTD in 3 grades. Grade 1 is a lesion<10mm in length and<5mm in depth. Grade 2 is>10mm in length and/or>5mm in depth with intact cartilage around the lesion. Grade 3 is the same as grade 2 but with overlying cartilage dissection. WHAT ARE THE CURRENT TREATMENT INDICATIONS?: After failure of 6 months' well-conducted medical treatment (sports rest, analgesics, physiotherapy), surgical options in France today comprise microfracture in grade 1 OLTD, raising the fragment, freshening the floor of the lesion and fixing the fragment (known as "lift, drill, fill, fix" (LDFF)) in grade 2, and mosaicplasty in grade 3. WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTS FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS AND THEIR ROLES?: Treatments are progressing and improving. Ideal treatment should restore hyaline cartilage to prevent secondary osteoarthritis. Matrix and cell culture techniques need to be validated. WHAT RESULTS CAN BE EXPECTED AND WHAT SHOULD PATIENTS BE TOLD?: Management according to grade secures AOFAS scores≥80/100 in 80% of cases, whatever the grade. Return to sport is feasible in 80% of case, at a mean 6 months. Progression is satisfactory after treatment adapted to the lesion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, expert opinion.

Implant system for large osteochondral defects

Issues with current treatments for osteochondral defects such as mosaicplasty and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) are lack of donor material, problems associated with donor sites, necessity of second surgical intervention and cell expansion, difficult site preparation and implant fitting to match the surrounding tissue. This study presents the development of a patient specific implant system for focal osteochondral defects that addresses these issues. Using computer aided design and manufacturing techniques, computed tomography scans are utilized to design the implant and templates that facilitate site preparation to allow for precise and easy implantation of the designed perfectly fitting tissue replacement. Functionality of the system and accurate restoration of a defect is demonstrated by digital before/after comparison and with a prototype. With the presented implantation system larger defects in curved joint surfaces can be restored to an optimal shape in an easier procedure than for instance mosaicplasty. The proposed system potentially allows for later replacement of worn implants.

Prognostic factors for the management of chondral defects of the knee and ankle joint: a systematic review

Purpose

Different surgical techniques to manage cartilage defects are available, including microfracture (MFx), autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), osteoarticular auto- or allograft transplantation (OAT), autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC). This study investigated the patient-related prognostic factors on the clinical outcomes of surgically treated knee and ankle cartilage defects.

Methods

This study followed the PRISMA statement. In May 2022, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus. All the studies investigating the outcomes of surgical management for knee and/or talus chondral defects were accessed. Only studies performing mesenchymal stem cells transplantation, OAT, MFx, ACI, and AMIC were considered. A multiple linear model regression analysis through the Pearson Product–Moment Correlation Coefficient was used.

Results

Data from 184 articles (8905 procedures) were retrieved. Female sex showed a positive moderate association with visual analogue scale at last follow-up (P = 0.02). Patient age had a negative association with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (P = 0.04) and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (P = 0.03). BMI was strongly associated with graft hypertrophy (P = 0.01). Greater values of VAS at baseline negatively correlate with lower values of Tegner Activity Scale at last follow-up (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The clinical outcomes were mostly related to the patients’ performance status prior surgery. A greater BMI was associated with greater rate of hypertrophy. Female sex and older age evidenced fair influence, while symptom duration prior to the surgical intervention and cartilage defect size evidenced no association with the surgical outcome. Lesion size and symptom duration did not evidence any association with the surgical outcome.

The Effectiveness of Osteochondral Autograft Transfer in the Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are common following ankle trauma. Operative treatment is often required, with osteochondral autografting frequently performed for large or cystic lesions, or following failed primary surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence for osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS) in the management of OLT. A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. Study quality was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS). Meta-analysis was carried out using RevMan, version 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020). A total of 23 studies were included. The mean modified CMS was 48.1±7.47. Fourteen studies reported preoperative and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Score (AOFAS). The aggregate mean preoperative and postoperative VAS score across 14 studies was 6.47±1.35 and 1.98±1.18, respectively. Meta-analysis of seven studies on 210 patients found that OATS resulted in a significant reduction in VAS score compared to baseline (Mean Difference {MD} -4.22, 95% Confidence Interval {CI} -4.54 to -3.90, P < 0.0001). The aggregate mean preoperative and postoperative AOFAS scores across 14 studies were 56.41±8.52 and 87.14±4.8, respectively. Based on eight studies on 224 patients, OATS resulted in a significant improvement in AOFAS score compared to baseline (MD 29.70, 95% CI 25.68 to 33.73, P = < 0.0001). Donor site pain occurred in 9% of cases. Current evidence from low-quality studies suggests that OATS is a safe and effective treatment option for OLT, though it is associated with a risk of donor site morbidity.

Allograft Versus Autograft Osteochondral Transplant for Chondral Defects of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether the results of osteochondral transplant using autografts or allografts for talar osteochondral defect are equivalent.

PURPOSE

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare allografts and autografts in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), MRI findings, and complications.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in February 2021. All studies investigating the outcomes of allograft and/or autograft osteochondral transplant as management for osteochondral defects of the talus were accessed. The outcomes of interest were visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score. Data concerning the rates of failure and revision surgery were also collected. Continuous data were analyzed using the mean difference (MD), whereas binary data were evaluated with the odds ratio (OR) effect measure.

RESULTS

Data from 40 studies (1174 procedures) with a mean follow-up of 46.5 ± 25 months were retrieved. There was comparability concerning the length of follow-up, male to female ratio, mean age, body mass index, defect size, VAS score, and AOFAS score (P > .1) between the groups at baseline. At the last follow-up, the MOCART (MD, 10.5; P = .04) and AOFAS (MD, 4.8; P = .04) scores were better in the autograft group. The VAS score was similar between the 2 groups (P = .4). At the last follow-up, autografts demonstrated lower rate of revision surgery (OR, 7.2; P < .0001) and failure (OR, 5.1; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Based on the main findings of the present systematic review, talar osteochondral transplant using allografts was associated with higher rates of failure and revision compared with autografts at midterm follow-up.

Outcome of retroarticular drilling for osteochondritis dissecans of the talus in a pediatric population

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of bone marrow stimulation for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the talus in pediatric patients is not optimal. The objective was to evaluate the retroarticular drilling technique for talar OCD.

METHODS

A retrospective case-series study of pediatric cases treated for talar OCD with retroarticular drilling was done. Clinical and radiological outcome scores were recorded as follows: the percentage of patients who had a successful treatment, the percentage for every category of the Berndt and Harty treatment result grading and the percentage for every radiographical outcome score were computed.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (18 girls; mean age: 14.6 ± 2.1 years) were included. The mean follow-up was 14.8 (±11.7) months. 26.3% required revision surgery. The Berndt and Harty scores were: 57.9% good, 10.5% fair, 31.6% poor. Radiological outcomes were: 21% healed, 47.4% partially healed, 31.6% no healing. The radiological outcome score was better for younger patients (P = 0.01) and those with an open physis (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

26.3% of patients needed revision surgery after talar OCD retroarticular drilling and 21% were healed radiographically. Skeletal immaturity and a younger age were associated to a better radiological outcome.

Hoffa’s fracture in an adolescent treated with an innovative surgical procedure: A case report

BACKGROUND

Hoffa fracture is rare, especially in adolescents, and has a high rate of complications such as avascular necrosis and osteoarthritis; moreover, there are no definitive guidelines for its treatment. This report could provide a new potential treatment for Hoffa fracture.

CASE SUMMARY

A 16-year-old girl presented to the orthopedic emergency department of No. 2 People’s Hospital of Yibin City with persistent pain following a right knee injury sustained during a sprint race. Her knee was swollen and tender, and the range of motion was restricted by the pain. X-ray and computed tomography revealed a Hoffa fracture in the right knee. After consultation, surgical treatment was performed, and the fracture was fixed with three 3.5-mm cannulated cancellous screws; osteochondral plugs that were harvested from the screw insertion site were re-implanted to cover the screw head. The patient’s fracture and osteochondral plug healed 6 mo postoperatively, and she presented a knee range of motion of 0–135 without pain, and was walking without support with a normal gait.

CONCLUSION

Here, we describe an innovative surgical procedure for Hoffa fracture that could provide a new possibility for the treatment of similar fractures, and further improve their management.

Long-term outcome for repair of osteochondral lesions of the talus by osteochondral autograft: A series of 56 Mosaicplasties®

INTRODUCTION

The present study analyzed results in 56 osteochondral Mosaicplasty® autografts for osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) at more than 5 years' follow-up.

HYPOTHESIS

Mosaicplasty® shows long-term efficacy and low morbidity in the treatment of OLT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study included patients treated by Mosaicplasty® with more than 5 years' follow-up. Preoperative data were collected from medical files, and all patients were reassessed. AOFAS scores and FAOS were calculated at last follow-up. Imaging comprised standard radiographs and MRI or CT arthrography of the ankle.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included, with a mean age of 34 years (range, 18-60 years). Seventeen involved work accidents. Mean follow-up was 8.5 years (range, 5-20 years). Mean AOFAS score at follow-up was 80.6±19.4 and mean FAOS 77.8±21.5. Work accident, preoperative osteoarthritis and untreated laxity correlated significantly with poorer results. At last follow-up, 22 patients (39%) showed signs of osteoarthritis. There was no morbidity implicating the malleolar osteotomy. There were 11 cases (20%) of persistent patellar syndrome at the donor site.

DISCUSSION

The present results were comparable to those reported elsewhere, showing that functional results of Mosaicplasty® autograft for OLT do not deteriorate over the long term. Work accidents correlated significantly with poorer functional outcome. Any associated instability must always be treated. Malleolar osteotomy provides good exposure without additional morbidity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Osteochondral lesion of the talus: What are we talking about?

INTRODUCTION

The analysis of osteochondral lesions of talus (OLT) is currently mostly descriptive, not permitting an understanding of the different nosological frameworks of these lesions. Better knowledge of the characteristics of patients with OLT should make it possible to optimize the surgical indications and anticipate the associated lesions, which should not be overlooked. The main objective of this study was, therefore, to assess the characteristics of patients with OLT, and to analyze the lesions encountered.

HYPOTHESIS

OLTs correspond to variable entities responding to specific treatments.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This was a prospective multicenter descriptive study including all patients operated on for an OLT, aged between 15 and 65 years, across 10 French specialist centers. The demographic, clinical and radiological data of the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

OLTs predominantly affect males and patients in their thirties. Two types of OLT should be distinguished: a lateral OLT; smaller and more superficial, most often presenting with painful instability, in the context of trauma, and a medial OLT; more frequent, wider and deeper.

DISCUSSION

Two nosological frameworks exist for OLTs, and correspond to precise surgical indications: medial lesions of more than 10mm² and more than 5mm in depth, with isolated anteromedial pain and significant functional impairment, most often idiopathic, generally requiring treatment by osteochondral autografts. Lateral lesions less than 5mm in depth and less than 10mm², often superficial, following trauma or ankle laxity, associated with lateral ligament damage in one-third of cases, and a clinical presentation associated to instability and pain, requiring treatment most often by microfracture with associated ligament repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Proposal of a new CT arthrographic classification system of osteochondral lesions of the talus

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) is warranted if medical treatments fail, achieving good results in around 85% of cases. Numerous classification systems, based on all possible imaging modalities (radiography, MRI, CT scan, scintigraphy, and CT arthrography), have been proposed to guide surgical treatments, but none has proven to be superior. A recent study demonstrated the prognostic value of CT arthrography by accurately describing the subchondral bone plate. A systematic review of the literature has brought new criteria to predict good outcome following bone marrow stimulation surgical techniques: lesions should measure less than 1 centimeter in size and 5 millimeters in depth. Based on these data, we are proposing a new simple, 3-stage CT arthrographic classification system of OLT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After a brief overview of the classification, 60 CT-arthrographies of ankles with OLT were organized according to this new CT arthrographic classification system by four surgeons (two juniors and two seniors). Two imaging assessments were performed one month apart. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fleiss' kappa coefficient to determine the inter- and intraobserver agreement.

RESULTS

An excellent inter- and intraobserver agreement was found with overall Fleiss' kappa coefficients of 0.897 and 0.847, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study showed an excellent inter- and intraobserver agreement for this new CT arthrographic classification system of OLT. The principal advantage of this new classification system, based on the latest data in the literature, is its ability to easily distinguish lesions that are more amenable to bone marrow stimulation techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

A triplanar osteotomy technique in arthroscopy-assisted ankle mosaicplasty

PURPOSE

Osteochondral lesions of the talus are lesions that are seen particularly in the young age group and are often related to sports injuries and trauma. These lesions, which show late symptoms radiologically, can be determined in the early stages with magnetic resonance imaging. The aim of this study was to present a new osteotomy technique to reduce the complications of mosaicplasty surgery to a minimum and provide an early return to work.

METHODS

A total of 11 patients who had cartilage lesions due to osteochondritis dissecans in the medial aspect of the talus underwent mosaicplasty after a triplanar osteotomy. The dimensions of the lesion and the depth of the triplanar osteotomy were determined preoperatively. Coronal, sagittal and transverse cuts were made at the depth defined arthroscopically. Following the osteotomy, an osteochondral graft taken from the ipsilateral knee was placed in the prepared area. Osteotomy side was fixed with one or two cannulated screws following mosaicplasty.

RESULTS

With this technique, weight-bearing can be immediate in cases with no need for osteotomy in the joint surface. In cases including the joint surface, partial weight-bearing is permitted after 4 weeks and can be increased as tolerated. In the 11 cases treated with this technique, full weight-bearing was achieved at mean 5 weeks (range, 5-8 weeks). No shift (upward displacement of osteotomized fragment) or non-union was seen in any patient.

CONCLUSION

With the triplanar osteotomy technique described here, potential shift complications can be reduced to a minimum. As only the lesion region is targeted, the osteochondral surface formed by the fracture is much less.

STUDY DESIGN

Case Series; Level of Evidence, 4.

Knee-to-Talus Donor-Site Morbidity Following Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis with Best-case and Worst-case Analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the promising clinical results of autologous osteochondral transplantation in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus, the occurrence of knee donor-site morbidity remains a concern. However, the proportion of patients experiencing donor-site morbidity is not well established because of important variations in estimates drawn by heterogeneous studies with loss to followup, often made at short-term (< 1 year). Therefore, both a meta-analysis of studies that assumed no patients lost to followup had donor-site morbidity and assumed all patients lost to followup had donor-site morbidity may help to estimate the true risk of donor-site morbidity.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

To evaluate the proportion of patients who developed knee donor-site morbidity after autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesion of the talus, by (1) meta-analysis of the proportion of patients experiencing donor-site morbidity in the best-case scenario as reported, in which no patients lost to followup were assumed to have donor-site morbidity and (2) meta-analysis of the percentage of patients who had donor-site morbidity in the worst-case scenario, in which all patients lost to followup were assumed to have donor-site morbidity and (3) present the characteristics of studies associated with the reporting of donor-site morbidity.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library databases was performed from their inception to October 2017 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies that reported knee donor-site morbidity after autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesion of the talus, mean followup ≥ 1 year, full-text studies published in a peer-review journal and written in English. Quality of evidence (Case Series Quality Appraisal Checklist), sample size, mean patient age, study design, mean followup time, and observed rate of knee donor-site morbidity were evaluated. Twenty-six studies with 915 ankles (904 patients) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Approximately half of the included studies were of small cohort (n < 30, 12 studies), and 12 of 26 studies did not report at all on loss to followup. In the studies that reported loss to followup (14 of 26), a total of 32 patients (35 ankles) were reported lost. Random-effects models were used to estimate the risk of donor-site morbidity as between-study heterogeneity was determined to be high in both meta-analyses that assumed that no patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity (I = 82.1%) and the one that assumed all patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity (I = 88.7%). Multivariable metaregression was used to estimate the association between study characteristics and the observed proportion of patients who experienced of donor-site morbidity. If there was evidence of an association between a study characteristic and proportion, a subgroup analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The estimated proportion of donor-site morbidity was 6.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-11.8), assuming that no patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity and 10.8% (95% CI, 4.8-18.3) assuming that all patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity after a mean followup of 43.8 ± 24.7 months (range, 15.9-120 months). There was a negative association between study sample size and proportion of donor-site morbidity (β = -0.26; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.12; p < 0.001 assuming that no patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity and β = -0.31; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.13; p < 0.001 assuming that all patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity); that is, as study size increased, the proportion of patients reported with donor-site morbidity decreased. In larger studies (n ≥ 30), the estimated percentage of donor-site morbidity was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.2%-5.0%; I = 47.6%) assuming that no patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity, and 5.0% (95% CI, 2.1%-9.0%; I = 74.5%) assuming all patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity. High between-study heterogeneity (differences in methodology) could not be completely explained by variability in study sample size, mean patient age, design, or mean followup time, and may be attributable to other factors such as inconsistent definitions of donor-site morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

The estimated proportion of donor-site morbidity after autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesion of the talus ranged from 6.7% to 10.8% in the current meta-analysis. However, subgroup analysis demonstrated that larger studies (n ≥ 30) estimated a lower donor-site morbidity risk (< 5.0%) than smaller studies (n < 30). This estimate should be interpreted in light of the fact that nearly half of the included studies did not report on loss to followup, and so their estimates of donor-site morbidity may be low. In addition, high between-study heterogeneity and the inclusion of predominantly retrospective studies with small sample sizes likely contributed to estimates that suffered from a high risk of bias, probably in favor of the surgical treatment being studied.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Good clinical and functional outcomes at mid-term following autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus

PURPOSE

Autologous osteochondral transplantation is an established treatment for large-sized osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) with excellent short term outcomes. However, few studies assess the outcomes of autologous osteochondral transplantation at mid-term follow-up. The purpose of the current systematic review was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the autologous osteochondral transplantation procedure in the treatment of OLT at mid-term and long-term follow-up.

METHODS

A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases was performed in October 2017 based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Included studies were evaluated with regard to level of evidence (LOE) and quality of evidence (QOE) using the Coleman Methodology Score. Clinical outcomes, and complications were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Eleven studies, with 500 ankles were included at a mean 62.8 months follow-up. Seven studies used the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. The weighted mean preoperative AOFAS score was 55.1 ± 6.1, and the postoperative score was 86.2 ± 4.5, with 87.4% of patients (132 of 151) being reported as excellent or good results. In total, 53 of the 500 patients (10.6%) had complications. The most common complication was donor site morbidity with 18 patients (3.6%) at final follow-up. Thirty-one patients (6.2%) underwent reoperations, and 5 ankles (1.0%) were regarded as failed autologous osteochondral transplantation.

CONCLUSION

The current systematic review demonstrated that good clinical and functional outcomes can be expected following autologous osteochondral transplantation for the treatment of OLT, with a low failure rate. The results from this study show patients can be reasonably counselled to expect good clinical outcomes in the mid-term. MRI and radiographs showed restoration of articular surface as well as a minimal presence of osteoarthritis at mid-term follow-up. However, as low level and quality of evidence and the variability of the data may confound the data, further well-designed studies are necessary to determine the effectiveness of autologous osteochondral transplantation in the treatment for OLT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Metal Resurfacing Inlay Implant for Osteochondral Talar Defects After Failed Previous Surgery: A Midterm Prospective Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of osteochondral talar defects (OCDs) after failed previous surgery is challenging. Promising short-term results have been reported with use of a metal resurfacing inlay implant.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the midterm clinical effectiveness of the metal implant for OCDs of the medial talar dome after failed previous surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

We prospectively studied all patients who met the inclusion criteria and received a metal resurfacing inlay implant between 2007 and 2014. The primary outcome measure was implant survival, as measured by reoperation rate. Secondary outcome measures were numeric rating scales for pain at rest and during walking, running, and stair climbing; the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS); the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle Hindfoot Scale; the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36); return to work and sports; and radiographic evaluation.

RESULTS

This study included 38 patients with a mean age of 39 years (SD, ±13 years) and a mean follow-up of 5.1 years (SD, ±1.5 years). Two patients (5%) underwent revision surgery by means of an ankle arthrodesis (2 and 6 years postoperatively). In 8 patients, computed tomography scanning was conducted to assess postoperative complaints. These scans showed impression of the tibial plafond (n = 4), a small tibial cyst (<2.5 mm; n = 1), and cyst formation around the implant screw (n = 4). A total of 21 reoperations were performed, including medial malleolar screw removal (n = 12), arthroscopic removal of bony anterior impingement (n = 7), and calcaneal realignment osteotomy (n = 2). All secondary outcome measures improved significantly, apart from pain at rest, the FAOS symptoms subscale, and the SF-36 mental component scale. The mean time for return to sport was 4.1 months (SD, ±3 months), and 77% of patients resumed sporting activities postoperatively. Only 1 patient did not return to work postoperatively. Radiographs at final follow-up showed cyst formation (n = 2), subchondral periprosthetic radiolucency (n = 2), and non-preexisting joint space narrowing (n = 2).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the metal implant is an effective technique when assessed at midterm follow-up for OCDs of the medial talar dome after failed previous surgery.

No superior treatment for primary osteochondral defects of the talus

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic literature review is to detect the most effective treatment option for primary talar osteochondral defects in adults.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify studies published from January 1996 to February 2017 using PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CDSR, DARE, and CENTRAL. Two authors separately and independently screened the search results and conducted the quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Subsequently, success rates per separate study were calculated. Studies methodologically eligible for a simplified pooling method were combined.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies with 1236 primary talar osteochondral defects were included of which forty-one studies were retrospective and eleven prospective. Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Heterogeneity concerning methodological nature was observed, and there was variety in reported success rates. A simplified pooling method performed for eleven retrospective case series including 317 ankles in the bone marrow stimulation group yielded a success rate of 82% [CI 78-86%]. For seven retrospective case series investigating an osteochondral autograft transfer system or an osteoperiosteal cylinder graft insertion with in total 78 included ankles the pooled success rate was calculated to be 77% [CI 66-85%].

CONCLUSIONS

For primary talar osteochondral defects, none of the treatment options showed any superiority over others.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

No superior surgical treatment for secondary osteochondral defects of the talus

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the most effective surgical treatment for talar osteochondral defects after failed primary surgery.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to find studies published from January 1996 till July 2016 using PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CDSR, DARE and CENTRAL. Two authors screened the search results separately and conducted quality assessment independently using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Weighted success rates were calculated. Studies eligible for pooling were combined.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies with a total of 299 patients with 301 talar OCDs that failed primary surgery were investigated. Eight studies were retrospective case series, twelve were prospective case series and there was one randomized controlled trial. Calculated success percentages varied widely and ranged from 17 to 100%. Because of the low level of evidence and the scarce number of patients, no methodologically proper meta-analysis could be performed. A simplified pooling method resulted in a calculated mean success rate of 90% [CI 82-95%] for the osteochondral autograft transfer procedure, 65% [CI 46-81%] for mosaicplasty and 55% [CI 40-70%] for the osteochondral allograft transfer procedure. There was no significant difference between classic autologous chondrocyte implantation (success rate of 59% [CI 39-77%]) and matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation (success rate of 73% [CI 56-85%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple surgical treatments are used for talar OCDs after primary surgical failure. More invasive methods are administered in comparison with primary treatment. No methodologically proper meta-analysis could be performed because of the low level of evidence and the limited number of patients. It is therefore inappropriate to draw firm conclusions from the collected results. Besides an expected difference in outcome between the autograft transfer procedure and the more extensive procedures of mosaicplasty and the use of an allograft, neither a clear nor a significant difference between treatment options could be demonstrated. The need for sufficiently powered prospective investigations in a randomized comparative clinical setting remains high. This present systematic review can be used in order to inform patients about expected outcome of the different treatment methods used after failed primary surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Restorative Tissue Transplantation Options for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Review

Symptomatic osteochondral lesions of the talus remain a challenging problem due to inability for cartilage lesions to heal. Numerous treatment options exist, including nonoperative management, marrow stimulating techniques, and autograft-allograft. Arthroscopic marrow stimulation forms fibrocartilage that has been shown to be biomechanically weaker than hyaline cartilage. Restorative tissue transplantation options are being used more for larger and cystic lesions. Newer biologics and particulated juvenile cartilage are currently under investigation for possible clinical efficacy. This article provides an evidenced-based summary of available literature on the use of biologics for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Combined Therapy with Shock Wave and Retrograde Bone Marrow-Derived Cell Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Multiple treatment strategies have been developed for osteochondral lesions (OCLs) of the talus. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess retrograde autologous bone marrow cell (BMC) transplantation via core drilling (CD) combined with focused extracorporeal shock wave treatment (ESWT) in undisplaced OCL of the talus. A total of 69 patients with unilateral osteochondral lesions of the talus (Hepple grade I-III) were divided into two groups: 41 patients received combined therapy of ESWT and BMC transplantation (group A), while 28 were administered BMC transplantation alone (group B). The patients were followed up clinically and radiographically for a minimum of 2 years. Mean follow-up was 4.1 ± 2.8 years. AOFAS scores increased more significantly while pain intensity levels decreased in group A after treatment, compared with group B values (P < 0.001). In MRI follow-up, a more remarkable improvement of OCLs of the talus was observed in group A compared with group B (P = 0.040). Therefore, the combined technique reported here is a highly effective therapeutic option in OCLs of the talus with intact cartilage. It promotes patient recovery with pain control, and improves clinical outcome for more than 2 years after surgery.

Knee donor-site morbidity after mosaicplasty - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Mosaicplasty has been associated with good short- to long-term results. Nevertheless, the osteochondral harvesting is restricted to the donor-site area available and it may lead to significant donor-site morbidity.

PURPOSE

Provide an overview of donor-site morbidity associated with harvesting of osteochondral plugs from the knee joint in mosaicplasty procedure.

METHODS

Comprehensive search using Pubmed, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus and CINAHL databases was carried out through 10th October of 2016. As inclusion criteria, all English-language studies that assessed the knee donor-site morbidity after mosaicplasty were accepted. The outcomes were the description and rate of knee donor-site morbidity, sample's and cartilage defect's characterization and mosaicplasty-related features. Correlation between mosaicplasty features and rate of morbidity was performed. The methodological and reporting quality were assessed according to Coleman's methodology score.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included, comprising a total of 1726 patients, with 1473 and 268 knee and ankle cartilage defects were included. The defect size ranged from 0.85 cm2 to 4.9 cm2 and most commonly 3 or less plugs (averaging 2.9 to 9.4 mm) were used. Donor-site for osteochondral harvesting included margins of the femoral trochlea (condyles), intercondylar notch, patellofemoral joint and upper tibio-fibular joint. Mean donor-site morbidity was 5.9 % and 19.6 % for knee and ankle mosaicplasty procedures, respectively. Concerning knee-to-knee mosaicplasty procedures, the most common donor-site morbidity complaints were patellofemoral disturbances (22 %) and crepitation (31 %), and in knee-to-ankle procedures there was a clear tendency for pain or instability during daily living or sports activities (44 %), followed by patellofemoral disturbances, knee stiffness and persistent pain (13 % each). There was no significant correlation between rate of donor-site morbidity and size of the defect, number and size of the plugs (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Osteochondral harvesting in mosaicplasty often results in considerable donor-site morbidity. The donor-site morbidity for knee-to-ankle (16.9 %) was greater than knee-to-knee (5.9 %) mosaicplasty procedures, without any significant correlation between rate of donor-site morbidity and size of the defect, number and size of the plugs. Lack or imcomplete of donor-site morbidity reporting within the mosaicplasty studies is a concern that should be addressed in future studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.