Head-shaft angle changes during internal and external shoulder rotations: 2-D angulation in 3-D space

Effect of humeral rotation on the reliability of radiographic measurements for proximal humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

There are concerns as to the reliability of proximal humerus radiographic measurements, particularly regarding the rotational position of the humerus when obtaining radiographs.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with proximal humerus fractures fixed surgically with locked plates received postoperative anteroposterior radiographs with the humerus in neutral rotation and in 30° of internal and external rotation. Radiographic measurements for head shaft angle, humeral offset and humeral head height were performed in each humeral rotation position. Intra-class correlation coefficient was used to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Mean differences (md) in measurements between humeral positions was evaluated using one-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

Head shaft angle demonstrated good-to-excellent reliability; the highest estimates for inter-rater reliability (ICC: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.94) and intra-rater reliability (ICC: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.98) were achieved in neutral rotation. There were significant differences in measurement values between each rotational position, with mean head shaft angle of 133.1° in external rotation, and increasingly valgus measurements in neutral (md: 7.6°; 95% CI: 5.0, 10.3°; p < 0.001) and internal rotation (md: 26.4°; 95% CI: 21.8, 30.9°; p < 0.001). Humeral head height and humeral offset showed good-to-excellent reliability in neutral and external rotation, but poor inter-rater reliability in internal rotation. Humeral head height was significantly greater using internal compared to external rotation (md: 4.5 mm; 95% CI: 1.7, 7.3 mm; p = 0.002). Humeral offset was significantly greater in external compared to internal rotation (md: 4.6 mm; 95% CI: 2.6, 6.6 mm; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Views of the humerus in neutral rotation and 30° of external rotation displayed superior reliability. Differences in radiographic measurement values, depending on humeral rotation views, can make for problematic correlations with patient outcome measures. Studies assessing radiographic outcomes following proximal humerus fractures should ensure standardized humeral rotation for obtaining anteroposterior shoulder radiographs, with neutral rotation and external rotation views likely yielding the most reliable results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Measuring Lateral Screw Protuberance Is a Clinically Accurate Method for Quantifying Femoral Neck Shortening

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to compare the reliability and accuracy of the screw protuberance method (SPM) and overlay method (OM) for measuring femoral neck shortening on anterior-posterior (AP) radiographs. The secondary aim is to investigate the changes in reliability and accuracy with varying femoral rotation.

METHODS

Radio-opaque femur sawbone models were fitted with either 3 cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw implant. Anterior-posterior radiographs were obtained using C-arm fluoroscopy with femoral neck shortening up to 15 mm and with the femoral shaft in 30 degrees of internal rotation to 30 degrees of external rotation (ER). Four observers measured femoral neck shortening at 2 time points. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were calculated using the intraclass coefficient. Accuracy was analyzed through a Bland-Altman agreement statistic stratified by femoral rotation.

RESULTS

Both measurement techniques displayed excellent reliability, regardless of femoral rotation or implant. There was a significant difference in femoral neck shortening measurements with rotation for both the OM (P < 0.001) and SPM (P < 0.001). Both methods are accurate within 1 mm of the actual magnitude of shortening from 30-degree internal rotation to 15-degree ER. At 30-degree ER, shortening was underestimated by -2.10 mm using the OM (95% confidence interval, -2.43 to -1.76; P < 0.01) and by -1.64 mm using the SPM (95% confidence interval, -1.83 to -1.45; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that both the OM and SPM are accurate and reliable assessments for femoral neck shortening; however, both methods are sensitive to extreme ER. Given the simplicity of the SPM technique, it may have increased utility for pragmatic research studies.