Near-anatomical correction using a CT-guided technique of a forearm malunion in a 15-year-old girl: A case report including surgical technique

Accuracy of 3D Corrective Osteotomy for Pediatric Malunited Both-Bone Forearm Fractures

Re-displacement of a pediatric diaphyseal forearm fracture can lead to a malunion with symptomatic impairment in forearm rotation, which may require a corrective osteotomy. Corrective osteotomy with two-dimensional (2D) radiographic planning for malunited pediatric forearm fractures can be a complex procedure due to multiplanar deformities. Three-dimensional (3D) corrective osteotomy can aid the surgeon in planning and obtaining a more accurate correction and better forearm rotation. This prospective study aimed to assess the accuracy of correction after 3D corrective osteotomy for pediatric forearm malunion and if anatomic correction influences the functional outcome. Our primary outcome measures were the residual maximum deformity angle (MDA) and malrotation after 3D corrective osteotomy. Post-operative MDA > 5° or residual malrotation > 15° were defined as non-anatomic corrections. Our secondary outcome measure was the gain in pro-supination. Between 2016−2018, fifteen patients underwent 3D corrective osteotomies for pediatric malunited diaphyseal both-bone fractures. Three-dimensional corrective osteotomies provided anatomic correction in 10 out of 15 patients. Anatomic corrections resulted in a greater gain in pro-supination than non-anatomic corrections: 70° versus 46° (p = 0.04, ANOVA). Residual malrotation of the radius was associated with inferior gain in pro-supination (p = 0.03, multi-variate linear regression). Three-dimensional corrective osteotomy for pediatric forearm malunion reliably provided an accurate correction, which led to a close-to-normal forearm rotation. Non-anatomic correction, especially residual malrotation of the radius, leads to inferior functional outcomes.

3D accuracy and clinical outcomes of corrective osteotomies with patient-specific instruments in complex upper extremity deformities: an approach for investigation and correlation

Background

Corrective osteotomies of the upper extremities with patient-specific instruments (PSIs) are increasingly used. In this context, the concordance between planning and postoperative 3D radiographs as well as the association between 3D accuracy and clinical outcome has rarely been evaluated. In this pilot study, we aimed to investigate our clinical mid-term outcome and 3D accuracy as well as their possible correlation, including identifying aspects critical to reaching optimal correction results.

Methods

From October 2018 to January 2020, we used PSIs for 12 corrective osteotomies of the upper extremity in 11 bones of 8 patients (congenital or posttraumatic deformities in 2 elbows, 3 forearms, 3 distal radii). In follow-up examination (10–25 months postoperatively), patient satisfaction, grip strength, ROM, VAS, and DASH were evaluated. Three-dimensional radiological accuracy was determined with 3D-reconstructed postoperative CT scans. With the software tool “Part Comparison” of Mimics^® Innovation Suite Software/Materialise, surface differences of pre-planned and postoperative 3D models were compared.

Results

Compared to the preoperative situation pain and function were better at follow-up: The average VAS score significantly decreased from 6.5 ± 4.1 cm preoperatively to 2.3 ± 2.6 cm at the follow-up time point (p = 0.008). The average DASH score significantly improved, from 48.4 ± 30.9 to 27.0 ± 25.2 (p = 0.015). In the part comparison analysis “planned vs postoperative comparison”, significantly more points in percent (= 3D accuracy) were in a −3 mm to 3 mm interval than in the “preoperative vs planned comparison” (87.3 ± 13.8% vs 48.9 ± 16.6%, p = 0.004). After surgery, the maximum deviation value over all cases was 4.5 ± 1.1 mm, and the minimum deviation value was − 4.5 ± 1.2 mm vs preoperatively 12.9 ± 6.2 mm (p = 0.004) and − 7.2 ± 2.1 mm (p = 0.02), respectively. Clinically, in all cases with higher accuracy (> 90%), an improvement of either DASH or VAS or both of > 60% to the preoperative values occurred. There was a significant correlation between accuracy (%) and ΔVAS (p = 0.004). There were no method-related complications.

Conclusions

Our data after PSI-based corrective osteotomy in complex deformities of the upper extremity in a limited number of cases indicate a positive correlation between 3D accuracy and clinical outcomes. Examination of 3D accuracy to analyse sources of error in the hole procedure from initial CT scan to end of surgery even in patients with not fully satisfactory clinical results is required for further development of the method to achieve optimal correction results with nearly 100% congruence between the planned and postoperative 3D bone position.

Trial registration This retrospective study was registered in the Center for Translational & Clinical Research Aachen (CTC-A) with the number 20-514 on November 20, 2021

Preoperative Three-Dimensional Simulation of Osteotomy for Correction of Malunion of Both Bones of Forearm: A Case Report

Corrective osteotomy of malunion of both forearm bones is a challenging procedure because it needs accurate angular and rotational correction of both bones. Recent advances in three-dimensional (3D) printing techniques have shown promising results in the correction of complex deformities. We report a patient with malunion of both bones of the forearm in whom we determined site and degree of correction required based on the computed tomography images of the affected side and mirrored images of the contralateral healthy side. We then created 3D printed sawbones and simulated osteotomy to confirm stable dynamic forearm rotation. This method enabled satisfactory restoration of anatomical and functional outcomes. Preoperative dynamic motion simulation using 3D printed anatomic bone model is helpful for complex corrective osteotomy of forearm fracture malunion.

Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic)

Three-dimensional printing in paediatric orthopaedic surgery

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a rapidly evolving and promising field to improve outcomes of orthopaedic surgery. The use of patient-specific 3D-printed models is specifically interesting in paediatric orthopaedic surgery, as limb deformity corrections often require an individual 3D treatment. In this editorial, various operative applications of 3D printing in paediatric orthopaedic surgery are discussed. The technical aspects and the imaging acquisition with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are outlined. Next, there is a focus on the intraoperative applications of 3D printing during paediatric orthopaedic surgical procedures. An overview of various upper and lower limb deformities in paediatrics is given, in which 3D printing is already implemented, including post-traumatic forearm corrections and proximal femoral osteotomies. The use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) or guiding templates during the surgical procedure shows to be promising in reducing operation time, intraoperative haemorrhage and radiation exposure. Moreover, 3D-printed models for the use of PSI or patient-specific navigation templates are promising in improving the accuracy of complex limb deformity surgery in children. Lastly, the future of 3D printing in paediatric orthopaedics extends beyond the intraoperative applications; various other medical applications include 3D casting and prosthetic limb replacement. In conclusion, 3D printing opportunities are numerous, and the fast developments are exciting, but more evidence is required to prove its superiority over conventional paediatric orthopaedic surgery.

Reconstruction using monorail fixator for forearm osteochondroma Masada type I and IIb: A case series

INTRODUCTION

Osteochondroma (solitary) and multiple hereditary exostoses (plural) are defined as a cartilage-capped bony projection arising on the external surface of bone containing a marrow cavity that is continuous with that of the underlying bone. These tumors grow slowly and develop to cause symptoms such as limited range of motion, joint pain, lumps, and deformities. The use of ulnar distraction osteogenesis has gained popularity in treating deformity in forearm osteochondroma. Problems that arise including bone angulation and persistent radial head dislocation.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe eight cases of forearm osteochondroma that came to the Prof. Dr. R. Soeharso Orthopedic Hospital, Surakarta, Indonesia. We found two variations in the classification of Masada in these 8 patients, Masada type I and IIB. The main complaint was a bent arm. We decided to do surgery in the form of tumor resection and reconstruction of the deformity by using ulnar gradual lengthening and osteotomies. The results of the procedure were investigated in this study, using clinical and radiological parameters focusing on medium-term functional and structural outcomes.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Eight patients had overall good results, although performed with a different sequence of operating techniques. Ulnar lengthening with a monorail fixator is still the main choice in its implementation. Gradual ulnar lengthening improves not only the deformity but also the functionality of the associated forearm.

Patient-Specific Guided Osteotomy to Correct a Symptomatic Malunion of the Left Forearm

We present a case report of a 12-year old female with a midshaft forearm fracture. Initial conservative treatment with a cast failed, resulting in a malunion. The malunion resulted in functional impairment for which surgery was indicated. A corrective osteotomy was planned using 3D analyses of the preoperative CT-scan. Subsequently, patient-specific guides were printed and used during the procedure to precisely correct the malunion. Three months after surgery, the radiographs showed full consolidation and the patient was pain-free with full range of motion and comparable strength in both forearms. The current case report shows that a corrective osteotomy with patient-specific guides based on preoperative 3D analyses can help surgeons to plan and precisely correct complex malunions resulting in improved functional outcomes.

Three-dimensional printing in medicine: a systematic review of pediatric applications

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional printing (3DP) addresses distinct clinical challenges in pediatric care including: congenital variants, compact anatomy, high procedural risk, and growth over time. We hypothesized that patient-specific applications of 3DP in pediatrics could be categorized into concise, discrete categories of use.

METHODS

Terms related to "three-dimensional printing" and "pediatrics" were searched on PubMed, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Initial search yielded 2122 unique articles; 139 articles characterizing 508 patients met full inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Four categories of patient-specific 3DP applications were identified: Teaching of families and medical staff (9.3%); Developing intervention strategies (33.9%); Procedural applications, including subtypes: contour models, guides, splints, and implants (43.0%); and Material manufacturing of shaping devices or prosthetics (14.0%). Procedural comparative studies found 3DP devices to be equivalent or better than conventional methods, with less operating time and fewer complications.

CONCLUSION

Patient-specific applications of Three-Dimensional Printing in Medicine can be elegantly classified into four major categories: Teaching, Developing, Procedures, and Materials, sharing the same TDPM acronym. Understanding this schema is important because it promotes further innovation and increased implementation of these devices to improve pediatric care.

IMPACT

This article classifies the pediatric applications of patient-specific three-dimensional printing. This is a first comprehensive review of patient-specific three-dimensional printing in both pediatric medical and surgical disciplines, incorporating previously described classification schema to create one unifying paradigm. Understanding these applications is important since three-dimensional printing addresses challenges that are uniquely pediatric including compact anatomy, unique congenital variants, greater procedural risk, and growth over time. We identified four classifications of patient-specific use: teaching, developing, procedural, and material uses. By classifying these applications, this review promotes understanding and incorporation of this expanding technology to improve the pediatric care.

The effect of three-dimensional (3D) printing on quantitative and qualitative outcomes in paediatric orthopaedic osteotomies: a systematic review

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology is increasingly being utilized in various surgical specialities. In paediatric orthopaedics it has been applied in the pre-operative and intra-operative stages, allowing complex deformities to be replicated and patient-specific instrumentation to be used. This systematic review analyses the literature on the effect of 3D printing on paediatric orthopaedic osteotomy outcomes.A systematic review of several databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating the use of 3D printing technology in orthopaedic osteotomy procedures in children (aged ≤ 16 years) were included. Spinal and bone tumour surgery were excluded. Data extracted included demographics, disease pathology, target bone, type of technology, imaging modality used, qualitative/quantitative outcomes and follow-up. Articles were further categorized as either 'pre-operative' or 'intra-operative' applications of the technology.Twenty-two articles fitting the inclusion criteria were included. The reported studies included 212 patients. There were five articles of level of evidence 3 and 17 level 4.A large variety of outcomes were reported with the most commonly used being operating time, fluoroscopic exposure and intra-operative blood loss.A significant difference in operative time, fluoroscopic exposure, blood loss and angular correction was found in the 'intra-operative' application group. No significant difference was found in the 'pre-operative' category.Despite a relatively low evidence base pool of studies, our aggregate data demonstrate a benefit of 3D printing technology in various deformity correction applications, especially when used in the 'intra-operative' setting. Further research including paediatric-specific core outcomes is required to determine the potential benefit of this novel addition. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:130-138. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200092.

Evaluation of CT-MR image registration methodologies for 3D preoperative planning of forearm surgeries

Computerized surgical planning for forearm procedures that considers both soft and bony tissue, requires alignment of preoperatively acquired computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images by image registration. Normalized mutual information (NMI) registration techniques have been researched to improve efficiency and to eliminate the user dependency associated with manual alignment. While successfully applied in various medical fields, the application of NMI registration to images of the forearm, for which the relative pose of the radius and ulna likely differs between CT and MR acquisitions, is yet to be described. To enable the alignment of CT and MR forearm data, we propose an NMI-based registration pipeline, which allows manual steering of the registration algorithm to the desired image subregion and is, thus, applicable to the forearm. Successive automated registration is proposed to enable planning incorporating multiple target anatomical structures such as the radius and ulna. With respect to gold-standard manual registration, the proposed registration methodology achieved mean accuracies of 0.08 ± 0.09 mm (0.01-0.41 mm range) in comparison with 0.28 ± 0.23 mm (0.03-0.99 mm range) associated with a landmark-based registration when tested on 40 patient data sets. Application of the proposed registration pipeline required less than 10 minutes on average compared with 20 minutes required by the landmark-based registration. The clinical feasibility and relevance of the method were tested on two different clinical applications, a forearm tumor resection and radioulnar joint instability analysis, obtaining accurate and robust CT-MR image alignment for both cases.

Seven-year follow-up for malrotation of a radial diaphysis fracture in a child corrected by osteotomy for loss of motion: A case report

A greenstick fracture is an incomplete fracture where the compressive side of the cortex is still intact but plastically deformed. The incidence of poor results following the closed treatment of greenstick fractures in children >10 years of age is seriously underestimated. Therefore, fixing the position of the forearm is important for initial treatment. In cases of greenstick fracture, the possibility of inadequate remodeling of angulated deformities during growth, and in particular, the lack of correction between rotational malalignment and growth when the diaphyseal forearm is involved in the fracture, should be considered. A male, 10-year-old, left hand-dominant, Asian patient fell while playing in the garden and was immediately assessed by an orthopedic doctor at an Emergency Orthopaedic Clinic. Initial examination revealed a deformity of his dominant left forearm and an angulated greenstick fracture of the radius. However, after 3 months, he developed loss of supination of his left forearm and complained of limitation of left forearm supination. Radiography demonstrated a volar angulation of 20°. The patient underwent open reduction, internal fixation and 10° bending with a plate for correction without corrective rotation. At 12 months after injury, the patient did not exhibit pain or limitation of the elbow and wrist. After follow-up for 7 years, the patient was able to perform normal day-to-day activities with no adverse symptoms. The present case indicated that corrective osteotomy is required following the loss of supination after a greenstick fracture of the diaphysis of the radius. The patient of the current study exhibited rotation due to the central band of the interosseous membrane. In the treatment of greenstick fractures, a radius apex angulation of 20° must be corrected via osteotomy due to loss of rotation. The present case indicated that corrective osteotomy of the radius apex alone without rotational correction, in combination with plate bending improved the loss of forearm rotation.