Trends in the surgical management of odontoid fractures in patients above 75 years of age: Retrospective study of 70 cases

Worsening ambulation in elderly patients with cervical odontoid fractures: A nationwide multicenter study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing prevalence of cervical odontoid fractures in older adults, the treatment strategy is controversial. The objectives of the current study are to investigate the prognosis and complications of cervical odontoid fractures in elderly patients and to identify factors associated with worsening of ambulation after 6 months.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study included 167 patients aged 65 years or older with odontoid fractures. Patient demographic and treatment data were investigated and compared according to the treatment strategy. To determine associations with worsening ambulation after 6 months, we focused on the treatment strategies (nonsurgical treatment [collar immobilization or halo vest], conversion to surgery, or initial surgery) and patients' background.

RESULTS

Patients who received nonsurgical treatment were significantly older, and patients who underwent surgery had more Anderson-D'Alonzo type 2 fractures. Of the patients initially treated nonsurgically, 26% later underwent surgery. Numbers of complications, including death, and degrees of ambulation after 6 months did not differ significantly among treatment strategies. Patients who had worsened ambulation after 6 months were significantly more likely to be older than 80 years, to have needed assistance with walking before injury, and to have cerebrovascular disease. Multivariable analysis showed that a score of ≥2 on the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) was significantly associated with worsening ambulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Preinjury mFI-5 scores of ≥2 were significantly associated with worsening ambulation 6 months after treatment of cervical odontoid fractures in older adults.

Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in geriatric patients aged 80 and older with axis fractures: a nationwide, cross-sectional analysis of concomitant injuries, comorbidities, and treatment strategies in 10,077 cases

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between treatment, comorbidities, concomitant injuries, and procedures with in-hospital mortality in patients aged 80 years or older with axis fractures.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the German InEK (Institut für das Entgeltsystem im Krankenhaus) GmbH database (2019-2021) for patients aged 80 years or older with axis fractures and the in-hospital mortality rate was calculated. Differences in comorbidities and concomitant diseases and injuries were analyzed using the Chi-square test. In surgically treated patients, odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to analyze potential risk factors for in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Among 10,077 patients, the in-hospital mortality rate was 8.4%, with no significant difference between surgically (9.4%) and non-surgically treated patients (7.9%; p = 0.103). The most common comorbidities were essential hypertension (67.3%), atrial fibrillation (28.2%), and chronic kidney disease (23.3%), while the most common concomitant injuries were head and face wounds (25.9%), concussions (12.8%), and atlas fractures (11.6%). In surgically treated patients, spinal cord injury (OR = 4.62, 95% CI: 2.23-9.58), acute renal failure (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 2.26-4.53), and acute bleeding anemia (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.64-2.59) were associated with increased in-hospital mortality (all p < 0.01). Screw-rod-system fixation of one segment (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56-0.97) and intraoperative navigation (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.16-0.71) were identified as potential protective factors (both p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive geriatric assessment and optimization of comorbidities during treatment are crucial. The indication for surgical treatment must be carefully individualized. Future studies should focus on the choice of surgical technique, perioperative blood management, and intraoperative navigation as potential protective factors.

Does the Surgical Approach Matter in Treating Odontoid Fractures? A Comparison of Mechanical Complication Rates Between Anterior Versus Posterior Surgical Approaches: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Objective

Odontoid fractures are treated surgically through the anterior or posterior approach. Each surgical approach has its advantages and disadvantages, so the preferred approach remains debatable. There are few meta-analyses or systemic reviews on the mechanical complications of surgical treatment for odontoid fractures. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the operation-related morbidity, including mechanical complications, and mortality of patients with odontoid fractures, treated via the anterior or posterior approach.

Methods

A systematic search was performed on PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for the studies up to October 2023 on the complication rate of the surgical treatment of odontoid fractures, related to the surgical approach. The risk ratios (RR) with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled to assess the mechanical complication rates, other complications, revision surgery, and mortality, depending on the surgical approach.

Results

A total of 1,519 studies were retrieved using the search strategy, and 782 patients from 15 articles were included in this meta-analysis. Mechanical complications were significantly more frequent in the anterior surgical group with low heterogeneity. The incidences of fracture nonunion and revision surgery were also higher in the anterior surgery group. However, there was no significant difference in systemic complications and mortality rates between the two groups.

Conclusion

The posterior approach was more advantageous than the anterior approach in terms of mechanical complications, fusion rates, and incidence of revision surgery. However, further studies, should be performed to strengthen these results.

The optimal treatment of type II and III odontoid fractures in the elderly: an updated meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Odontoid fractures are the most common cervical spine fractures in the elderly, with a controversial optimal treatment. The objective of this review was to compare the outcome of surgical and conservative treatments in elderly (≥ 65 years), by updating a systematic review published by the authors in 2013.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in seven databases. Clinical outcome was the primary outcome. Fracture union- and stability were secondary outcomes. Pooled point estimates and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived using the random-effects model. A random-effects multivariable meta-regression model was used to correct for baseline co-variates when sufficiently reported.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, of which forty were case series and one a cohort study. No clinical differences in outcomes including the Neck Disability Index (NDI, 700 patients), Visual Analogue Scale pain (VAS, 180 patients), and Smiley-Webster Scale (SWS, 231 patients) scores were identified between surgical and conservative treatments. However, fracture union was higher in surgically treated patients (pooled incidence 72.7%, 95% CI 66.1%, 78.5%, 31 studies, 988 patients) than in conservatively treated patients (40.2%, 95% CI 32.0%, 49.0%, 22 studies, 912 patients). This difference remained after correcting for age and fracture type. Fracture stability (41 studies, 1917 patients), although numerically favoring surgery, did not appear to differ between treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

While surgically treated patients showed higher union rates than conservatively treated patients, no clinically relevant differences were observed in NDI, VAS pain, and SWS scores and stability rates. These results need to be further confirmed in well-designed comparative studies with proper adjustment for confounding, such as age, fracture characteristics, and osteoporosis degree.

Geriatric Odontoid Fractures: Treatment Algorithms of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Based on Expert Consensus and a Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review/expert consensus.

OBJECTIVES

Fractures of the axis represent the most frequent injury of the spine in elderly patients. Both, operative and non-operative treatment are associated with a high rate of complications and mortality. The aim of this article was to summarize the current literature on the management of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients and to weigh it based on an expert consensus process.

METHODS

In a joint consensus process, members of the Spine Section of the German Orthopaedic and Trauma Society (DGOU) aimed to formulate recommendations for the diagnostic workup and treatment of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients. Based on the previously published recommendations, this article is an updated version with incorporating a systematic review of the recent literature.

RESULTS

Based on the new data available, the recommendations established in the initial consensus process were adapted.

CONCLUSIONS

Computed tomography represents the diagnostic standard for patients with suspected injuries of the upper cervical spine. Anderson/D'Alonzo odontoid fractures type 1, non-displaced type 2, and type 3 can be treated conservatively. Even non-unions do not necessarily result in poor clinical outcome. In Anderson/D'Alonzo type 2 fractures, surgical therapy offers the advantage of relatively safe osseous healing with no increased complication rate even in elderly patients and can thus be recommended. In very high aged patients, however, a case-by-case decision should be made. When surgical stabilization of osteoporotic odontoid fractures is indicated, posterior techniques are biomechanically advantageous and can be considered the standard.

Short-term posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation without fusion to treat type II odontoid fracture among people under 60 years

INTRODUCTION

Posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation is a reliable technique used in treatment of type II odontoid fracture. However, the loss of cervical range of rotation motion (RORM) was inevitable. There were few studies focusing on the influence of short-term C1-C2 fixation with nonfusion technique to preserve cervical function in patients younger than 60 years. The purpose of this study was to compare cervical RORM which was measured by an improved goniometer, and the clinical outcomes between short-term and long-term C1-C2 fixation techniques in the treatment of Grauer type 2B and 2C odontoid fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study represents a retrospective analysis, including patients who underwent primary C1-C2 fixation surgery. These patients were divided into short-term and long-term groups based on whether underwent a fixation removal operation. The clinical results were collected and compared between the two groups. Independent T test and Chi-square analyses were used to identify significant differences between the two groups and dependent T test was used within each group. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.

RESULTS

There were no severe postoperative complications, and all 60 patients achieved spinal stabilization after primary surgery. The mean rotation angle in the short-term group at last follow-up time was 138.39 ± 21.06°, which was better than 83.59 ± 13.06° in the long-term group (p < .05). The same statistical difference was observed in flexion-extension angle, which was 71.11 ± 18.73° in short-term group and 53.34 ± 18.23° in long-term group. The mean NDI score in short-term group at last follow-up time was 1.23 ± 0.86 and better than 8.24 ± 3.17 in long-term group. However, the VAS score in short-term group was 1.82 ± 0.54 which was worse compared to 0.64 ± 0.29 in long-term group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated that primary C1-C2 fixation with nonfusion technique could support satisfactory clinical effects. In addition, the removal of instruments after bony fusion could improve the function of cervical movement significantly in patients under 60 years.

Comparison of Hard and Soft Cervical Collars for the Management of Odontoid Peg Fractures in the Elderly

Introduction

Odontoid peg fractures (OF) are the most common cervical spine fracture in the elderly. This retrospective analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of older patients with OF who had been managed non-operatively with either a hard or soft cervical collar.

Materials and Methods

We analysed the retrospective data of the clinical and radiographic records of patients 60 years or older who presented over a 10-year period with OF and were treated non-operatively with a cervical collar. Mortality was the primary outcome measure with mechanism of injury, complications, and fracture healing secondary measures.

Results

45 patients (hard collar n = 22; soft collar n = 23) were included with comparable demographics for frailty and co-morbidities in each group; age was significantly higher in the soft collar group (80.6 vs 86.4 years; P = .0065). Associated injuries and complications were not significantly different overall, or when Type II fractures were separately analysed (P = .435 associated injuries, P = .121 complications). All-cause mortality was greater in the soft collar group (30-day mortality hard: 0%, soft: 9%; 1-year mortality hard: 18%, soft: 48% P = .035). However, once corrected for age, this proved not to reach significance (P = .333) in any fracture type. Non-union was common (77%) but was not significantly different (hard = 70%; soft = 87%; P = .419).

Discussion

Consistent with other reports, non-union rates remained substantial regardless of which collar was used. After controlling for age, there was no difference in all-cause mortality between elderly patients treated with a hard or soft cervical collar for odontoid peg fractures.

Conclusions

Soft collars appear suitable for the treatment of odontoid peg fractures in the elderly without compromising outcome. Larger cohort analyses will help confirm this finding.

Odontoid Fractures: A Standard Review of Current Concepts and Treatment Recommendations

Odontoid fractures represent the most common fractures involving C2 and the most common cervical spine fractures in patients older than 65 years. Despite their increasing frequency, optimal management of these injuries remain a subject to debate. Although types I and III injuries have relatively good healing potential with nonsurgical treatment, type II fractures carry a higher risk for nonunion. In particular, elderly patients are at risk for nonunion or fibrous malunion after nonsurgical treatment; however, increased medical comorbidities and poor bone quality also increase the risks of surgery in this cohort. The high morbidity and mortality associated with these injuries has made it an area of particular interest among spine surgeons. The purpose of this review was to summarize the pathophysiology, evaluation, and diagnosis of these injuries and to review controversies in management and considerations for treatment based on the most recent available literature.

An experience with Goel-Harms C1-C2 fixation for type II odontoid fractures

Objective:

Type II odontoid fractures need surgical stabilization for disabling neck pain and instability. Anterior odontoid screw fixation is a well-known technique. However, certain patients require posterior fixation. We present our surgical results and experiences with nine cases managed by the Goel-Harms technique.

Materials and Methods:

This is a retrospective review of nine patients operated on between January 2019 and December 2021 for Type II odontoid fractures with posterior fixation technique. Their clinical profile was collected from case files. The radiological data were retrieved from radiology archives. The indications for surgery were instability and refractory neck pain. The surgical decision for posterior fixation was guided by fracture morphology.

Results:

The mean age of presentation was 37.22 ± 9.85 years. Seven patients had Type II, and two had Type IIa odontoid fracture. All patients presented with unbearable neck pain. One patient had a quadriparesis. The fracture line was anterior-inferior sloping in six, posterior-inferior sloping in two, and transverse in one case. The anterior-posterior displacement of fracture ranged from 0 to 7 mm (mean 2.44 ± 2.18 mm). Partial transverse ligament tear without the Atlanto Axial Dislocation was present in three patients. The C1-C2 joint distraction was required in five cases. C1-C2 joint spacer was required in two cases. Following surgery, neck pain was relieved in all cases. Complete fracture alignment was achieved in eight patients. There were no postoperative complications. At the mean follow-up of 16.22 ± 9.61 months, there was no implant failure.

Conclusions:

Posterior C1-C2 fixation by the Goel-Harms technique is an excellent alternative to anterior fixation in selected cases.

Too frail is to fail: Frailty portends poor outcomes in the elderly with type II odontoid fractures independent of management strategy

Type-II odontoid fractures are common and highly morbid injuries, particularly among elderly patients. However, few risk stratification resources exist to predict outcomes and guide management decision making. Frailty indices have been increasingly utilized for these purposes in elective surgery, but have not been assessed for trauma. A single-center prospective trauma registry identified patients aged ≥ 80 years with type-II odontoid fractures. Frailty was the independent variable, using three independent indices: modified-5-item frailty (mFI-5), modified Charlson comorbidity (mCCI), and Davies. 97 patients had complete frailty data and sufficient follow up information, with median mIF-5 of 2 (range 0-4; 34 frail, mFI-5 > 2), median mCCI score of 6 (range 4-14), and median Davies score of 2 (range 0-7). For all indices, increasing score was associated with mortality, mIF-5 (HR = 1.76, 95%CI = 1.06-2.88), mCCI (HR = 1.10, 95%CI = 1.01-1.20), and Davies scores (HR = 1.21, 95%CI = 1.08-1.37). Median post-injury survival among patients with mIF-5 of ≤ 2 was 10-fold longer than patients with mIF-5 of > 2 (70 vs. 710 days, p = 0.0026). After adjusting for initial treatment strategy, frailty status remained an independent predictor of patient mortality; mIF-5 (HR = 1.72, 95%CI = 1.02-2.80), mCCI (HR = 1.10, 95%CI = 1.01-1.20), and Davies scores (HR = 1.21, 95%CI = 1.08-1.37). Among octogenarian patients with type-II odontoid fractures, frailty was associated with increased mortality, independent of treatment strategy.

Biomechanical comparison of a C1 posterior arch clamp with C1 lateral mass screws in constructs for C1-C2 fusion

The aim of this experimental study was to assess the biomechanical performance of a novel C1 posterior arch (C1PA) clamp compared with C1 lateral mass (C1LM) screws in constructs used to treat atlantoaxial instability. These constructs had either C2 pedicle (C2P) screws or C2 translaminar (C2TL) screws. Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric ligamentous spine specimens (C0-C3) were tested under six conditions: the intact state, the destabilized state after a simulated odontoid fracture, and when instrumented with four constructs (C1LM-C2P, C1LM-C2TL, C1PA-C2P, C1PA-C2TL). Each specimen was tested in a spinal loading simulator that separately applied axial rotation, flexion-extension and lateral bending. In each test condition, displacement controlled angular motion was applied in both directions at a speed of 2 deg/s until a resulting moment of 1.5 Nm was achieved. The measured ranges of motion (ROM) of the C1-C2 segments were compared for each test condition using nonparametric Friedman tests. The destabilized state had significantly more C1-C2 motion (p < 0.05) than the intact state in all cases, and all constructs greatly reduced this motion. C2 pedicle screw constructs that used the C1PA clamp had significantly less C1-C2 motion (p < 0.05) than those with C1LM screws in flexion-extension as well as axial rotation and no statistically significant difference was detected in lateral bending. C2 translaminar screw constructs that used the C1PA clamp had significantly less C1-C2 motion (p < 0.05) than those with C1LM screws in flexion-extension and no statistically significant difference was detected in axial rotation or in lateral bending. Data from the current study suggested that constructs using the novel C1PA clamp would provide as good, or improved, biomechanical stability to the C1-C2 segment compared with constructs using C1LM screws.

Odontoid Type II fractures in elderly: what are the real management goals and how to best achieve them? A multicenter European study on functional outcome

Odontoid fractures constitute the most common cervical fractures in elderly. External immobilization is the treatment of choice for Type I and III; there is still no wide consensus about the best management of Type II fractures. Observational multicenter study was conducted on a prospectively built database on elderly patients (> 75 years) with Type II odontoid fracture managed conservatively during the last 10 years. All patients underwent CT scan on admission and at 3 months; if indicated, selected patient had CT scan at 6 and 12 months. All patients were clinically evaluated by Neck Disability Index (NDI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification (ASA) on admission; NDI was assessed also at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months; furthermore, a quality of life (QoL) assessment with the SF-12 form was performed at 3 and 12 months. Among the 260 patients enrolled, 177 (68%) were women and 83 (32%) men, with a median age of 83 years. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months: 247 (95%) showed an excellent functional outcome within 6 weeks, among them 117 (45%) showed a good bony healing, whereas 130 (50%) healed in pseudo-arthrosis. The residual 5% were still variably symptomatic at 12 weeks; however, only 5 out of 13 (2% of the total cohort) required delayed surgery. This study showed that a conservative approach to odontoid Type II fracture in elderly is an effective and valid option, resulting in an excellent functional outcome (regardless of bony fusion) in the majority of cases. Failure of conservative treatment can be safely addressed with surgical fixation at a later stage.

A new tool in percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation for odontoid fractures remains challenging due to the complex anatomy of the craniocervical junction. We designed a new guide instrument to help with the placement of guide wire, which have achieved satisfying surgical results. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this new tool in percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with odontoid fracture were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation with the traditional guide instrument (n = 13) or the new guide instrument we designed (n = 16). The following clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups: operation time, radiograph times, incision length, blood loss, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative complications, bony union, fixation failure, and reoperation. Radiographs or CT scans were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative demographic data between the two groups. The operation time (56.62 ± 8.32 Vs 49.63 ± 7.47, P = 0.025) and radiograph times (26.54 ± 6.94 Vs 20.50 ± 5.02, P = 0.011) of the designed guide instrument group were significantly lower than those of the traditional guide instrument group. There were no significant differences in incision length (16.08 ± 3.07 Vs 15.69 ± 2.73, P = 0.720), blood loss (16.08 ± 4.96 Vs 17.88 ± 5.98, P = 0.393), postoperative hospitalization (7.15 ± 1.91 Vs 6.88 ± 2.36, P = 0.734), postoperative complications (7.7% Vs 12.5%, P = 1), and bony union (92.3% Vs 93.8%, P = 1) between the two groups. No fixation failure or reoperation occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The top of our designed guide instrument is a wedge-shaped tip with 30° inclination, which has a large contact area with the anterior surface of the cervical vertebra. According to our retrospective study, the guide instrument can reduce the operation time and radiograph times. It has potential clinical value, which needs further testing with a higher level of research design.

Cirq® Robotic Assistance for Minimally Invasive C1-C2 Posterior Instrumentation: Report on Feasibility and Safety

BACKGROUND

Accurate screw placement remains very challenging especially in the upper cervical spine.

OBJECTIVE

To present our first experience of a percutaneous posterior C1-C2 fixation for a traumatic fracture.

METHODS

This is a case report of a non-neurological patient, harboring a type II odontoid fracture. She underwent a posterior percutaneous fixation using Cirq® Robotic Assistance coupled to the AIRO® intraoperative computed tomography (iCT)-scan and BrainLab® navigation system (all by BrainLab AG). Routine CT was performed on postoperative day 2 to evaluate pedicle screw placement. The effective dose was calculated.

RESULTS

The C1-C2 posterior percutaneous fixation was performed with cannulated VERTEX® Reconstruction System (Medtronic). Overall, 4 screws were placed. All of them were rated as acceptable (100%). Radiation dose received by the patient was 4.13 mSv. Radiation dose received by the surgical staff was 0 mSv. Postoperative course was excellent.

CONCLUSION

Posterior percutaneous fixation using Cirq® Robotic Assistance coupled with iCT navigation system is a major innovation that can improve pedicle screw positioning's accuracy with acceptable patient radiation and reduced surgical team exposure.

Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Odontoid Fractures in Geriatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Odontoid fractures in geriatric patients represent an entity of increasing incidence with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. The optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management is being controversially discussed in the literature.

METHODS

In a consensus process and based on the current literature, the members of the working groups "Osteoporotic Fractures" and "Upper Cervical Spine" of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) defined recommendations for the diagnostics and treatment of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients.

RESULTS

For the diagnosis of odontoid fractures in symptomatic patients, computed tomography represents the gold standard, along with conventional radiographs. Magnetic resonance and dynamic imaging can be used as ancillary imaging modalities. With regard to fracture classification, the systems described by Anderson/D'Alonzo and by Eysel/Roosen have proved to be of value. A treatment algorithm was developed based on these classifications. Anderson/D'Alonzo type 1, type 3, and non-displaced type 2 fractures usually can be treated non-operatively. However, a close clinical and radiological follow-up is essential. In Anderson/D'Alonzo type 2 fractures, operative treatment is associated with better fracture healing. Displaced type 2 and type 3 fractures should be stabilized operatively. Type 2 fractures with suitable fracture patterns (Eysel/Roosen 2A/B) can be stabilized anteriorly. Posterior C I/II-stabilization procedures are well established and suitable for all fracture patterns.

Surgical treatment of type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients: a comparison of anterior odontoid screw fixation and posterior atlantoaxial fusion using the Magerl-Gallie technique

PURPOSE

This single-centre retrospective study compared anterior odontoid screw fixation and posterior atlantoaxial fusion in the surgical treatment of type II B odontoid fractures according to Grauer in elderly patients.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2014, 133 consecutive patients above 60 years presenting with type II B odontoid fracture were treated surgically in our department. They were divided retrospectively into two groups. Group A included 47 patients in whom anterior odontoid screw fixation was performed. Group B with 86 patients underwent posterior atlantoaxial fusion. The clinical and radiological data were analysed. Any reoperation during the follow-up was recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age in group A (74.19 years) was significantly less than in group B (78.16 years). The mean operative time in group A (64.5 min) was significantly shorter than in group B (116 min). Again, the mean amount of blood loss in group A (79 ml) was significantly less than in group B (379 ml). The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in group A (17.4 days) than in group B (30 days). The mean follow-up was 29.3 months in group A and 32 months in group B. The rate of pseudoarthrosis was significantly higher in group A (25.5%) than in group B (3.5%). Furthermore, the need for revision surgery was significantly increased in group A (23.4%) than in group B (10.47%).

CONCLUSIONS

Odontoid screw fixation is a less invasive surgery for type II B odontoid fractures in elderly patients. However, posterior atlantoaxial fusion provides a superior surgical outcome regarding fracture healing and the need for surgical revisions. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Mortality, complication, and fusion rates of patients with odontoid fracture: the impact of age and comorbidities in 204 cases

PURPOSE

The French Society of Spine Surgery (SFCR) conducted a prospective epidemiologic multicenter study. The purpose was to investigate mortality, complication, and fusion rates in patients with odontoid fracture, depending on age, comorbidities, fracture type, and treatment.

METHODS

Out of 204 patients, 60 were ≤ 70 years and 144 were > 70 years. Demographic data, comorbidities, treatment types and complications (general medical, infectious, neurologic, and mechanical), and death were registered within the first year. Fractures were classified according to Anderson-D'Alonzo and Roy-Camille on the initial CT. A 1-year follow-up CT was available in 144 patients to evaluate fracture consolidation.

RESULTS

Type II and oblique-posterior fractures were the most frequent patterns. The treatment was conservative in 52.5% and surgical in 47.5%. The mortality rate in patients ≤ 70 was 3.3% and 16.7% in patients > 70 years (p = 0.0002). Fracture pattern and treatment type did not influence mortality. General medical complications were significantly more frequent > 70 years (p = 0.021) and after surgical treatment (p = 0.028). Neurologic complications occurred in 0.5%, postoperative infections in 2.0%, and implant-related mechanical complications in 10.3% (associated with pseudarthrosis). Fracture fusion was observed in 93.5% of patients ≤ 70 years and in 62.5% >70 years (p < 0.0001). Pseudarthrosis was present in 31.5% of oblique-posterior fractures and in 24.3% after conservative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Age and comorbidities influenced mortality and medical complication rates most regardless of fracture type and treatment choice. Pseudarthrosis represented the main complication, which increased with age. Pseudarthrosis was most frequent in type II and oblique-posterior fractures after conservative treatment.

Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between modified Gallie graft fusion-wiring technique and posterior cervical screw constructs for Type II odontoid fractures

The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between modified Gallie graft fusion-wiring technique and posterior cervical screw constructs for Type II odontoid fractures, and hope to provide references in decision making and surgical planning for both spinal surgeons and surgically treated patients.This is a retrospective study. By retrieving the medical records from January 2005 to July 2015 in our hospital, 53 Type II odontoid fracture patients were reviewed. According to the instrumentation type, patients were divided into 2 groups: Wiring group and Screw group. Three categorized factors were analyzed statistically: patient characteristics: age, body mass index, preoperative neurological status, duration, complicated injuries; surgical variables: surgery time, blood loss, vertebral artery injury, spinal cord or nerve root injury, major systemic complications, wound infection, pain at the bone donor area, instrumentation failure, revision rate; and radiographic parameters: preoperative and final follow-up data of C0-2 curvature, C2-7 curvature, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, C7 slope, fracture classification, separation, and displacement of odontoid fracture, fusion rate. An additional comparison of surgical outcomes was done, including patient satisfaction, visual analog scale score for neck pain, neck stiffness, medical expense.There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in patient characteristics of age, sex, body mass index, preoperative neurological status, duration, and complicated injuries. No statistically significant difference was noted in surgical variables of blood loss, vertebral artery injury, spinal cord or nerve root injury, major systemic complications, wound infection, bone harvested zone pain, instrumentation failure, revision rate. The surgery time was shorter in Wiring group than that in Screw group, with a statistically significant difference. We noted no significant difference between the 2 groups when comparing radiographic parameters of preoperative and final follow-up data of C0-2 curvature, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, fracture classification, the separation and displacement of odontoid fracture, and fusion rate. Although we noted no significant difference in preoperative C2-7 curvature and C7 slope, the final follow-up data showed that C2-7 curvature and C7 slope were smaller in Wiring group than that in Screw group. We noted no significant difference in visual analog scale score, neck stiffness, and neurological status at final follow-up. The medical expense was less in Wiring group; the patient satisfaction was lower in the Wiring group than that in the Screw group.The modified Gallie graft fusion-wiring technique provided solid fusion and stabilization for patients with Type II odontoid fractures, Gallie graft fusion-wiring resulted in less surgery time, less medical expense, but lower patient satisfaction when compared with the posterior cervical screw constructs.

Odontoid Fracture in Patients Age >75 Years Surgically Managed by the Harms Technique: Bone Healing and 1-Year Mortality Rate in 57 Cases

BACKGROUND

Odontoid fracture is the most common lesion of the cervical spine in persons age >70 years. Management of these fractures has become a public health issue. In this study, we evaluated bone fusion, early complications, and mortality in a cohort of patients age >75 years who underwent surgical management of odontoid fracture using the Harms technique.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of 57 patients treated surgically between 2002 and 2016 in a single spine surgery institution. Age at diagnosis, comorbidities, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score were analyzed. At a 6-month follow-up, bone healing was evaluated with computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 85.5 ± 6.6 years, and 53% of the patients had an ASA score ≥3. According to the Anderson classification, 70% of the patients had a type 2 odontoid fracture. The average duration of follow-up was 15.7 months. Ten patients were lost to follow-up. The rate of early complications was 19%, with no mechanical complications reported. At a 6-month follow-up, a solid bony union was seen in all patients. The 1-year mortality was 14%.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical management of odontoid fractures in elderly patients using the Harms technique is associated with an excellent rate of bone healing with acceptable rates of early complications and mortality.