Popeye sign: Tenodesis vs. self-locking "T" tenotomy of the long head of the biceps

Management of normal long head of the biceps tendon in isolated grade-1 supraspinatus tear: Research protocol for a multicenter prospective single-blind randomized study

BACKGROUND

The long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon is a common locus of pain in rotator cuff tear and of residual pain after tendon repair. Therefore, systematic LHB tenotomy, with or without tenodesis, is usually recommended. However, the recent literature suggests that long-term functional results of supraspinatus tendon repair are comparable between conservation of a normal biceps and tenotomy. The study objective is to compare functional results between sectioning and sparing a normal LHB in treating isolated grade-1 supraspinatus tendon tear. The study hypothesis is that sparing the normal LHB is clinically preferable to sectioning in the particular case of distal supraspinatus tear.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A French nationwide prospective single-blind randomized clinical study will include 194 patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of grade-1 supraspinatus tear with normal LHB. They will be randomized to 2 parallel groups: LHB sparing and sectioning. The main endpoint is Constant-Murley score, and secondary endpoints comprise ASES and SSV scores, clinical assessment of the biceps, pain on VAS, ultrasound assessment of cuff repair healing and conserved LHBs, impact on return to work and sport, pathologic assessment of sectioned LHBs, and analysis of risk factors for cuff repair failure.

ETHICAL APPROVAL AND PUBLICATION

The protocol has been approved by the data protection committee (art.L.1122-1) and meets the criteria of the Declaration of Helsinki and of the SPIRIT statement defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

not applicable.

Clinical effectiveness of tenotomy versus tenodesis for long head of biceps pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The comparative clinical effectiveness of common surgical techniques to address long head of biceps (LHB) pathology is unclear. We synthesised the evidence to compare the clinical effectiveness of tenotomy versus tenodesis.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

DATA SOURCES

EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library of randomised controlled trials were searched through 31 October 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials, reporting patient reported outcome measures, comparing LHB tenotomy with tenodesis for LHB pathology, with or without concomitant rotator cuff pathology. Studies including patients treated for superior labral anterior-posterior tears were excluded. No language limits were employed. All publications from database inception to 31 October 2021 were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Screening was performed by two authors independently. A third author reviewed the article, where consensus for inclusion was required. Data were extracted by two authors. Data were synthesised using RevMan. Inverse variance statistics and a random effects model were used.

RESULTS

860 patients from 11 RCTs (426 tenotomy vs 434 tenodesis) were included. Pooled analysis of patient-reported functional outcome measures data demonstrated comparable outcomes (n=10 studies; 403 tenotomy vs 416 tenodesis; standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.14, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.32, p=0.13). There was no significant difference for pain (Visual Analogue Scale) (n=8 studies; 345 tenotomy vs 350 tenodesis; MD: -0.11, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.06, p=0.21). Tenodesis resulted in a lower rate of Popeye deformity (n=10 studies; 401 tenotomy vs 410 tenodesis; OR: 0.29, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.45, p<0.00001). Tenotomy demonstrated shorter operative time (n=4 studies; 204 tenotomy vs 201 tenodesis; MD 15.2, 95% CI 1.06 to 29.36, p<0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Aside from a lower rate of cosmetic deformity, tenodesis yielded no significant clinical benefit to tenotomy for addressing LHB pathology.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020198658.

The IBTIS score; a new prognostic score for arthroscopic biceps tenotomies

INTRODUCTION

Shoulder pain associated with tendinopathy of the long head of biceps (LHB) is common. Surgical treatment with arthroscopic tenotomy of the LHB has been shown to be effective. However, it's efficacy is inconsistent. The objective of this study was to assess the pre-operative clinical and radiological prognostic factors of arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of biceps, and to establish a predictive score for good responses to treatment; the IBTIS score (Isolated Biceps Tenotomy Index Score).

HYPOTHESIS

Prognostic factors representing a good response to treatment of LHB tendinopathy by arthroscopic tenotomy exist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective monocentric study including 64 patients who underwent surgery of the LHB by arthroscopic tenotomy (with or without tenodesis) between January 2018 and March 2020. We identified 2 patient groups (good responder group and poor responder group) from a 3-month post-operative clinical assessment, which included a subjective assessment comprising Single Shoulder Value (SSV), Constant score, C-Test, and pain level. Prognostic factors of a good response were then sought from the 2 groups using interviews, clinical examinations and pre-operative imaging. Based on these findings, a predictive score for a good response was established.

RESULTS

All evaluation criteria demonstrated post-operative improvement: mean SSV (72.2 vs 50.7; p<0.001), relative constant (78.2 vs 64.3; p<0.001), pain level (3.2 vs 7; p<0.001) and C-Test (94.1 vs 85.6; p=0.07). 34 patients (58.6%) were considered good responders, while 24 patients (41.38%) were considered poor responders. There was a trend towards a favourable result for: age>65 years (p=0.01), rotator cuff rupture on preoperative imaging (p=0.01), Cross Arm Test (p=0.02), nocturnal pain (p=0.08), Yergason's test (p=0.16) and Speed's Test (p=0.22). Manual labour appeared to be an unfavourable factor (p=0.07). These factors were incorporated into the 10-point IBTIS score. A score greater than 5 was associated with a favourable result in more than 80% of patients (p<0.001).

DISCUSSION

Our score consists of 7 items. We identified 7 pre-operative prognostic factors for a good result after LHB tenotomy. Over 65 years of age was found to be statistically significant in univariate analysis, as was visualization of rotator cuff rupture on pre-operative imaging. The Cross Arm Test was included given its high statistical significance. The Speed's Test and Yergason's Test are ubiquitous in the literature. Nocturnal pain was found in more than 80% of patients. Undertaking manual labour represented an unfavourable prognostic factor after arthroscopic surgery of the LHB.

CONCLUSION

The IBTIS score (Isolated Biceps Tenotomy Index Score) is a pre-operative clinico-radiological score for the surgical treatment of arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of biceps. Further studies are required to validate its prognostic accuracy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case-control.

Tenodesis yields better functional results than tenotomy in long head of the biceps tendon operations-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) is a common disorder affecting muscle function and causing considerable pain for the patient. The literature on the two surgical treatment methods (tenotomy and tenodesis) is controversial; therefore, our aim was to compare the results of these interventions.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis using the following strategy: (P) patients with LHBT pathology, (I) tenodesis, (C) tenotomy, (O) elbow flexion and forearm supination strength, pain assessed on the ten-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), bicipital cramping pain, Constant, ASES, and SST score, Popeye deformity, and operative time. We included only randomized clinical trials. We searched five databases. During statistical analysis, odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively, using the Bayesian method with random effect model.

Results

We included 11 studies in the systematic review, nine of these were eligible for the meta-analysis, containing data about 572 patients (279 in the tenodesis, 293 in the tenotomy group). Our analysis concluded that tenodesis is more beneficial considering 12-month elbow flexion strength (WMD: 3.67 kg; p = 0.006), 12-month forearm supination strength (WMD: 0.36 kg; p = 0.012), and 24-month Popeye deformity (OR: 0.19; p < 0.001), whereas tenotomy was associated with decreased 3-month pain scores on VAS (WMD: 0.99; p < 0.001). We did not find significant difference among the other outcomes.

Conclusion

Tenodesis yields better results in terms of biceps function and is non-inferior regarding long-term pain, while tenotomy is associated with earlier pain relief.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00264-022-05338-9.

Current Controversies and Decision-Making in the Management of Biceps Pathologies

»

Biceps tendon pathologies include a spectrum of injuries that range from mild tendinosis to complete tendon rupture.

»

Tendinosis, the most common pathology, occurs more frequently with age and is likely related to chronic degeneration. On the other side of the spectrum of severity lies a rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT), which may be accompanied by injury to the glenoid labrum.

»

Superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears are frequently associated with biceps pathology. Surgical management for injuries of the bicipital-labral complex includes biceps tenodesis or tenotomy and SLAP repair. A consensus as to which of these procedures is the optimal choice has not been reached, and management may ultimately depend on patient-specific characteristics.

»

Due to the relatively low incidence of distal biceps tendon rupture, agreement on the optimal management strategy has not been reached. Surgical repair, or reconstruction in the case of a chronic rupture, is often chosen. However, nonoperative management has also been utilized in older, less-active patients.

Effect of age, gender, and body mass index on incidence and satisfaction of a Popeye deformity following biceps tenotomy or tenodesis: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of Popeye deformity following biceps tenotomy vs. tenodesis and evaluate risk factors and subjective and objective outcomes.

METHODS

Data for this study were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial in which patients aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery for a long head of the biceps tendon lesion were allocated to undergo tenotomy or tenodesis. The primary outcome measure for this secondary analysis was rate of Popeye deformity at 24 months postoperation as determined by an evaluator blinded to group allocation. Those with a deformity indicated their satisfaction with the appearance of their arm on a 10-cm visual analog scale, rated their pain and cramping, and completed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index. Isometric elbow flexion and supination strength were also measured. Cohen kappa was calculated to measure inter-rater reliability between patient and evaluator on the presence of a deformity. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of presence or absence of a Popeye deformity.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups, of which 42 to the tenodesis group and 45 to the tenotomy group completed a 24-month follow-up. Based on clinical observation, the odds of a Popeye in the tenotomy group were 4.3 times greater than in the tenodesis group (P = .018) with incidence of 33% (15/45) and 9.5% (4/42), respectively. Surgical technique was the only significant predictor of perceived deformity, with male gender trending toward significance (odds ratio 7.33, 95% confidence interval 0.867-61.906, P = .067). Mean (standard deviation) satisfaction score of those with a deformity regarding appearance of their arm was 7.3 (2.6). Increasing satisfaction was correlated with increasing age (r = 0.640, P = .025), but there was no association with gender (r = -0.155, P = .527) or body mass index (r = -0.221, P = .057). Differences in subjective outcomes were dependent on whether the Popeye was clinician- or self-assessed.

CONCLUSION

The odds of developing a perceived Popeye deformity was 4.3 higher after tenotomy compared to tenodesis based on clinician observation. Male gender was trending toward being predictive of having a deformity. Pain and cramping were increased in those with a self-reported Popeye. Younger patients were significantly less satisfied with a deformity despite no difference in functional outcomes at 24 months. Thus, biceps tenodesis may be favored in younger male patients to minimize the risk of Popeye and the risk of dissatisfaction in the appearance of their arm following surgery.

Biceps Tenodesis Versus Tenotomy in the Treatment of Lesions of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The biceps tendon is a known source of shoulder pain. Few high-level studies have attempted to determine whether biceps tenotomy or tenodesis is the optimal approach in the treatment of biceps pathology. Most available literature is of lesser scientific quality and shows varying results in the comparison of tenotomy and tenodesis.

PURPOSE

To compare patient-reported and objective clinical results between tenotomy and tenodesis for the treatment of lesions of the long head of the biceps brachii.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic surgery with intraoperative confirmation of a lesion of the long head of the biceps tendon were randomized. The primary outcome measure was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, while secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score, elbow and shoulder strength, operative time, complications, and the incidence of revision surgery with each procedure. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at postoperative 1 year to evaluate the integrity of the procedure in the tenodesis group.

RESULTS

A total of 114 participants with a mean age of 57.7 years (range, 34 years to 86 years) were randomized to undergo either biceps tenodesis or tenotomy. ASES and WORC scores improved significantly from pre- to postoperative time points, with a mean difference of 32.3% (P < .001) and 37.3% (P < .001), respectively, with no difference between groups in either outcome from presurgery to postoperative 24 months. The relative risk of cosmetic deformity in the tenotomy group relative to the tenodesis group at 24 months was 3.5 (95% CI, 1.26-9.70; P = .016), with 4 (10%) occurrences in the tenodesis group and 15 (33%) in the tenotomy group. Pain improved from 3 to 24 months postoperatively (P < .001) with no difference between groups. Cramping was not different between groups, nor was any improvement in cramping seen over time. There were no differences between groups in elbow flexion strength or supination strength. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging at postoperative 12 months showed that the tenodesis was intact for all patients.

CONCLUSION

Tenotomy and tenodesis as treatment for lesions of the long head of biceps tendon both result in good subjective outcomes but there is a higher rate of Popeye deformity in the tenotomy group.

REGISTRATION

NCT01747902 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Should long head of biceps tenodesis or tenotomy be routinely performed in arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs?

Purpose

The long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) lesions are frequently associated with partial or complete rotator cuff tears (RCTs), but controversy revolves around their optimal surgical management.

Methods

Hence this article aims to review the current literature available on the role of biceps surgery in rotator cuff surgery and whether it should be routinely performed in rotator cuff repairs.

Results

Furthermore, we also discuss the advantages and drawbacks of tenotomy or tenodesis of LHBT in rotator cuff surgery.

Conclusion

We conclude this article with recommendations for surgeons performing rotator cuff repairs and future research in this area.