Developments in ambulatory surgery in orthopedics in France in 2016

International strategies, experiences, and payment models to incentivise day surgery

The importance of day surgery as a less costly alternative compared to conventional inpatient hospital stays is growing internationally. The rate of day surgery activities has increased across Europe. However, this trend has been heterogeneous across countries, and might still be below its potential. Since payment systems affect how providers offer care, they represent a policy instrument to further increase the rate of day surgeries. In this paper, we review international strategies to promote day surgery with a particular focus on payment models for 13 OECD countries (Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, England, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland). We conduct a cross-country comparison based on an email survey of health policy experts and a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed papers and grey literature. Our research shows that all countries aim to strengthen day surgery activity to increase health system efficiency. Several countries used financial and non-financial policy measures to overcome misaligned incentive structures and promote day surgery activity. Financial incentives for day surgery can serve as a policy instrument to promote change. We recommend embedding these incentives in a comprehensive approach of restructuring health systems. In addition, we encourage countries to monitor and evaluate the effect of changes to payment systems on day surgeries to allow for more informed decision-making.

The development of one-day surgical care in Hungary between 2010 and 2019

BACKGROUND

The constant increase in the utilization of one-day surgical care could be identified since more than a decade in most of European countries. Initially, according to the international rankings, the exploitation of one-day surgery in Hungary was not really significant. In 2010, the Hungarian policy makers intended to increase one-day surgical care as a priority strategy. The aim of our study was to analyze the evolution of the Hungarian one-day surgical care during the last decade in DRG- based performance financing system in Hungary.

METHODS

The dataset of the research was provided by the National Health Insurance Fund Administration of Hungary. The most important indicators related to the one-day surgical care were compared to inpatient care (market share, number of cases, and DRG cost-weights). To discover the impact of one-day surgical care to the utilization of inpatient treatment, the number of hospitalized days was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2019, the market share of one-day surgical cases increased from 42, to 80%. Simultaneously the constant increase of one-day surgical cases, the number of hospitalized days were decreased in inpatient care by 17%. The value of Case Mix Index has also increased, approximately by 140%, which could confirm that more complex interventions are being conducted in one-day surgical care as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the comprehensive health policy strategy related to the dissemination of one-day surgical care in Hungary, several important performance indicators were improved between 2010 and 2019. Given that Hungary belongs to the low- and middle-income countries, the results of the study could be considerable even in an international comparison.

Early postoperative practices following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in France

INTRODUCTION

The early postoperative period after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) is critical for optimal functional recovery. Despite an abundance of literature, there is no consensus regarding good practices. This period is often under-considered by orthopedic surgeons. The aim of this study was to identify early postoperative practices after ACL reconstruction in France.

HYPOTHESIS

The hypothesis was that there was a discrepancy between validated data in the literature and the current practices of orthopedic surgeons in France.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 2019, a questionnaire was sent to all the members of the French Arthroscopy Society to investigate their postoperative practices after ACL reconstruction. Two hundred sixty-nine members responded. Surgeons were divided into two groups of experienced (n=137) and less experienced (n=132) surgeons, according to the number of ACL reconstructions performed per year (<or≥50/year). Outpatient management, effusion prevention measures, and rehabilitation instructions and goals were collected. Overall responses were analyzed after multiple linear logistic regression and the responses of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

ACL reconstruction was performed as an outpatient procedure in 72.9% of cases. This rate increased with surgical experience (p=0.009×10^-3). Among measures to prevent effusion, cryotherapy was recommended in 97.8% of cases. The experienced group more often used compressive cryotherapy devices (p=0.004). Rehabilitation was started immediately in 75.5% of cases, with as main objective recovery of full extension (89.6%). Weight-bearing was allowed in 98.5% of cases and a brace was prescribed in 69.9% of cases. In the experienced group, braces were less frequent (p=0.02) and self-rehabilitation was preferred (p=0.0006).

CONCLUSION

Early postoperative practices after ACL reconstruction in France are related to surgical experience. The greater the surgical experience, the greater the role of joint effusion prevention and self-rehabilitation. Despite recommendations in the literature, a quarter of the French orthopedic surgeons who responded to this survey did not perform this procedure on an outpatient basis and more than two-thirds prescribed braces.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Outpatient surgery of the first ray of the foot: post-operative pain monitoring at home

INTRODUCTION

At present, health facilities are forced to switch to outpatient care. While it lends itself well to this organizational arrangement, first ray surgery is broadly considered as painful by patients, who are often reluctant to this treatment. The evolution of post-operative pain in patients who underwent operations for first ray surgery from D0 to D15 were studied. Secondly, the duration of the oral analgesic treatment, the patient's satisfaction level, and searched for complications were assessed.

METHODS

This is an observational, single-center and single-operator study. Between July and December 2019, forty patients who underwent first ray surgery (hallux valgus or rigidus) and eligible for outpatient treatment were included. The surgical technique of the hallux valgus treatment consisted of open surgery via double metatarsal and phalangeal osteotomy. The hallux rigidus surgery consisted of arthrodesis using an open dorsal plate. Home monitoring was carried out by a healthcare provider (e-HORUS). The protocol provided for pain management by means of a diffuser of Nefopam IV for a maximum of 5 days, combined with alleviating oral analgesics 1 and 2 and NSAIDs. The pain was evaluated on D0, D1, D3, D5, D8 and D15, using a numerical scale (NS) from 0 to 10. The degree of patient satisfaction was recorded at 1 month.

RESULTS

35 patients were followed. 5 patients were excluded due to incomplete data. The series included 26 women and 9 men, with an average age of 59.9 years. There were 30 hallux valgus and 5 hallux rigidus. The pain analyzed by the NS was 5.37 on D0, 3.34 on D1, 1.83 on D3, 1.43 on D5, 1.06 on D8 and 2.2 on D15. The average duration of Nefopam infusions was 3.89 days, and the average duration of oral analgesics was 17.7 days. The tolerance of the treatment was satisfactory in 79% of the cases. 69% of patients were very satisfied with the management of their pain. There were no scar complications or infections. No re-hospitalization was necessary. 3 algoneurodystrophies were identified. The existence of fibromyalgia or Parkinsonian syndrome was correlated with higher pain.

DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION

Pain management after outpatient first ray surgery using the injectable Nefopam protocol was satisfactory in the majority of cases, with a high degree of patient satisfaction. This protocol is routinely offered to our patients who must undergo first ray surgery.

Can primary total hip arthroplasty be performed in an outpatient setting? Prospective feasibility and safety study in 321 patients in a day-surgery unit

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed as day-surgery is an emerging and growing practice. The main aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility and safety of primary THA in an outpatient setting. The study hypothesis was that, within a specifically dedicated structure, such surgery is feasible and safe.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed in two centers, one private hospital and one university hospital, including all patients operated on by two senior surgeons between 2014 and 2017 for primary THA and eligible for day-surgery. The clinical pathway was governed by a pre-established protocol. Preoperatively, all patients took part in an information workshop, with their spouses and the surgeon. Postoperative phone interviews were held on D1 and D3, then out-patient consultations were conducted at 1 and 6 weeks. The main study endpoint was successful outpatient management, failure being defined as crossover or readmission within 1 week of discharge. Secondary endpoints comprised complications rate and satisfaction as assessed by patient and spouse at 6 weeks.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1,303 patients received primary THA. 338 (25.9%) were eligible for day-surgery, but 17 (5%) declined; the day-surgery series thus comprised 321 patients (24.6%): 166 men, 155 women; mean age, 61.2±9.7 years. Same-day discharge was not possible for 14 patients (4.5%): 9 due to persistent faintness, 2 to intraoperative femoral fracture, 1 to organizational issues, 1 to an uncomplicated fall, and 1 to hemoglobinemia<11g/100ml in a coronary patient. There were no readmissions during week 1. At 6 weeks' follow-up, there had been 3 adverse events: 2 dislocations, and 1 periprosthetic fracture. 312 patients (97.2%) were satisfied.

CONCLUSION

The present prospective study found no major adverse events in patients undergoing day-surgery for primary THA. However, patients should be selected, consenting, prepared and managed on a standardized clinical pathway.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; non-comparative prospective study.

Future endeavors in ambulatory spine surgery

Due to the high societal and financial burden of spinal disorders, spine surgery is thought to be one of the most impactful targets for healthcare cost reduction. One avenue for cost-reduction that is increasingly being explored not just in spine surgery but across specialties is the performance of surgeries in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). Despite potential cost-savings, the utilization of ASCs for spine surgery remains largely limited to high-volume centers in the US, and predominantly for single- or two-level lumbar microdiscectomy and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. Factors most commonly cited for the lack of wider adoption include the risk of life-threatening complications, paucity of guidelines, and limited accessibility of these procedures to various patient populations. Thus, the future growth and adoption of ambulatory spine surgery depends on addressing these concerns by developing evidence-based guidelines for patient- and procedure selection, creating risk-stratification tools, devising appropriate discharge recommendations, and optimizing care protocols to ensure that safety, efficacy and outcomes are maintained. Other avenues that may allow for more widespread use of ASCs include the use of electronic health tools for post-operative monitoring after discharge from the ASC, increasing accessibility of ambulatory procedures to eligible populations, and identifying systemic inefficiencies and implementing process-improvement measures to optimize patient-selection, scheduling and peri-operative management. The success of ambulatory surgery ultimately depends not only on the surgical procedure, but also on its organization upstream and downstream. It provides an exciting and burgeoning avenue for innovation, cost-reduction and value-creation.