Treatment of vertebral compression fractures with the cranio-caudal expandable implant SpineJack®: Technical note and outcomes in 77 consecutive patients

Risk Factors for Residual Back Pain After Balloon Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture

Background

Balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) is a method for the management of osteoporotic vertebral body fracture (OVF). However, improvement in back pain (BP) is poor in some patients, also previous reports have not elucidated the exact incidence and risk factors for residual BP after BKP. We clarified the characteristics of residual BP after BKP in patients with OVF.

Hypothesis

In this study, we hypothesize that some risk factors may exist for residual BP 2 years after the treatment of OVF with BKP.

Patients and Methods

A multicenter cohort study was performed where patients who received BKP within 2 months of OVF injury were followed-up for 2 years. BP at 6 months after surgery and final observation was evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. Patients with a score of 40 mm or more were allocated to the residual BP group, and comparisons between the residual back pain group and the improved group were made for bone density, kyphosis, mobility of the fractured vertebral body, total spinal column alignment, and fracture type (fracture of the posterior element, pedicle fracture, presence or absence of posterior wall damage, etc.). Also, Short Form 36 (SF-36) for physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) at the final follow-up was evaluated in each radiological finding.

Results

Of 116 cases, 79 (68%) were followed-up for 2 years. Two years after the BKP, 26 patients (33%) experienced residual BP. Neither age nor sex differed between the groups. In addition, there was no difference in bone mineral density, BKP intervention period (period from onset to BKP), and osteoporosis drug use. However, the preoperative height ratio of the vertebral body was significantly worse in the residual BP group (39.8% vs. 52.1%; p = 0.007). Two years after the operation, the vertebral body wedge angle was significantly greater in the residual BP group (15.7° vs. 11.9°; p = 0.042). In the multiple logistic regression model with a preoperative vertebral body height ratio of 50% or less [calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve], the adjusted odds ratio for residual BP was 6.58 (95% confidence interval 1.64-26.30; p = 0.007); similarly, patients with vertebral body height ratio less than 50% had a lower score of SF-36 PCS 24.6 vs. 32.2 p = 0.08.

Conclusion

The incidence of residual BP 2 years after BKP was 33% in the current study. The risk factor for residual BP after BKP was a preoperative vertebral body height ratio of 50% or less, which should be attentively assessed for the selection of a proper treatment scheme and to provide adequate stabilization.

Level of Evidence

III.

'Armed kyphoplasty' with posterior stabilization avoids corpectomy in complex thoracolumbar spine fractures: a case series

BACKGROUND

Complex thoracolumbar fractures require reduction and stabilization. Posterior instrumentation alone and standard cement augmentation may represent undertreatment, while corpectomy has significant morbidity. In a series of unstable thoracolumbar fractures, we assessed the feasibility, safety, and results of 'armed kyphoplasty' (AKP) and surgical posterior stabilization (PS).

METHODS

A total of 24 consecutive patients were treated with combined AKP and PS. Minimally invasive and open surgery techniques were used for PS. AKP was performed with C-arm or biplane fluoroscopic guidance, and screws were placed under navigation or fluoroscopic guidance. A postoperative CT scan and standing plain films were obtained. Patients were followed up according to clinical standards. Kyphosis correction (measured with regional Cobb angle), pain (measured with the Numeric Rating Scale), neurological status (measured with Frankel grade) were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 25 fractures of neoplastic (40%), traumatic (32%), and osteoporotic (28%) nature were treated. Open surgery and minimally invasive techniques were applied in 16/24 and 8/24 patients, respectively. Decompressive laminectomy was performed in 13 cases. No intraprocedural complications occurred. Two patients (8%) died due to underlying disease complications and three complications (12%) required re-intervention (one surgical site infection, one adjacent fracture, and one screw pull-out) in the first month. The mean Cobb angle was 20.14±6.19° before treatment and 11.66±5.24° after treatment (P<0.0001). No re-fractures occurred at the treated levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined AKP and PS is feasible and effective in the treatment of complex thoracolumbar fractures of all etiologies. AKP avoided highly invasive corpectomy. Anterior and posterior support ensured stability, preventing implant failure and re-fracture. The complication rate was low compared with more invasive traditional 360° open surgical approaches.

Clinical Outcomes and Safety Comparison of Vertebroplasty, Balloon Kyphoplasty, and Vertebral Implant for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Vertebral compression fracture represents a major health burden for the aging populations globally. However, limited studies exist on the relative efficacy and safety of surgical interventions for vertebral compression fracture. Here, we aim to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes following vertebral augmentation using balloon kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and SpineJack vertebral implant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An institutional review board-approved, retrospective, multi-institutional review of patients undergoing vertebral augmentation with kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and/or a SpineJack vertebral implant was performed between 2018 and 2021. Primary outcomes included pre- and postprocedural pain ratings and vertebral body height restoration. The secondary outcome was a change in the local kyphotic angle. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare outcomes across 3 treatment options. Complications were reviewed during and 30-90 days after the procedure.

RESULTS

Vertebral augmentation of 344 vertebral compression fracture levels was performed during the study period. Sixty-seven patients had 79 kyphoplasty procedures (55% women; mean age, 64.2 [SD, 12.3] years). Seventy-four patients underwent a mean of 84 vertebroplasty procedures (51% women; mean age, 63.5 [SD, 12.8] years), and 61 patients had a mean of 67 SpineJack vertebral implant procedures (57.4% women; mean age, 68.3 [SD, 10.6] years). Following kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and SpineJack vertebral implant, pain scores improved significantly (P < .001). Resting pain improvement was similar across the 3 procedures, whereas improvement of "worst pain" was significantly better following a SpineJack vertebral implant compared with kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty (P < .001). Patients with a SpineJack vertebral implant had greater improvement in vertebral body height restoration and local kyphotic angle compared with those undergoing kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Adjacent level fractures (6.7% incidence) occurred similarly in the 3 procedure types. There were no other peri- or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The SpineJack vertebral implant showed equivalent pain improvement compared with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, but it had superior vertebral body height restoration and local kyphotic angle improvement. This study supports the SpineJack vertebral implant as a safe and effective alternative (adjunct) for vertebral augmentation, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe vertebral compression fractures for greater improvement in vertebral body height restoration.

Percutaneous Vertebral Reconstruction (PVR) Technique of Pathological Compression Fractures: An Innovative Combined Treatment of Microwave Ablation, Bilateral Expandable Titanium SpineJack Implants Followed by Vertebroplasty

(1) Background: to retrospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of combined microwave ablation (MWA) and bilateral expandable titanium SpineJack (SJ) implants followed by vertebroplasty (VP) for the treatment of painful thoracolumbar pathological vertebral compression fracture. (2) Methods: from July 2017 to October 2022, twenty-eight patients (13 women and 15 men; mean age 68 ± 11 years) with a history of primary neoplasm and thirty-six painful vertebral metastases with vertebral compression fracture underwent combined MWA and bilateral expandable titanium SpineJack implants with vertebroplasty. We analyzed safety through complications rate, and efficacy through vertebral height restoration and pain decrease, evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and Functional Mobility Scale (FMS), and local tumor control. Contrast-enhanced CT scans were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months and a contrast-enhanced spine MRI at 6 months after the procedure. (3) Results: Technical success rate was 100%. No procedure-related major complications or death occurred. Vertebral height restoration was observed in 22 levels (58%), with a mean anterior height restoration of 2.6 mm ± 0.6 and a mean middle height restoration of 4.4 mm ± 0.6 (p < 0.001). Mean VAS score of pain evaluation on the day before treatment was 6.3 ± 1.5 (range 4-9). At the 6-month evaluation, the median VAS score for pain was 0.4 ± 0.6 (range 0-2) with a mean reduction of 93.65% (6.8 ± 0.7 vs. 0.4 ± 0.6; p < 0.000) compared with baseline evaluation. Contrast-enhanced CT scans were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months and a contrast-enhanced spine MRI was performed at 6 months after the procedure, showing no local recurrence, implant displacement, or new fractures in the treated site. (4) Conclusions: combined microwave ablation and bilateral expandable titanium SpineJack implants with vertebroplasty is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of pathological compressive vertebral fractures. The vertebral stabilization achieved early and persistent pain relief, increasing patient mobility, improving recovery of walking capacity, and providing local tumor control.

Re-expansion of vertebral compression fractures in patients with multiple myeloma with percutaneous vertebroplasty using spinejack implants: a preliminary and retrospective study

Objective

To retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of vertebroplasty using Spinejack implantation for the treatment and stabilization of painful vertebral compression fractures, in patients diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma (MM), to allow both an effective pain reduction and a global structural spine stabilization.

Materials and Methods

From July 2017 and May 2022 thirty-nine patients diagnosed MM, with forty-nine vertebral compression fractures underwent percutaneous Vertebroplasty using Spinejack Implants. We analyzed the feasibility and complications of the procedure, the decrease in pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Functional Mobility Scale (FMS).

Results

The technical success rate was 100%. No procedure-related major complications or death occurred. In the 6-month follow-up, the mean VAS score decreased from 5.4 ± 1.0 to 0.2 ± 0.5 with a mean reduction of 96.3%. FMS decreased from 2.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4 with a mean reduction of -47.8%. There were no major complications related to incorrect positioning of the Expandable Titanium SpineJack Implants. In five patients, a cement leak was observed with no associated clinical manifestations. The average length of hospital stay was 6-8 Hours6.6 ± 1.2 h. No new bone fractures or local disease recurrence occurred during a median contrast-enhanced CT follow-up of 6 months.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that vertebroplasty, using Spinejack implantation for the treatment and stabilization of painful vertebral compression fractures, secondary to Multiple Myeloma is a safe and effective procedure with long - term pain relief and restoration of vertebral height.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Management of Vertebral Compression Fractures: 2022 Update

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) can have a variety of etiologies, including trauma, osteoporosis, or neoplastic infiltration. Osteoporosis related fractures are the most common cause of VCFs and have a high prevalence among all postmenopausal women with increasing incidence in similarly aged men. Trauma is the most common etiology in those >50 years of age. However, many cancers, such as breast, prostate, thyroid, and lung, have a propensity to metastasize to bone, which can lead to malignant VCFs. Indeed, the spine is third most common site of metastases after lung and liver. In addition, primary tumors of bone and lymphoproliferative diseases such as lymphoma and multiple myeloma can be the cause of malignant VCFs. Although patient clinical history could help raising suspicion for a particular disorder, the characterization of VCFs is usually referred to diagnostic imaging. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Innovative minimally invasive implants for osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures

With increasing population aging, osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs), resulting in severe back pain and functional impairment, have become progressively common. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) as minimally invasive procedures have revolutionized OVCFs treatment. However, PVP- and PKP-related complications, such as symptomatic cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fractures, continue to plague physicians. Consequently, progressively more implants for OVCFs have been developed recently to overcome the shortcomings of traditional procedures. Therefore, we conducted a literature review on several new implants for OVCFs, including StaXx FX, Vertebral Body Stenting, Vesselplasty, Sky Bone Expander, Kiva, Spine Jack, Osseofix, Optimesh, Jack, and V-strut. Additionally, this review highlights the individualized applications of these implants for OVCFs. Nevertheless, current clinical studies on these innovative implants remain limited. Future prospective, randomized, and controlled studies are needed to elucidate the effectiveness and indications of these new implants for OVCFs.

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel tri-blade titanium implantable vertebral augmentation device

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Titanium implantable vertebral augmentation device (TIVAD) are regarded as having potential in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). However, improper design in current TIVADs results in the inability to effectively restore VCF height and maintain stability. There is still an unmet clinical need for improvement.

PURPOSE

The authors tested a newly developed a TIVAD (Tri-blade fixed system) that can provide enough endplate collapse support to restore the vertebral body height in a safe retraction mechanism for VCFs using minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

STUDY DESIGN

The performed biomechanical tests included blade expansion force, lifetime of cement embedded and vertebral height restoration efficiency of porcine osteoporosis VCFs for its feasibility.

METHODS

A cylinder with 3 surface cuts that form blades that can be expanded into a conical space was designed (Tri-blade fixed system). The 3 blades can be expanded outward with angles between blades as 105°/ 105°/150° for lower left/lower right/upper arms, respectively that reach 15mm in height and 14.8 mm in width. A frame was specifically designed to measure the contact force using force sensing resistors during blade expansion. The Tri-blade fixed system was embedded into a cement block to perform fatigue testing under 2000N pressure (5*10⁶ cycles) for understanding the device lifetime limitation. The Tri-blade system was then inserted into porcine osteoporosis VCFs to examine the vertebral height restoration efficiency.

RESULTS

The average maximum contact force for the top, bottom left and right blades were 299.0N, 283.5N and 279.3N, respectively with uniformly outward expansion forces. The fatigue test found that there were no obvious cracks or damage to the cement block. The porcine osteoporosis vertebral body at the anterior, middle, and posterior heights can be restored to 21.9%, 12.6% and 6.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed a novel TIVAD with conical shape that can provide a more stable structure with sufficient/uniform expansion force, passing the fatigue test with bone cement and high effective in vertebral height restoration tests for porcine osteoporosis VCFs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The new 3D Tri-blade TIVAD may offer a new treatment option for VCFs.

"Double Cross Sign" Could Be an Indicator of an Adequate Amount of Bone Cement in Kyphoplasty with the SpineJack System: A Retrospective Study

Kyphoplasty with the SpineJack system was able to restore vertebral height and stabilize the vertebra with an injection of bone cement. The goal of this study was to seek a reliable assessing method during the surgery in determining the minimum amount of bone cement required for the SpineJack system to restore vertebral height and stabilize the vertebra. We defined the “double cross sign” as bone cement that expanded vertically along the bilateral SpineJack system, and spread across the midline of the vertebral body as viewed in the anteroposterior (AP) view of the radiographic image. Sixty-five patients aged 74.5 ± 8.5 years with vertebral compression fracture were included in the study. Patients with a positive double cross sign had better ODI score than those without the double cross sign (20.0 ± 6.9 vs. 32.3 ± 8.2; p < 0.001). Postoperative regional kyphotic and local kyphotic angle were significantly better in the positive double cross sign group (11 ± 8.8 degrees vs. 5.3 ± 3.2 degrees; p = 0.001/11.7 ± 6.2 degrees vs. 6.6 ± 4.1 degrees; p = 0.001, respectively). The more stable construct was built once the double cross sign was achieved during surgery. In this study, a convenient and intuitive method in identifying the minimum but sufficient quantity of injected cement during the SpineJack procedure was developed.

Is vertebral stenting kyphoplasty a good choice in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fracture? A series of 47 patients (v2)

Background

The incidence of vertebral fragility fracture is increasing over last three decades with an essential impact on quality of life. Some devices were proposed to improve conventional kyphoplasty in the last five years, known as vertebral stenting kyphoplasty (VSK).

Materials and Methods

All osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) treated with VSK, single-level fracture without neurological impairment, and with more than 24 months of follow-up were included in the study. We recorded fracture types according to DGOU classification, fracture level, regional kyphosis angle (RKA), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and complications.

Results

Forty-seven consecutive patients were included. RKA significantly improved from pre to postoperative values (p<0.000001) and to follow-up values (p<0.00001). A significant difference was found between preoperative RKA of (OF2+OF3) and OF4 (p<0.00001), confirmed immediately after surgery (p= 0.005425) and at last follow up (p= 0.000947). A significant difference was found in correction of RKA between (OF2+OF3) and OF4 at injury time and after treatment (p<0.00001), and it was confirmed at the last follow-up (p=0.000026). ODI showed a significant difference between (OF2+OF3) and OF4 type of fractures (p=0.038216). We recorded five complications: 2 cases of leakage without neurological impairment, two progressions of kyphosis, and one implant migration.

Conclusions

VSK is an excellent and reliable option in the treatment of OVF, with good clinical results and preservation of obtained RKA at the time of treatment. However, in case of vertebral collapse with the involvement of both vertebral plates, surgeons must be aware of possible implant failure or migration.

Level of Evidence

4.

Expandable Intravertebral Implant in Cancer-Related Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Retrospective Review of 36 Implantations

The purpose of this retrospective review was to evaluate SpineJack implantation in cancer-related vertebral compression fractures in 13 consecutive patients (mean age, 62.8 years ± 18.8). A total of 36 devices were inserted at 20 levels (13 [65%] lumbar and 7 [35%] thoracic vertebrae), with a mean Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score of 9.1 ± 2.1. Vertebral height restoration was observed in 10 levels (50%), with a mean height restoration of 5.6 mm ± 2.2 (interquartile range [IQR], 4-7.5). A total of 6 cement leakages were observed in 3 (23%) patients without clinical consequences. No severe adverse events were observed. One adjacent fracture occurred. Average pain scores on the visual analog scale significantly improved from 5.5 ± 1.8 (IQR, 4-7) preoperatively to 1.5 ± 2.2 (IQR, 0-3.3) at 1 month (P < .01) and to 1.5 ± 1.3 (IQR, 0.3-2.8) at 6 months (P < .01). In this small cohort, SpineJack offered pain relief in cancer-related fractures without an observed increase in adverse events.

INTRAVERTEBRAL EXPANDABLE IMPLANTS IN THORACOLUMBAR VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES

Current scientific evidence enhances the importance of the anatomic restauration of vertebral bodies with compression fractures aiming, as with other human body joints, to obtain a biomechanic and functional spine as close as the one prior to the fracture as possible. We consider that anatomic reduction of these fractures is only completely possible using intravertebral expandable implants, restoring vertebral endplate morphology, and enabling a more adequate intervertebral disc healing. This enables avoiding disc and osteodegenerative changes to that vertebral segment and its adjacent levels, as well as the anterior overload of adjacent vertebral bodies in older adults - a consequence of post-traumatic vertebral flattening - thus minimizing the risk of adjacent vertebral fractures. The ability of vertebral body fracture reduction and height maintenance over time and its percutaneous transpedicular application make the intra-vertebral expandable implants a very attractive option for treating these fractures. The authors show the direct and indirect reduction concepts of vertebral fractures, review the biomechanics, characteristics and indications of intravertebral expandable implants and present a suggestion for updating the algorithm for the surgical treatment of vertebral compression fractures which includes the use of intravertebral expandable implants. Level of Evidence V, Expert Opinion.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3 Treatment Arms for Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Comparison of Improvement in Pain, Adjacent-Level Fractures, and Quality of Life Between Vertebroplasty, Kyphoplasty, and Nonoperative Management

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) have become increasingly common, and previous nonrandomized and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the effects of cement augmentation versus nonoperative management on the clinical outcome. This meta-analysis focuses on RCTs and the calculated differences between cement augmentation techniques and nonsurgical management in outcome (e.g., pain reduction, adjacent-level fractures, and quality of life [QOL]).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the following scientific search engines were used: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria included RCTs that addressed different treatment strategies for OVF. The primary outcome was pain, which was determined by a visual analog scale (VAS) score; the secondary outcomes were the risk of adjacent-level fractures and QOL (as determined by the EuroQol-5 Dimension [EQ-5D] questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis [QUALEFFO], and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [RDQ]). Patients were assigned to 3 groups according to their treatment: vertebroplasty (VP), kyphoplasty (KP), and nonoperative management (NOM). The short-term (weeks), midterm (months), and long-term (>1 year) effects were compared. A random effects model was used to summarize the treatment effect, including I2 for assessing heterogeneity and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for assessment of ROB. Funnel plots were used to assess risk of publication bias. The log of the odds ratio (OR) between treatments is reported.

RESULTS

After screening of 1,861 references, 53 underwent full-text analysis and 16 trials (30.2%) were included. Eleven trials (68.8%) compared VP and NOM, 1 (6.3%) compared KP and NOM, and 4 (25.0%) compared KP and VP. Improvement of pain was better by 1.31 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 2.21; p < 0.001) after VP when compared with NOM in short-term follow-up. Pain effects were similar after VP and KP (midterm difference of 0.0 points; 95% CI, -0.25 to 0.25). The risk of adjacent-level fractures was not increased after any treatment (log OR, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.83 to 0.5; NOM vs. VP or KP). QOL did not differ significantly between the VP or KP and NOM groups except in the short term when measured by the RDQ.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides evidence in favor of the surgical treatment of OVFs. Surgery was associated with greater improvement of pain and was unrelated to the development of adjacent-level fractures or QOL. Although improvements in sagittal balance after surgery were poorly documented, surgical treatment may be warranted if pain is a relevant problem.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Percutaneous Image-Guided Vertebral Fixation in Cancer-Related Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Case Series Study

Background and objectives: Cancer-related vertebral compression fractures (VCF) may cause debilitating back pain and instability, affecting the quality of life of cancer patients. To further drive cement deposition during vertebroplasty, the aims of this restrospective case series study were to report the feasibility, safety and short term efficacy (≤6 months) of percutaneous vertebral fixation in cancer-related vertebral compression fractures using various intravertebral implants. Methods: All consecutive cancer patients treated with percutaneous vertebral fixation for VCF were retrospectively included. Various devices were inserted percutaneously under image guidance and filled by cement. Descriptive statistics were used and a matched paired analysis of pain scores was performed to assess for changes following interventions. Results: A total of 18 consecutive patients (12 women (66.6%) and 6 men (33.3%); mean age 59.7 ± 15.5 years) were included. A total of 42 devices were inserted in 8 thoracic and 16 lumbar vertebrae. Visual analogue scale measurement significantly improved from 5.6 ± 1.8 preoperatively to 1.5 ± 1.7 at 1 week (p < 0.01) and to 1.5 ± 1.3 at 6 months (p < 0.01). No severe adverse events were observed, but three adjacent fractures occurred between 1 week and 5 months after implantation. Conclusions: Percutaneous vertebral fixation of cancer-related VCF is feasible and safe and allows pain relief.

Use of the SpineJack direct reduction for treating type A2, A3 and A4 fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Compression injuries of the thoracolumbar spine without neurological impairment are usually treated with minimally invasive procedures. Intravertebral expandable implants represent an alternative strategy in fractures with low fragments' displacement.

METHODS

Patients with A2, A3 and A4 fractures of the T10-L2 spinal segment without neurological impairment, fracture gap >2 mm, vertebra plana, pedicle rupture, pedicle diameter <6 mm, spinal canal encroachment ≥50%, and vertebral body spread >30% were treated with the SpineJack device. Patients with pathological/osteoporotic fractures were excluded. Demographic and fracture-related data were assessed together with vertebral kyphosis correction, vertebral height restoration/loss of correction and final kyphosis. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Smiley-Webster Pain Scale (SWPS) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) were evaluated at 1 (-post), 6 and 12 months (-fup) after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed and p values ≤0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included in the study. Patients aged >60 years reported worse kyphosis correction (<4°) with more postoperative complications, while vertebral plasticity in younger patients, fragmentation-related greater remodeling in A3/A4 fractures, and treatments within 7 days of trauma determined superior wedging corrections, with better EQ-5D-post and mRS-fup. Cement leakages did not affect functional outcome, while female gender and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3-4 were associated with worse ODI-fup and VAS-fup. Although fracture characteristics and radiological outcome did not negatively influence the clinical outcome, A2 fracture was a risk factor for complications, thus indirectly compromising both the functional and radiological outcome.

CONCLUSION

With spread of <30%, the SpineJack is an alternative to minimally invasive fixations for treating A3/A4 thoracolumbar fractures, being able to preserve healthy motion segments in younger patients and provide an ultra-conservative procedure for elderly and fragile patients.

Biomechanical comparative evaluation of percutaneous fixations with vertebral expansion for vertebral compression fractures: an experimental and finite element study

This study uses in vitro experiments and validated finite element models (FEM) to analyze the effect of posterior fixation, alone or associated with expandable device (ED) and/or cement. 3-dimensional FEMs of intact, fractured and instrumented spine were built and compared with experimental load-displacement curves. FEM ranges of motion were within the experimental corridors. Stresses appeared sensitive to both implant configuration and fracture severity with a stress reduction up to 84%. The FEM highlighted that for a same instrumental strategy, different biomechanical performances were observed according to fracture severity. When bone continuity is altered, both ED and cement may be needed.

Clinical outcomes and safety of the SpineJack vertebral augmentation system for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures in a United States patient population

The SpineJack implant system was recently FDA approved for treatment of vertebral compression fractures (VCF), however United States-based outcomes data is lacking. We sought to examine the safety and clinical outcomes following vertebral augmentation using the SpineJack implant for treatment of VCF in a U.S. patient population. An IRB-approved, retrospective study of SpineJack implants used in vertebral augmentation was performed from 11/2018 to 2/2020. Outcome objectives included pain improvement, vertebral body height (VH) restoration, improvement in local kyphotic angle (LKA), and incidence of adjacent level fractures (ALF). Complications were reviewed to assess safety of the procedure. Thirty patients with VCF (60% female; mean [SD] age of 62.7 [±12.8] years) underwent a total of 53 vertebral augmentations with 106 SpineJack implants. Worst pain scores decreased significantly from 8.7 to 4.3 (95%CI of the change [Δ]: 4.3-4.4; p < 0.001). Middle and anterior VH significantly increased from 13.1 ± 0.2 to 15.9 ± 0.2 mm (95%CI Δ: 2.6-2.9 mm; p < 0.001) and 15.6 ± 0.2 to 16.8 ± 0.2 mm (95%CI Δ: 1.1-1.4 mm; p < 0.001), respectively. LKA was significantly decreased from 10.0 ± 2.1 to 7.4 ± 2.1 degrees (95%CI Δ: 2.4-2.8 degrees; p < 0.001). Four patients (13%) sustained ten ALF over a median (IQR) follow up period of 94 (17.5-203) days. There were no major adverse events during the follow up period. To summarize, vertebral augmentation with SpineJack implants of patients with VCF resulted in significantly decreased pain, restored VH, and improved LKA, without major adverse events. However, 13% of patients sustained ALF during a median follow up period of 3 months.

Treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Osteoporosis is a public health problem that is contributing to an increasing number of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The aim of this lecture is to summarize the current state of knowledge about osteoporotic fractures by answering five questions. 1/How does the spine typically age and how is osteoporosis diagnosed? Various normal aging processes will gradually modify the vertebral column (static, dynamic, bone quality). Osteoporosis is diagnosed through a DEXA scan. 2/How is an osteoporotic fracture evaluated clinically and radiologically? Magnetic resonance imaging is the preferred modality for making the diagnosis and selecting the most appropriate treatment. 3/What are the treatment options for an osteoporotic fracture? The options are conservative treatment, conventional surgery, and minimally invasive techniques (cementoplasty, percutaneous instrumentation). 4/Which fractures should be treated, and which technique should be used? The choice is clear when neurological deficits are present, although the indications are less firm when there is no deficit. The treatment can be conservative (back brace) if the fracture is non-displaced and minimally painful, vertebroplasty if the fracture is painful and shows hyperintensity on T2-STIR sequences, vertebral expansion if the radiological deformity worsens along with symptoms. 5/What are the technical challenges and complications related to the presence of osteoporosis when treating vertebral fractures surgically? The reduced bone stock increases the risk of poor implant hold and postoperative mechanical complications (adjacent fracture, junctional kyphosis). Technical solutions have been developed (augmented screw fixation, transitional zone) to limit their impact. It is essential to know and master these techniques, and their indications. Treatment of the osteoporosis itself is crucial. Level of evidence V; Expert opinion.

Armed Kyphoplasty: An Indirect Central Canal Decompression Technique in Burst Fractures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Burst fractures are characterized by middle column disruption and may feature posterior wall retropulsion. Indications for treatment remain controversial. Recently introduced vertebral augmentation techniques using intravertebral distraction devices, such as vertebral body stents and SpineJack, could be effective in fracture reduction and fixation and might obtain central canal clearance through ligamentotaxis. This study assesses the results of armed kyphoplasty using vertebral body stents or SpineJack in traumatic, osteoporotic, and neoplastic burst fractures with respect to vertebral body height restoration and correction of posterior wall retropulsion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective assessment of 53 burst fractures with posterior wall retropulsion and no neurologic deficit in 51 consecutive patients treated with armed kyphoplasty. Posterior wall retropulsion and vertebral body height were measured on pre- and postprocedural CT. Clinical and radiologic follow-up charts were reviewed.

RESULTS

Armed kyphoplasty was performed as a stand-alone treatment in 43 patients, combined with posterior instrumentation in 8 and laminectomy in 4. Pre-armed kyphoplasty and post-armed kyphoplasty mean posterior wall retropulsion was 5.8 and 4.5 mm, respectively (P < .001), and mean vertebral body height was 10.8 and 16.7 mm, respectively (P < .001). No significant clinical complications occurred. Clinical and radiologic follow-up (1-36 months; mean, 8 months) was available in 39 patients. Three treated levels showed a new fracture during follow-up without neurologic deterioration, and no retreatment was deemed necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of burst fractures with posterior wall retropulsion and no neurologic deficit, armed kyphoplasty yields fracture reduction, internal fixation, and indirect central canal decompression. In selected cases, it might represent a suitable minimally invasive treatment option, stand-alone or in combination with posterior stabilization.

Preventive Vertebroplasty for Long-Term Consolidation of Vertebral Metastases

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the long-term consolidation of vertebral metastases (VM) after preventive vertebroplasty (PV) and to report risk factors of pathological fracture despite PV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Files of 100 consecutives cancer patients referred for PV of VM were retrospectively analyzed. We enumerated 215 VM at the time of the PV procedure (T0): 138 VM were considered at risk of pathological fracture and had PV (treated-VM), and 77 VM were not cemented. We compared the VM characteristics using the spine instability neoplastic score (SINS) at T0 and the rate of pathologic fracture between treated-VM and untreated-VM using Kaplan-Meier method. We analyzed risk factors of pathological fracture despite PV using treated-VM characteristics and quality of cement injection criteria.

RESULTS

Despite a lower SINS value at T0 (p < 0.001), the rate of pathological fracture was significantly higher among untreated-VM compared to the treated-VM, (log-rank, p < 0.001). Major risk factors of fracture among treated-VM were: SINS value ≥ 8 (p < 0.012), mechanical pain (p = 0.001), osteolytic lesion (p = 0.033), metastatic vertebral body involvement > 50% with no collapse (p < 0.001) and unilateral posterior involvement by the vertebral metastasis (p = 0.024), Saliou score < 9 (p = 0.008), vertebral metastasis filling with cement < 50% (p = 0.007) and the absence of cement's contact with vertebral endplates (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

PV is long-term effective for consolidation of VM and must be discussed at the early diagnosed. Quality of cement injection matters, suggesting that techniques that improve the quantity and the quality of cement diffusion into the VM must be developed.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Management of Vertebral Compression Fractures

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) have various causes, including osteoporosis, neoplasms, and acute trauma. As painful VCFs may contribute to general physical deconditioning, management of painful VCFs has the potential for improving quality of life and preventing superimposed medical complications. Various imaging modalities can be used to evaluate a VCF to help determine the etiology and guide intervention. The first-line treatment of painful VCFs has been nonoperative or conservative management as most VCFs show gradual improvement in pain over 2 to 12 weeks, with variable return of function. There is evidence that vertebral augmentation (VA) is associated with better pain relief and improved functional outcomes compared to conservative therapy for osteoporotic VCFs. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the management of painful pathologic VCFs, with management strategies including medications to affect bone turnover, radiation therapy, and interventions such as VA and percutaneous thermal ablation to alleviate symptoms. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Vertebral augmentation with the SpineJack® in chronic vertebral compression fractures with major kyphosis

OBJECTIVES

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are an important health issue for which minimally invasive techniques are a feasible treatment. The SpineJack® (Vexim) is an intravertebral expandable system designed to improve the correction of the structural modifications caused by OVCFs. Its ability to stabilise and reduce OVCFs at the acute phase being already well established, we sought to evaluate the feasibility of vertebral augmentation with the SpineJack® in chronic kyphotic OVCFs.

METHODS

All consecutive patients treated with the SpineJack® were prospectively included if they met the following criteria: (1) OVCF considered unstable (grade A3 according to Magerl's classification). (2) Local kyphotic angle ≥ 20°. (3) OVCF older than 6 weeks. (4) Back pain with visual analogue scale (VAS) ≥ 4.

RESULTS

Nineteen consecutive patients (16 women [84.2%] and 3 men [15.8%]; mean age 73.2 ± 8.2 years) were included. Treatment was performed after a mean delay of 5.8 months ± 2.9 (range 1.5-12). Median visual analogue scale significantly improved from 7 preoperatively (IQR 6-9) to 2 (IQR 1-5) at 6 months (p < 0.01). Significant kyphosis reduction (i.e. ≥ 30%) was obtained in 94.7% of cases. Secondary adjacent level fractures (SALFs) were noted in 21.1% of cases and were correlated with the importance of the kyphosis reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Vertebral augmentation with the SpineJack® is feasible and seems able to correct major structural deformities in chronic OVCFs. SALFs were noted in a substantial amount of cases. Preventive adjacent vertebroplasty might be useful in patients with several risk factors for SALFs.

KEY POINTS

• Vertebral augmentation with SpineJack® is effective to correct major structural deformities e.g. height loss and kyphosis. • Successful reduction is reachable with SpineJack® in chronic (older than 6 weeks) OVCFs. • Aggressive reduction of major kyphosis might promote SALFs and complementary adjacent vertebroplasties prevent their occurrence.

Kyphoplasty for the treatment of an atypical osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture of the lumbar spine: A case report

Vertebral augmentation is a minimally invasive but sometimes technically challenging intervention typically reserved for the treatment of older patients with painful vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis or neoplasms. We report the successful treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures of the first lumbar vertebral body (L1) using kyphoplasty in a paraplegic young patient with multiple comorbidities. Despite the unusual and complicated clinical scenario, kyphoplasty was nonetheless performed with immediate and lasting pain relief.