Redefining knee replacement

Excellent results of restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 10 years of follow-up

PURPOSE

While restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented implants has been shown to provide a similar survivorship rate to mechanical alignment (MA) in the short term, no studies have reported on the long-term survivorship and function.

METHODS

One hundred four consecutive cemented cruciate retaining TKAs implanted using computer navigation and following the rKA principles proposed by Vendittoli were reviewed at a minimum of 10 years after surgery. Implant revisions, reoperations and clinical outcomes were assessed using knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), forgotten joint score (FJS), patients' satisfaction and joint perception questionnaires. Radiographs were analyzed to identify signs of osteolysis and implant loosening.

RESULTS

Implant survivorship was 99.0% at a mean follow-up of 11.3 years (range: 10.3-12.9) with one early revision for instability. Patients perceived their TKA as natural or artificial without limitation in 50.0% of cases, and 95.3% were satisfied or very satisfied with their TKA. The mean FJS was 67.6 (range: 0-100). The mean KOOS were as follows: pain 84.7 (range: 38-100), symptoms 85.5 (range: 46-100), function in daily activities 82.6 (range: 40-100), function in sport and recreation 35.2 (range: 0-100) and quality of life 79.1 (range: 0-100). No radiological evidence of implant aseptic loosening or osteolysis was identified.

CONCLUSION

Cemented TKA implanted with the rKA alignment protocol demonstrated excellent long-term implant survivorship and is a safe alternative to MA to improve patient function and satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, continuous case series with no comparison group.

'Extended' restricted kinematic alignment results in decreased residual medial gap tightness among osteoarthritic varus knees during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Aims

The aims of this study were: 1) to describe extended restricted kinematic alignment (E-rKA), a novel alignment strategy during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA); 2) to compare residual medial compartment tightness following virtual surgical planning during RA-TKA using mechanical alignment (MA) and E-rKA, in the same set of osteoarthritic varus knees; 3) to assess the requirement of soft-tissue releases during RA-TKA using E-rKA; and 4) to compare the accuracy of surgical plan execution between knees managed with adjustments in component positioning alone, and those which require additional soft-tissue releases.

Methods

Patients who underwent RA-TKA between January and December 2022 for primary varus osteoarthritis were included. Safe boundaries for E-rKA were defined. Residual medial compartment tightness was compared following virtual surgical planning using E-rKA and MA, in the same set of knees. Soft-tissue releases were documented. Errors in postoperative alignment in relation to planned alignment were compared between patients who did (group A) and did not (group B) require soft-tissue releases.

Results

The use of E-rKA helped restore all knees within the predefined boundaries, with appropriate soft-tissue balancing. E-rKA compared with MA resulted in reduced residual medial tightness following surgical planning, in full extension (2.71 mm (SD 1.66) vs 5.16 mm (SD 3.10), respectively; p < 0.001), and 90° of flexion (2.52 mm (SD 1.63) vs 6.27 mm (SD 3.11), respectively; p < 0.001). Among the study population, 156 patients (78%) were managed with minor adjustments in component positioning alone, while 44 (22%) required additional soft-tissue releases. The mean errors in postoperative alignment were 0.53 mm and 0.26 mm among patients in group A and group B, respectively (p = 0.328).

Conclusion

E-rKA is an effective and reproducible alignment strategy during RA-TKA, permitting a large proportion of patients to be managed without soft-tissue releases. The execution of minor alterations in component positioning within predefined multiplanar boundaries is a better starting point for gap management than soft-tissue releases.

Construction and validation of a predictive model for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty

The aim was to investigate the independent risk factors for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after total knee arthroplasty, and to establish a nomogram prediction model accordingly. Data were collected from total knee replacement patients from January 2022 to December 2023 in our hospital. Unifactorial and multifactorial logistic regression analyses were used to determine the independent risk factors for lower extremity DVT after total knee arthroplasty and to establish the corresponding nomogram. The receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted and the area under the curve was calculated, and the calibration curves and decision curves were plotted to evaluate the model performance. A total of 652 patients with total knee arthroplasty were included in the study, and 142 patients after total knee arthroplasty developed deep veins in the lower extremities, with an incidence rate of 21.78%. After univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, a total of 5 variables were identified as independent risk factors for lower extremity DVT after total knee arthroplasty: age > 60 years (OR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.23-3.91), obesity (OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.10-1.96), diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.23-2.46), D-dimer > 0.5 mg/L (OR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.07-1.78), and prolonged postoperative bed rest (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.15-3.44). the nomogram constructed in this study for lower extremity DVT after total knee arthroplasty has good predictive accuracy, which helps physicians to intervene in advance in patients at high risk of lower extremity DVT after total knee arthroplasty.

Overview of the different personalized total knee arthroplasty with robotic assistance, how choosing?

Current limitations in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) function and patient satisfaction stimulated us to question our practice. Our understanding of knee anatomy and biomechanics has evolved over recent years as we now consider that a more personalized joint reconstruction may be a better-targeted goal for TKA. Implant design and surgical techniques must be advanced to better reproduce the anatomy and kinematics of native knees and ultimately provide a forgotten joint. The availability of precision tools as robotic assistance surgery can help us recreate patient anatomy and ensure components are not implanted in a position that may compromise long-term outcomes. Robotic-assisted surgery is gaining in popularity and may be the future of orthopedic surgery. However, moving away from the concept of neutrally aligning every TKA dogma opens the door to new techniques emergence based on opinion and experience and leads to a certain amount of uncertainty among knee surgeons. Hence, it is important to clearly describe each technique and analyze their potential impacts and benefits. Personalized TKA techniques may be classified into 2 main families: unrestricted or restricted component orientation. In the restricted group, some will aim to reproduce native ligament laxity versus aiming for ligament isometry. When outside of their boundaries, all restricted techniques will induce anatomical changes. Similarly, most native knee having asymmetric ligaments laxity between compartments and within the same compartment during the arc of flexion; aiming for ligament isometry induces bony anatomy changes. In the current paper, we will summarize and discuss the impacts of the different robotic personalized alignment techniques, including kinematic alignment (KA), restricted kinematic alignment (rKA), inverse kinematic alignment (iKA), and functional alignment (FA). With every surgical technique, there are limitations and shortcomings. As our implants are still far from the native knee, it is primordial to understand the impacts and benefits of each technique. Mid to long data will help us in defining the new standards.

Combining load sensor and robotic technologies for ligament balance in total knee arthroplasty

Good ligament balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is thought to improve clinical results, but is highly surgeon-dependent when performed without technological assistance. We therefore describe a TKA technique using the Mako robotic arm (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) as sole means of balancing ligament tension by bone recuts associated to control by the VERASENSE load sensor (Orthosensor, Inc, Dania Beach, Florida, USA). In this preliminary series of 29 patients, 27 (93%) showed a well-balanced knee in extension at end of procedure, and 23 (79%) showed a well-balanced knee in flexion and extension, without any periarticular soft-tissue release. The load sensor analyzes ligament balance after the initial bone cuts, and guides possible further femoral or tibial recuts. This technique enables quantifiable alignment and control of ligament tension. Collecting objective intraoperative data should improve knowledge in placing TKA prostheses.

Coronal and sagittal alignment of the lower limb in Caucasians: Analysis of a 3D CT database

INTRODUCTION

Lower limb alignment is a major determinant of long-term outcomes after osteotomy or total knee replacement. The aim of this paper is to define the mean values of coronal and sagittal lower limb alignment for Caucasians as a function of sex using 3D reconstructions from CT-scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analysis involved 586 Caucasian patients (269 males and 317 females) who had their hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA), lateral and medial proximal posterior tibial angles (LPPTA/MPPTA), posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA), and non-weightbearing joint convergence angle (nwJLCA) measured. This analysis was performed using a CT-scan-based modelling system (SOMA). Differences between sexes and morphotypes (neutral, varus and valgus) were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The mean HKA was 180±2.57°, LDFA 86.1±1.87°, MPTA 86.1±2.15°, PPTA 84.6±2.58°, LPPTA 84.9±3.17°, MPPTA 85.1±3.21°, PDFA 85.3±1.50° and nwJLCA 0.82±1.32°. There was a significant difference between sexes for the HKA (180.3±2.46° and 179.0±2.52°), LDFA (85.6±1.90° and 86.8±1.61°), MPPTA (84.7±3.06° and 85. 6±3.31°). The neutral morphotype was more frequent in women than men (78% vs. 73%), the varus morphotype was more frequent in men than women (20% vs. 7.6%) and the valgus morphotype was more frequent in women than men (15% vs. 6.7%).

CONCLUSION

Normal parameters for lower limb alignment in Caucasian patients were described in the coronal and sagittal planes. There was a significant influence of sex in the coronal plane, which was not found in the sagittal plane.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective cohort study.

Restricted Kinematic Alignment, the Fundamentals, and Clinical Applications

Introduction: After a better understanding of normal knee anatomy and physiology, the Kinematic Alignment (KA) technique was introduced to improve clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The goal of the KA technique is to restore the pre-arthritic constitutional lower limb alignment of the patient. There is, however, a large range of normal knee anatomy. Unusual anatomies may be biomechanically inferior and affect TKA biomechanics and wear patterns. In 2011, the leading author proposed the restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) protocol, setting boundaries to KA for patients with an outlier or atypical knee anatomy. Material and Equipment: rKA aims to reproduce the constitutional knee anatomy of the patient within a safe range. Its fundamentals are based on sound comprehension of lower limb anatomy variation. There are five principles describing rKA: (1) Combined lower limb coronal orientation should be ± 3° of neutral; (2) Joint line orientation coronal alignment should be within ± 5° of neutral; (3) Natural knee's soft tissues tension/ laxities should be preserved/restored; (4) Femoral anatomy preservation is prioritized; (5) The unloaded/most intact knee compartment should be resurfaced and used as the pivot point when anatomical adjustment is required. An algorithm was developed to facilitate the decision-making. Methods: Since ~50% of patients will require anatomic modification to fit within rKA boundaries, rKA is ideally performed with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), intra-operative computer navigation or robotic assistance. rKA surgical technique is presented in a stepwise manner, following the five principles in the algorithm. Results: rKA produced excellent mid-term clinical results in cemented or cementless TKA. Gait analysis showed that rKA TKA patients had gait patterns that were very close to a non-operated control group, and these kinematics differences translated into significantly better postoperative patient-reported scores than mechanical alignment (MA) TKA cases. Discussion: Aiming to improve the results of MA TKA, rKA protocol offers a satisfactory compromise that recreates patients' anatomy in most cases, omitting the need for extensive corrections and soft tissue releases that are often required with MA. Moreover, it precludes the reproduction of extreme anatomies seen with KA.

Restoration of Joint Inclination in Total Knee Arthroplasty Offers Little Improvement in Joint Kinematics in Neutrally Aligned Extremities

Kinematically aligned total knee replacements have been shown to better restore physiological kinematics than mechanical alignment and also offer good postoperative satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the extent to which an inclined joint line in a kinematically aligned knee can alter the postoperative kinematics. A multi-body dynamic simulation was used to identify kinematic changes in the joint. To accurately compare mechanical alignment, kinematic alignment and a natural knee, a “standard” patient with neutral alignment of the lower extremities was selected for modeling from a joint database. The arthroplasty models in this study were implanted with a single conventional cruciate-retaining prosthesis. Each model was subjected to a flexion movement and the anteroposterior translation of the femoral condyles was collected for kinematic analysis. The results showed that the mechanical alignment model underwent typical paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral condyles. Incorporating an inclined joint line in the model did not prevent the paradoxical anterior translation, but a 3° varus joint line in the kinematic alignment model could reduce the peak value of this motion by about 1 mm. Moreover, the inclined joint line did not restore the motion curve back to within the range of the kinematic curve of the natural knee. The results of this study suggest that an inclined joint line, as in the kinematic alignment model, can slightly suppress paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral condyles, but cannot restore kinematic motions similar to the physiological knee. This finding implies that prostheses intended to be used for kinematic alignment should be designed to optimize knee kinematics with the intention of restoring a physiological motion curve.

Undercoverage of lateral trochlear resection is correlated with the tibiofemoral alignment parameters in kinematically aligned TKA: a retrospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

A mismatch between the femoral component and trochlear resection surface is observed in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) when conventional prostheses are employed. This mismatch is mainly manifested in the undercoverage of the lateral trochlear resection surface. The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between the mismatch and the alignment parameters of the tibiofemoral joint.

METHODS

Forty-five patients (52 knees) who underwent KA-TKA in our hospital were included. Patient-specific instrumentation was used in 16 patients (16 knees), and conventional instruments with calipers and other special tools were employed in the other 29 patients (36 knees). The widths of the exposed resection bone surface at the middle (MIDexposure) and distal (DISexposure) levels on the lateral trochlea were measured as dependent variables, whereas the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and transepicondylar axis angle (TEAA) were measured as independent variables. Correlation analysis and subsequent linear regression were conducted among the dependent variables and various alignment parameters of the tibiofemoral joint.

RESULTS

The incidence of undercoverage of the lateral trochlear resection surface was 86.5 % with MIDexposure and DISexposure values of 2.3 (0-6 mm) and 2.0 (0-5 mm), respectively. The widths of the two levels of exposed bone resection were significantly correlated with mLDFA and HKAA but were not related to TEAA.

CONCLUSIONS

The undercoverage of the trochlear resection surface in KA-TKA is mainly correlated with the degree of valgus of the distal femoral joint line. The current study suggests that this correlation should be considered in the development of KA-specific prostheses.

Combining kinematic alignment and medial stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: Basic rationale and preliminary clinical evidences

Objective: kinematic alignment technique has been recently described as a new surgical procedure able to restore the patient specific physiological knee alignment; furthermore, new prosthesis, as medial stabilized (MS) third generation TKA, were designed to better reproduce the anatomical shape of the knee. In this prospective study, the authors evaluated early clinical improvement and radiological outcomes of patients having pre-operative small coronal limb deformity underwent TKA using a surgical technique combining a "restricted kinematic alignment" with medial stabilized polyethylene insert.

Methods

Fifteen consecutive patients (8 female and 7 male) scheduled for a total knee replacement have been enrolled for this study and treated using a modern third generation knee implant with a medial congruent tibial polyethylene. Clinical improvements have been assessed pre-operatively and at 6 and 12 months Follow up (FU) using the Oxford knee Score (OKS)( Ishikawa et al., Jun. 2015) 12 the Knee Society Score (KSS)( Pinskerova and et al., Aug. 2004) 13 and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) as patient reported outcomes measurement system (PROMs). A radiological evaluation was made by a single physician at 6 months.

Results

Average improvement in OKS was from 20.2 (SD 5.5) pre-operatively to 41.3 (SD 2.1) at the final FU. KSS pain/motion improved with a mean score from 40.1 (SD 4.0) pre-op to 89.1 (SD 6.3) while KSS function improved with an average score from 51.0 (SD 6.2) pre-op to 81.8 (SD 8.4) showing good to excellent results in all the knee treated. The mean FJS at 6 months follow up was 75.1 (SD 4.2) improving to 79.3 (SD 3.3) at one year FU. Post-operative XR showing an average varus Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle of 178.8° (range from 176° to 182°, SD 2,3°); We found no statistically significant difference between pre-operative and post-operative HKA (p < 0,05).

Conclusion

The current authors assumed appropriate to combine a modern TKA implant designed replicating the anatomical shape of the native knee with a surgical technique able to better reproduce the physiological, patient specific, knee biomechanics. Our findings suggest that combining MS implant with KA technique may results in better short-term functional results, helping the patient to "forget" their replaced joint and restoring their pre-arthritic quality of life.

Less gap imbalance with restricted kinematic alignment than with mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: simulations on 3-D bone models created from CT-scans

Background and purpose - Mechanical alignment techniques for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) introduce significant anatomic alteration and secondary ligament imbalances. We propose a restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) protocol to minimize these issues and improve TKA clinical outcomes.Patients and methods - rKA tibial and femoral bone resections were simulated on 1,000 knee CT scans from a database of patients undergoing TKA. rKA was defined by the following criteria: independent tibial and femoral cuts within 5° of the bone neutral mechanical axis, with a resulting HKA within 3° of neutral. Imbalances in the extension space, flexion space at 90°, medial compartment and lateral compartment were calculated and compared with measured resection mechanical alignment (MA) results. 2 MA techniques were simulated for rotation using the surgical transepicondylar axis (TEA) and 3° to the posterior condyles (PC).Results - Extension space imbalances ≥ 3 mm occurred in 33% of TKAs with MA technique versus 8.3% with rKA (p < 0.001). Similarly, more frequent flexion space imbalance ≥ 3mm was created by MA technique (TEA 34% or 3° PC 15%) versus rKA (6.4%, p < 0.001). Using MA with TEA or PC, there were only 49% and 63% of the knees respectively with < 3 mm of imbalance throughout the extension and flexion spaces and medial and lateral compartments versus 92% using rKA (p < 0.001).Interpretation - significantly fewer imbalances are created using rKA versus MA for TKA. rKA may be the best compromise, by helping the surgeon to preserve native knee ligament balance during TKA and avoid residual instability, whilst keeping the lower limb alignment within a safe range.

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reproduces more native rollback and laxity than mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: A matched pair cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

A growing body of evidence supports that kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides superior clinical outcomes and satisfaction than mechanically aligned (MA) TKA. In theory, KA TKA would restore knee kinematics closer to the native condition than MA TKA, but the current biomechanical evidence is lacking.

HYPOTHESIS

KA TKA would restore knee biomechanics to the native condition better than MA TKA.

METHODS

Seven pairs of cadavers were tested. For each pair, one knee was randomly assigned to KA TKA and the other to MA TKA. During KA TKA, the sizes of femur and tibia resections were equivalent to implant thickness to align with the patient-specific joint line. MA TKA was performed using conventional measured resection techniques. All specimens were mounted on a customized knee-testing system and digitized. Knee motions measured during flexion included rollback, axial tibiofemoral rotation, and laxities, specifically varus-valgus laxity, anterior-posterior translation, and internal-external rotation.

RESULTS

The pattern of knee motion following KA TKA was similar to the native knee. However, following MA TKA, both medial and lateral rollback and tibiofemoral axial rotation were decreased relative to those of the native knee. Valgus laxity was restored only after KA TKA, whereas varus laxity was restored only after MA TKA. Anterior translation was increased regardless of the alignment strategy. In addition, rotational laxities were restored after KA TKA, but external rotation laxity increased after MA TKA.

CONCLUSION

KA TKA restores femoral rollback and laxity to the native condition better than MA TKA. KA TKA may enhance functional performance and provide a more normal knee sensation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Controlled laboratory study.

Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment

PURPOSE

Kinematic alignment technique for TKA aims to restore the individual knee anatomy and ligament tension, to restore native knee kinematics. The aim of this study was to compare parameters of kinematics during gait (knee flexion-extension, adduction-abduction, internal-external tibial rotation and walking speed) of TKA patients operated by either kinematic alignment or mechanical alignment technique with a group of healthy controls. The hypothesis was that the kinematic parameters of kinematically aligned TKAs would more closely resemble that of healthy controls than mechanically aligned TKAs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study. Eighteen kinematically aligned TKAs were matched by gender, age, operating surgeon and prosthesis to 18 mechanically aligned TKAs. Post-operative 3D knee kinematics analysis, performed with an optoelectronic knee assessment device (KneeKG®), was compared between mechanical alignment TKA patients, kinematic alignment TKA patients and healthy controls. Radiographic measures and clinical scores were also compared between the two TKA groups.

RESULTS

The kinematic alignment group showed no significant knee kinematic differences compared to healthy knees in sagittal plane range of motion, maximum flexion, abduction-adduction curves or knee external tibial rotation. Conversely, the mechanical alignment group displayed several significant knee kinematic differences to the healthy group: less sagittal plane range of motion (49.1° vs. 54.0°, p = 0.020), decreased maximum flexion (52.3° vs. 57.5°, p = 0.002), increased adduction angle (2.0-7.5° vs. - 2.8-3.0°, p < 0.05), and increased external tibial rotation (by a mean of 2.3 ± 0.7°, p < 0.001). The post-operative KOOS score was significantly higher in the kinematic alignment group compared to the mechanical alignment group (74.2 vs. 60.7, p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

The knee kinematics of patients with kinematically aligned TKAs more closely resembled that of normal healthy controls than that of patients with mechanically aligned TKAs. This may be the result of a better restoration of the individual's knee anatomy and ligament tension. A return to normal gait parameters post-TKA will lead to improved clinical outcomes and greater patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Differences in trochlear parameters between native and prosthetic kinematically or mechanically aligned knees

INTRODUCTION

Kinematic (KA) and mechanical (MA) alignment techniques are two different philosophies of implant positioning that use the same TKA implants. This might generate differences in the resulting prosthetic trochleae parameters between the two techniques of alignment. Our study aim was to test the following hypotheses : (1) mechanically or kinematically aligned femoral implant understuffs the native trochlear articular surface and poorly restores the native groove orientation, and (2) the orientation of the prosthetic trochlear groove and trochlear fill are different between MA and KA.

METHODS

Three-dimensional models of the femur were made from segmentation of preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging scans (MRIs) of ten subjects with isolated medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. In-house planning and analysis software kinematically and mechanically aligned a modern cruciate retaining femoral component and determined differences in parameters of the trochlear fit between native and prosthetic trochleae, and between KA and MA prosthetic trochleae.

RESULTS

The MA prosthetic trochleae did not fill (understuffed) the entire length of the native medial facet and the proximal 70% of the native groove and lateral facet, and oriented the trochleae groove 8° more valgus than native. The KA prosthetic trochleae understuffed the proximal 70% of the native trochleae, and had a groove 6° more valgus than native. The KA trochleae understuffed the medial facet distally and oriented the groove 2° less valgus and 3° more internally rotated than the MA trochleae.

CONCLUSION

MA and KA prosthetic trochleae substantially understuff and create a prosthetic groove more valgus compared to native trochlear anatomy, and they also differed between each other regarding trochleae stuffing and groove alignment. Although randomized trials have not shown differences in patellofemoral complications between KA and MA, a femoral component designed specifically for KA that more closely restores the native trochlear anatomy might improve patient reported satisfaction and function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2 controlled laboratory study.